logo
This Polyester Outdoor Jacket Is Made From Polyester Outdoor Jackets

This Polyester Outdoor Jacket Is Made From Polyester Outdoor Jackets

Forbes10-04-2025

You may own a fleece top or two made from plastic soda bottles. Recycled polyester, or polyethylene terephthalate, known in the industry as PET or just 'chip,' is old hat. US outdoor clothing brand Patagonia first transformed trash into fluffy fleece in 1993. So far, so normal. But it's not anywhere near normal for a polyester outdoor jacket to be recycled into PET and then remade as another polyester outdoor jacket.
British outdoor clothing brand Páramo has achieved this feat, although at a premium. The employee-owned company's $830 Halkon 360° jacket—360° as in full circle, a nod to the product's recycled nature—has a fabric liner made from recycled chip, but it's twice the price of its Halkon jacket that does not have a liner made from recycled chip.
'Performance-wise, the jackets are exactly the same,' says Páramo CEO Richard Pyne. 'They will both keep you dry and comfortable out on the hill.'
Both are also made by the Miquelina Foundation, a nun-run sewing workshop offering practical help to women rescued from the streets of Bogotá, Colombia. Páramo has partnered with this educational body since 1992 when the company was spun out of Nikwax, a British brand of waterproofing products for outdoor kit. (Páramo is a grassland habitat ecosystem of South America's Andes mountains.)
Páramo CEO Richard Pyne.
Páramo
Páramo and Nikwax—both based in the market town of Wadhurst in rural East Sussex (population: 3,407)—were founded by Nick Brown, an extremely tall outdoors enthusiast who concocted an eco-friendly boot waterproofing product in the late 1970s while fresh out of university.
Nikwax still makes this boot wax as well as wash-in PFAS-free water-based waterproofing products using Durable Water Repellent (DWR) polymer coatings; these are hydrophobic or water-hating, and it's this 'hate' that does the repelling. Nikwax products are free of solvents, persistent chemicals of concern, and perfluorochemicals, or PFCs.
'The 360° [version of the Halkon] arrived at the end of a seven-year development cycle for us,' says Pyne. 'We've always manufactured in polyester, keeping to a single material to eventually make it easier to solve the end-of-life problem [for our products]. We believe that the onus is on the brand, rather than the customer, to collect and deal with end-of-life garments. If consumers put jackets into bins, nobody really knows where anything goes, whereas a business can collect it all and know what's what. We've been working with a chemical recycling facility in Japan for several years, sending them a few tons of jackets collected each year. Chemical recycling for textiles is still relatively new. When we started collecting old jackets, the chemical recycling technology was not available.'
Two years ago, the recycling technology was ready for commercialization.
'Our [Japanese] facility got to the point where their chemically recycled PET chips—the building blocks of polyester—was the same quality as virgin polyester; that was a breakthrough. Up until that point, we'd had either mechanical recycling, where whatever you put in is what you get out, so any impurities, including dyes, become part of the output, leading to a drop-off in quality; not great for high-performance outdoor clothing.'
The Japanese recycled chip was now as good as virgin polyester but was fiendish expensive.
'The [new-process] chip was fifteen times the price of the standard recycled chip,' says Pyne, 'and that wouldn't be something that could we ordinarily move forwards with.'
But, by making a halo product—and that's the Halkon 360° jacket—'we could show the world that it *is* possible [to use this technology],' says Pyne. 'We're a small business, but if we were willing to do this, others might be convinced to do it, too.' With other companies working with the technology, prices will come down. 'There are many businesses out there that are much bigger than us, and not just in the outdoor industry, who can and should be doing this. The fifteen-times-more expensive technology can come down to something that's actually affordable.'
Making and selling the Halkon 360° jacket was, confirms Pyne, done to 'start a conversation' around the full-circle recycling technology. According to Pyne, companies such as Nike and Adidas could use the chemically recycled PET chip. 'We shouldn't be paying fifteen times more for fully sustainable textiles,' he says. 'It's still cheaper to make virgin polyester than to chemically recover it, but that needs to change.'
Páramo has worked with a vertically integrated fabric mill in Colombia for 26 years. 'They can spin their own yarns and then make their own textiles,' says Pyne, 'and they said we'll buy some chip, and we'll make your lining fabric for you.'
Páramo's outdoor garments don't work like jackets made from Gore-Tex, a waterproof barrier fabric made with a partially breathable expanded PTFE membrane. Gore-Tex jackets must be joined with 'welded' seams, stuck down with powerful glues. Such glues and taped seams make Gore-tex jackets unsuitable for chemical recycling. Once a Gore-tex fabric has been punctured, water seeps in, rendering that part of the jacket ineffective. Páramo jackets, on the other hand, are not made with barrier membranes and still work when punctured. The fabrics used for the outers are not impervious to rain, but water ingress is slowed through the use of (Nikwax) chemical treatments. While water can seemingly soak the outer fabric of a Páramo jacket, the jacket's hydrophilic, i.e., water-loving, internal liner sucks up water droplets and sweat vapor and 'pumps' it outside the jacket via capillary action known as 'wicking.'
'Nick's about eight foot tall,' jokes Pyne, 'and he struggled in membranes. He got very hot [when walking outdoors] and didn't find [membranes] worked for him, so he started thinking, 'There's got to be a better way of doing this.' He's pretty stubborn—as most entrepreneurs are—and he looked at how mammals keep themselves dry. He worked with textile mills to develop a fabric that mimicked animal fur. He used his TX-10 [waterproofing liquid, now known as TX-Direct] to replicate the oil in animal fur and got this movement of water from one side of the material to the other. [Páramo] keeps you dry in a different way [to membranes]. You don't have that horrible, sweaty feel on the inside. You can stick pins in [a Páramo garment], pierce it with nails, and then take them out, and it will perform exactly the same. It means you can darn it if you get it caught on something, and it rips.'
The raw material used to make polyester is crude oil. 'Extracting oil from the ground is a dirty business, laden with environmental and social risks,' says a Páramo statement. 'By recycling polyester, we conserve the material we've already extracted and help reduce the need for more drilling.'
Both Nikwax and Páramo have operated as an employee-owned business since 2022, when Brown transferred his shares to the firm's Employee Ownership Trust (EOT).
Páramo's sales are seasonal (the brand has few products for summer use), but the firm's long-term manufacturing contract with the Miquelina Foundation ensures year-round production. One hundred twenty women are employed by the project, with Páramo saying its work with the Miquelina Foundation has helped more than 10,000 local women since 1992. 85% of Páramo Clothing is produced by the Miquelina Foundation.
'Whereas most brands will book a production space over in the Far East for spring, summer and another one for [fall] and winter, we maintain level production throughout the year so that Miquelina have steady income coming in,' says Pyne. 'There are no peaks and troughs, so Miquelina can maintain staffing.'
The Colombian workers are part of Páramo's EOT structure.
'For them, it's amazing,' says Pyne. 'They're part of this Western company. We're very open with our finances; everyone wins.'
The Halkon 360° jacket is available in green only.
'We make jackets that last a long time,' says Pyne. 'We don't use fashion colors that might be popular for just six months, and then our retailers feel the need to sell them all off cheap and buy new ones in. That would feed the problem. We design with longevity in mind.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Britain's debt is a threat to national security
Britain's debt is a threat to national security

Yahoo

time19 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Britain's debt is a threat to national security

Our sky high debt is a threat to our national security. This year, the cost of servicing our debt will be almost double what we are spending on defence. And in today's turbulent world, the fiscal buffer to cushion us from shocks is paper thin. The smallest tap could shatter our economic credibility. The Prime Minister has made defence and security the organising principle of his government. Given that, putting our debt on a downward path should be his government's priority. It isn't. Debt will be higher at the end of the Parliament than today. And with global government debt already around $100 trillion, and Donald Trump about to increase that by a further $2.4 trillion, who will buy our debt – and at what price? Last year, the cross-party House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee raised a red flag that UK debt risks becoming unsustainable unless tough decisions are taken in this Parliament. We set out a choice: taxes would have to rise, or the state would have to do less. Being cross-party, we did not opine on which option was best. The Government has taken tough decisions – but in my mind the wrong ones. Taxes are rising to record highs. The Chancellor said last year that her strategy would deliver growth, and that she would not come back for more tax. But the growth forecast has been halved, and further tax hikes are on the cards. Meanwhile, pressure to spend more on defence is going to increase. At the upcoming Nato summit, nations are likely to be asked to commit to spending 5 per cent of GDP on defence – double Labour's current commitment. So what is to be done? We need to confront the other option: the state should do less. The Government rightly says that the relentless rise in welfare spending is 'unsustainable'. Spending on disability and incapacity benefits alone is more than on defence. But having announced that action would be taken to curb the growth in the welfare budget, the Prime Minister is now blinking in the face of opposition. The Government – and the nation – cannot afford ministers losing their nerve to keep a lid on spending. The bond vigilantes have saddled up and are on the prowl. Nor can the Chancellor tax her way out of the debt quagmire: to do so would risk us entering into a doom loop of ever lower growth and ever higher debt. If defence and security is the organising principle of government, the Chancellor must set out a credible plan to stop debt's relentless rise and bring it down from today's giddying heights. Not doing so risks economic catastrophe – and our national security. Lord Bridges of Headley is a former Government minister; he was Chairman of the House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee between January 2022 and January 2025 Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Pensions report cuts Reeves' planned growth funds from £160bn to £11bn
Pensions report cuts Reeves' planned growth funds from £160bn to £11bn

Yahoo

time20 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Pensions report cuts Reeves' planned growth funds from £160bn to £11bn

Plans to invest £160bn of surplus funds from final salary pension schemes to boost the UK economy over the next 10 years have been dealt a blow by a Whitehall assessment that found there was likely to be little more than £11bn available to spend. In a knock to Rachel Reeves's growth agenda, a report by civil servants at the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) found that the expected surpluses in occupational schemes would be used by businesses to offload their pension liabilities to insurance companies. It could mean that as little as £8.4bn would be available for companies to invest in new equipment or technology, but the figure was likely to be nearer £11bn, the DWP said on Friday. 'It is estimated that an additional £11.2bn surplus will be extracted as a result of the preferred option to legislate over a 10-year period,' the report said. Pension surpluses were a significant pillar of the chancellor's plans to use private sector funds to grow the economy during a period when state funds are likely to be severely restricted. Reeves is expected to lay out her growth plans on Wednesday in the spending review, which will set out the government priorities for the next year. Earlier this year she said about 75% of final salary schemes, also known as defined benefit schemes, were in surplus, worth £160bn, but restrictions have meant businesses have struggled to invest them. In her Mansion House speech in November, Reeves also outlined proposals for pension megafunds to be created from individual defined contribution schemes and a merger of local authority pension schemes to make the pensions industry more cost-effective. A pensions bill going through parliament will allow pension fund trustees to unlock trapped surplus funds that Reeves said would increase investment in British businesses and lift economic growth. Hundreds of final salary schemes, which spent decades in deficit, meaning the value of their obligations to members outweighed their assets, have moved into surplus in recent years after an increase in interest rates. 'Although fewer than 700,000 people are actively saving into a private sector defined benefit scheme, the sector remains a significant market within the UK economic landscape,' the report said. 'Across around 5,000 schemes, around nine million members are being supported with assets of around £1.2tn.' An impact assessment by DWP officials said legislation was needed to overhaul the pension system and give trustees the power to access surplus funds. It said a failure to act would also mean 'an opportunity to benefit members, businesses and to drive economic growth would be missed. Therefore 'do nothing' is not considered a desirable option.' However, a combination of factors means the expected surplus for investment is reduced to no more than £12bn over 10 years, in part because the legislation does not force trustees of defined benefit funds to use surpluses for investment, and that most occupational final salary schemes have reached a level where a buyout is possible. In a note for the Pension Insurance Corporation, an independent expert, John Ralfe, said: 'Forget about £160bn of pension surpluses just waiting, as Rachel Reeves said, to be paid out to 'drive growth and boost working people's pension pots'. 'The DWP figures estimate just a fraction of this – under £12bn – will be paid out over the next 10 years, mainly because most companies want a full buyout with an insurance company. Related: UK service sector confidence higher in May than since before autumn budget 'And the bill contains no details of how pensions will be protected if cash is withdrawn. Member security must be a priority with strict rules on repaying amounts if funding deteriorates,' he added. Many pension fund trustees are known to be concerned that allowing company boards access to surplus funds could leave their schemes vulnerable after a panic in financial markets. Without strong safeguards, giving businesses access to surplus pension funds could also make them more attractive targets for foreign takeovers. It is understood the new regime will allow trustees to block moves to access surplus funds if they believe it will undermine the safety of the fund. The pensions minister Torsten Bell said: 'I have read the impact assessment, and I am satisfied that, given the available evidence, it represents a reasonable view of the likely costs, benefits and impact of the leading options.' The Treasury and the DWP were contacted for comment. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Lee Jae-myung, Trump speak on phone, reaffirm U.S.-South Korea alliance
Lee Jae-myung, Trump speak on phone, reaffirm U.S.-South Korea alliance

UPI

time20 hours ago

  • UPI

Lee Jae-myung, Trump speak on phone, reaffirm U.S.-South Korea alliance

New South Korean President Lee Jae Myung appears at a news conference at the presidential office in Seoul, South Korea, on Wednesday, his first remarks after being inaugurated earlier in the day. Photo by Ahn Young-joon/EPA-EFE/pool June 7 (UPI) -- South Korea's President Lee Jae-myung spoke for the first time with U.S. President Donald Trump late Friday as both leaders agreed to further strengthen their nations' alliance. Lee, who took office Wednesday, talked with Trump in a 20-minute phone call, according to the presidential office of South Korea. The White House has not confirmed the conversation, and the president, who is in New Jersey this weekend, hasn't posted about the call on Truth Social. The two presidents agreed to strive toward reaching a mutually acceptable trade agreement, including on tariffs. Trump has imposed 10% baseline tariffs on most trading partners. On April 2, Trump said the Republic of Korea would face a 49% duty but one week later he paused it for three months along with the other worst offenders in the trade imbalance. South Korea's tariffs on imported agricultural goods average 54%. Trump congratulated Lee on his election victory, and the new leader expressed his gratitude, according to the office. Lee noted the importance of the alliance, which forms the foundation of Seoul's diplomacy. The phone call was "conducted in a friendly and candid atmosphere," as they shared anecdotes and experiences from their election campaigns, according to South Korea's presidential office. They exchanged views on their assassination attempts last year and political challenges, in addition to discussing their their golf skills and agreed to play a round together. Trump invited Lee to the White House and the Group of Seven summit in Alberta, Canada, from June 15-17. South Korea is not a G7 member state, but the nation attended them group's meetings in 2021 and 2023. Korea's neighbor, Japan, is a member of the G7. Yonhap reported the South Korea government is in consultations for Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and Chinese President Xi Jinping to speak to their leader. It has not been decided whether Lee will attend the North Atlantic Treaty Organization leaders' summit in the Netherlands on June 24 and 25, according to the presidential office. Lee, the Democratic Party liberal candidate, won in a landslide over Kim Moon-soo of the conservative People Power Party. He was inaugurated the next day on Wednesday. South Koreans turned out in record numbers in a snap election triggered by the impeachment and removal of Yoon Suk Yeol in April after a botched martial law decree. Some 35.24 million voters cast a ballot, representing a turnout of 79.4% -- the highest mark since an 80.7% turnout in 1997.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store