
USAID analysis found no evidence of massive Hamas theft of Gaza aid
The analysis, which has not been previously reported, was conducted by a bureau within the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and completed in late June. It examined 156 incidents of theft or loss of US-funded supplies reported by US aid partner organisations between October 2023 and this May.
It found "no reports alleging Hamas" benefited from US-funded supplies, according to a slide presentation of the findings seen by Reuters.
A US State Department spokesperson disputed the findings, saying there is video evidence of Hamas looting aid, but provided no such videos. The spokesperson also accused traditional humanitarian groups of covering up "aid corruption".
The findings were shared with the USAID's inspector general's office and State Department officials involved in Middle East policy, said two sources familiar with the matter, and come as dire food shortages deepen in the devastated enclave.
Israel says it is committed to allowing in aid but must control it to prevent it from being stolen by Hamas, which it blames for the crisis.
The UN World Food Programme says nearly a quarter of Gaza's 2.1 million Palestinians face famine-like conditions, thousands are suffering acute malnutrition, and the World Health Organization and doctors in the enclave report starvation deaths of children and others.
The UN also estimates that Israeli forces have killed more than 1,000 people seeking food supplies, the majority near the militarised distribution sites of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), the new private aid group that uses a for-profit US logistics firm run by a former CIA officer and armed US military veterans.
The study was conducted by the Bureau of Humanitarian Assistance (BHA) of USAID, which was the largest funder of assistance to Gaza before the Trump administration froze all US foreign aid in January, terminating thousands of programmes. It has also begun dismantling USAID, whose functions have been folded into the State Department.
The analysis found that at least 44 of the 156 incidents where aid supplies were reported stolen or lost were "either directly or indirectly" due to Israeli military actions, according to the briefing slides.
Israel's military did not respond to questions about those findings.
The study noted a limitation: because Palestinians who receive aid cannot be vetted, it was possible that US-funded supplies went to administrative officials of Hamas, the Islamist rulers of Gaza.
One source familiar with the study also cautioned that the absence of reports of widespread aid diversion by Hamas "does not mean that diversion has not occurred".
The war in Gaza began after Hamas attacked Israel in October 2023, killing 1,200 people and capturing 251 hostages, according to Israeli tallies. Nearly 60,000 Palestinians have been killed since the Israeli assault began, according to Palestinian health officials.
Israel says Hamas diverts humanitarian aid
Israel, which controls access to Gaza, has said that Hamas steals food supplies from UN and other organisations to use to control the civilian population and boost its finances, including by jacking up the prices of the goods and reselling them to civilians.
Asked about the USAID report, the Israeli military told Reuters that its allegations are based on intelligence reports that Hamas militants seized cargoes by "both covertly and overtly" embedding themselves on aid trucks.
Those reports also show that Hamas has diverted up to 25% of aid supplies to its fighters or sold them to civilians, the Israeli military said, adding that GHF has ended the militants' control of aid by distributing it directly to civilians.
Hamas denies the allegations. A Hamas security official said that Israel has killed more than 800 Hamas-affiliated police and security guards trying to protect aid vehicles and convoy routes. Their missions were coordinated with the UN.
Reuters could not independently verify the claims by Hamas and Israel, which has not made public proof that the militants have systematically stolen aid.
GHF also accuses Hamas of massive aid theft in defending its distribution model. The UN and other groups have rejected calls by GHF, Israel and the US to cooperate with the foundation, saying it violates international humanitarian principles of neutrality.
In response to a request for comment, GHF referred Reuters to a 2 July Washington Post article that quoted an unidentified Gazan and anonymous Israeli officials as saying Hamas profited from the sales and taxing of pilfered humanitarian aid.
Aid groups required to report losses
The 156 reports of theft or losses of supplies reviewed by BHA were filed by UN agencies and other humanitarian groups working in Gaza as a condition of receiving US aid funds.
The second source familiar with the matter said that after receiving reports of US-funded aid thefts or losses, USAID staff followed up with partner organisations to try to determine if there was Hamas involvement.
Those organisations also would "redirect or pause" aid distributions if they learned that Hamas was in the vicinity, the source said. Aid organisations working in Gaza also are required to vet their personnel, sub-contractors and suppliers for ties to extremist groups before receiving US funds, a condition that the State Department waived in approving $30m for GHF last month.
The slide presentation noted that USAID partners tended to over-report aid diversion and theft by groups sanctioned or designated by the US as foreign terrorist organisations - such as Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad - because they want to avoid losing US funding.
Of the 156 incidents of loss or theft reported, 63 were attributed to unknown perpetrators, 35 to armed actors, 25 to unarmed people, 11 directly to Israeli military action, 11 to corrupt sub-contractors, five to aid group personnel "engaging in corrupt activities," and six to "others," a category that accounted for "commodities stolen in unknown circumstances," according to the slide presentation.
The armed actors "included gangs and other miscellaneous individuals who may have had weapons," said a slide. Another slide said "a review of all 156 incidents found no affiliations with" US-designated foreign terrorist organisations, of which Hamas is one.
"The majority of incidents could not be definitively attributed to a specific actor," said another slide.
"Partners often largely discovered the commodities had been stolen in transit without identifying the perpetrator."
It is possible there were classified intelligence reports on Hamas aid thefts, but BHA staff lost access to classified systems in the dismantlement of USAID, said a slide.
However, a source familiar with US intelligence assessments said that they knew of no US intelligence reports detailing Hamas aid diversions and that Washington was relying on Israeli reports.
The BHA analysis found that the Israeli military "directly or indirectly caused" a total of 44 incidents in which US-funded aid was lost or stolen. Those included the 11 attributed to direct Israeli military actions, such as airstrikes or orders to Palestinians to evacuate areas of the war-torn enclave.
Losses indirectly attributed to Israeli military included cases where they compelled aid groups to use delivery routes with high risks of theft or looting, ignoring requests for alternative routes, the analysis said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Journal
40 minutes ago
- The Journal
Q&A: What we know (and don't know) about the EU-US tariff deal
THE EU-US tariff deal, struck yesterday , will avoid a painful trade war between the transatlantic allies. The stakes were high, with a looming 1 August deadline set by Washington and a €1.65tr trading relationship on the line. Despite that, the agreement has not satisfied everyone. Many European leaders issued lukewarm statements throughout the day today, while Taoiseach Micheál Martin welcomed the agreement as an end to uncertainty for businesses. A full deal is yet to be fleshed out . An agreed 'framework' has laid out the broad principles of a deal, but negotiators will still need to hammer out the details in coming days, with a joint statement expected by the original 1 August deadline. The final agreement will need to be approved by all European leaders. US President Donald Trump will expectedly carry out the changes through executive orders, which bypasses a vote by the American parliament. So what was agreed? Both sides confirmed there will be a blanket 15% tariff rate on a majority of Irish goods exported to the US, the same level secured by Japan this month. While this means the European car sector actually sees a reduction in tariffs – from 27.% to 15% – the agreed rate is three-times higher than the tariffs before. Many European ministers pointed to this as their prime gripe with the deal . The European Commission described the deal as a step towards stabilising EU-US trade, with EU trade commissioner Maroš Šefčovič telling journalists that it was 'the best deal we could get under very difficult circumstances'. An opportunity presented itself to the EU during the deal, however. Many European governments are seeking to distance themselves from a long-term reliance on Russian energy . The EU has agreed to purchase €647m worth of liquefied natural gas, oil and nuclear fuels from the US over three years. It also said it would pour €517bn in additional investments in America, through the private sector. Advertisement Negotiating teams agreed to deals around energy products and fuel. Alamy Alamy As is the case with many of these agreements, the EU has also agreed to purchase 'significant amounts of US military equipment', according to the White House . This is a significant policy change from the European Commission, which as been promoting cross-member state trade of arms in recent months . One EU official was quick to pour cold water on this assessment, claiming it was not 'agreed or discussed'. That may suggest that the US expects EU member states to turn towards the American arms market for procurement in the near future. Blanket tariffs, you say. Are any goods tariff-free? So, we're still finding this out. The exact list of goods which will be exempt from tariffs will soon be finalised, Brussels said today. One EU official said the member states would also consider lowering levies on US cars, which are traditionally unpopular in Europe, to 0%. Machinery products and different types of fertilisers may also see zero-tariff rates, as an alternative to Russian sources. In exchange, the official said, Washington was expected to reduce tariffs on European aircraft, certain medical devices and some pharmaceuticals – for which the US largely depends on Irish imports. Discussions are ongoing about European alcohol exports becoming tariff-free – including wine and Irish whiskey. Discussions are ongoing about European alcohol exports becoming tariff-free - including wine and Irish whiskey. Alamy, file Alamy, file Irish Farmers Association President Francie Gorman said today that the agriculture industry were the 'fall guys' for EU trade policy. He questioned why the European negotiators could not achieve a lower rate of baseline tariffs, as the UK did previously. Workers' Union Siptu has demanded clarity for its members and is seeking immediate action from Ireland to protect jobs in specific sectors, such as pharmaceuticals, semiconductors and the drinks' industry, which may be impacted by tariffs. Related Reads 'Resorted to submission': Last-minute US tariff deal earns stinging criticism from EU leaders Are pharmaceuticals part of the EU-US tariff deal? And what's Section 232 got to do with it? 'A good deal for everybody': US and EU reach 15% tariff deal after Trump-von der Leyen meeting What about pharma? Any sector-specific tariffs? The White House is currently targeting pharmaceuticals and semiconductors – microchips which power mobile devices and digital machines. The US could potentially impose massive levies to attract American companies home. Ireland, home to thousands of multinational pharmaceutical manufacturers, hoped that there would be particular exemptions for medicines – a key industry here. Protecting pharmaceuticals was a priority in the EU's negotiations. An internal review by the US trade department is still ongoing over the legality of placing a levy on medical imports. Under American trade law, essential items, such as medicine and aircraft components, cannot be unfairly taxed. The US is reviewing the legality of placing a levy on medical imports. Alamy, file Alamy, file Tech firms with European bases in Dublin will not be directly impacted by tariffs on physical goods, but could be affected if the US changes tax laws to make it less attractive to set up in low-tax countries, said Andrew Kenningham from Capital Economics. Under the deal struck yesterday, the EU says the US has agreed that tariffs on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors will be capped at 15%. The White House said medicines and semiconductors would indeed be taxed at that rate. European steel, copper and aluminium are currently facing a 50% US tariff. The White House said those sectoral tariffs 'will remain unchanged' but that it would seek to ensure that the supply chains are not impacted. With reporting by AFP Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal


The Irish Sun
2 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Martin defends EU tariff deal to avoid ‘damaging' US trade war & rules out ‘hand-out approach' help for Irish businesses
MICHEAL Martin has hit back at claims EU chiefs rolled over in the Trump tariff talks. And the Taoiseach claimed an all-out trade war with the US President The deal received a mixed reaction from EU members, with some countries claiming that the Bloc is getting nothing in return for an agreement that will punish Europe and boost the US. READ MORE IN IRISH NEWS But Germany's leader Friedrich Merz praised the deal for averting a trade war. At home, Asked if Mr Martin warned a trade war between the US and Most read in Irish News He said: 'A trade war would have been very damaging to jobs in this country and The Government will now carry out work to assess the impact that the new 15 per cent tariffs will have on the Irish economy and jobs here. NO HAND-OUT APPROACH But the Taoiseach today ruled out He said: 'This is not 1 Micheal Martin warned a trade war between the US and EU would have devastated the Irish economy Credit: 2025 PA Media, All Rights Reserved


Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Paul Hosford: The game of roulette is sure to continue
And so the Donald Trump tariff roulette ball lands on 15. That is the percentage rate which EU and US goods will be subject to after weeks of showdown talks between the two parties. The deal will impose 15% tariffs on almost all European exports to the US, including the likes of cars. It brings what the government here is calling clarity, and avoids a 30% trade war between the two largest trade partners in the history of commerce. Privately, the message is similar across the board: it's not great, but it's not as bad as it could have been, which in an Irish context will mean tighter belts, but more of a watching brief in this year's budget. Most around the Irish government are of the opinion that the impact of tariffs will probably not be seen in its entirety this year, given the late stage at which the tariff framework has been agreed. What happens from here on out is where the challenge lies. Last week, the Government released its summer economic statement, which outlined a total budget package of €9.4bn. Included in this is €1.5bn in tax cuts and €7.9bn in increased spending. Though how much of that is already accounted for was not clear as public expenditure minister Jack Chambers and finance minister Paschal Donohoe released the document last Tuesday. The message from Mr Chambers has been that spending needs to moderate, particularly in a day-to-day sense. US president Donald Trump with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at the Trump Turnberry golf course in Scotland last Sunday. Picture: Jacquelyn Martin/AP The Government has been quick to play down the idea that October 7 will see an austerity budget, but it will probably be the closest that a generation of taxpayers can remember. This will be far from those swinging days of cuts and protests and febrile demonstrations, but it will not bring with it a huge expansion of spending. In part, that is because the budgets of recent years have seen a huge expansion of public expenditure. In Budget 2020, passed in October 2019, there was a total gross voted current expenditure of just under €62bn. Flash forward to last October, and that figure stood and a little over €90bn. The state cannot realistically continue to grow at a rate of tens of billions of euro in baked-in spending every five years. Some moderation was always going to happen. Beyond that, there is the simple fact that nobody knows whether this 15% tariff is here to stay. Given the continuing rate of change within the Trump administration on the issue of tariffs, there is no guarantee that we won't be back worrying about the future face of trade between the EU and the US in mere months. Who is to say that the next time Mr Trump has a domestic issue to quell, a 30% tariff is not back on the agenda? The summer economic statement published last week was done so on the basis the tariffs would be 10%. Ireland does two sets of economic projections a year in April and October, and so last week's figures were based on the situation as had been the case in April. The document itself says that, should the tariff situation worsen, there would be a need to look at Ireland's economic model. The document said that if the tariff landscape deteriorates, the government would "recalibrate" its fiscal strategy, reducing the quantum of the budgetary package. While 15% is not the worst spin of the roulette wheel, more challenges lie ahead.