
Brownsville ISD nears completion of 2025-26 budget
May 23—Just as the House and Senate were reaching a deal on an $8.5 billion funding package for Texas public schools, the Brownsville Independent School District was moving forward on next year's budget.
Legislative leaders in Austin announced the deal on Thursday amid an ongoing battle over school finance. It appeared to strike a face-saving compromise for both chambers, which had been divided by the House's aim to bump up the basic per-student allotment and the desire in the Senate to prioritize teacher pay raises.
Legislative leaders said the package in House Bill 2 represents a historic investment in public schools, although advocates say such an effort is long overdue and comes as school districts across the state are facing budget shortfalls brought on by six years of doing nothing to increase the basic per-student allotment, which has remained at $6,160 since 2019.
Meanwhile, Brownsville ISD has been working right along on its 2025-2026 budget, which must be enacted by July 1, the start of the district's fiscal year.
BISD is the largest district in the Edinburg-based Region One Education Service Center that stretches from Laredo to Brownsville.
Its budget of nearly $579 million is larger than the city of Brownsville or Cameron County. Even as it consolidates schools and grows smaller because of changing demographics and a falling birth rate, it is still the largest employer south of San Antonio.
But its schools and facilities have long-standing maintenance and modernization needs. Earlier this year, BISD tried to float a $350 million bond issue for just that purpose, but a divided Board of Trustees couldn't reach agreement on how to include a desired performing arts center, what schools to upgrade and other issues.
House Bill 2 takes a different approach to the basic per-student allotment, which districts traditionally have used to pay for a range of other needs, including insurance, maintenance and instructional materials.
Rather than raising the amount beyond the $55 proposed by the Senate, the deal would set aside $1.3 billion for a fund to cover some fixed costs, lawmakers said — essentially providing a different way to give districts the spending flexibility they had hoped for.
BISD Superintendent Jesus H. Chavez said the state missed the mark.
"While we appreciate the state's efforts to allocate additional funding, we remain concerned that the amount provided still falls short of what is truly needed," Chavez said in a statement to The Brownsville Herald.
"Since the last legislative session, funding levels have not kept pace with the growing demands on public education. As a result, most districts—including BISD—continue to experience significant budget shortfalls. This ongoing gap makes it increasingly difficult to meet educational needs and places added financial strain on our local communities," the statement read.
"BISD requires additional funding to properly maintain facilities, expand educational programs, and offer competitive salaries to attract and retain quality staff. At this time, the district is also uncertain about the financial impact that enrollment shifts and the implementation of school vouchers may have on our budget moving forward," Chavez added.
In a statement to the Texas Tribune announcing the compromise, House Speaker Dustin Burrows, R-Lubbock, said the deal "reflects constructive input from both chambers and parties, and a shared commitment to delivering historic school funding and teacher pay raises."
Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, the Republican Senate leader, called it "the most effective school finance bill in Texas history."
At BISD's most recent budget committee meeting on Tuesday, members went over substitute teacher pay, nurses pay and other costs.
In a presentation by Human Resources Director Linda Gallegos, it emerged that Brownsville substitute pay falls in the middle of the pack among similar-sized districts in Region One.
In 2024-2025, the daily rate for certified substitutes ranged from a high of $185 at La Joya and Mission, to $180 at Donna, PSJA and Weslaco, $165 at Edinburg, $150 in Brownsville, $140 at Los Fresnos and Point Isabel, $135 at Harlingen and San Benito, $130 at Laredo United and $125 at McAllen.
Administration substitutes earn $210 per day at Weslaco and $160 at Brownsville, the only two districts with that category.
BISD has more than 800 active substitute teachers. Mondays and Fridays are the most-utilized days, with an average of 517 and 577, respectively. Tuesdays at 503, Wednesdays at 495 and Thursdays at 508, are right behind.
Committee member Minerva Pena urged the administration to try to raise BISD rates so that it attracts the best talent.
Nurses fall under professional instructional support and their pay is at 98% of market value, according to a study by the Texas Association of School Boards and Gallegos' presentation.
BISD has one more budget workshop on June 9 before a June 26 special called Board of Trustees meeting to adopt the budget. The board is to adopt the district's tax rate at its Sept. 2 meeting.
Featured Local Savings
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

an hour ago
Former Tennessee football coach Derek Dooley eyes GOP Senate run against Jon Ossoff in Georgia
DALTON, Ga. -- Derek Dooley, a former University of Tennessee football coach, said Friday that he is considering a Republican run for U.S. Senate in Georgia in 2026 against Democratic incumbent Jon Ossoff. The trial balloon shows how Gov. Brian Kemp's decision not to run for the seat has left Georgia Republicans looking for other options to face off against Ossoff, considered the most vulnerable Democratic incumbent up for reelection next year. Dooley, 56, said he would decide on a bid in coming weeks. 'Georgia deserves stronger common-sense leadership in the U.S. Senate that represents all Georgians and focuses on results — not headlines,' Dooley said in a statement. 'I believe our state needs a political outsider in Washington — not another career politician — to cut through the noise and partisanship and get back to real problem solving.' The announcement, first reported by The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, came as other declared candidates stumped before the state Republican convention in the northwest Georgia city of Dalton. Among Republicans who have declared their candidacies are U.S. Rep. Buddy Carter, Insurance Commissioner John King and activist Reagan Box. Other Republicans who could run include U.S. Reps. Mike Collins and Rich McCormick, Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and state Sen. Greg Dolezal. Attacks on Ossoff were among the most reliable applause lines during Friday afternoon speeches at the convention. 'Folks, President Trump needs backup, he needs backup in the Senate,' King said. Dooley has never run for office before. His appeal wouldn't be based on his career 32-41 record at Louisiana Tech and Tennessee, but his status as the son of legendary University Georgia coach Vince Dooley and Kemp's long ties to the Dooley family. As a teenager, Kemp was a frequent guest in the Dooley home, and roomed with Derek's older brother, Daniel Dooley, at the University of Georgia. Kemp has the most effective Republican political organization in Georgia, and he would likely give Dooley a big credibility boost. Kemp and President Donald Trump have been trying to agree on a mutual candidate to back for Senate in 2026, hoping to avoid the conflict that plagued Kelly Loeffler's unsuccessful run, where she lost to Democrat Raphael Warnock in a 2021 runoff. That, along with Republican David Perdue's loss to Ossoff on the same day handed control of the U.S. Senate to Democrats. Trump had preferred then U.S. Rep Doug Collins instead of Loeffler. Then in 2022, Trump anointed Georgia football legend Herschel Walker as the Republican nominee, but Warnock turned back Walker's flawed candidacy in another runoff. Kemp only swung in to help Walker in the runoff. The effort to screen 2026 candidates has already produced some results, with U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene saying she wouldn't bring her right-wing positions to the Senate campaign trail. Dooley would be far from the first sports figure to run for office. His father was frequently discussed as a possible candidate, but never took the plunge. But other coaches have gone far. Former Auburn University football coach Tommy Tuberville was elected to the Senate in 2020 from Alabama and is now running for governor. Former Ohio State University coach Jim Tressel is currently that state's lieutenant governor. And University of Nebraska coaching legend Tom Osborne served three terms in the U.S. House. Dooley walked on in football at the University of Virginia and earned a scholarship as a wide receiver. He earned a law degree from the University of Georgia and briefly practiced law in Atlanta before working his way up the college coaching ladder, becoming head coach for three years at Louisiana Tech and then moving on to Tennessee. Dooley recorded three consecutive losing seasons in Knoxville before he was fired in 2012 after losing to in-state rival Vanderbilt. After that, he has worked as an assistant coach for the NFL's Miami Dolphins and Dallas Cowboys, the University of Missouri and the New York Giants. Most recently, Dooley was an offensive analyst with the University of Alabama.


Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Trump's Patience With Putin Leaves Senate Sanctions Push on Hold
President Donald Trump's suggestion that he may let Russia and Ukraine keep fighting has left US lawmakers in an awkward spot over their plan to force a ceasefire with 'bone-crushing' sanctions against Moscow. The Senate bill has more than 80 co-sponsors, an all-but-unheard-of level of bipartisan support. Yet although that kind of veto-proof backing is enough for the Senate to press ahead without White House backing, supporters show no sign they're ready to challenge the president.

3 hours ago
Democratic states double down on laws resisting Trump's immigration crackdown
As President Donald Trump's administration targets states and local governments for not cooperating with federal immigration authorities, lawmakers in some Democratic-led states are intensifying their resistance by strengthening state laws restricting such cooperation. In California alone, more than a dozen pro-immigrant bills passed either the Assembly or Senate this week, including one prohibiting schools from allowing federal immigration officials into nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant. Other state measures have sought to protect immigrants in housing, employment and police encounters, even as Trump's administration has ramped up arrests as part of his plan for mass deportations. In Connecticut, legislation pending before Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont would expand a law that already limits when law enforcement officers can cooperate with federal requests to detain immigrants. Among other things, it would let 'any aggrieved person' sue municipalities for alleged violations of the state's Trust Act. Two days after lawmakers gave final approval to the measure, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security included Connecticut on a list of hundreds of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' obstructing the enforcement of federal immigration laws. The list later was removed from the department's website after criticism that it errantly included some local governments that support Trump's immigration policies. Since taking office in January, Trump has enlisted hundreds of state and local law enforcement agencies to help identify immigrants in the U.S. illegally and detain them for potential deportation. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement now lists 640 such cooperative agreements, a nearly fivefold increase under Trump. Trump also has lifted longtime rules restricting immigration enforcement near schools, churches and hospitals, and ordered federal prosecutors to investigate state or local officials believed to be interfering with his crackdown on illegal immigration. The Department of Justice sued Colorado, Illinois and New York, as well as several cities in those states and New Jersey, alleging their policies violate the U.S. Constitution or federal immigration laws. Just three weeks after Colorado was sued, Democratic Gov. Jared Polis signed a wide-ranging law expanding the state's protections for immigrants. Among other things, it bars jails from delaying the release of inmates for immigration enforcement and allows penalties of up to $50,000 for public schools, colleges, libraries, child care centers and health care facilities that collect information about people's immigration status, with some exceptions. Polis rejected the administration's description of Colorado as a 'sanctuary state,' asserting that law officers remain 'deeply committed' to working with federal authorities on criminal investigations. 'But to be clear, state and local law enforcement cannot be commandeered to enforce federal civil immigration laws,' Polis said in a bill-signing statement. Illinois also has continued to press pro-immigrant legislation. A bill recently given final approval says no child can be denied a free public education because of immigration status — something already guaranteed nationwide under a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court decision. Supporters say the state legislation provides a backstop in case court precedent is overturned. The bill also requires schools to develop policies on handling requests from federal immigration officials and allows lawsuits for alleged violations of the measure. Democratic-led states are pursuing a wide range of means to protect immigrants. A new Oregon law bars landlords from inquiring about the immigration status of tenants or applicants. New laws in Washington declare it unprofessional conduct for bail bond agents to enforce civil immigration warrants, prohibit employers from using immigration status to threaten workers and let employees use paid sick leave to attend immigration proceedings for themselves or family members. Vermont last month repealed a state law that let law enforcement agencies enter into immigration enforcement agreements with federal authorities during state or national emergencies. They now need special permission from the governor to do so. As passed by the House, Maryland legislation also would have barred local governments from reaching immigration enforcement agreements with the federal government. That provision was removed in the Senate following pushback from some of the seven Maryland counties that currently have agreements. The final version, which took effect as law at the start of June, forbids public schools and libraries from granting federal immigration authorities access to nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant or 'exigent circumstances.' Maryland Del. Nicole Williams said residents' concerns about Trump's immigration policies prompted her to sponsor the legislation. 'We believe that diversity is our strength, and our role as elected officials is to make sure that all of the residents within our community — regardless of their background — feel safe and comfortable,' Williams said. Though legislation advancing in Democratic states may shield against Trump's policies, 'I would say it's more so to send a message to immigrant communities to let them know that they are welcome,' said Juan Avilez, a policy associate at the American Immigration Council, a nonprofit advocacy group. In California, a law that took effect in 2018 already requires public schools to adopt policies 'limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible.' Some schools have readily applied the law. When DHS officers attempted a welfare check on migrant children at two Los Angeles elementary schools in April, they were denied access by both principals. Legislation passed by the state Senate would reinforce such policies by specifically requiring a judicial warrant for public schools to let immigration authorities into nonpublic areas, allow students to be questioned or disclose information about students and their families. 'Having ICE in our schools means that you'll have parents who will not want to send their kids to school at all,' Democratic state Sen. Scott Wiener said in support of the bill. But some Republicans said the measure was 'injecting partisan immigration policies' into schools. 'We have yet to see a case in California where we have scary people in masks entering schools and ripping children away,' said state Sen. Marie Alvarado-Gil. 'Let's stop these fear tactics that do us an injustice.'