logo
Sudan accuses the UAE of funding Colombian mercenaries to fight alongside the RSF in civil war

Sudan accuses the UAE of funding Colombian mercenaries to fight alongside the RSF in civil war

Independent14 hours ago
Sudan has accused the United Arab Emirates of sending Colombian mercenaries to fight alongside the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces against the military in the country's civil war.
The foreign ministry said in a statement Monday that the Sudanese government has 'irrefutable evidence' confirming mercenaries from Colombia and some neighboring African countries were sponsored and financed by Emirati authorities. The statement didn't share the evidence or name the neighboring countries.
'This unprecedented phenomenon poses a serious threat to peace and security in the region and across the continent,' the foreign ministry said, asserting that hundreds of thousands of mercenaries were hired from across the African continent.
There was no immediate response from the UAE or Colombia.
The civil war in Sudan erupted in April 2023 in Khartoum before spreading across the country following simmering tensions between the RSF and the army. The fighting has killed over 40,000 people, displaced as many as 12 million and pushed many to the brink of famine.
Sudan has long accused the UAE of being involved in the war by supplying the RSF with weapons, but the Gulf country has denied that claim.
In November, an Amnesty International report said armored vehicles manufactured by the UAE and equipped with French defense systems had been captured by the Sudanese military. A spokesperson for the Emirati government said at the time that the UAE was the 'target of a coordinated disinformation campaign aimed at undermining our foreign policy, regional role and humanitarian efforts.'
Sudan's army and the RSF both have been accused of committing atrocities like ethnic cleansing, extrajudicial killings and sexual violence against civilians, including children.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

No bullying found in Harry charity row, but blame for all sides
No bullying found in Harry charity row, but blame for all sides

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

No bullying found in Harry charity row, but blame for all sides

There was no evidence of widespread bullying, harassment or misogyny at the Sentebale charity founded by Prince Harry, the charity regulator has Charity Commission has published its findings into whistleblower allegations that followed a bitter boardroom dispute that saw Prince Harry resigning, along with several trustees, earlier this has imposed no sanctions - and the current leadership, headed by Sophie Chandauka, will remain at the charity which supports young people in southern the commission did criticise "all parties" for allowing a "damaging" dispute to play out publicly - and gave the charity a regulatory action plan to deal with "governance weaknesses". It's a bittersweet outcome for Prince Harry who has left the charity, which his spokesman said had been "deeply personal" to of the criticism from the commission focused on how the internal dispute descended into such a public argument in the media, which it said had damaged the charity's row had seen Prince Harry accused of being a "toxic" brand by the charity's chair Ms Chandauka - and he had stepped down saying his and the trustees' relationship with her was broken "beyond repair" and saying that they had faced "blatant lies"."Sentebale's problems played out in the public eye, enabling a damaging dispute to harm the charity's reputation, risk overshadowing its many achievements, and jeopardising the charity's ability to deliver for the very beneficiaries it was created to serve," said Charity Commission chief executive David Prince Harry's team welcomed the finding that there had not been evidence of bullying, a spokesman said the report "falls troublingly short" in that the "consequences of the current chair's actions will not be borne by her". The current chair, Ms Chandauka, remains at the head of the charity, with the watchdog finding no reason for her not to continue.A Sentebale spokesman said that the report confirmed that the new trustees had been validly appointed and could move forward "free from interference".Ms Chandauka said the "adverse media campaign" from those who had resigned from the charity had caused "incalculable damage". "We are emerging not just grateful to have survived, but stronger," she Charity Commission also said that although there was no evidence of widespread or systemic bullying or harassment, including misogyny or misogynoir [discrimination against black women], it acknowledged a "strong perception of ill treatment felt by a number of parties" and said it wasn't its role as a regulator to adjudicate on individual claims of commission has not sanctioned any individuals, but its regulatory action plan is meant to address problems such as a lack of clarity over roles and a better mechanism for handling internal warned of "weaknesses in the charity's management" that had added to inquiry highlighted how tensions had risen around a new fundraising strategy in the United States, with some trustees believed to have raised concerns about the charity's action plan warns of the importance of "sufficient funding to enable the charity to deliver for its beneficiaries".The Charity Commission website is still showing Sentebale's financial position from August 2023 - but sources close to the charity say it is in good financial charity had been a very personal project for Prince Harry, which made his resignation even more difficult. Sentebale had been co-founded with Prince Seeiso of Lesotho, with both honouring the legacies of their mothers. "For 19 years, its dedicated staff and steadfast supporters have provided vital care to over 100,000 young people across southern Africa, including young people living with HIV/Aids and those facing mental health challenges," said a spokesman for Prince Harry's spokesman said the charity had been grown to become a "flowering force for good" and that he will "now focus on finding new ways to continue supporting the children of Lesotho and Botswana".Ms Chandauka said: "Despite the recent turbulence, we will always be inspired by the vision of our founders, Prince Harry and Prince Seeiso."The Charity Commission concluded that those running charities should not let disagreements make them forget their initial good intentions and to focus on those they were trying to help."Passion for a cause is the bedrock of volunteering and charity, delivering positive impact for millions of people here at home and abroad every day," said Mr Holdsworth."However, in the rare cases when things go wrong, it is often because that very passion has become a weakness rather than a strength."Moving forward I urge all parties not to lose sight of those who rely on the charity's services."The current trustees must now make improvements and ensure the charity focuses on delivering for those it exists to serve." Sign up here to get the latest royal stories and analysis every week with our Royal Watch newsletter. Those outside the UK can sign up here.

Elon Musk's X 'played central role' in stoking racist riots, damning report finds
Elon Musk's X 'played central role' in stoking racist riots, damning report finds

Daily Mirror

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Elon Musk's X 'played central role' in stoking racist riots, damning report finds

Amnesty International analysis found X's algorithm prioritises posts that are most likely to contain lies and hatred - and say nothing has changed amid heightened tensions Elon Musk's X played a "central role" in fuelling last year's racist riots as it is designed to amplify dangerous hate posts, a damning study has found. ‌ Analysis by Amnesty International suggests the social network's algorithm prioritises comments that are most likely to contain misinformation and hatred. This led to an enormous spread of vile lies following the Southport attacks last July, researchers found - and they warned nothing has changed. ‌ Within 24 hours posts wrongly claiming the killer was a Muslim or had come to the UK by small boat had been seen a staggering 27million times, the study says. And the attack was seized on by far-right agitator Tommy Robinson and notorious influencer Andrew Tate, who had previously been banned for hate speech, with their posts reaching millions of people. ‌ UK-France small boats returns deal - all you need to know as new details released Hundreds of people were arrested as violence broke out following the murder of three schoolgirls by British-born Axel Rudakubana, who was 17 at the time. The report said X, formerly known as Twitter, "dismantled or weakened" key safeguards after Musk took over in 2022. Sacha Deshmukh, Amnesty International UK's chief executive, said: 'By amplifying hate and misinformation on such a massive scale, X acted like petrol on the fire of racist violence in the aftermath of the Southport tragedy. ‌ "The platform's algorithm not only failed to 'break the circuit' and stop the spread of dangerous falsehoods; they are highly likely to have amplified them." The charity's study found X gives top priority to content that drives conversation - regardless of whether this is driven by misinformation or hatred. And it said posts from users who pay a premium are even more visible - further ramping up the risk of "toxic, racist, and false" content. Pat de Brún, Amnesty's head of big tech accountability, said: 'X's algorithm favours what would provoke a response and delivers it at scale. Divisive content that drives replies, irrespective of their accuracy or harm, may be prioritised and surface more quickly in timelines than verified information.' ‌ The report states: "In the critical window after the Southport attack, X's engagement-driven system meant that inflammatory posts, even if entirely false, went viral, outpacing efforts to correct the record or de-amplify harmful content - some of which amounted to advocacy of hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination or violence." It said this "contributed to heightened risks amid a wave of anti-Muslim and anti-migrant violence" which was seen across the UK. And it warns the platform "continues to present a serious human rights risk today". Amnesty's report points to an infamous post by Lucy Connolly, who was jailed for 31 months for stirring up racial hatred. It said X's failure to remove it was "telling" - saying it was seen 310,000 times, despite her account having less than 9,000 followers at the time.

Prince Harry among those criticised in report on dispute at Sentebale charity
Prince Harry among those criticised in report on dispute at Sentebale charity

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Prince Harry among those criticised in report on dispute at Sentebale charity

The Charity Commission has criticised Prince Harry for allowing a row with the chair of his African charity to 'play out publicly', as the watchdog cleared him of racism. The prince was engaged in a public war of words earlier this year with the chair of the Sentebale charity, Dr Sophie Chandauka, after his resignation as a patron. Harry and the co-founder, Prince Seeiso of Lesotho, stepped down in March and its trustees quit over a dispute with Chandauka, a lawyer appointed in 2023. After Harry's resignation was made public, Chandauka said she had been subjected to people who 'play the victim card'. She had said that it was a 'story of a woman who dared to blow the whistle about issues of poor governance, weak executive management, abuse of power, bullying, harassment, misogyny, misogynoir [discrimination against black women] – and the cover-up that ensued'. In a ruling on Tuesday in a compliance case into Sentebale, which works with children and young people in southern Africa, the regulator criticised all those involved in the dispute for 'allowing it to play out publicly'. It said the then trustees' failure to resolve disputes internally had 'severely impacted the charity's reputation and risked undermining public trust in charities more generally'. David Holdsworth, the chief executive of the Charity Commission, said: 'Sentebale's problems played out in the public eye, enabling a damaging dispute to harm the charity's reputation, risk[ing] overshadowing its many achievements, and jeopardising the charity's ability to deliver for the very beneficiaries it was created to serve. 'This case highlights what can happen when there are gaps in governance and policies critical to charities' ability to deliver for their cause. As a result, we have issued the charity a Regulatory Action Plan to make needed improvements and rectify findings of mismanagement.' In response to the report, a spokesperson for Harry, who was not a trustee and established the charity in memory of his mother, Diana, Princess of Wales, criticised the commission, claiming its report had fallen 'troublingly short'. The commission found that a serious dispute between Chandauka and Harry had followed the formulation of a new fundraising strategy in the US. The breakdown in the relationship had been raised with the commission in February but an investigation was only opened in April after an analysis. The commission did not find evidence of widespread or systemic bullying or harassment, including misogyny or misogynoir, it said, but acknowledged 'the strong perception of ill treatment felt by a number of parties to the dispute and the impact this may have had on them personally'. It further found no evidence of ''overreach' by either the chair or the Duke of Sussex as patron' but the commission was 'critical of the charity's lack of clarity in delegations to the chair which allowed for misunderstandings to occur'. It said: 'The commission's assessment of the various accounts that have been provided is that all the charity's then trustees contributed to a missed opportunity to resolve issues which led to the dispute. 'The regulator observed that strategic and financial difficulties that had emerged for the charity following the Covid-19 pandemic contributed to the tensions that arose.' A spokesperson for the Duke of Sussex said: 'Unsurprisingly, the commission makes no findings of wrongdoing in relation to Sentebale's co-founder and former patron, Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex. 'They also found no evidence of widespread bullying, harassment or misogyny and misogynoir at the charity, as falsely claimed by the current chair. 'Despite all that, their report falls troublingly short in many regards, primarily the fact that the consequences of the current chair's actions will not be borne by her – but by the children who rely on Sentebale's support. 'Sentebale has been a deeply personal and transformative mission for Prince Harry, established to serve some of the most vulnerable children in Lesotho and Botswana.' A spokesperson for Sentebale said they were pleased with the action plan offered by the commission, which would allow it to 'move forward … free from interference'. Chandauka said: 'The unexpected adverse media campaign that was launched by those who resigned on 24 March 2025 has caused incalculable damage and offers a glimpse of the unacceptable behaviours displayed in private. 'We are emerging not just grateful to have survived, but stronger: more focused, better governed, boldly ambitious and with our dignity intact. 'Despite the recent turbulence, we will always be inspired by the vision of our founders, Prince Harry and Prince Seeiso, who established Sentebale in memory of their precious mothers, Princess Diana and Queen 'Mamohato.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store