logo
The Right-Wing Culture War Scam Comes Full Circle

The Right-Wing Culture War Scam Comes Full Circle

Newsweek22-05-2025

Last week, a New York University (NYU) student named Logan Rozos delivered a short commencement address condemning Israel's brutalization of Gaza. The beliefs expressed in the address—which (quelle horror!) apparently departed from university guidelines—were unremarkable and at this point widely shared among younger Americans. Instead of quietly moving along from a speech that was received quite well by its audience, NYU has taken the unprecedented (and cowardly) step of withholding the student's diploma altogether.
The imbroglio is a perfect encapsulation of where the GOP's "cancel culture" scam has been headed all along, which is not to the mythical "viewpoint diversity" disingenuously demanded by the kinds of people who have spent the past decade bizarrely obsessing over minor dining hall controversies at Oberlin College or parsing silly Halloween emails from Yale administrators but rather to a different, more open and unapologetic censorship regime, one designed and policed by the far right rather than the far left.
A group of faculty, staff, and students of George Washington University meet in the yard where there was a pro-Palestine encampment last year, on May 8, 2025, in Washington D.C.
A group of faculty, staff, and students of George Washington University meet in the yard where there was a pro-Palestine encampment last year, on May 8, 2025, in Washington D.C.
AANDREW THOMAS/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images
Left-wing ideological excesses at American colleges and universities were always massively overblown. College campuses, after all, cannot and should not be anarchic free speech zones where any maniacal provocateur like Milo Yiannopoulos can come and deliver an outrageous address designed to do nothing other than generate controversy without any pushback. You don't actually have a constitutional right not to be protested, and when you visit a college, you are also setting foot in a place where other human beings live and work. You should not always expect your opinions to be received calmly or warmly.
But yes, occasionally the anti-speaker fervor of left-wing student groups went overboard and in general some academics and writers on the left should have been more outspoken about maintaining climates of open discourse on campus. I'm thinking in particular of former International Monetary Fund (IMF) honcho Christine Lagarde pulling out of her Smith College commencement address in 2014 because of protests. At the same time, conservatives in the 21st century have consistently claimed speech rights for incendiary campus speakers that they do not believe should be enjoyed by professors with unfashionable views about Israel and Palestine.
And it's worth noting that according to the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, since 2023 "students and student groups were mostly targeted by administrators, for expression about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict" and that "government officials and politicians led more attempts to punish student speech than in any other period" that the organization has studied. So, to the extent that cancel culture is running amok on college campuses today, it is almost entirely perpetrated by those on the political right.
It's also telling that nearly all of the prominent public figures who made their careers warning about the dangers of woke "cancel culture" on college campuses have been completely silent as students are not just attacked but in some cases disappeared into America's immigration gulag for the crime of leading protests or writing op-eds. With a few prominent exceptions like The Atlantic's Connor Friedersdorf, who to his credit has condemned the new witch hunts against Palestinian activists, their commitment to campus free speech has turned out to be nothing but empty clout-chasing and bad faith.
And it should be no surprise that Israel is the leading edge of the new right-wing censorship regime. For more than 20 years, apologists for Israel have sought to shame, blackball, and fire professors who criticize Israeli policy. Today's incarnation of silencing Palestinian voices is called "Project Esther" but 20 years ago it was called Campus Watch, which still hosts a web page that re-runs in its entirety an utterly innocuous 14-year-old article from my university's student newspaper about students studying the Arab Spring.
It's all the same thing. Something—in this case it is the accusation that Israel is committing war crimes or genocide in Gaza—is declared beyond the scope of criticism and free speech and then a million little busybodies start sifting through syllabi, social media, and research to find thoughtcrimes. Academics who study the Middle East are more than accustomed to dealing with this kind of blowback, and many have paid for their views with their careers, without any support from the Free Press crowd.
But what's new is both the effort to silence and harm the career prospects of student dissidents as well as the coordinated effort to force universities to shutter entire programs of study for fear that criticism of Israel's policies—and America's complicity with them—might escape containment. What's also new is the effort to strip entire institutions of completely unrelated funding if they do not do the bidding of people whose fragile outlooks cannot bear a moment's criticism of Israel.
Administrators must either resist this new, MAGA-led witch hunt, or watch the independence and freedom of universities disappear along with their integrity.
David Faris is an associate professor of political science at Roosevelt University and the author of It's Time to Fight Dirty: How Democrats Can Build a Lasting Majority in American Politics. His writing has appeared in Slate, The Week, The Washington Post, The New Republic, Washington Monthly and more. You can find him on Twitter @davidmfaris.
The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Election observers at the OAS voice serious concerns about Mexico's contentious judicial elections
Election observers at the OAS voice serious concerns about Mexico's contentious judicial elections

Hamilton Spectator

time27 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Election observers at the OAS voice serious concerns about Mexico's contentious judicial elections

MEXICO CITY (AP) — Electoral watchdogs at the Organization of American States expressed concern Friday over the low turnout in Mexico's historic and contentious judicial elections, recommending that countries in the Americas not follow its path. In a report, the electoral mission said the June 1 election was 'extremely complex' and 'polarizing,' and was marked by a 'widespread lack of awareness' among voters about what they were voting for and who the thousands of candidates were. In Sunday's vote, Mexicans elected 881 federal judges and another 1,800 state judges as part of a complete overhaul of the judiciary. The process was carried out following a constitutional reform approved last year by a Congress with a ruling-party majority. The overhaul fueled protests and criticism within Mexico and by the American and Canadian governments, which warned of a potential loss of judicial independence and the politicization of justice in Mexico. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum and her mentor and architect of the overhaul, former President Andrés Manuel López Obrador claimed they want to root out corruption in the judiciary, which most Mexicans agree is broken. Mexico's electoral authority said this week that voter turnout was 13%, significantly lower than the 60% turnout in last year's general elections. In the Friday report, the OAS mission — led by former Chilean Foreign Minister Heraldo Muñoz Valenzuela — expressed concern over 'the low level of citizen participation' and noted that 'this is one of the lowest turnout levels in the region.' Observers also pointed to the 'high percentage' of null and unmarked ballots, which exceeded 10%. 'It's necessary to carry out a comprehensive reflection on the nature of the (electoral) process and how it was conducted,' the report concluded. The OAS's 16-member observation mission also raised concerns about the nine candidates elected to join Mexico's Supreme Court who 'were promoted in physical and digital 'cheat sheets.'' While parties were not allowed to advocate for candidates, pamphlets known as 'accordions' guiding voters on which candidates to vote for were widely distributed. Mexican electoral authorities investigated complaints against the ruling Morena party and other opposition groups that distributed the voter guides in communities across the capital and other cities in the weeks leading up to the vote. The agency also ordered that a website featuring a digital cheat sheet with Morena-aligned candidates for the Supreme Court and other top tribunals be taken down. OAS observers also noted that six of the nine candidates elected to the high court had been nominated by the government controlled by Morena, and the remaining three were justices appointed by López Obrador, 'which raises reasonable doubts about the autonomy and independence of the highest court in relation to the Executive.' Given the findings, the mission concluded that 'it does not recommend this model of judge selection be replicated in other countries in the region.' Despite the criticism, Sheinbaum praised the election this week, calling it a success. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Ukraine hopes for Trump-Zelensky meeting in Canada during G7
Ukraine hopes for Trump-Zelensky meeting in Canada during G7

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ukraine hopes for Trump-Zelensky meeting in Canada during G7

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy intends to hold a meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump during the Group of Seven (G7) summit in Canada, Head of the Presidential Office Andriy Yermak said on air on June 6. The summit is scheduled to take place from June 15 to 17 in Kananaskis, Alberta. Yermak said the Ukrainian delegation's recent trip to Washington was aimed in part at arranging the high-level meeting between Zelensky and Trump. The Ukrainian delegation, led by First Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Economy Yulia Svyrydenko, arrived in the U.S. on the morning of June 3. The delegation included senior officials from the Defense Ministry and the Presidential Office. During their visit, the Ukrainian officials are expected to engage with American counterparts on a wide range of critical issues, including ongoing negotiations in Istanbul, sanctions policy against Russia, and continued support for Ukraine amid Russia's full-scale war. Following the latest round of peace talks between Ukraine and Russia on June 2, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan suggested that Turkey plans to facilitate a meeting between the leaders of Russia and Ukraine in either Ankara or Istanbul. Speaking to reporters on the same day, Zelensky expressed readiness to take part in such talks. "I had a conversation with President Erdoğan of Turkey. And indeed, he sent a signal, asking how I would feel about a meeting of four leaders: himself, the President of the United States, Putin, and me. I told him that I support a meeting at the level of leaders, because I have the impression that there will be no ceasefire without our meeting," Zelensky said during an online press conference attended by the Kyiv Independent. We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.

US agents arrest two migrants at NY courthouse
US agents arrest two migrants at NY courthouse

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US agents arrest two migrants at NY courthouse

US agents pounced on two immigrants in the hallway of a New York courthouse Friday, wrestling them to the ground in a forceful display of President Donald Trump's crackdown on people without papers. The two men had just attended a scheduled hearing when plainclothes Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, some wearing black face masks, grabbed them. The officers yelled for the men not to move or put up resistance and forced them to lay face-down on the ground as they tied their hands behind their backs and arrested them. The immigrants were then whisked away into an elevator on the 12th floor of the Jacob K Javits Federal Building in Manhattan. The routine appointment they hoped would be a step toward life in America ended in shock and detention. AFP was on hand to witness these events because there was a similar arrest at the same courthouse earlier in the week and the agency suspected more might be imminent. It was not immediately clear exactly why these two men were arrested nor the fate that awaits them. Trump was elected to a second term largely on a promise to crack down hard on the entry and presence of undocumented migrants and Americans largely support the idea. But polls show they also find tactics like surprise courthouse arrests by agents with black masks to be harsh. In recent weeks ICE agents have intensified operations like this in and around American immigration courts. After Trump swept back into power in January, the Department of Homeland Security revoked regulations that limited agents' access to protected areas like the courts. One of the men arrested was a 34-year-old Dominican named Joaquin Rosario who arrived in the United States a year ago, registered with authorities as he came in, and had his first immigration hearing Friday, said a relative of his, Julian Rosario, who declined to say how they were related. "He was at ease. He did not think anything was going to happen," said the relative, who was still visibly upset by what he had witnessed as agents threw the other man to the ground. Rosario was so unworried he did not even bother to have a lawyer with him, the relative said. The other detainee looked to be Asian. He arrived on his own and was accompanied by one of many immigration advocacy group volunteers who walk with such immigrants to and from the courtroom. The idea is to make them feel safe. This time the volunteers screamed out as the agents arrested the two men but this did nothing to halt the raid. Before this arrest other immigrants with appointments, including entire families, came and went with no problem. A pair of Venezuelans who refused to give their names were jubilant because their next appointment is not until 2027 -- that's how backlogged the US immigration court system is. - 'Sound the alarm' - Human rights groups are outraged by these operations, arguing that they sap trust in the courts and make immigrants wary of showing up for appointments as they try to gain US residency. "They're illegal abductions," said Karen Ortiz, herself a court employee who was demonstrating Friday against these sudden arrests of migrants. "We need to sound the alarm and show the public how serious this is and one way we can do that is actually physically putting ourselves between a masked ICE agent and someone they're trying to detain and send away," Ortiz told AFP. Since returning to power Trump has dramatically tested the limits of executive power as he cracked down on foreigners without papers, arguing that the United States is being invaded by criminals and other undesirables. af/dg/dw/sla

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store