
Stella Rimington: The spy who brought MI5 out of the shadows
He was also the senior liaison officer for MI5 – the British security service – in the Indian capital, and when the diplomat's wife accepted his offer of employment it was to mark her entry into the shadowy world of intelligence.
It was a curiously low-key start for a remarkable 29-year career marked by a series of 'firsts' – culminating in her appointment as the UK's first woman spymaster.
In that time she found herself pitted against Russian espionage agents and IRA terrorists as well as, more controversially, domestic 'subversives' including the leaders of the 1984 miners' strike.
Dubbed the 'housewife superspy' when she became the first female director general of MI5 – and the first to be named publicly – she did much to bring the service out of the shadows and explain its role to the public.
While she struggled with the publicity – she was forced to move out when the press discovered where she lived – she nevertheless appeared delighted when she was credited as the model for Judi Dench's M in the James Bond movies.
The greater openness she inaugurated went too far for some when, after leaving, in another first, she became the first former director general to publish her memoir.
In retirement she took on a number of non-executive directorships – including for Marks & Spencer, using her surveillance skills to eavesdrop on customers to pick up what they were saying about the company's products.
She also drew on her experiences to forge a successful second career as a thriller writer, with a series of novels about the fictional MI5 officer Liz Carlyle.
Stella Whitehouse was born on May 13 1935 in South Norwood, a comfortable middle class suburb in south London, the second of two children.
Following the outbreak of the Second World War, they moved first to Wallasey and then to Barrow-in-Furness, where her father had taken a job at a steel works.
Both towns were hit hard in the Blitz and the nightly bombing raids left her with an acute fear of being trapped in confined spaces that was to last well into adulthood.
Only with the end of the war was she able to resume proper schooling, first at the local Croslands Covent School and then at Nottingham High School for Girls after the family moved to the Midlands.
After excelling academically, she won a place to read English at Edinburgh University, where in her final year she became friendly again with her future husband, John Rimington, whom she had first met in Nottingham.
Following her degree, she took a course in archive administration at Liverpool University, followed by jobs first at the County Record Office in Worcester and then the India Office Library in London.
That came to an end in 1965, when her husband, whom she had married two years earlier, was offered a posting as first secretary (economic) in New Delhi and the couple sailed for India.
The routine of life as a diplomatic wife soon began to pall, so she jumped at the opportunity of work with MI5, even though it turned out to be mostly clerical and 'not particularly exciting'.
Nevertheless, on their return to London in 1969, she decided to seek a permanent job with the service, initially as 'something to keep me interested and amused' until she started a family.
The organisation she joined she soon found was a 'land of eccentrics' peopled largely by war veterans and ex-colonial service officers, with a heavy drinking culture.
The 'two well-bred ladies of a certain age' who were entrusted with her training would each day at noon produce a pair of glasses and a bottle of sherry for a 'rather elegant pre-lunch drink'.
It was also a service with a 'strict sex discrimination' policy with women confined to administrative and support roles while the frontline work – such as recruiting and running agents – was for men only.
Her early assignments including helping to identify potential communist infiltrators in rural Sussex and working on the newly formed Northern Ireland desk set up in response to the start of the Troubles.
After becoming pregnant with the first of her two daughters, Sophie, she found her determination to return to work after the child was born was met with 'incomprehension' within the service.
She was not particularly enthusiastic herself, but needed the money, although matters improved when she was given the chance to work on the 'main enemy' – the Soviet Union.
The defections of the Cambridge spies – Kim Philby, Guy Burgess and Donald Maclean – still cast a long shadow over the intelligence community, fuelled in part by the conspiracy theories of MI5 officer Peter Wright who was convinced there was another Russian mole within the organisation.
Mrs Rimington was tasked with re-interviewing John Cairncross – later identified as the so-called 'fifth man' in the group – who had made a partial confession to spying in the 1960s, but failed to extract any new leads from him.
Nevertheless, her persistence paid off when she finally persuaded her bosses to make her a full MI5 officer, after complaining that male graduates recruited straight from university were being brought in over her head.
A further breakthrough followed when it was agreed she could train as an agent-runner, the view having long been taken that potential informants would be unwilling to talk to a woman.
In her memoir she recalled the difficulties of juggling her new role, which frequently involved going under cover, with bringing up a young family.
On one occasion she received a call from a nanny to say her younger daughter had been taken to hospital with convulsions just as she was preparing for a crucial rendezvous with a potential defector.
In the event she managed to make it to the meet, after first checking in at the hospital, but had to borrow money from the would-be defector to pay for all the taxis involved.
'Whether the apparent scarcity of funds available to British intelligence influenced his decision or not, I don't know,' she wrote. 'But he did eventually decide not to make the jump across.'
Nevertheless, her career was by this stage firmly on an upward trajectory and in 1983 she was appointed an assistant director – the first woman to hold the post – with responsibility for counter-subversion.
Initially, she thought it was something of a backwater but that quickly changed with the advent of the miners' strike the following year.
She later recalled 'agonising' over whether it was legitimate for MI5 to monitor Arthur Scargill and other union leaders – finally concluding that they should as Mr Scargill had declared his aim was to bring down the government of Margaret Thatcher.
When MI5's involvement became known it nevertheless proved highly controversial, leading to claims it had engaged in a 'dirty tricks' campaign against the miners, which Mrs Rimington always denied.
Promotion, to director of counter-espionage, saw her embroiled in further controversy when Peter Wright – by now retired and thoroughly embittered – published his notorious Spycatcher memoir.
It included his now long-discredited theory that former director general Roger Hollis had been a Russian spy as well as a startling claim that a group of MI5 officers – himself among them – had tried to bring down Labour prime minister Harold Wilson.
Although Wright later withdrew the allegations, his description of how MI5 had 'bugged and burgled' their way across London led to demands that the service should be brought more firmly under ministerial control with its surveillance powers set on a statutory footing.
At first Mrs Rimington was reluctant, producing an internal policy paper arguing against legislation, but after accepting that change was inevitable she became an enthusiastic proponent, sitting on a joint working group with the Home Office which drew up the landmark Security Service Act.
By now both the service she had first joined in the 1960s and the threats it faced were very different.
With the end of the Cold War and collapse of the Soviet Union, in 1991 she led a three-strong delegation to Moscow in an extraordinary attempt to establish friendly relations with their erstwhile adversaries in the KGB.
Despite a warm welcome, with a visit to the Bolshoi Ballet and with much champagne flowing, when she suggested to the Russians they might cut back their espionage in the UK as a prelude to greater co-operation on issues such as counter-terrorism, the idea was dismissed as 'ridiculous'.
Any disappointment was short-lived. On her return to London she was greeted with news that she was to be the next director general, despite not having been interviewed for the post, or even asked whether she wanted it.
Furthermore, John Major's government had decided that now the service was on a statutory footing, thanks to the legislation she helped draw up, her appointment should be announced publicly – the first time any British intelligence chief had been openly identified.
The announcement – in a brief, two-line statement with no accompanying photograph – caused a media sensation, not least because she was the first woman to head any of the agencies, for which she was ill-prepared.
Her elder daughter, Sophie, was away at university and only learned the news from the television, while their home was soon surrounded by journalists.
In the absence of any official photograph, a blurry snatch shot taken some years earlier was widely circulated, before photographers finally managed to capture a rather unflattering image of her leaving the house.
Amid all the furore, it soon became apparent that she could not carry on living there, and she was forced to move into secure accommodation with her younger daughter (she had separated from her husband some years earlier).
Despite such an inauspicious start, Mrs Rimington used her time as director general to bring gradually bring the service out of the shadows, dispelling some of the myths and misconceptions built up around it.
In 1993, MI5 published a short booklet which, for the first time, put some facts into the public domain, while she appeared alongside then home secretary Michael Howard in an official photocall to launch it.
A further step towards greater openness followed when, despite much official hand-wringing, she was given permission to deliver the prestigious BBC Dimbleby lecture on the role of the security services in a democracy.
She was made a dame in the 1996 New Year's Honours list.
Her heightened public profile led to sniping in Whitehall that 'Stella likes the limelight' – a perception only enhanced when, five years after her retirement in 1996, she chose to publish her memoir, to the fury of many of her former colleagues.
Such criticisms did not stop her speaking out in the wake of the 9/11 attacks and the US 'war on terror' to warn that draconian new laws simply played into the hands of the terrorists by spreading fear and alarm.
Alongside her post-MI5 writing and business commitments she even found time to chair the judging panel for the Man Booker Prize for literature, although her comment that they were looking for 'readability' found her once again in the firing line from critics who accused her of 'dumbing down' the award.
During the Covid-19 pandemic of 2020, she reconciled with her husband, moving in together during lockdown.
'It's a good recipe for marriage, I'd say,' she said. 'Split up, live separately, and return to it later.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Spectator
2 hours ago
- Spectator
What France's fight against Islamism can teach Labour
So far this year France has deported 64 individuals from its database of radical Islamists. More are planned in the coming weeks and months, putting the minister of the interior, Bruno Retailleau, on course to surpass last year's total of 142. A senior unnamed prefect was quoted in yesterday's Le Figaro declaring: We are very committed to this issue; it is an ongoing effort by the state, given what is at stake. It is even monitored weekly by the (interior) minister at the central level. Retailleau is supported by his predecessor, Gérald Darmanin, who has been the Minister of Justice since last December. It was Darmanin who last year commissioned a report into the Muslim Brotherhood, a report that, when published in May this year, revealed the disturbing extent of their growing influence in the country. The government of France considers that the rights of the victims are the priority When Darmanin ran the interior ministry, his chief of staff was Alexandre Brugère. He has been the prefect for western Paris since November last year and in that time he has been relentless in prioritising 'the deportation of undocumented foreigners who disturb public order'. Brugère has this year expelled 370 undesirables, a 61 per cent increase on the same period in 2024. Some are petty criminals or members of drug cartels but most are radical Islamists. Last month Brugère expelled four such individuals, including a Syrian who had his refugee status revoked after expressing support for the Islamic State. Brugère has promised to remain 'extremely firm in the fight against Islamism', conscious of the gravity of the threat posed by extremism. This was underlined earlier this year by Céline Berthon, the head of DGSI, France's equivalent of MI5. 'Our biggest challenge today is online radicalization,' she said in an interview in March, explaining how individuals 'can be influenced or controlled from outside, particularly by terrorist organizations present either in Syria and Iraq for the Islamic State, or in Afghanistan and Pakistan for the Islamic State in Khorasan.' A similar warning was issued by MI5 Director General Ken McCallum last October. 'We're also seeing far too many cases where very young people are being drawn into poisonous online extremism,' said McCallum in a speech from the Counter Terrorism Operations Centre. The division of MI5's counter-terrorist work, he added, was 'roughly 75 per cent Islamist extremist, 25 per cent extreme right-wing terrorism'. Doubtless MI5 is working as tirelessly as its French counterpart to monitor the Islamic extremists, but what is being done by the government? If Labour has deported any Islamic extremists flagged by MI5 they haven't been made public, which is perhaps surprising given the Prime Minister's oft-mentioned determination to clamp down on the extreme right. Last week, it was announced that members of the government's national security and online information team (NSOIT) have been tracking people who make critical comments online about migrant hotels and policing standards. It is the same team deployed during the Covid Pandemic to keep tabs on anti-lockdown campaigners. While Labour appears less ardent in its monitoring of Islamic extremism, the Tories can't claim to have done a great job either during their time in office. In April 2024 there was a pledge to introduce legislation to 'protect the public from…foreign nationals who are sowing division and spreading hate in communities, potentially having them removed from the country.' Why so long? In 2017 – after seven years of Tory governance – it was reported that since 2004 Britain had deported 11 extremists; in the same period France had expelled 120. The Conservatives' promise to finally act came to naught; three months later, they were out of office, replaced by a government led by Keir Starmer. This is the same Keir Starmer who, as a barrister in 2008, represented the Palestinian-born Abu Qatada as he fought a deportation order to Jordan where he was wanted on charges of terrorism. Among Qatada's many incendiary declarations was a 1999 fatwa 'authorising the killing of Jews, including Jewish children'. Often described as Osama bin Laden's 'ambassador in Europe, Qatada sought to remain in Britain because – as Starmer told the judge – 'deportation and the revocation of refugee status both interfere with domestic civil rights'. The judge dismissed Starmer's argument as 'fallacious' but it took another five years before the government overcame the Human Rights lawyers and finally deported Qatada. Starmer's role in defending Abu Qatada was a line of attack for Rishi Sunak in last year's televised election debates. The morning after the debate, the Labour party issued a statement in which they said: 'In this country, everyone is entitled to a defence, which means lawyers cannot choose who they work for.' This line of argument was addressed by Bruno Retailleau in October last year, a month after he was appointed Minister of the Interior. 'In the face of disorder, we must find the right balance between protecting individual freedoms and protecting society,' he said. He then singled out the European Court of Human Rights, which had recently prevented France from deporting an Islamist and said in such a case 'the balance is no longer right, as we are protecting the rights of dangerous individuals more than those of the victims'. Retailleau and the government of France consider that the rights of the victims are the priority and that dangerous individuals must be deported. This doesn't appear to be the priority of the British government.

Leader Live
3 hours ago
- Leader Live
Titan tour operator ‘leveraged intimidation tactics' to evade scrutiny
The incident resulted in the deaths of five people in June 2023 – including British adventurer Hamish Harding and father and son Shahzada and Suleman Dawood. The chief executive of tour operator OceanGate Expeditions, Stockton Rush, and French national Paul-Henri Nargeolet, were also killed in the incident. On Tuesday, the US Coast Guard published a 335-page report in which identified eight 'primary causal factors' that led to the fatal implosion. The report said OceanGate had a 'toxic workplace environment' and used the 'looming threat of being fired' to prevent staff from coming forward with safety concerns. It added that analysis revealed a 'disturbing pattern of misrepresentation and reckless disregard for safety'. The report criticised OceanGate's design and testing processes and the continued use of the Titan submersible despite 'a series of incidents that compromised the integrity of the hull and other critical components'. The tour operator's former director of engineering was reported by the US Coast Guard to have said the first hull used on the Titan submersible was akin to a 'high school project'. According to the report, a contractor hired by OceanGate in 2022 voiced 'numerous safety concerns' to a company director, before being told: 'You have a bad attitude, you don't have an explorer mindset, you know, we're innovative and we're cowboys, and a lot of people can't handle that.' Authored by lead investigator Thomas Whalen and marine board chairman Jason Neubauer, it read: 'For several years preceding the incident, OceanGate leveraged intimidation tactics, allowances for scientific operations, and the company's favourable reputation to evade regulatory scrutiny. 'By strategically creating and exploiting regulatory confusion and oversight challenges, OceanGate was ultimately able to operate Titan completely outside of the established deep-sea protocols, which had historically contributed to a strong safety record for commercial submersibles. 'The lack of both third-party oversight and experienced OceanGate employees on staff during their 2023 Titan operations allowed OceanGate's chief executive officer to completely ignore vital inspections, data analyses, and preventative maintenance procedures, culminating in a catastrophic event.'


Scottish Sun
3 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Shock footage shows bikini-clad women brawling on a beach in Ukraine after group started ‘playing Russian music'
Playing Russian music is banned in Ukraine since the outbreak of war BEACH BIKINI BRAWL Shock footage shows bikini-clad women brawling on a beach in Ukraine after group started 'playing Russian music' THIS is the shocking moment a brawl breaks out between bikini-clad women in war torn Ukraine. The mass scrap was triggered when one group began blasting Russian music on a beach in Odesa, on the Black Sea coast, according to some local reports. Advertisement 4 Around a dozen women and men were involved in the brawl Credit: East2West 4 The group fell to the sand and continued grappling Credit: EAST2WEST 4 A few men got piled in later on Credit: East2West Playing Russian music publicly is banned - so any infringement at the popular Golden Beach would have riled fury. Footage shows a gaggle of women pushing and pulling at each other. One pair each has their fists gripped onto the other's hair before collapsing onto another pair brawling in the sand. Other women pile into the heap, before some men in underpants also get involved. Advertisement Bodies are shoved out of the melee - some tumbling backwards and taking others with them. Things look to have calmed down, but then two men begin wrestling on their feet. And the group of women, now also back on their feet, continues to whack at each other. The Strana news outlet reported that holidaymakers fought on the beach after "a song in Russian was played". Advertisement Odesa has seen almost daily drone or missile strikes during the war - and the famous Golden Beach usually provides a brief respite from the conflict. The port city has faced down more than 700 Russian attacks since war broke out in February 2022. Watch moment migrant boat arrives on Spain hols beach before they are chased & tackled by angry locals At least 131 civilians have been killed and more than 312 wounded by the aerial offensives. The Russian port punch-up follows another beach brawl between migrants and locals on the Spanish coast. Advertisement A migrant boat arrived and unloaded its occupants, who were chased and tackled by angry beach goers. Around a dozen of those who arrived on the boat were detained, with some held by beachgoers until authorities arrived. The shocking incident unfolded on Sotillo Beach in Castell de Ferro, Granada in the afternoon on Sunday. Footage shared on social media shows a speed boat with young men on board arriving at the shore at around 2pm. Advertisement Those on the boat are captured diving into the water in front of stunned holidaymakers and locals. They then swim to the beach before attempting making a run for it. But locals are seen tackling some of the migrants to the ground, whilst others manage to escape. A clip shows a beachgoer in swimming trunks pinning one man down whilst he appears to beg to be let go. Advertisement