SA insurers expose shocking ‘kill-for-cash' schemes and fraud frenzy
Image: Ai-Generated/Sora
From shocking 'murder for money' cases to bank errors that drained customer accounts, South Africa's financial watchdogs and insurers are uncovering fraud and fixing costly mistakes – and the amounts involved run into the hundreds of millions.
In fact, in the past year, of the 5 505 fraudulent and dishonest life insurance claims recorded by Association for Savings and Investment South Africa (ASISA) members, 38 were murder for money cases, its latest report showed.
Jean van Niekerk, convenor of the ASISA Forensic Standing Committee, said that while all types of fraud and dishonesty are of concern, the industry is particularly focused on stamping out murder for insurance payouts and deceased estate fraud.
In addition, ASISA members have picked up on criminal syndicates identifying deceased estates as a lucrative way of accessing large amounts of money, preying on people's grief and the slow and arduous processes involved in winding up the financial affairs of a deceased family member
Although the numbers are still relatively low, incidents detected have tripled from 54 in 2023 to 161 in 2024. Even more concerning is the significant rand value of the fraud prevented. 'If we had not detected the 161 cases last year, our industry and beneficiaries would have lost R220 million to criminal syndicates,' says Van Niekerk.
Of the 5 505 fraudulent and dishonest life insurance claims recorded by Association for Savings and Investment South Africa last year, 38 were murder for money cases.
Image: ASISA
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad Loading
These findings form part of ASISA's annual fraud statistics compiled by its Forensic Standing Committee. It stated that its members detected 16 520 cases of fraud and dishonesty in 2024 – up 26% from 13 074 cases the previous year. Insurers and investment firms prevented losses of about R1.4 billion, although criminals and dishonest policyholders still cost the industry R131.6m.
Van Niekerk said the loss represents just 0.02% of the R639bn in honest claims paid in 2024. He attributed the lower losses to improved detection tools and forensic teams.
'Our industry has always been seen as a soft target by criminals and dishonest individuals because of the significant amounts of investments and benefits being managed, but it is getting increasingly difficult to get away with fraud and dishonesty,' he said.
Remuneration fraud, where agents or advisers dishonestly claim commissions or fees, accounted for more than half of all cases. Life insurance claim fraud was the second-largest category, while fraudulent withdrawals and disinvestments were the only area to see fewer cases, although actual losses there increased slightly.
Meanwhile, honest customers are having to deal with miscommunication and unlawful deductions. Last year, the newly created National Financial Ombud Scheme South Africa (NFO) secured R328.5 million in refunds for aggrieved customers who complained about financial institutions.
Its annual report shows that of the 28 002 complaints it handled between January and December 2024, 30% related to fraud. Maladministration by financial institutions and complaints from debt-stressed consumers were the second- and third-highest categories.
'These trends align with patterns observed in previous years, where fraud-related disputes consistently accounted for a significant portion of complaints,' the report noted.
One case involved a South African customer who signed up for a personal loan over the phone. She believed the interest rate was 19.25%, only to later discover it was 29.25%. She asked the bank to review the rate.
The bank said the higher rate was correct, based on her credit profile, and was legal. But when the NFO investigated, it listened to the call recording and found the customer had repeatedly complained about poor line quality. 'Based on the call it was probable that the complainant did not hear the interest rate correctly,' the report said of this anonymous example.
Top complaints to the National Financial Ombud in 2024.
Image: NFO
Because of the bad call quality, there were doubts about whether she fully understood or agreed to the 29.25% rate. South African contract law requires both parties to agree clearly (a meeting of the minds), and banks must make sure customers understand the terms and risks of credit agreements.
After mediation, the bank agreed to reduce the interest rate to 19.25% and refunded the difference from the start of the loan.
In another case, a customer found R1 689.88 had been taken from his account without notice, leading him to lodge a fraud complaint. He had made a payment of R3 000 to a beneficiary, but a bank system error reversed it and credited the money back to him. He then paid it again – and the beneficiary ended up receiving both payments.
Instead of fixing the error, the bank deducted R1 689.88 from his account and flagged a balance owing. The NFO found that the customer was not at fault and that the bank should have dealt directly with the beneficiary who was unjustly enriched. The bank refunded the customer and removed the flag from his account.
Nerosha Maseti, Lead Ombud of the Banking Division, said 'bank customers have every right to expect good service and for complaints to be taken seriously'.
IOL
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
19 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Government says it is working on ways to mitigate job losses from US tariffs
The government says it is working on ways to mitigate job losses caused by steep US tariffs and is considering exempting exporters from some competition rules to support them. Africa's biggest economy faces a 30% tariff on its exports to the US starting this week, a move expected to cost tens of thousands of jobs after it failed to secure a trade deal before a deadline set by US President Donald Trump. Trump last Thursday issued an executive order imposing higher import duties on dozens of countries that are set to take effect in seven days as part of his push to reshape global trade in favour of the US 'South Africa poses no trade threat to the US economy or its national security,' the trade and foreign ministers said in a joint statement on Monday. 'The calculation of the US-SA 'trade deficit' ignores the substantial US trade surplus in services, and the complementary nature of the bilateral trade and investment relations between the two countries.' Measures to cushion the impact of job losses could involve the Unemployment Insurance Fund, the government statement said. The statement said a 'block exemption' from competition rules was being developed to enable collaboration and co-ordination by competitors.
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
Put Johannesburg under administration
Finance minister Enoch Godongwana has given the City of Johannesburg a deadline to stabilise its finance or face a cut in grant payments On one hand, it is heartening to see Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana giving Joburg mayor Dada Morero a two-week deadline to address the city's escalating financial troubles. However, if the minister carries out his threat to cut grant funding to the city, matters are only going to get worse for residents and ratepayers. Yesterday, DA Joburg caucus leader Belinda Kayser-Echeozonjoku set out the consequences for a failure to heed the warning. 'Johannesburg's R89 billion budget is funded through a mix of grants, loans, revenue collection and conditional grants. 'Conditional grants, which form a significant portion of the city's funding, can only be spent on what they are intended for,' she said. 'If Treasury pulls back or suspends these funds, as the minister warns in his letter, the city's ability to deliver the little basic services it is currently able to deliver, will collapse entirely.' Dire Johannesburg finances The numbers are horrific. Apart from repeated non-compliance with the Municipal Finance Management Act, the metro incurred R1.4 billion in unauthorised expenditure, R22 billion in irregular expenditure, and R705 million in fruitless and wasteful spending. Let's put that in plain language: the comrades are looting the city's coffers. If there is another explanation, we'd like to hear it. Apart from the lack of service delivery – power, water, roads, traffic lights are all in a state of collapse – the city abuses those residents who do pay by saddling them with outrageous – and frequently incorrect – bills. All the while, however, those who can afford to pay but don't – we're looking at many of you in Soweto, for example – are allowed to get away with it. We would like to suggest a better option: put Johannesburg under administration, as has been done with other delinquent municipalities around the country. Then, fire useless politicians like Morero and bring in experts to fix the mess. NOW READ: 'Barrelling towards collapse': Concerns mount as Godongwana gives Morero deadline to fix Joburg's finances
The Citizen
2 days ago
- The Citizen
Ban on new captive lion facilities draws criticism and praise
Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment Dion George recently confirmed that a prohibition notice outlawing the establishment of new captive lion facilities for commercial purposes was moving towards formal promulgation under the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (No. 10 of 2004), known as Nemba. 'We are committed to enforcing clear, effective and legally robust measures that protect South Africa's natural heritage and address concerns raised by the public, conservation experts and stakeholders,' George said in a press statement. He added that his department intended to implement these reforms without delay. Steps to ensure this will happen included engaging with provincial members of the Executive Council under Section 87A(3) of Nemba. Criticism from sustainable use sector Speaking to Farmer's Weekly, Pieter Swart, chairperson of the executive committee of the Sustainable Use Coalition Southern Africa (SUCo-SA), said a blanket prohibition, particularly on new facilities without performance-based criteria, undermined the sustainable use model by shutting down legally compliant and potentially high-welfare operations. 'SUCo-SA views the prohibition as fundamentally at odds with the principles of sustainable use as articulated under both the [Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora] framework and the SADC Protocol on Wildlife Conservation and Law Enforcement. These frameworks emphasise the regulated, science-based and equitable use of wildlife resources for the benefit of conservation and local livelihoods,' he explained. Swart added that the ban could cause significant disruption to the broader wildlife economy and integrated wildlife value chains. These included live animal trade, particularly for tourism and zoological purposes; consumptive uses, such as trophy hunting and the bone trade, non-consumptive uses like photographic tourism and breeding-for-display; and support services like logistics, feed, security and veterinary care. According to him, investor confidence in the broader wildlife economy may weaken if other sectors feared being targeted without due process. 'SUCo-SA's position is that this decision was not adequately grounded in science or socio-economic impact assessment, nor was it preceded by genuine, inclusive stakeholder consultation. 'We urge government to conduct public socio-economic impact assessments, commission peer-reviewed ecological risk-benefit analyses, and adopt transparent stakeholder forums where industry, rural communities and scientists co-develop policy. 'Sound biodiversity policy must integrate evidence, ethics, and economics, not ideology,' he said. Swart added that SUCo-SA believed captive lion facilities still had a legitimate role to play. 'This is particularly [so] in conservation education and outreach, research under ethical frameworks, and a regulated trade, where welfare standards and biosecurity are enforced. The focus should be on improving standards and enforcement, not eliminating legal activities altogether.' Cautious optimism from conservationists Dr Louise de Waal, director and campaign manager of the documentary Blood Lions, said George's announcement on the progress of the prohibition notice for new captive lion facilities was a step in the right direction and showed his commitment to ultimately phasing out the industry. 'We applaud the minister for his commitment to seeing former minister [Barbara] Creecy's vision, to stop the domestication of our iconic lion, through to its conclusion. However, we would like to see more urgency in setting a moratorium on breeding lions, in addition to this prohibition notice, to have a greater impact on curbing the growth of the captive lion population. Currently, thousands of lions and other predators are kept in substandard captive conditions and used for financial gain,' she said. De Waal said the delay in implementing the prohibition notice was frustrating: 'There appears to be a misunderstanding that the industry will be banned in its entirety, but the prohibition notice, while a step in the right direction, will not be a blanket ban. 'Once the prohibition notice is in place, it will only curb the growth of the industry. The breeding, keeping, and trading of captive-bred lions will remain legal for now, which means the industry continues to exist.' Asked how long it would take to root out the captive lion industry entirely, De Waal responded: 'How long is a piece of string? For the industry to be made illegal, the minister will need to change existing legislation, which will most likely take about two years due to the procedural process that needs to be adhered to. This will then be followed by a phase-out process of the industry, which could take another five years or so.' She explained that phasing out an industry that had been allowed to grow for decades couldn't happen overnight and that it needed to be done responsibly for both the animals and people involved. 'In addition, we are hopeful that the minister will extend the closure of the industry to other big cats, so we will not be facing a similar problem in the near future with just a different species, like tigers. 'Unfortunately, the past has proven that this industry indeed includes actors who are willing to take the illegal route and those people will most likely not be deterred by the closure of the industry. Illegal wildlife trade is a global issue that requires specialist enforcement agencies to work together. Under our current law enforcement system, this will be extremely challenging to be rooted out altogether,' De Waal concluded. Breaking news at your fingertips… Follow Caxton Network News on Facebook and join our WhatsApp channel. Nuus wat saakmaak. Volg Caxton Netwerk-nuus op Facebook en sluit aan by ons WhatsApp-kanaal. Read original story on
