Big business wants AI to do 'boring but essential' work
Big business wants artificial intelligence to handle more "boring but essential" jobs as part of a race to establish Australia as a global leader in the technology and avoid decades of playing catch-up.
AI is a significant opportunity to boost living standards and the nation's "next big lever for economic growth" according to Business Council of Australia chief executive Bran Black.
"If we get this right, AI can deliver a significant productivity boost and that means higher real wages and more opportunities for more Australians.
"The choices we make now will determine whether we gain a competitive edge or fall behind."
The council on Monday released a report aiming to accelerate Australia's AI agenda, with a plan to boost innovation and address stagnating productivity.
It recommends "clear, practical and risk-based" regulations be developed, as well as the establishment of new research centres and partnerships and a simplified approval process for data centres to speed infrastructure development.
Specialist training for data scientists and engineers needs expanding and workers need education for how to use the technology to improve "the day-to-day work experience", with courses a part of primary, secondary and tertiary curricula.
"Even if we apply AI to just the 'boring but essential' parts of our economy - like payroll processing or document analysis - the dividends to consumers and businesses could be significant," Mr Black said.
It could free people up to do more creative and collaborative work that machines can't.
The change will be disruptive and a challenge for many, requiring safeguards such as the council's recommended safety institute to focus on technical guardrails.
But it's hoped Australia could become a hub for artificial intelligence, leveraging a highly-educated workforce, a stable democracy and the potential of abundant renewable energy in the future, along with its research institutions and international intelligence sharing deals.
The council wants the focus to be on opportunity, rather than a "fear-first" mindset, but acknowledges the power that makes AI so promising also raises legitimate questions about its responsible and safe use.
It's up to industry and the government to strengthen public trust in AI technology, the report says.
"We believe AI can augment human capabilities, create new kinds of jobs, and make existing ones more rewarding and less burdensome."
"But achieving this positive future requires deliberate choices and concerted action," the report notes.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
44 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Albanese government accused of hiding truth over super tax rules for politicians on old pension scheme
The Albanese government has faced scathing criticism for failing to be upfront about how Labor's controversial $3 million super tax will apply differently to politicians. It comes after it was revealed that Mr Albanese and other politicians under the generous defined benefit pension schemes will not have to pay the tax until after they retire. Sky News also revealed recently that state officials on the old pension schemes are not expected to be taxed at all due to constitutional protections. Shadow industrial relations minister Tim Wilson told Sky News the super tax was 'one of the worst taxes' he had ever seen. 'It's reckless, it is dangerous, it' irresponsible and the family savings tax must be defeated,' he said on Tuesday. 'The government is looking at this as a way to get revenue. But what it actually means is young Australians won't be able to then go on and secure jobs in growth industries.' The comments come amid questions about how transparent Labor has been in the tax's applications to politicians, compared to other high-net-worth superannuants. Employment and Workplace Relations Minister Amanda Rishworth recently admitted to Sky News Sunday Agenda that some politicians would be 'treated differently'. 'They are treated differently. There is interest payable that is calculated in a defined benefit scheme,' she said. 'It is the same way that other superannuation tax changes and other changes have been applied to the defined benefit schemes.' Unlike ordinary superannuants with balances above $3 million, politicians on the old pension will only begin paying after they retire. Interest will accumulate on the tax owed at the long-term government bond rate of about 4.5 per cent. Mr Albanese deflected on Sunday when asked by Sky News whether he and others on these legacy schemes would pay the tax later than other superannuants. 'Look it applies to us as it applies across the board, but the legislation, of course, has yet to be carried by the parliament,' he said. The 'different' treatment has infuriated critics, who say the government has been deliberately opaque. Shadow finance minister James Paterson slammed the government's approach as dishonest and self-serving, warning it created a 'double standard'. 'Let me be helpful and answer the question: yes, it is deferred. You do not pay it during your working life,' Mr Paterson told Sky News Sunday Agenda. 'Every other taxpayer, if they exceed the threshold, has to pay it during their working life, but people like Anthony Albanese, on a defined benefit pension, only have to pay it after they retire. 'I think the government has to be open and transparent, much more transparent than the (Employment) Minister (Ms Rishworth). 'The Prime Minister should stand up today and explain his understanding of this different treatment between different categories of retirees.' When Treasurer Jim Chalmers was asked on May 14 by Sky News whether the tax would apply to politicians like Mr Albanese and Peter Dutton, he insisted it would. 'Yes, and we've made that clear... Politicians on defined benefit will be impacted if they've got very substantial balances by the changes we're proposing,' he said. However, Mr Chalmers' answer failed to clarify that the tax would not apply annually but instead would be deferred until retirement for defined benefit members. The government has attempted to justify its approach by saying it mirrors previous governments, including the Coalition, handling of tax legislation. A spokesperson for Mr Chalmers recently told Sky News the primary legislation makes it "clear that all federal politicians … will be subject to the measure'. "This is the case regardless of when they entered into parliament and whether have a defined benefit interest or not.' The superannuation tax, which the government claims will affect fewer than 0.5 per cent of superannuants initially, has been projected to raise $40 billion over a decade. However, critics warn that the unindexed $3 million threshold will subject increasing numbers of Australians to the tax over time. AMP Deputy Chief Economist Diana Mousina conducted modelling that showed the average 22-year-old will be hit by the tax by the time they retire. CPA Australia's Superannuation Lead, Richard Webb, called on policymakers to ensure the policy will be indexed to inflation. 'Bracket creep is already having a silent eroding effect on personal finances,' Mr Webb said in a statement. 'Allowing this further erosion of superannuation savings is contrary to the fundamental principles of our tax system.'
The Advertiser
an hour ago
- The Advertiser
Australia risks missing AI boost if it gets rules wrong
Australia could miss out on vital health, entertainment and productivity breakthroughs if it introduces rigid artificial intelligence rules rather than taking a balanced approach like some of its neighbours. Google-Alphabet Senior Vice President James Manyika issued the warning while attending an AI summit in Sydney on Tuesday to discuss the technology's potential uses in Australia. The executive also warned the risks of AI misuse were real and its governance would require careful consideration in each industry. His warnings come a day after the Business Council of Australia called for greater support, rules and innovation in AI to boost the nation's productivity, and as the federal government considers regulations following an inquiry. Rules about the use of AI technology vary across the world, from the more restrictive approach of the European Union to the hands-off style adopted in the US. A "two-sided" balance between the risks and rewards of AI - similar to rules adopted by Singapore - should be Australia's goal, Mr Manyika said. "On the one hand, you want to address the risks and complexities that come with this technology, which are quite real, but on the other side, you want regulation that enables all the beneficial applications and possibilities," he told AAP. "Both are important and I'm hoping Australia takes that approach." Allowing businesses to experiment with AI technology would be crucial to boosting productivity, he said, as well as financially supporting research opportunities, as breakthroughs in health and social issues would not "happen automatically". Restrictions should be applied to individual high-risk uses, the former United Nations AI policy co-chair said, and by focusing on industries with the highest risks. "A sector-based approach is important because often underlying technology applied in one sector may be perfectly fine - but applied in a sector, like financial services or health care, it is absolutely not," he said. Google announced several AI advancements at its annual developers conference in the United States in May, including plans to build a universal AI assistant and make changes to web searches. But the internet giant's video-generating AI tool Veo 3 arguably grabbed the most attention as it created audio that appeared to come from the mouths of AI-crafted characters. The development, like others in AI video creation, had the potential to make traditional filmmakers nervous, Mr Manyika said. But it could also play an important role as a tool in designing productions rather than replacing them. "Many start with fear and concern but often, when they have actually played with the tools and also been part of ... collaborations we've done ... that's generated a lot of excitement," he said. "Scrappier filmmakers have been thrilled because (they) can do previews with a hundred possibilities and then decide which one (they're) actually going to shoot." The federal government issued voluntary AI rules in September but has not created mandatory guardrails for high-risk AI use. A Senate inquiry made 13 recommendations in November, including introducing a dedicated AI law and ensuring general AI services such as Google Gemini and Open AI's ChatGPT fall beneath it. Australia could miss out on vital health, entertainment and productivity breakthroughs if it introduces rigid artificial intelligence rules rather than taking a balanced approach like some of its neighbours. Google-Alphabet Senior Vice President James Manyika issued the warning while attending an AI summit in Sydney on Tuesday to discuss the technology's potential uses in Australia. The executive also warned the risks of AI misuse were real and its governance would require careful consideration in each industry. His warnings come a day after the Business Council of Australia called for greater support, rules and innovation in AI to boost the nation's productivity, and as the federal government considers regulations following an inquiry. Rules about the use of AI technology vary across the world, from the more restrictive approach of the European Union to the hands-off style adopted in the US. A "two-sided" balance between the risks and rewards of AI - similar to rules adopted by Singapore - should be Australia's goal, Mr Manyika said. "On the one hand, you want to address the risks and complexities that come with this technology, which are quite real, but on the other side, you want regulation that enables all the beneficial applications and possibilities," he told AAP. "Both are important and I'm hoping Australia takes that approach." Allowing businesses to experiment with AI technology would be crucial to boosting productivity, he said, as well as financially supporting research opportunities, as breakthroughs in health and social issues would not "happen automatically". Restrictions should be applied to individual high-risk uses, the former United Nations AI policy co-chair said, and by focusing on industries with the highest risks. "A sector-based approach is important because often underlying technology applied in one sector may be perfectly fine - but applied in a sector, like financial services or health care, it is absolutely not," he said. Google announced several AI advancements at its annual developers conference in the United States in May, including plans to build a universal AI assistant and make changes to web searches. But the internet giant's video-generating AI tool Veo 3 arguably grabbed the most attention as it created audio that appeared to come from the mouths of AI-crafted characters. The development, like others in AI video creation, had the potential to make traditional filmmakers nervous, Mr Manyika said. But it could also play an important role as a tool in designing productions rather than replacing them. "Many start with fear and concern but often, when they have actually played with the tools and also been part of ... collaborations we've done ... that's generated a lot of excitement," he said. "Scrappier filmmakers have been thrilled because (they) can do previews with a hundred possibilities and then decide which one (they're) actually going to shoot." The federal government issued voluntary AI rules in September but has not created mandatory guardrails for high-risk AI use. A Senate inquiry made 13 recommendations in November, including introducing a dedicated AI law and ensuring general AI services such as Google Gemini and Open AI's ChatGPT fall beneath it. Australia could miss out on vital health, entertainment and productivity breakthroughs if it introduces rigid artificial intelligence rules rather than taking a balanced approach like some of its neighbours. Google-Alphabet Senior Vice President James Manyika issued the warning while attending an AI summit in Sydney on Tuesday to discuss the technology's potential uses in Australia. The executive also warned the risks of AI misuse were real and its governance would require careful consideration in each industry. His warnings come a day after the Business Council of Australia called for greater support, rules and innovation in AI to boost the nation's productivity, and as the federal government considers regulations following an inquiry. Rules about the use of AI technology vary across the world, from the more restrictive approach of the European Union to the hands-off style adopted in the US. A "two-sided" balance between the risks and rewards of AI - similar to rules adopted by Singapore - should be Australia's goal, Mr Manyika said. "On the one hand, you want to address the risks and complexities that come with this technology, which are quite real, but on the other side, you want regulation that enables all the beneficial applications and possibilities," he told AAP. "Both are important and I'm hoping Australia takes that approach." Allowing businesses to experiment with AI technology would be crucial to boosting productivity, he said, as well as financially supporting research opportunities, as breakthroughs in health and social issues would not "happen automatically". Restrictions should be applied to individual high-risk uses, the former United Nations AI policy co-chair said, and by focusing on industries with the highest risks. "A sector-based approach is important because often underlying technology applied in one sector may be perfectly fine - but applied in a sector, like financial services or health care, it is absolutely not," he said. Google announced several AI advancements at its annual developers conference in the United States in May, including plans to build a universal AI assistant and make changes to web searches. But the internet giant's video-generating AI tool Veo 3 arguably grabbed the most attention as it created audio that appeared to come from the mouths of AI-crafted characters. The development, like others in AI video creation, had the potential to make traditional filmmakers nervous, Mr Manyika said. But it could also play an important role as a tool in designing productions rather than replacing them. "Many start with fear and concern but often, when they have actually played with the tools and also been part of ... collaborations we've done ... that's generated a lot of excitement," he said. "Scrappier filmmakers have been thrilled because (they) can do previews with a hundred possibilities and then decide which one (they're) actually going to shoot." The federal government issued voluntary AI rules in September but has not created mandatory guardrails for high-risk AI use. A Senate inquiry made 13 recommendations in November, including introducing a dedicated AI law and ensuring general AI services such as Google Gemini and Open AI's ChatGPT fall beneath it. Australia could miss out on vital health, entertainment and productivity breakthroughs if it introduces rigid artificial intelligence rules rather than taking a balanced approach like some of its neighbours. Google-Alphabet Senior Vice President James Manyika issued the warning while attending an AI summit in Sydney on Tuesday to discuss the technology's potential uses in Australia. The executive also warned the risks of AI misuse were real and its governance would require careful consideration in each industry. His warnings come a day after the Business Council of Australia called for greater support, rules and innovation in AI to boost the nation's productivity, and as the federal government considers regulations following an inquiry. Rules about the use of AI technology vary across the world, from the more restrictive approach of the European Union to the hands-off style adopted in the US. A "two-sided" balance between the risks and rewards of AI - similar to rules adopted by Singapore - should be Australia's goal, Mr Manyika said. "On the one hand, you want to address the risks and complexities that come with this technology, which are quite real, but on the other side, you want regulation that enables all the beneficial applications and possibilities," he told AAP. "Both are important and I'm hoping Australia takes that approach." Allowing businesses to experiment with AI technology would be crucial to boosting productivity, he said, as well as financially supporting research opportunities, as breakthroughs in health and social issues would not "happen automatically". Restrictions should be applied to individual high-risk uses, the former United Nations AI policy co-chair said, and by focusing on industries with the highest risks. "A sector-based approach is important because often underlying technology applied in one sector may be perfectly fine - but applied in a sector, like financial services or health care, it is absolutely not," he said. Google announced several AI advancements at its annual developers conference in the United States in May, including plans to build a universal AI assistant and make changes to web searches. But the internet giant's video-generating AI tool Veo 3 arguably grabbed the most attention as it created audio that appeared to come from the mouths of AI-crafted characters. The development, like others in AI video creation, had the potential to make traditional filmmakers nervous, Mr Manyika said. But it could also play an important role as a tool in designing productions rather than replacing them. "Many start with fear and concern but often, when they have actually played with the tools and also been part of ... collaborations we've done ... that's generated a lot of excitement," he said. "Scrappier filmmakers have been thrilled because (they) can do previews with a hundred possibilities and then decide which one (they're) actually going to shoot." The federal government issued voluntary AI rules in September but has not created mandatory guardrails for high-risk AI use. A Senate inquiry made 13 recommendations in November, including introducing a dedicated AI law and ensuring general AI services such as Google Gemini and Open AI's ChatGPT fall beneath it.
9 News
2 hours ago
- 9 News
Something 'unusual' has happened to the Australian dollar
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here The financial uncertainty around Donald Trump's tariffs has had an "unusual" impact on the Australian dollar even as it weighs on global markets, according to the Reserve Bank . The Aussie plummeted in the aftermath of Trump's so-called "liberation day" announcement, dropping below 60 US cents for the first time since the pandemic. While a blow, particularly for Australians overseas who suddenly were getting less value for money on their travels, that was largely in line with historical trends. The Australian dollar is behaving unusually nearly two months after Donald Trump's tariff announcements. (Fairfax Media) "When the outlook for global growth weakens, the Australian dollar typically depreciates as investors expect our economy to be buffeted by the global headwinds," RBA assistant governor Sarah Hunter said in a speech to the Economic Society of Australia in Brisbane today. "When global investors are worried, they tend to focus on reducing risk exposure, moving their capital to low-risk assets in countries like the United States, Switzerland and Japan," she added. However, the dollar has since rebounded, bouncing between 64 and 65 US cents over the last month or so – more than it was buying before the tariffs were unveiled – and improving against other currencies tied to the greenback. That, Hunter said, is "more unusual", but appears down to what's happening to the US dollar more than a particular strength in the Aussie. "The weakness in the US dollar during a period of heightened risk is in contrast with many previous episodes, though it's too early to know whether this dynamic will continue," she said. "On average, the price of our exports in foreign currency terms hasn't changed. The so-called "liberation day" saw the Australian dollar plunge, but it's since sharply rebounded. (AP) "But the relative move of capital towards Australian assets compared to the United States... could support domestic investment activity. "We'll be monitoring how these channels play out over time." More broadly, Hunter said the uncertainty caused by Trump's volatile trade policy could lead to households delaying spending and businesses pushing back hiring and investment plans, and could also push down prices, although she said the RBA "can't be completely sure" about the overall impact. CONTACT US Auto news: Google Gemini AI assistant coming to new cars in 2025.
