logo
Could there be a second election in the nail-biter seat of Bradfield?

Could there be a second election in the nail-biter seat of Bradfield?

Australian elections often throw up ultra-tight contests. But this year's battle for the seat of Bradfield on Sydney's north shore has been a roller coaster ride from the start.
More than four weeks after election day, only a few votes separated Liberal hopeful Gisele Kapterian and teal independent Nicolette Boele. A recount is ongoing, but even that may not end in a candidate emerging victorious. There is a growing consensus that Bradfield could be headed back to the polls for a byelection.
How did we get here?
On election night it appeared Boele, who almost seized Bradfield in 2022, had won the seat on her second attempt, although she stopped short of claiming victory. Late that night, Boele led by almost 700 votes and many news outlets, including the ABC, called the electorate for her.
As counting progressed, Boele's lead evaporated. A week after polling day, it seemed Kapterian had built an insurmountable advantage; several media organisations called the seat for the Liberals on May 12. But then Kapterian's buffer was whittled away and the lead changed again.
When the initial count concluded, Kapterian was up by just eight votes and the Australian Electoral Commission ordered a recount. (It is AEC policy to do this if the final margin in a seat is fewer than 100 votes.)
After more than a week of recounting, the result is still up in the air. At 2.30pm on Monday, live results published on the AEC's website showed Boele ahead by 20 votes, although the commission says this online tally 'is just a point in time figure and shouldn't be taken as instructive about the final result'.
The full recount is expected to finish 'late this week'.
What happens if the recount ends in a tie?
Acting electoral commissioner Jeff Pope has said that in the event of a tie in Bradfield, the AEC would refer the result to the Court of Disputed Returns, which could order a byelection.
Whatever happens in the count, Kapterian or Boele or any voter enrolled in Bradfield could petition the Court of Disputed Returns to overturn the result.
Electoral analyst Ben Raue, who publishes the Tally Room website, believes a legal challenge to the result in Bradfield is 'pretty likely at this point' given the tiny margin.
Raue believes a new election to decide Bradfield would be justified should the two-candidate preferred gap between Kapterian and Boele remain as close as it was in the initial count.
'I think there is a point where you get to where an election is so close that you can't actually be sure who has won,' he said.
Electoral analyst and editor of the Poll Bludger website, William Bowe says trends in the recount so far suggest Boele will end up with a narrow lead once the recount is finished. He estimates the recount has cut a total of 82 votes from Kapterian's tally, after preferences, compared with 62 taken from Boele's total by late on Saturday. This has been due to recounted votes having been deemed to be informal.
Loading
But Bowe also expects the courts will be called on to adjudicate given the wafer-thin margin.
'I wouldn't blame either candidate for challenging it,' he said. 'Why wouldn't you roll the dice again?'
Until recently, Bradfield had been considered a blue ribbon Liberal stronghold; Bowe says that makes a challenge from the party likely should Kapterian fall short.
'The Liberal Party will not want to lose that seat because they'll be worried they'd never get it back again,' he said.
Bowe believes 'there's a very big chance that the margin will be so small that the court will say there has to be a fresh election'.
What is the Court of Disputed Returns?
The High Court sits as the Court of Disputed Returns, which has the power, under the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918, to rule on the validity of federal elections.
According to constitutional law expert Professor Anne Twomey, the court 'has very limited powers in relation to elections'. It can declare that candidates who were returned as elected were not elected. It can declare that other candidates were duly elected. The court can also declare an election to be absolutely void.
A petition is a formal legal document asking the court to investigate the election, conduct inquiries and potentially overturn the result. It must be lodged within 40 days of the writs being returned.
In the case of this election, the writs must be returned by July 9. This technically means if a candidate is declared the winner by the AEC, they could take their seat in federal parliament while the court considers the petition, although it would be a bold and unlikely move. (That said, Kapterian has already voted in the Liberal Party leadership ballot and Liberal leader Sussan Ley has given her a shadow ministry position.)
Twomey says the petition must be able to point to evidence of irregularities in the election, such as the electoral commissioner wrongly ruling votes formal or informal, or proof that people voted twice.
Bowe says it is common for a handful of voters to cast two ballots in each federal electorate.
Has the court ordered a byelection in other tight races?
The closest election victory in history was in the 1919 race for the Victorian seat of Ballarat (then spelt Ballaarat), in which Nationalist candidate Edwin Kerby finished just one vote ahead of Labor's Charles McGrath. McGrath challenged the result over electoral irregularities in the Court of Disputed Returns, which ordered a byelection.
Loading
McGrath won the rematch with a swing of 6.1 per cent.
The court has also declared other election battles void, including Western Australia's half-Senate election in 2013, when on the initial counts, the final two seats would have gone to the Palmer United Party and Labor but on the recount, they went to the Australian Sports Party and the Greens.
In a major twist, it was discovered that about 1370 ballots had gone missing, so the recount could not be properly completed. The electoral commission chief petitioned the Court of Disputed Returns to declare the election void.
What would a byelection in Bradfield look like?
If the battle for Bradfield ends with the election being declared void, voters in the seat will need to go back to the ballot box for a byelection.
That byelection does not need to replicate the initial poll, which means it could be a two-horse race (Kapterian v Boele) if other candidates or parties do not want to run again. It is likely that Labor, which finished third in Bradfield with 22,777 votes, would not run again.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Great concern': Future of Tassie Devils at risk amid political turmoil
‘Great concern': Future of Tassie Devils at risk amid political turmoil

The Age

time25 minutes ago

  • The Age

‘Great concern': Future of Tassie Devils at risk amid political turmoil

Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff is facing a no-confidence motion after increasing heat over his party's financial management and plans for a new AFL stadium in Hobart. The state Liberal premier's grip on power appears to be sliding, with Labor ready to pull the trigger on a no-confidence motion on Wednesday morning if it has the parliamentary numbers. The Tasmania Football Club, known as the Devils, has expressed 'great concern' over the political uncertainty enveloping the Tasmanian government. 'The political uncertainty that is currently unfolding in the Tasmanian Parliament is of great concern to Tasmania Football Club,' Tasmania Football Club said in a statement on social media. 'Like the rest of the community, we are unsure what will happen today and what the impacts of any actions taken might be. What we do know is that uncertainty presents a serious risk for jobs, investment and growth, and for the future of Tasmania Football Club. 'Tasmania Football Club remains steadfast on building a club for all Tasmanians. We are also steadfast on staying out of politics. We ask that our political leaders understand the implications of their actions and decisions on the future of our state for all Tasmanians, a future which we know Tasmania Football Club can play a significant part.' Last week's Tasmanian state budget predicted debt would more than double to $10.8 billion in four years' time with deficits each year. The Liberals, who have been in power since 2014, are governing with a minority of just 14 of 35 seats in the lower house.

Coalition angry over super changes, Labor up for talks
Coalition angry over super changes, Labor up for talks

The Advertiser

timean hour ago

  • The Advertiser

Coalition angry over super changes, Labor up for talks

The federal coalition has drawn a red line on the government's plan to double the tax on superannuation balances above $3 million, as the prime minister welcomes possible negotiations. Labor plans to double the concessional tax rate on the proportion of superannuation balances above that level, to 30 per cent. The policy was formulated after Treasury noticed a small number of people appeared to be using the system as a tax reduction strategy rather than solely for their retirement, as intended. An aspect of the policy, to tax unrealised capital gains on those very large accounts, has proven contentious. Many are set up under self-managed super fund structures. Unrealised gains are 'paper profits' - increases in the value of assets such as properties or shares that haven't been cashed in. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has described the proposed change, first flagged more than two years ago and which is still before the Senate, as "modest". "What this change is about, it's about making concessional treatment for people with very large superannuation balances still concessional but a little bit less so," he said last month. "In terms of the calculation of unrealised gains, that's actually not unique in the system. "And if you make a loss you can carry the loss forward." Nationals senator Matt Canavan said taxing unrealised gains was a major sticking point for the coalition. "There's no way in hell we'll support attacks on people that don't have the means to pay for it," he told Nine's Today show on Wednesday. "This so-called tax on unrealised gains is incredibly unfair." Tax on unrealised gains is already part of the Australian tax system and is, for example, paid under land tax regimes. Greens Leader Larissa Waters told Nine her party, which holds the balance of power in the Senate, believes the threshold should apply to balances above $2 million, rather than $3 million. "It's important to remember that I reckon nobody watching your show would be impacted by this tax," she said. "It would touch only half a per cent of people - we are talking about folk who have an awful lot of money in their super accounts - that is not ordinary people." On Tuesday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said that if the coalition was willing to negotiate a deal on the changes, then that was "good". "I welcome the fact that they're saying that they won't just say no to everything from the very beginning but we'll, of course, talk to people in the Senate." Mr Albanese noted that some super accounts are worth more than $100 million. "That's not really to provide for an adequate retirement, is it?" he told Perth radio 6PR. The federal coalition has drawn a red line on the government's plan to double the tax on superannuation balances above $3 million, as the prime minister welcomes possible negotiations. Labor plans to double the concessional tax rate on the proportion of superannuation balances above that level, to 30 per cent. The policy was formulated after Treasury noticed a small number of people appeared to be using the system as a tax reduction strategy rather than solely for their retirement, as intended. An aspect of the policy, to tax unrealised capital gains on those very large accounts, has proven contentious. Many are set up under self-managed super fund structures. Unrealised gains are 'paper profits' - increases in the value of assets such as properties or shares that haven't been cashed in. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has described the proposed change, first flagged more than two years ago and which is still before the Senate, as "modest". "What this change is about, it's about making concessional treatment for people with very large superannuation balances still concessional but a little bit less so," he said last month. "In terms of the calculation of unrealised gains, that's actually not unique in the system. "And if you make a loss you can carry the loss forward." Nationals senator Matt Canavan said taxing unrealised gains was a major sticking point for the coalition. "There's no way in hell we'll support attacks on people that don't have the means to pay for it," he told Nine's Today show on Wednesday. "This so-called tax on unrealised gains is incredibly unfair." Tax on unrealised gains is already part of the Australian tax system and is, for example, paid under land tax regimes. Greens Leader Larissa Waters told Nine her party, which holds the balance of power in the Senate, believes the threshold should apply to balances above $2 million, rather than $3 million. "It's important to remember that I reckon nobody watching your show would be impacted by this tax," she said. "It would touch only half a per cent of people - we are talking about folk who have an awful lot of money in their super accounts - that is not ordinary people." On Tuesday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said that if the coalition was willing to negotiate a deal on the changes, then that was "good". "I welcome the fact that they're saying that they won't just say no to everything from the very beginning but we'll, of course, talk to people in the Senate." Mr Albanese noted that some super accounts are worth more than $100 million. "That's not really to provide for an adequate retirement, is it?" he told Perth radio 6PR. The federal coalition has drawn a red line on the government's plan to double the tax on superannuation balances above $3 million, as the prime minister welcomes possible negotiations. Labor plans to double the concessional tax rate on the proportion of superannuation balances above that level, to 30 per cent. The policy was formulated after Treasury noticed a small number of people appeared to be using the system as a tax reduction strategy rather than solely for their retirement, as intended. An aspect of the policy, to tax unrealised capital gains on those very large accounts, has proven contentious. Many are set up under self-managed super fund structures. Unrealised gains are 'paper profits' - increases in the value of assets such as properties or shares that haven't been cashed in. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has described the proposed change, first flagged more than two years ago and which is still before the Senate, as "modest". "What this change is about, it's about making concessional treatment for people with very large superannuation balances still concessional but a little bit less so," he said last month. "In terms of the calculation of unrealised gains, that's actually not unique in the system. "And if you make a loss you can carry the loss forward." Nationals senator Matt Canavan said taxing unrealised gains was a major sticking point for the coalition. "There's no way in hell we'll support attacks on people that don't have the means to pay for it," he told Nine's Today show on Wednesday. "This so-called tax on unrealised gains is incredibly unfair." Tax on unrealised gains is already part of the Australian tax system and is, for example, paid under land tax regimes. Greens Leader Larissa Waters told Nine her party, which holds the balance of power in the Senate, believes the threshold should apply to balances above $2 million, rather than $3 million. "It's important to remember that I reckon nobody watching your show would be impacted by this tax," she said. "It would touch only half a per cent of people - we are talking about folk who have an awful lot of money in their super accounts - that is not ordinary people." On Tuesday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said that if the coalition was willing to negotiate a deal on the changes, then that was "good". "I welcome the fact that they're saying that they won't just say no to everything from the very beginning but we'll, of course, talk to people in the Senate." Mr Albanese noted that some super accounts are worth more than $100 million. "That's not really to provide for an adequate retirement, is it?" he told Perth radio 6PR. The federal coalition has drawn a red line on the government's plan to double the tax on superannuation balances above $3 million, as the prime minister welcomes possible negotiations. Labor plans to double the concessional tax rate on the proportion of superannuation balances above that level, to 30 per cent. The policy was formulated after Treasury noticed a small number of people appeared to be using the system as a tax reduction strategy rather than solely for their retirement, as intended. An aspect of the policy, to tax unrealised capital gains on those very large accounts, has proven contentious. Many are set up under self-managed super fund structures. Unrealised gains are 'paper profits' - increases in the value of assets such as properties or shares that haven't been cashed in. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has described the proposed change, first flagged more than two years ago and which is still before the Senate, as "modest". "What this change is about, it's about making concessional treatment for people with very large superannuation balances still concessional but a little bit less so," he said last month. "In terms of the calculation of unrealised gains, that's actually not unique in the system. "And if you make a loss you can carry the loss forward." Nationals senator Matt Canavan said taxing unrealised gains was a major sticking point for the coalition. "There's no way in hell we'll support attacks on people that don't have the means to pay for it," he told Nine's Today show on Wednesday. "This so-called tax on unrealised gains is incredibly unfair." Tax on unrealised gains is already part of the Australian tax system and is, for example, paid under land tax regimes. Greens Leader Larissa Waters told Nine her party, which holds the balance of power in the Senate, believes the threshold should apply to balances above $2 million, rather than $3 million. "It's important to remember that I reckon nobody watching your show would be impacted by this tax," she said. "It would touch only half a per cent of people - we are talking about folk who have an awful lot of money in their super accounts - that is not ordinary people." On Tuesday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said that if the coalition was willing to negotiate a deal on the changes, then that was "good". "I welcome the fact that they're saying that they won't just say no to everything from the very beginning but we'll, of course, talk to people in the Senate." Mr Albanese noted that some super accounts are worth more than $100 million. "That's not really to provide for an adequate retirement, is it?" he told Perth radio 6PR.

World Environment Day asks us to help turn the tide on plastic in the ocean
World Environment Day asks us to help turn the tide on plastic in the ocean

The Advertiser

timean hour ago

  • The Advertiser

World Environment Day asks us to help turn the tide on plastic in the ocean

Every minute, more than 250 kilograms of plastic enter the Australian environment, that's about 145,000 tonnes each year. The Australian Marine Conservation Society (AMCS) is the voice for Australia's oceans. Their plastics campaign manager, Cip Hamilton, said plastic pollution is causing unnecessary devastation to our marine life. "Every marine species has encountered plastic pollution, and none of the impacts are positive. It's entangling turtles, suffocating corals and starving seagulls," she said. "We recently saw a 90-day-old seabird chick over on Lord Howe Island with over 400 pieces of plastic in its stomach - the researchers could feel the crunch of plastic beneath their fingers as they handled the birds. This is not normal. This is not okay. We urgently need more action." The AMCS is calling for more to be done to stop plastic pollution at the source. "Corporations must be financially accountable for the packaging they place on our shelves and, importantly, we need government regulation to decrease the tidal wave of plastics that is inundating our beaches and oceans," Cip said. "We have a petition running calling for the Australian government to finalise a strong global plastics treaty, and we're also running a survey asking customers to compare the price of loose and packaged produce at the supermarkets. Last year, we found that 70 per cent of the time, it was more expensive to buy loose items than pre-packaged, so we're calling on customers to help us uncover these practices, and we'll use these results in our 2025 audit." If you want to add your voice to help reduce plastic pollution, you can sign the Strong Global Plastics Treaty petition available on You can also take part in the 2025 shopper survey by signing up on the Plastic Investigation Unit page. Plastic Free July is a global movement that empowers millions to be part of the solution to plastic pollution. If you want to take the challenge, you can find ideas at World Environment Day is the United Nations' biggest global platform for environmental awareness and action, celebrated every year on June 5. This year, the focus is on ending plastic pollution, with communities around the world encouraged to implement and advocate for lasting solutions to #BeatPlasticPollution. The global celebrations will be hosted by the Republic of Korea. Over the past 28 years, the country has made remarkable progress in improving water and air quality, managing chemicals safely, and protecting and restoring ecosystems. While plastic pollution is a major concern, it's also one we can solve. You can find more information by visiting Every minute, more than 250 kilograms of plastic enter the Australian environment, that's about 145,000 tonnes each year. The Australian Marine Conservation Society (AMCS) is the voice for Australia's oceans. Their plastics campaign manager, Cip Hamilton, said plastic pollution is causing unnecessary devastation to our marine life. "Every marine species has encountered plastic pollution, and none of the impacts are positive. It's entangling turtles, suffocating corals and starving seagulls," she said. "We recently saw a 90-day-old seabird chick over on Lord Howe Island with over 400 pieces of plastic in its stomach - the researchers could feel the crunch of plastic beneath their fingers as they handled the birds. This is not normal. This is not okay. We urgently need more action." The AMCS is calling for more to be done to stop plastic pollution at the source. "Corporations must be financially accountable for the packaging they place on our shelves and, importantly, we need government regulation to decrease the tidal wave of plastics that is inundating our beaches and oceans," Cip said. "We have a petition running calling for the Australian government to finalise a strong global plastics treaty, and we're also running a survey asking customers to compare the price of loose and packaged produce at the supermarkets. Last year, we found that 70 per cent of the time, it was more expensive to buy loose items than pre-packaged, so we're calling on customers to help us uncover these practices, and we'll use these results in our 2025 audit." If you want to add your voice to help reduce plastic pollution, you can sign the Strong Global Plastics Treaty petition available on You can also take part in the 2025 shopper survey by signing up on the Plastic Investigation Unit page. Plastic Free July is a global movement that empowers millions to be part of the solution to plastic pollution. If you want to take the challenge, you can find ideas at World Environment Day is the United Nations' biggest global platform for environmental awareness and action, celebrated every year on June 5. This year, the focus is on ending plastic pollution, with communities around the world encouraged to implement and advocate for lasting solutions to #BeatPlasticPollution. The global celebrations will be hosted by the Republic of Korea. Over the past 28 years, the country has made remarkable progress in improving water and air quality, managing chemicals safely, and protecting and restoring ecosystems. While plastic pollution is a major concern, it's also one we can solve. You can find more information by visiting Every minute, more than 250 kilograms of plastic enter the Australian environment, that's about 145,000 tonnes each year. The Australian Marine Conservation Society (AMCS) is the voice for Australia's oceans. Their plastics campaign manager, Cip Hamilton, said plastic pollution is causing unnecessary devastation to our marine life. "Every marine species has encountered plastic pollution, and none of the impacts are positive. It's entangling turtles, suffocating corals and starving seagulls," she said. "We recently saw a 90-day-old seabird chick over on Lord Howe Island with over 400 pieces of plastic in its stomach - the researchers could feel the crunch of plastic beneath their fingers as they handled the birds. This is not normal. This is not okay. We urgently need more action." The AMCS is calling for more to be done to stop plastic pollution at the source. "Corporations must be financially accountable for the packaging they place on our shelves and, importantly, we need government regulation to decrease the tidal wave of plastics that is inundating our beaches and oceans," Cip said. "We have a petition running calling for the Australian government to finalise a strong global plastics treaty, and we're also running a survey asking customers to compare the price of loose and packaged produce at the supermarkets. Last year, we found that 70 per cent of the time, it was more expensive to buy loose items than pre-packaged, so we're calling on customers to help us uncover these practices, and we'll use these results in our 2025 audit." If you want to add your voice to help reduce plastic pollution, you can sign the Strong Global Plastics Treaty petition available on You can also take part in the 2025 shopper survey by signing up on the Plastic Investigation Unit page. Plastic Free July is a global movement that empowers millions to be part of the solution to plastic pollution. If you want to take the challenge, you can find ideas at World Environment Day is the United Nations' biggest global platform for environmental awareness and action, celebrated every year on June 5. This year, the focus is on ending plastic pollution, with communities around the world encouraged to implement and advocate for lasting solutions to #BeatPlasticPollution. The global celebrations will be hosted by the Republic of Korea. Over the past 28 years, the country has made remarkable progress in improving water and air quality, managing chemicals safely, and protecting and restoring ecosystems. While plastic pollution is a major concern, it's also one we can solve. You can find more information by visiting Every minute, more than 250 kilograms of plastic enter the Australian environment, that's about 145,000 tonnes each year. The Australian Marine Conservation Society (AMCS) is the voice for Australia's oceans. Their plastics campaign manager, Cip Hamilton, said plastic pollution is causing unnecessary devastation to our marine life. "Every marine species has encountered plastic pollution, and none of the impacts are positive. It's entangling turtles, suffocating corals and starving seagulls," she said. "We recently saw a 90-day-old seabird chick over on Lord Howe Island with over 400 pieces of plastic in its stomach - the researchers could feel the crunch of plastic beneath their fingers as they handled the birds. This is not normal. This is not okay. We urgently need more action." The AMCS is calling for more to be done to stop plastic pollution at the source. "Corporations must be financially accountable for the packaging they place on our shelves and, importantly, we need government regulation to decrease the tidal wave of plastics that is inundating our beaches and oceans," Cip said. "We have a petition running calling for the Australian government to finalise a strong global plastics treaty, and we're also running a survey asking customers to compare the price of loose and packaged produce at the supermarkets. Last year, we found that 70 per cent of the time, it was more expensive to buy loose items than pre-packaged, so we're calling on customers to help us uncover these practices, and we'll use these results in our 2025 audit." If you want to add your voice to help reduce plastic pollution, you can sign the Strong Global Plastics Treaty petition available on You can also take part in the 2025 shopper survey by signing up on the Plastic Investigation Unit page. Plastic Free July is a global movement that empowers millions to be part of the solution to plastic pollution. If you want to take the challenge, you can find ideas at World Environment Day is the United Nations' biggest global platform for environmental awareness and action, celebrated every year on June 5. This year, the focus is on ending plastic pollution, with communities around the world encouraged to implement and advocate for lasting solutions to #BeatPlasticPollution. The global celebrations will be hosted by the Republic of Korea. Over the past 28 years, the country has made remarkable progress in improving water and air quality, managing chemicals safely, and protecting and restoring ecosystems. While plastic pollution is a major concern, it's also one we can solve. You can find more information by visiting

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store