Elon Musk's big win over Australia
The ruling, delivered on Tuesday evening, rescinds a takedown order issued by eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant over a controversial social media post on X from February 2024.
In the post, Mr Elston slammed the proposed appointment of Mr Cook, a biological female, to a World Health Organisation panel on healthcare delivery.
Mr Elston, who goes by the X name Billboard Chris, took aim at WHO's panel of experts hired to draft policy regarding trans people while also misgendering Mr Cook.
The post reads: 'This woman (yes, she's female) is part of a panel of 20 'experts' hired by the WHO to draft their policy on caring for 'trans people'. People who belong in psychiatric wards are writing the guidelines for people who belong in psychiatric wards.'
Ms Grant labelled the remarks 'degrading' and issued a takedown notice to X on March 22, threatening the company with a fine of up to $782,500 for any refusal to remove the post.
X complied and the post was blocked, but the company and Mr Elston filed a legal challenge against the notice, and on Tuesday evening, ART deputy president O'Donovan ruled in their favour, setting aside the removal order. The post from Billboard Chris about Mry Cook that was subject to the takedown notice. Administrative Review Tribunal Credit: News Corp Australia
'The post, although phrased offensively, is consistent with views Mr Elston has expressed elsewhere in circumstances where the expression of the view had no malicious intent,' Mr O'Donovan said.
'For example, his statement placed on billboards that he is prepared to wear in public 'children are never born in the wrong body' expresses the same idea about the immutability of biology that he expresses, albeit much more provocatively, in the post.
'When the evidence is considered as a whole, I am not satisfied that an ordinary reasonable person would conclude that by making the post Mr Elston intended to cause Mr Cook serious harm.'
Mr O'Donovan also said there was no evidence Mr Elston intended for Mr Cook to read or receive the post.
'In the absence of any evidence that Mr Elston intended that Mr Cook would receive and read the post, and in light of the broader explanation as to why Mr Elston made the post, I am satisfied that an ordinary reasonable person would not conclude that it is likely that the post was intended to have an effect of causing serious harm to Mr Cook,' the ruling reads. Australia's eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant issued the takedown notice in March 2024. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia
The ruling centred around the Online Safety Act, which offers a reporting scheme for adult cyber abuse.
The Act defines adult cyber abuse as material targeting a particular Australian adult that is both intended to cause serious harm and is also menacing, harassing or offensive in all circumstances.
If the material meets both of these two criteria, eSafety holds the power to order its removal.
The ruling has been heralded in some quarters as a victory for freedom of speech.
Victorian Liberal parliamentarian Moira Deeming celebrated the ruling on X, writing, 'Wow! Than you Billboard Chris and Elon Musk.'
Alliance Defending Freedom International executive director Paul Coleman called the ruling a 'decisive win' for free speech.
'In this case, the Australian government alarmingly censored the peaceful expression of a Canadian citizen on an American-owned platform, evidence of the expansive reach of censorial forces, even beyond national borders,' he said.
'This is a victory not just for Billboard Chris but for every Australian – and indeed every citizen who values the fundamental right to free speech.'
Mr Cook was formerly ACON's director of LGBTQ+ community health.
The eSafety Commission has been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
15 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Australia urged to adopt new approach to global talks
Australia has been told to develop a clear vision for foreign policy as it attempts to navigate an unpredictable relationship with the United States. The future of defence spending, tariffs and Australia's nuclear submarine agreement with the US and UK remain unclear after Foreign Minister Penny Wong's meeting with Secretary of State Marco Rubio in Washington. Australia's military budget did not even come up in conversation, according to Senator Wong, despite previous US calls for Australia to lift its defence spending. While the other two topics were discussed, there was little sign negotiations had progressed. The government needed to outline a clear direction, La Trobe University's international relations emeritus professor Joseph Camilleri said. "What Australian governments - this one included - struggle with is a lack of coherent foreign policy and that then shows itself in these meetings," he told AAP. Australia should instead clarify how its relationship with the US relates to its Southeast Asian neighbours on one hand, and with China on the other, and that could trickle through to the position the government takes on issues like the war in Ukraine, conflict in Gaza and tensions between Israel and Iran. But there were considerable differences in perspectives and views the government hadn't been able to handle coherently, according to Professor Camilleri. "It just tries to deal with foreign policy as best it can in small pieces," he said. "They are hemmed in by powerful pressures on different sides and to think through a coherent alternative would require a very bold initiative. "Most governments, this one included, are not taken to bold initiatives." There are interests within the US, including intelligence, security and military agencies, and in Australia, such as the coalition, that are committed to the alliance. "We need a real focus on this alliance - it's crucial to our prosperity, to our security as a country," opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said. However, Australian voters' declining trust in the US under its Republican president was made clear at the federal election in May, where Donald Trump's volatility appeared to contribute to Labor's landslide win. When asked if the US remained a reliable partner while led by Mr Trump, Senator Wong said Australia understood he had a "different view of how America is to be in the world". "We respect that, we also recognise how important our relationship is and we believe that is understood here in Washington," she said. "(This) is a relationship where the alliance has been in the hands of governments of both political persuasions and it will always be so."
Sydney Morning Herald
4 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Chinese electric car giant races ahead of Tesla in Australia
Chinese electric car giant BYD sold a record number of vehicles in Australia last month, reflecting its aggressive local expansion campaign, the growing appeal of cheaper electric cars and the sinking popularity of Elon Musk's Tesla. Yet-to-be-filed sales figures show Australians bought more than 8000 new BYD vehicles in June, a 350 per cent increase compared with the same time last year, eclipsing the company's previous monthly record of 4811 local sales in March. The result widens BYD's lead over its biggest rival, Tesla, which on Wednesday reported the sales of 4589 vehicles in Australia for June, which is a drop of 2 per cent versus the same month last year, and a 39 per cent year-to-date decline. So far this year, BYD has sold about 23,000 vehicles in Australia, while Tesla has sold 14,146. BYD's blockbuster monthly result highlights the Shenzhen-based vehicle giant's rising popularity in Australia since launching two years ago. Aggressive pricing and an emphasis on design have fuelled BYD's ambitious plan to take on Tesla for the top spot on the Australian electric vehicle sales charts. Loading While Tesla has been the best-selling electric car brand for years, its sales have been sliding globally as motorists embrace cheaper Chinese models. Meanwhile, the Tesla brand has suffered intense backlash because of chief executive Elon Musk's involvement with right-wing politics and Donald Trump's administration in the United States. BYD's goal is to become one of Australia's top-five automotive brands as it expands its product range and aims to double its local dealership network in the coming year. In January, it launched its first plug-in hybrid electric ute, the Shark 6, which retails for $57,900 before on-road costs and is aimed at snatching market share from Australia's top-selling utes, the Toyota Hilux and Ford Ranger.
Sydney Morning Herald
4 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Never mind the economy, climate change is bad for the health
Your article (' Pocock springs test on fate of future children ', July 31) quotes Anthony Albanese, saying that rejecting any moratorium on new fossil fuel projects is 'disastrous for the economy'. Try telling that to the Greeks, or to the 33 million victims of the Pakistani floods in March, or to the flood and fire victims of the eastern half of Australia over recent years. Not only were these events 'disastrous for the economy', but at what cost to human health and welfare and to the environment? Bring on the moratorium. We cannot afford not to. Hugh Barrett, Sanctuary Point May the noise made by the main parties not drown out the sane and sensible discussion in federal decision-making. Changed thinking and behaviours are needed about the approval and assistance provided to fossil fuel projects. When community and expert concern and worsening outlooks concerning 'global boiling' are being raised time and time again, stronger federal leadership is needed. The public values considerations that go well beyond party-political eyes being focused on getting past the next election and maintaining sources of donations, and the current yet still modest 2030 and 2050 emissions reduction targets. Sue Dyer, Downer (ACT) Pocock's bill to force legislators to consider the impact on future generations of new fossil fuel licences will be unpopular with Labor if it threatens new coal and gas, which Labor relies on for revenue and to contain energy prices. It throws up in stark relief whether future generations must be considered against winning the next election. It seems surprising that it needs legislation. I was under the naive assumption that governments should consider all our welfare in any legislation anyway. Or is it only those who can afford lobbyists who are considered? The independents are doing a good job of forcing government to face up to difficult issues. Gary Barnes, Mosman Pocock says we have a 'moral duty to young people and future generations'. The burden on the youngest members of our society is not just logistical, it is an overwhelming emotional burden. Today's children and young people with whom I work as an occupational therapist are more anxious (scared, fearful, despondent) than this group have been in the last thirty years – and it is over climate. The rest of the article makes it clear that the federal Labor government is trying to shrink the scale of the task in our eyes. Their attempt to displace the emotional burden they promised to take up when they entered office is hurting our children right now. Jo Jackson King, Gidgegannup (WA)
