&w=3840&q=100)
Israeli nationalists march in Jerusalem, chant anti-Arab slogans, storm UN compound
Israeli youths argue with police during a march marking Jerusalem Day, an Israeli holiday celebrating the capture of east Jerusalem in the 1967 Mideast war, in Jerusalem's Old City, Monday, May 26, 2025. (AP Photo)
Young ultranationalist Israelis marched through Muslim quarters of Jerusalem's Old City on Monday, chanting 'Death to Arabs' and 'May your village burn,' hours before the start of the annual Jerusalem Day parade.
The event commemorates Israel's capture of East Jerusalem in the 1967 war, but its nationalist overtones and history of incitement have long made it a flashpoint for Israeli-Palestinian tensions.
In anticipation of the march, Palestinian shopkeepers shuttered early and Israeli police lined the narrow alleyways of the Old City. At one point, a police officer was seen warmly greeting a marcher, highlighting the celebratory tone among participants, despite the heavy police presence.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Meanwhile, a group of Israeli demonstrators, including a sitting member of parliament, forcefully entered a compound belonging to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) in east Jerusalem. The UN compound, mostly empty since January due to security threats, remains under UN ownership and is protected by international law. UNRWA's West Bank coordinator Roland Friedrich said Israeli lawmaker Yulia Malinovsky was among those who climbed over the gate in view of Israeli police. Authorities offered no immediate comment.
Jerusalem lies at the heart of the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians, who each see the city as a key part of their national and religious identity. It is one of the most intractable issues of the conflict and often emerges as a flashpoint.
Last year's procession, which came during the first year of the war in Gaza, saw ultranationalist Israelis attack a Palestinian journalist in the Old City and call for violence against Palestinians. Four years ago, the march helped set off an 11-day war in Gaza.
Tour buses carrying young ultranationalist Jews lined up near entrances to the Old City, bringing hundreds from outside Jerusalem, including settlements in the Israeli-occupied West Bank.
Police said they would maintain order and urged the public to refrain from taunting and violence. Volunteers from the pro-peace organizations Standing Together and Free Jerusalem tried to position themselves between the marchers and residents to prevent violence.
'This is our home, this is our state,' shouted one protester at a Palestinian woman.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'Go away from here!' she responded, in Hebrew.
Increased Jewish visits to a flashpoint holy site Israel's far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, who oversees the country's police force, visited a flashpoint hilltop compound holy to Jews and Muslims, where the Al Aqsa Mosque and the Dome of the Rock are located today. One Israeli lawmaker, Yitzhak Kroizer, could be seen praying.
Perceived encroachments by Jews on the site have set off widespread violence on a number of occasions going back decades.
'We are marking a holiday for Jerusalem,' Ben-Gvir said Monday at the site, accompanied by other lawmakers and a rabbi. 'There are truly many Jews flooding the Temple Mount. How nice to see that.' Beyadenu, an activist group that encourages Jewish visits to the site, said dozens of people had ascended to the holy compound on Monday draped in the Israeli flag, and had prayed there.
Since Israel captured the site in 1967, a tenuous understanding between Israeli and Muslim religious authorities at the compound has allowed Jews — who revere the site as the Temple Mount, the location of the biblical temples — to visit but not pray there.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Ben-Gvir says he is changing that status quo. Palestinians already say it has long been eroding because of an increase in Jewish visits to the site.
'Today, thank God, it is possible to pray on the Temple Mount,' Ben-Gvir said at the site, according to a statement from his office.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said in the past there has been no change to the status quo. Police said that Monday's march would not enter the site. Netanyahu's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Israel considers all of Jerusalem to be its eternal, undivided capital. Its annexation of east Jerusalem is not internationally recognized. Palestinians want an independent state with east Jerusalem as its capital.
For many in Israel, Jerusalem Day is a joyous occasion that marks a moment of redemption in their country's history, when access to the key Jewish holy site of the Western Wall was restored and the city was unified. But over recent years, the Jerusalem Day march in the city has become dominated by young nationalist and religious Israelis and on some occasions has descended into violence.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Protesters storm UN compound in Jerusalem UNRWA West Bank coordinator Roland Friedrich said around a dozen Israeli protesters, including Yulia Malinovsky, one of the legislators behind an Israeli law that banned UNRWA, forcefully entered the compound, climbing its main gate in view of Israeli police.
Israel has accused the agency, which is the biggest aid provider in Gaza, of being infiltrated by Hamas, allegations denied by the UN.
There was no immediate comment from Israeli police.
The compound has stood mainly empty since the end of January, after UNRWA asked staff not to work from there, fearing for their safety. The UN says it has not vacated the compound and that it is protected under international law.
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
28 minutes ago
- Hans India
SP Leader Sparks Outrage By Linking Uttarakhand Floods To Bulldozer Action On Religious Sites
Samajwadi Party leader ST Hasan has ignited a major political controversy by drawing connections between the devastating flash floods in Uttarakhand and the government's bulldozer operations targeting religious structures in the state. His inflammatory comments have triggered widespread condemnation across party lines, with critics accusing him of exploiting natural disasters for political gain and spreading communal discord. The contentious remarks emerged in response to the catastrophic cloudburst incident in Uttarakashi that resulted in five fatalities. Hasan's attempt to correlate the natural calamity with demolition activities against places of worship has been met with fierce backlash from various political quarters, including both ruling and opposition parties who have denounced the statement as inappropriate and divisive. Congress Member of Parliament Imran Masood delivered a particularly harsh rebuke, describing such statements as the product of mental instability. He emphasized that individuals making such inflammatory remarks should fear divine retribution and avoid spreading hatred through their words. His criticism reflects the broader political consensus against using natural disasters as fodder for communal polarization. Despite facing intense criticism from multiple directions, Hasan has remained steadfast in defending his controversial position. He expanded his argument beyond the immediate incident, claiming that various natural calamities are occurring due to severe ecosystem damage and indiscriminate deforestation practices. The SP leader argued that regardless of religious affiliation—whether Hindu, Muslim, Sikh, or Christian—all believers share faith in a divine creator, and consequently, places of worship including mosques, dargahs, and temples should remain protected from bulldozer operations. While acknowledging that authorities might evacuate such structures if necessary, he insisted they should be allowed to remain standing. The backlash against Hasan's statements has been particularly severe from the Bharatiya Janata Party leadership. Uttar Pradesh minister Danish Azad Ansari condemned the remarks as completely inappropriate, arguing that mocking such tragic events does not suit leaders of the Samajwadi Party. He criticized what he perceived as an attempt to score political points even during tragic circumstances, calling upon SP leadership to demonstrate greater sensitivity toward human suffering. BJP spokesperson Pradeep Bhandari launched an even more scathing attack, accusing Hasan of deliberately communalizing what should be treated as a natural tragedy. He alleged that the former SP parliamentarian was insulting Hindu communities while simultaneously downplaying the genuine suffering of Uttarkashi's Dharali village residents who bore the brunt of the cloudburst disaster. Bhandari's criticism highlighted what he characterized as the Samajwadi Party's tendency to view even death and disaster through the lens of Hindu-Muslim divisions. The controversy has exposed deeper fault lines in Indian political discourse, particularly regarding the intersection of environmental issues, religious sensitivities, and political opportunism. While Hasan's concerns about deforestation and ecosystem damage reflect legitimate environmental issues that contribute to natural disasters, his decision to link these concerns with religious demolitions has been widely perceived as crossing acceptable boundaries of political commentary. Environmental experts and disaster management specialists have long warned that uncontrolled development, deforestation, and climate change are increasing the frequency and severity of natural disasters in mountainous regions like Uttarakhand. However, the scientific consensus focuses on these measurable factors rather than drawing connections to religious or political activities unrelated to environmental degradation. The timing of Hasan's remarks has also contributed to the intensity of the backlash, coming as rescue operations were still underway and families were grieving their losses. Political analysts note that exploiting human tragedy for partisan purposes typically generates negative public reaction across ideological lines, as demonstrated by the cross-party condemnation of his statements. The incident reflects broader challenges facing Indian politics, where natural disasters and national tragedies sometimes become vehicles for advancing partisan agendas rather than opportunities for unified response and genuine problem-solving. The controversy surrounding Hasan's remarks illustrates how quickly legitimate policy discussions about environmental protection and religious rights can be overshadowed by inflammatory rhetoric that prioritizes political scoring over constructive dialogue. The widespread rejection of Hasan's comments by leaders across the political spectrum suggests that there remain certain boundaries in Indian political discourse that are considered inviolable, particularly when it comes to exploiting human suffering for electoral or ideological advantage. However, the incident also highlights ongoing tensions between secular governance and religious sensitivities that continue to influence political debates in contemporary India.
Mint
28 minutes ago
- Mint
Israel Urged to Reconsider Gaza Plan by Australia, New Zealand
Israel risks violating international law by taking control of Gaza City and should reconsider its plan, the leaders of Australia and New Zealand warned. 'We urge the Israeli government to reconsider before it is too late,' Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and his New Zealand counterpart Christopher Luxon said Saturday in a joint statement. 'Any proposals for the permanent forced displacement of the Palestinian population must be abandoned.' Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's security cabinet on Friday approved an operation aimed at 'defeating Hamas' by taking control of Gaza City, a move that could displace 1 million Palestinians living there and is drawing global backlash. The decision stopped short of a full Gaza takeover that Netanyahu floated in an interview with Fox News on Thursday. 'Any attempt by Israel to escalate hostilities, including by taking control of Gaza City, would be wrong, risk violating international law, and exacerbate the human catastrophe already unfolding inside the Gaza Strip,' Albanese and Luxon said, following talks in Queenstown, New Zealand. Germany on Friday said it's halting deliveries to Israel of military equipment that could be used in operations in the Gaza Strip, including spare parts for tanks and other defense-related goods. Foreign minsters of Germany, Australia, Italy, New Zealand and the UK earlier Saturday issued a joint statement also calling on Israel to abandon its planned Gaza City operation. 'It will aggravate the catastrophic humanitarian situation, endanger the lives of the hostages, and further risk the mass displacement of civilians,' the ministers said. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Assam eviction drives aimed at 'creating narrative' before assembly polls: Experts
On these recent evictions, eminent advocate Santanu Borthakur said: "If it is a forest land, then whosoever stays there for whatever longer period, it does not give them legal rights to settle there permanently. " However, targeting only one community, as seen in the recent cases in Golaghat is "absolutely discriminatory", he added. "The CM's recent comment that no eviction will take place against people from other communities is anti-Constitution and not permitted by law," Borthakur said. In Rengma, 1,500 Muslim families were evicted. The remaining families are from Bodo, Nepali, Manipuri and other communities, who have certificates from the Forest Rights Committee (FRC). According to Kaustubh Deka, an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Dibrugarh University, the eviction drive is a significant and sensitive moment for the state, and the whole episode highlights the critical bearing of the state's complex socio-political history. "The government must maintain a fair balance between three aspects. One, the allegation that genuine Indian citizens are being selectively targeted, needs to be addressed in all earnestness. Two, the rights given to people under progressive environmental legislations such as 'Forest Rights Act' need to be respected," he added. Also, care should be taken that the ongoing process doesn't trigger complications in Assam's already volatile border dispute scenario with many of its neighbouring states, Deka said. Talking about alleged encroachments in inter-state border areas in Rengma, advocate Borthakur said that normally in border areas, the government settles people in the buffer zones so that no encroachment takes place from the opposite side. "We can see such habitation in all border areas. Usually minorities, Gorkha and Bihari people, are settled in such locations," he added. Barua too supported his claim and said that in all the border areas with neighbouring states, usually people or communities originally from outside are settled. "The indigenous people usually do not live there. People from communities like Adivasis, Gorkhas and minorities live in such areas," he added. The reserve forests witnessing recent evictions are along Assam-Nagaland border, where people from the neighbouring state had allegedly attempted to occupy land. The evicted people claimed that their previous generation was settled in the forest by the Golap Borbora government in 1978-79 and the AGP government, which came to power in 1985. Borthakur said, "Without considering the historical background, carrying out an eviction is not appropriate. Legally, the government has the power, but the manner in which that power was exercised is not acceptable. It is inhuman and arbitrary." He also stressed that evicting people without rehabilitation is wrong. Echoing similar sentiments, Deka said, "This is against all democratic norms and practices. Utterly inhumane." Even the Supreme Court judgement says that even pavement dwellers can not be evicted without rehabilitation.
