Fairmont State University raises thousands of dollars for Tygart Valley United Way
'We're excited to be here at Fairmont State today, celebrating another successful campaign,' Tygart Valley United Way CEO Brett White said. 'When the community is in need, Fairmont State is always there. So we're thrilled to be here to celebrate with them today.'
White told 12 News that Fairmont State's campaign is the second-largest workplace campaign in the Tygart Valley and that it's part of the Tygart Valley United Way's overall community campaign, which has a goal of raising $600,000 for the Tygart Valley region this year.
'Every single dollar goes right back to work of helping support 42 different programs and 30 health and human service agencies,' he added.
According to White, the Tygart Valley United Way has reached about 75% of its campaign goal and is working hard to bring in the remaining dollars by the end of February. However, he said that this large donation from Fairmont State University will be a big help.
United Way holds point-in-time homeless count in Harrison County
'Every little bit counts, and every little bit goes every direction and helps every agency here within the Tygart Valley region,' FSU Senior Director of Career Services and Community Engagement Susan Rodriguez said.
Rodriguez stated that FSU was able to raise more than $30,000 throughout the year through different initiatives such as a chili cookoff and jeans day. 'Just all these things that contribute—that go to the actual campaign goal here that we've set here at Fairmont State University,' she added.
The money raised will be allocated to Tygart Valley United Way directly, which will distribute the funds among its different programs and health/human service agencies at its discretion. However, Rodriguez added that people who make campaign pledges are able to designate specific agencies to receive the funds such as the Disability Action Center and soup kitchen.
This celebration luncheon is held annually between Tygart Valley United Way and Fairmont State University as a way to recognize FSU staff and faculty that contribute to this workplace campaign—including the team captains. 'Our team captains are very important that they kind of spearhead the group, and get them motivated and get them going to contribute to the United Way campaign,' Rodriguez added.
Rodriguez said that she's grateful to everybody who contributed to this effort, adding that the United Way is very important to the local community and the agencies it serves. 'It's very rewarding,' she added. 'They can't survive if they don't have our help, […] it's a very key role that we play a little small part of.'
FSU works with Tygart Valley United Way annually on their Day of Action and also collaborates on volunteer initiatives and different projects throughout the year.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
INTC: White House Confirms U.S. in Talks for 10% Intel Stake
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Aug 21 - The White House confirmed that the U.S. government is exploring a plan to acquire a 10% stake in Intel (NASDAQ:INTC), one of the country's largest semiconductor firms. Officials described the potential agreement as both an economic and national security measure aimed at strengthening domestic chip production. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick explained that the deal could involve swapping existing government grants for equity. The idea, he said, is to secure a direct return for taxpayer money while supporting Intel's expansion. The company is currently building a major manufacturing hub in Ohio as part of efforts to boost American chipmaking. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 9 Warning Signs with INTC. Is INTC fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. The move comes as Intel faces stiff competition from Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA), AMD (NASDAQ:AMD), Samsung, and TSMC (NYSE:TSM). Although still capable of producing advanced chips at scale, Intel has lagged behind its global rivals in the fast-growing AI market. SoftBank, the Japanese investment firm, also announced a $2 billion investment in Intel this week, a sign some investors see a turnaround potential. Intel's shares rose nearly 7% in New York following the news. Analysts noted the deal would be unusual but said Washington's interest reflects the strategic importance of securing the domestic semiconductor supply chain.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
It's Not Tariffs, It's You: How Marketing Missteps and Tone-Deaf Collabs Are Crushing Brands
In the past, brand partnerships were seen as monumental cultural events—think 18th-century royals lending their names to luxury goods or icons like Babe Ruth fronting tobacco campaigns in the 1930s. They were rare moments that generated headlines and shaped consumer trends. Fast-forward to the digital age. Collaborations have become an industry in themselves, with influencers, celebrities and corporations teaming up on a near-constant basis. More from Sourcing Journal Wrangler and Coors Banquet Celebrate the Spirit of the West in New Collection Target CEO Cornell Resigns, but His Delivery and Fulfillment Investments Endure American Eagle's Foot Traffic Drops Amid Sydney Sweeney Controversy While that might sound like a win from a profit standpoint, oversaturating the market with high-profile campaigns has its downside, according to Dave Mayer, a senior partner at global brand consultancy Lippincott. 'Any collaboration is only as good as the benefit that it delivers to its customers. Initially, that's boosted by novelty (I mean, we are designed to seek new experiences for the dopamine hit and social recognition that comes from being early adopters),' Mayer told Sourcing Journal. 'However, as collabs become more common, the novelty wears off. At this stage, the underlying value proposition—meaning, the tangible benefits and relevance to consumers—becomes the primary factor determining their excitement.' Nowadays, brands are locked in an arms race to launch the hottest campaign with the flashiest star, hoping to grab attention and drive sales. But with collaborations dropping in a near-constant cycle, there's little time left for thoughtful curation, and that rush to stay relevant can make campaigns more prone to missteps or outright controversy. Take, for example, American Eagle's (AE) Fall 2025 campaign featuring 'Euphoria' star Sydney Sweeney. In one of the promotional videos for the campaign, Sweeney says, 'Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality and even eye color. My jeans are blue.' A voiceover then states, 'Sydney Sweeney has great jeans.' Almost immediately after the campaign went live, fans across social media tore apart the wording, posting comments like: 'This is what happens when you have no [people] of color in a room. Particularly in a time like this…this ad campaign got so caught up in this 'clever' play on words and this stunt the [people] in the room missed what was so blatantly obvious to anyone not White.' The backlash wasn't confined to just social media, though. According to AI-powered geospatial insights company Pass_by, AE's in-store traffic decline accelerated in the wake of the controversy. For the week of Aug. 3–9, visits were down 8.96 percent year-over-year, following a 3.9 percent drop the previous week. 'When a collaboration goes wrong, the cost is more than just wasted media spend. Trust erodes, acquisition costs climb and retargeting pools shrink,' Joseph Perello, founder and CEO of performance-based creator marketing platform Props, told Sourcing Journal. 'AE's Sydney Sweeney campaign shows a different risk. After decades out of the cultural spotlight, the brand staged a provocative return. Investors cheered, with AEO shares spiking nearly 24 percent,' he added. 'Yet the sales data told another story. Early analysis showed little impact on demand or in-store traffic. The campaign generated headlines, political commentary and trading frenzy, but not sustainable consumer behavior. It serves as a reminder that shock value may stir markets in the short term, but it rarely builds long-term brand equity.' AE hasn't cut ties with Sweeney, and in Perello's estimation, the campaign's unfortunate subtext could amount to a blip on consumers' radar. However, there are instances when brands' handling of collabs gone wrong could prove critical. If history is any guide, companies that cling too tightly to a controversial figure risk deeper financial fallout. Adidas learned that lesson in 2022 when it severed its nearly decade-long partnership with iconoclastic creative Kanye West following his antisemitic remarks. The breakup reportedly cost the sportswear giant around $247 million in lost sales. Other partners including Balenciaga and Gap quickly followed suit in severing ties, also suffering fiscal blows. Lost sales don't always stem from a poorly executed campaign or a celebrity scandal; they can also be driven by the players behind the brand itself. In 2024, Lululemon founder and former CEO Chip Wilson drew sharp criticism for controversial remarks about the company's customers and marketing direction. Wilson, who resigned in 2013 after infamously blaming a yoga pants recall on the size of women's thighs, resurfaced in a Forbes interview to slam Lululemon's diversity and inclusion efforts. He accused the brand of becoming 'like the Gap—everything to everybody,' and dismissed ads featuring models he claimed were 'not inspirational.' 'I think the definition of a brand is that you're not everything to everybody,' Wilson told Forbes. 'You've got to be clear that you don't want certain customers coming in.' While the company didn't suffer an immediate collapse in sales, its performance in the Americas showed signs of strain. Net revenue in the region grew just 4 percent in 2024 compared to the year prior, with comparable sales flat in the fourth quarter and down 1 percent for the full year, according to a Lululemon press release, suggesting a slowdown in what remains its most critical market. All in all, it was a relatively modest ding in sales for Lululemon. More recently, though, retail giant Target proved that the way a company represents its values can have bigger consequences. In 2024, the retailer—long praised for its Pride merchandising—reversed course, announcing it would sell Pride-themed apparel and home goods for adults only 'in select stores, based on historical sales performance.' It was a drastic shift for a chain that had featured such items widely across its U.S. locations for more than a decade. The move was compounded by fresh backlash this year after Target announced it was winding down certain diversity initiatives, saying it needed to 'stay in step with the evolving external landscape'—namely, the Trump administration's crackdown on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI)—while still claiming a commitment to 'inclusion' and 'belonging,' according to an internal memo from chief community impact and equity officer Kiera Fernandez. The consequences were swift. Coupled with mounting tariff pressures, Target acknowledged that customer boycotts tied to its DEI retreat had dented performance. Quarterly sales fell 2.8 percent to $23.85 billion, missing Wall Street's $24.23 billion expectations and down from $24.53 billion a year earlier. On Wednesday, following the company's earnings announcements, 11-year CEO Brian Cornell announced he would step down as the company works to steady itself amid ongoing backlash and wavering consumer loyalties. Amid the upheaval, Target and Ulta Beauty announced this week that they will not renew their shop-in-shop partnership once the current agreement concludes in August 2026, a move that's likely to dampen in-store traffic and weaken a program once touted as a key growth driver. 'The increasing polarization of values has made it more difficult for mass market brands to embrace collabs with other brands that may have characteristics that alienate a subset of their audience. This polarization—particularly along the conservative to liberal spectrum—has fractured collaboration opportunities into distinct pools where political values must align as a prerequisite,' Mayer said. 'So, a mass-market retailer like Target is largely limited to collaborating within a similar market space and cannot easily engage with brands strongly identified with either progressive or conservative ideologies without risking audience backlash,' the consultant added. Whether it's a tone-deaf executive or a poorly executed campaign, the bottom line is that consumers aren't rejecting collaborations altogether. But brands will pay the price for inauthenticity. Younger shoppers in particular want partnerships to stand for something bigger, whether that's innovation, sustainability, inclusivity or 'even just joy,' as Alexis Quintal, CEO and founder of Rosarium PR & Marketing Collective, put it. 'The real business value today lies in how intentional and authentic the partnership feels to the consumer,' Quintal told Sourcing Journal. 'When brands treat collaborations as short-term stunts or cash-grabs, fatigue can set in. But when they focus on shared values, storytelling and creating something consumers couldn't access otherwise, the return on investment (ROI) remains strong.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Washington Post
14 hours ago
- Washington Post
U.S. and European Union provide fresh details of giant trade pact
The United States and European Union have agreed on a 'joint statement' providing additional details of the trade deal that they announced last month, but the two sides still face weeks or months of additional negotiations to iron out their remaining issues. White House officials hailed the statement as an important step toward fleshing out the commitments reached by President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at their impromptu July summit. The three-and-a-half page statement confirms that the U.S. will impose a 15 percent tariff on most European products. The U.S. now has agreed to lower its 25 percent tariff on imported cars to 15 percent for European vehicles once the E.U. introduces legislation to eliminate its already-low tariffs on American industrial products and to provide greater market access for some American farm goods. European semiconductors, pharmaceuticals and lumber also will face import taxes of 15 percent, far lower than levels the president is eyeing for those goods produced in other markets. The White House said the E.U. deal signals the president's determination to replace the 30-year old global trading system helmed by the World Trade Organization with a series of government-to-government arrangements designed to shrink the chronic U.S. trade deficit. 'We feel like this is a really positive step forward for the U.S.-E.U. relationship, where both parties have agreed that there are certain problems, such as trade imbalances, that need to be addressed, that are no longer sustainable, and that we can address in a bilateral way outside the WTO,' said a senior administration official speaking on the condition of anonymity under ground rules set by the White House. Still, the joint statement was replete with provisions that will require additional bargaining. The two sides, for example, agreed to negotiate 'rules of origin' that will determine which specific products qualify for lower tariffs. In other trade negotiations, hammering out such terms proved complex and time-consuming. Elsewhere, the joint statement said the two sides 'commit to work together' on issues such as reducing nontariff trade barriers, addressing 'unjustified digital trade barriers' and cooperating on addressing other nations' export controls on critical minerals, a likely reference to China. 'These are ambitious things and we expect in the coming weeks — hopefully weeks and not too many months — to fully paper over the agreement,' said the senior administration official. Last month, the White House hailed the Trump-von der Leyen handshake agreement as 'historic' and 'colossal' and said it would fundamentally reshape the transatlantic trading relationship. Though the partial deal left several issues for subsequent talks, Trump celebrated it as 'the biggest deal ever made.' The agreement reached at Trump Turnberry, one of the president's Scottish golf courses, established a 15 percent tariff on most European goods. That figure is lower than the 50 percent tax that Trump had threatened. But it is far higher than the roughly 2 percent levy that European products traditionally faced. The E.U. also agreed to purchase $750 billion worth of American energy products over the next three years and to invest an additional $600 billion in the U.S. Analysts reacted skeptically to those plans, noting that European leaders do not dictate private sector spending or investment decisions. The White House expects private companies to follow through with the spending and investment plans with a focus on strategic sectors such as pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, automobiles and advanced manufacturing, according to the senior administration official. U.S. and European diplomats in recent weeks traded proposed language for the statement. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick pressed the Europeans — without clear success — for changes in taxes and regulations that affect U.S. digital giants, such as Google, Apple, Amazon and Facebook.
