logo
How hard is it to remove artificial dye from food? It took Welch's Fruit Snacks 10 years

How hard is it to remove artificial dye from food? It took Welch's Fruit Snacks 10 years

Fast Company14-07-2025
American food is about to look a little bit duller, but that's probably for the best.
Since Robert F. Kennedy Jr. introduced a ban targeting eight synthetic dyes in processed food, Kraft Heinz and General Mills have both committed to removing them across all their product lines by the end of 2027 in what will be the most significant ingredient shift in the processed food industry since the ban of trans fats in 2018.
But PIM Brands—makers of Welch's Fruit Snacks, the top seller in its category worldwide—posits that this transition may be harder than it looks, at least if companies want to protect the bright color experience of their products.
'It would be darn impossible, in my opinion, to just snap your fingers and say, 'Okay, we're gonna make everything better in the next year or two,' says Michael Rosenberg, president & CEO of PIM Brands. 'I think Americans are just a little bit more aggressive and punchy and just want to visually enjoy their products.'
It's a challenge of both consumer expectations around product consistency, but also, in terms of human perception: Bright colors can actually make things taste sweeter or skew our tastebuds in other ways.
Today, the company is announcing that it's removed all artificial dyes from its 'mixed fruit' Welch's Fruit Snacks, with the remainder of its portfolio transitioning next year. But the road to get here was anything but quick or easy for the company—despite having its own food science team in-house.
Instead, it's been a 10-year process, the company says, adding that it couldn't have possibly reacted rapidly to the demands of the new administration.
'It happens that all this coalesced just as the MAGA movement was really intensifying, but that's just pure coincidence,' says Rosenberg. 'Because we started working on this before any of this ever was even on anybody's radar screen.'
The challenge of natural dyes
The big truth about dyes is that they make up very little of the food we eat—maybe 0.5% of a Welch's Fruit Snack is added color by volume, according to Bhavna Ramani, chief R&D and production officer of PIM Brands. But their use has still prompted legitimate health concerns from researchers. The synthetic dyes used in the U.S. aren't actually banned in Europe, but since 2010 manufacturers have had to place a warning label on foods in the region using them. Manufacturers have tried to avoid using these warnings, so their versions of products like Fruit Loops often eliminate artificial dyes and appear duller as a result.
The Welch's team tracked these concerns a decade ago, and began a plan to transition its product. Its challenges ranged from feasibility (how do you source a color as rare as blue?) to its own scale—the company's own color suppliers couldn't meet their demand.
As of today, a simple Welch's Fruit Snack is a portrait of our complex global industrial supply chain. The majority of its ingredients are a real fruit puree that match the flavor they're advertising. That means for a strawberry snack, the company uses strawberries rather than defaulting to cheaper ingredients like apples and pears and supplementing flavor with extracts. But these fruits generally don't supply the amount of color to which artificial dyes have accustomed us: peach, for instance, would be but the faintest shade of orange without dye.
Welch's approach means that it already sources 30 different fruits from countries around the globe, tracking seasonal produce worldwide so that it can constantly produce all of its flavors of fruit snack. 'When it's hot in one place, it's cold in another,' says Rosenberg. 'So we're really traversing the globe for our raw materials.'
Shifting to natural dyes meant shifting from a synthetic supply chain, derived from abundant petroleum, to a complex global footprint with similar problems to Welch's primary fruit sourcing.
Imagine that you need a certain fruit to source a certain color. If it's grown in China instead of India, it will be different due to the climate and terroir. Each fruit's hue could shift alongside ensuing chemical differences. That means fruits sourced from two different parts of the globe for color need to be constantly rebalanced and mixed appropriately to control each shade. Furthermore, those natural ingredients come with added concerns around contamination and food safety that don't accompany their sterile synthetic counterparts.
Any color but brown
Making matters tricker is that processed foods add dyes in part because they oxidize, turning food brown over time. That's specifically a concern for Welch's, which are mostly oxidation-prone fruit that's been stabilized in gelatine (which is less color-dependable than drier processed foods due to its water content). The team clarifies that not all products are as tricky to update with natural dyes as their own product—Ramani notes that hard candies, for instance, should be much easier, as desiccant sugars and corn syrup keeps colors more stable. The other unique challenge facing Welch's is that this fruit creates acidity, and acids, too, will break down natural colors.
Each different color—like the yellows in its orange snacks, and the reds in its strawberry—had to be developed on its own. The company also created a new, proprietary process to add its natural dyes to its puree on the assembly line at a precise moment, using just the right method—and it updated its own packaging to tweak the exchange of oxygen.
Even still, to validate each color, they didn't want to simply simulate the effects of heat or humidity. So they created the snacks and let them sit on the shelf, analyzing them each month for 18 months to see if the color shifted. The tests involved dozens of different natural dyes to find those that worked best.
'There were times where we're at, you know, six months, seven months, and we didn't like the way the color had held up,' says Ramani. 'And so then we got to start over again, right back at one month.'
Yellow was the first color Welch's solved—in 2015, concerns of yellow dyes spiked with research linking them to cancer triggers —and in what the team deemed to be relatively easy fix, it replaced its synthetic yellow with turmeric and annatto (both popular natural yellow dyes Kraft used to update their macaroni and cheese around the same time).
Its other colors are only coming to market now and over the next several months. The new red is made from purple carrot, red grape, and anthocyanins. Of all of the colors, its most difficult update was blue. Despite it filling our oceans and sky, blue is actually one of the world's rarest colors. The company found its solution in South America's huito fruit, which looks something like jackfruit crossed with a lime, but develops blue tones when exposed to air. Alongside a little spirulina, it created just the right color.
Trying the new version
After hearing so much about Welch's commitment to a perfect color switch, as I open two packs of Welch's Fruit Snacks side-by-side—one with artificial dyes and one with natural—I am surprised that I can definitely see a difference, as can my kids (who do both partake in Welch's now and again). The naturally dyed snacks are undeniably less saturated, with slightly less rich reds and oranges.
'Scientifically there will never be complete parity between artificial and natural colors,' Ramani concedes. 'We conducted side-by-side visual and sensory panels internally and externally . . . most consumers either couldn't tell the difference, or preferred the new colors knowing they came from natural sources.'
If I weren't looking at them side-by-side, I'd never know myself. But I do swear the new snacks taste a little less sweet. It's something my son notes, too, unprompted and unaware of research pointing out just this phenomenon. If we were blindfolded or in a dark movie theater, would we have noticed? We'd need to set up a larger blind taste test to know.
That said, there is no shortage of sweet treats on the market if your only concern is a sugar blast. And as a consumer who has loathed unnecessary artificial dyes for years—perhaps the one health topic on which RFK Jr and scientifically minded liberals agree—I'm only more likely to buy Welch's now. And watching my kids eagerly nosh on my remaining press samples, it doesn't seem they're sweating the changes, either.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CRISPR Therapeutics (CRSP) Sees 47% Price Increase Over Last Quarter
CRISPR Therapeutics (CRSP) Sees 47% Price Increase Over Last Quarter

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

CRISPR Therapeutics (CRSP) Sees 47% Price Increase Over Last Quarter

CRISPR Therapeutics recently announced significant developments in its in vivo cardiovascular disease programs, notably CTX310 and CTX320, which may have contributed to the company's 47% share price increase over the last quarter. The company's inclusion in multiple indices further enhances its market presence, potentially impacting investor interest positively. Meanwhile, CRISPR reported a net loss in its Q1 earnings, although revenue increased year-over-year. Despite a volatile market backdrop, characterized by declining major indices due to weak job reports and tariff concerns, CRISPR's advancements in therapeutic programs and strategic index additions contrasted against broader market movements. We've spotted 1 risk for CRISPR Therapeutics you should be aware of. Uncover the next big thing with financially sound penny stocks that balance risk and reward. Over the past year, CRISPR Therapeutics reported a total shareholder return of 9.74%. While the company's shares outperformed the US Biotechs industry, which returned a decline of 8.4% over the same period, it lagged behind the broader US Market's 17.7% return. The favorable performance relative to its industry can be linked to its strategic advancements in cardiovascular disease programs and inclusion in various Russell indices. The recent developments highlighted in the introduction, particularly the positive updates in CRISPR's cardiovascular programs and index additions, could potentially influence expectations around future revenue and earnings. Analysts forecast strong revenue growth of 57.3% annually, despite the company's forecast to remain unprofitable over the next three years. Meanwhile, with the current share price at $56.09, the market seems to discount the consensus analyst price target of $80.91, reflecting a substantial perceived upside potential in the stock. This price movement suggests that investors might see potential growth opportunities, even as the company navigates its profitability challenges. The valuation report we've compiled suggests that CRISPR Therapeutics' current price could be quite moderate. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include CRSP. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@

An Amazon seller doing 7 figures says one strategic addition has doubled her profit
An Amazon seller doing 7 figures says one strategic addition has doubled her profit

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

An Amazon seller doing 7 figures says one strategic addition has doubled her profit

Lisa Harrington started selling clothes on eBay before transitioning to Amazon. Her business selling interior cat doors took off after hiring a PPC coach. She emphasizes investing in coaching and networking for long-term business growth. Lisa Harrington's e-commerce career began in the early 2010s when she started selling clothing, purses, and other items in her closet that she didn't need anymore. She used the eBay profit to launch her first Amazon product — dog harnesses — and sold enough to quit her corporate job in 2016. She eventually created and patented interior cat doors, which have become a top-selling Amazon product and bring in seven figures in annual revenue. Harrington, who's been doing e-commerce for more than a decade, can pinpoint one decision that took her business to the next level: hiring a PPC coach. PPC (pay-per-click) refers to Amazon's advertising platform, where sellers can pay to have their products displayed prominently. Many sellers consider ads an essential aspect of succeeding in the competitive e-commerce space. For years, "I had a very low spend on my advertisement," Harrington told Business Insider. Figuring out how to run Amazon ads wasn't how she wanted to spend her time. "I just didn't have much interest in it. I really wanted to focus on branding and product development, but it has such an enormous impact on your profit and loss statement that you really can't ignore it." The idea to hire a coach came from an industry event. "I remember talking to this woman, and she's like, 'I hire a coach for everything I don't know how to do. It is the fastest way to level up,'" recalled Harrington. She took the advice, found a coach to help her specifically with ads, and, "in the time I've worked with her, my profit has doubled," said Harrington. It took her six months to find the right fit. "Coaches are hard to find. But when you do find one, it levels your business up," she said. Over the last couple of years, her PPC coach has become more of a general business coach. They discuss everything from product development to effective employee management. "She's the only person I can talk to about every aspect of my business. She not only has the expertise but has the background information, so I can spitball with her, solve problems, and come up with great ideas," said Harrington. The full-time entrepreneur and mother of two kids doesn't hesitate to outsource when she can. "I try to get a coach for everything because, thankfully, I've gotten to the point where I can pay people to help me," she said. "That, in some cases, tends to be a cheaper way to learn a skill or a cheaper way to get something done." Harrington is also a member of the elite group of seven-figure Amazon sellers called Million Dollar Sellers. Members must complete an interview and application and pay $7,497 a year to join the group, which grants them access to exclusive events and a robust network of top-tier entrepreneurs. She's adamant that investing in yourself "always pays dividends," she said. "The knowledge that you gain, the networks that you gain, the experience shares that you hear, the tips and tricks that you get access to — not only is that short-term helping your business and helping your profit and loss statement, but you're also learning all of those things, so that if everything fell apart tomorrow, you could rebuild it again." Read the original article on Business Insider Sign in to access your portfolio

Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) Reports Q2 2025 Sales Decline to US$4934 Million
Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) Reports Q2 2025 Sales Decline to US$4934 Million

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) Reports Q2 2025 Sales Decline to US$4934 Million

Cleveland-Cliffs recently faced challenges as their second-quarter 2025 earnings revealed sales declined to USD 4,934 million, while registering a net loss of USD 483 million compared to a modest net income last year. Despite these disappointing financial results, Cleveland-Cliffs's share price rose by 15% over the past month. This performance unfolded against the backdrop of a broader market that saw similar gains in July, although markets experienced a downturn due to economic concerns fueled by weak U.S. jobs data and renewed tariff policies. The company's operational struggles might have tempered the overall positive market momentum. We've identified 3 risks with Cleveland-Cliffs (at least 1 which is a bit unpleasant) and understanding the impact should be part of your investment process. Find companies with promising cash flow potential yet trading below their fair value. The recent earnings report highlighting Cleveland-Cliffs' net loss of US$483 million amidst sales of US$4.93 billion presents a challenging landscape for the company. Despite this, shares have climbed 15% in the past month, reflecting broader market trends, though these gains might be vulnerable to ongoing economic uncertainties, such as the U.S. jobs data concerns. Addressing this financial strain is crucial as Cleveland-Cliffs navigates its reliance on U.S. steel tariffs and OEM reshoring, central to its growth narrative. Over a longer five-year period, Cleveland-Cliffs' total shareholder return, encompassing both share price appreciation and dividends, marked an impressive increase of 83.58%. This growth sharply contrasts with the company's recent underperformance against the US Metals and Mining industry over the past year. The industry saw returns of 13.4%, surpassing Cleveland-Cliffs' performance during the same one-year period. Future revenue and earnings projections are aligned with anticipated benefits from reshoring and tariff protections, yet the magnitude of the recent loss highlights potential vulnerabilities. Analysts anticipate the revenue will rise, with margins eventually reaching profitability. However, any shifts in trade policies or market conditions could alter these forecasts. With the current share price at US$10.06, close to the target of US$10.99, the upward movement suggests market confidence, yet analysts see limited upside relative to the target, indicating cautious optimism about hitting expected milestones. According our valuation report, there's an indication that Cleveland-Cliffs' share price might be on the cheaper side. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include CLF. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store