logo
CSL chairman Brian McNamee hits out at Labor's unrealised capital gains tax proposal

CSL chairman Brian McNamee hits out at Labor's unrealised capital gains tax proposal

The Australian24-04-2025

You can now listen to The Australian's articles. Give us your feedback.
You can now listen to The Australian's articles.
Labor's plan for an unrealised capital gains tax on super­annuation accounts has been ­denounced by CSL chairman Brian McNamee and veteran UBS dealmaker Brett Paton, who say it will cost jobs, cause a drought in funding for new businesses and could be a 'Trojan horse' for government to tax other assets such as residential property.
Labor wants to slap a 30 per cent tax on unrealised capital gains made in superannuation ­accounts worth $3m or more without any indexation.
The Greens are willing to back Labor but want the threshold to be lowered to $2m, which would leave 100,000 superannuants from day one paying the tax and eventually as many as 1.8 million Australians paying it if it remained unindexed.
In the most stunning intervention by a business leader in the election campaign so far, Dr McNamee said the Albanese government did 'not understand the consequences' of the 'frightening, shocking' unrealised capital gains tax policy that Jim Chalmers was championing.
'I am deeply troubled about what it will do and how it could make Australia a less attractive place to invest,' Dr McNamee told The Australian.
'It's a frightening, shocking precedent and yet there are some people who would want to see it on other assets too,' he said.
The Australian reported this week that up to $25bn could be withdrawn from the self-­managed super pool to avoid paying the tax on unrealised gains.
Financial advisers have been fielding calls from clients about shifting money out before Labor's planned July 1 start date.
'I don't think the policymakers truly understand the consequences,' Dr McNamee said.
'Start-ups need people to give them capital and the self-­managed superannuation funds are a big part of that,' he said.
'The last thing we need to do is make it harder for start-ups. That's where the new jobs in the economy come from.'
Dr McNamee was made chairman of Australia's third largest company, having been chief executive for 23 years, and is ­regarded as a leader in raising up small technology and drug ­companies.
'The problem with UCGT is that every time you raise capital for a company, it can take place at a higher valuation and every time that happens you would get taxed, but the trouble is the company could still fail, it could go to zero and yet you have paid all this tax on what wasn't even there and there is no refund,' he said.
Experts in raising money for companies say an unrealised capital gains tax would be a disaster.
Mr Paton, the former UBS and Citi dealmaker who with his team assisted in raising more than $200bn in capital for companies, said Labor's new tax was a 'wrecking ball' for small and ­medium-sized business capital.
Brett Paton.
He said Labor risked the pool of savings created for emerging industries in Australia, which had been augmented by former Labor treasurer and prime minister Paul Keating and supported by Liberal treasurer Peter Costello.
'The big industry super funds who manage a large part of this do not have the flexibility and ­mobility to back early start-up ventures because their mandates usually dictate a minimum investment size of about $50m and a shareholding constraint of less than 10 per cent of a company – so that's a $500m company which is hardly a start-up,' Mr Paton said. 'What we need is a pool of capital that can take small licks in early stage companies who often need just $5-$10m to keep growing and that pool exists in the larger SMSF community.
'The wrecking ball of Labor's division 296 tax on unrealised gains is that in the world of backing entrepreneurs who create jobs, opportunities and taxes down the track, the massive pool of funds that can embrace risk capital will become barren.
'My prediction, after 25 years in raising capital, is that this is a game stopper for entrepreneurial spirit in Australia unless Treasury finds a way for big industry funds to fill the space of providing long term risk capital for small early-stage companies.'
Anthony Albanese on the campaign trail in Western Australia. Picture: Mark Stewart/NewsWire
Mr Paton, who is now chairman of Escala Partners, said that if such a tax were implemented it would make it tempting for government to apply it across other assets such as property.
'This tax is a Trojan horse which could extend itself to the second home or negative gearing,' Mr Paton said.
Investment managers across Australia – including regional areas where people with illiquid assets such as farms and warehouses would also have to pay unrealised gains – are raising the idea that Labor's new tax would eventually be used on the family home.
Clime Investment Management founder John Abernethy said such a tax was 'absolutely, totally outrageous'.
'They are clearly testing to see how far it will go,' Mr Abernethy said. 'This is a Trojan horse that current generations under a so defined $3m limit may commit future generations to significant consequences.
'This is just the beginning. Superannuation accounts over $3m would only be worth tens of billions but if you extend unrealised capital gains tax even at a small rate on residential property you've got a pool of $11 trillion there to tax the unrealised gains.'
'If $3m is the suggested trigger point, then how many residences valued above $3m today and into the future, without indexing, would be caught? Remembering that residential home ownership is a key plank of retirement policy.
'They really should have put this to the people like they did with the voice referendum. They should ask whether having ­unrealised capital gains tax on ­assets is fair.'
Other investment managers such as Geoff Wilson, the ­architect of the Coalition's ­successful attack on Labor's franking-credits policy at the 2019 election, have been stunned by the lack of campaigning by the Coalition on the issue.
The Coalition is against the ­unrealised capital gains tax while some teal members of parliament are open to some aspects of Labor's policy.
In the US, former Democrat president Joe Biden wanted to ­impose a 25 per cent minimum tax on unrealised capital gains ­accrued by wealthy Americans but it was shot down by his own party and billionaire entrepreneurs such as Mark Cuban in the lead-up to the November election.
Read related topics: Csl

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AUKUS review comes after US calls for more defence spending from Australia
AUKUS review comes after US calls for more defence spending from Australia

Sky News AU

time25 minutes ago

  • Sky News AU

AUKUS review comes after US calls for more defence spending from Australia

Sky News host Andrew Bolt discusses how the United States' review on AUKUS comes after their call for more defence spending by the Albanese Labor government. 'The more you see of how this submarine story has unfolded, the more it seems like it is Donald Trump's team putting a squeeze on Australia,' Mr Bolt said. 'Telling us, well, you want your submarines, then you do what we say and you pay billions more for your defence.'

'We are concerned': Opposition Leader Sussan Ley calls on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to meet with Donald Trump at earliest opportunity amid AUKUS crisis
'We are concerned': Opposition Leader Sussan Ley calls on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to meet with Donald Trump at earliest opportunity amid AUKUS crisis

Sky News AU

time31 minutes ago

  • Sky News AU

'We are concerned': Opposition Leader Sussan Ley calls on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to meet with Donald Trump at earliest opportunity amid AUKUS crisis

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has expressed dire concern for the nation's defence, after the Trump administration launched a formal review of the AUKUS deal, suggesting it is considering "backing away" from the Biden-era pact with Australia and the United Kingdom. "We are reviewing AUKUS as part of ensuring that this initiative of the previous administration is aligned with the President's America First agenda," the official said of the review, which was first reported by Financial Times. "Any changes to the administration's approach for AUKUS will be communicated through official channels, when appropriate." Ms Ley told Sky News on Thursday night the Opposition is "concerned" about the AUKUS review due to the party's lack of confidence in the Albanese government's relationship with US President Donald Trump. She further urged the PM to secure a meeting with Trump at the "earliest opportunity" to safeguard the future of the AUKUS pact. "We are concerned about the Pentagon reviewing AUKUS because we're not sure of the standing that this government has with the President and with the US administration," she told Sky News host Kieran Gilbert. "I feel there's something of a bystander approach from Anthony Albanese." The Opposition Leader added she wants to see the PM do well on "team Australia moments" and her party is willing to get behind the government on initiatives that strengthen the nation. However, she advised Mr Albanese to focus on harbouring a personal relationship with Trump as the AUKUS deal is "critical" to the nation's security in the Indo-Pacific, and "its delivery matters a great deal''. When asked what Ms Ley thought about Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles asking the Coalition to "take a deep breath" with the AUKUS panic, she urged the Albanese government to "simply focus on the task at hand". "I would say simply focus on the task at hand, which is building that relationship, that I've not been confident has been built from the get-go in this second Trump administration," she said. "It is all about the personal relationship and I'm not suggesting that it's not there. "But this does look as if the government has been caught somewhat flat-footed by the announcement of this review." Ms Ley suggested the Labor government was not aware of the AUKUS review coming up and was instead caught off-guard. "I just want to encourage the government to build that relationship and I haven't heard the Deputy Prime Minister point to a meeting that's coming up between our Prime Minister and the President," she added. "Until that happens, we secure that face-to-face conversation. I don't think we will rest on this issue." Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said he would not react to political pressure but that he would address defence policy according to need and capability. Mr Marles also defended the Albanese government's commitment to AUKUS after the Trump administration launched their review into the $368 billion deal. 'We are committed to AUKUS and we look forward to working closely with the US on the review,' Mr Marles said in a statement response to the US review. 'It is natural that the administration would want to examine this major undertaking including progress and delivery. 'Our engagement with the Trump administration and across the full political spectrum of the United States has shown clear and consistent support for AUKUS.'

‘National embarrassment': Australia ‘forced' to spend more on defence by the US
‘National embarrassment': Australia ‘forced' to spend more on defence by the US

Sky News AU

time41 minutes ago

  • Sky News AU

‘National embarrassment': Australia ‘forced' to spend more on defence by the US

Strategic Analysis Australia Director Michael Shoebridge discusses the 'national embarrassment' regarding Australia's lackluster spending on defence. Ties between Canberra and Washington have frayed as the Trump administration launches a review of the AUKUS deal after the Albanese government resisted requests to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. 'Australia shouldn't be forced by America into investing enough in our own security,' Mr Shoebridge said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store