
Israelis Begin to Question the Morality of Their War in Gaza
Whether or not it was a Walter Cronkite moment, when the US broadcaster declared on live TV in 1968 that the Vietnam War was unwinnable — a turning point in public opinion — it seemed significant in a country that's been steadfast in its defense of the war against Hamas in Gaza for 22 months.
There are other indications — from WhatsApp group chats to new reports by Israeli human rights organizations — that the mood is shifting away from a robust embrace of the conflict.
Some commentators are announcing a change of heart about the war, triggered when Hamas militants attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing 1,200 people and abducting 250. The subsequent Israeli offensive has killed nearly 60,000 people, according to the Hamas-run Gaza health ministry, and left much of the Palestinian territory in ruins.
The United Nations World Food Program has warned for weeks that Gaza's population of more than 2 million people faces crisis levels of food insecurity, with scores of aid groups reporting widespread starvation.
'After the massacre, it was imperative to strike at Hamas with all our might, even at the cost of civilian casualties,' wrote Nahum Barnea, a columnist for centrist newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth. But 'the damage — in military casualties, Israel's international standing and civilian casualties — is growing worse. Hamas is to blame, but Israel is responsible.'
Sherwin Pomerantz, who runs an economic consulting group, wrote in the conservative Jerusalem Post: 'What was a just war two years ago is now an unjust war and must be ended.'
The shift in Israeli sentiment is reflected in a pile-up of bad news: Hamas still holds hostages in Gaza and remains a military force, soldiers continue to die, Israelis abroad are shunned, even attacked, and now scenes of starving children are shown across global media.
US President Donald Trump, a fervent defender of Israel, even weighed in, saying this week he didn't agree with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's assertion there is no starvation in Gaza. 'That's real starvation stuff, I see it, and you can't fake that,' Trump said in Scotland on Monday.
There haven't been any recent polls published in Israel related to the war. One in May showed 65% of Israelis unconcerned about humanitarian conditions in Gaza. But until this past week, little of the destruction and death there appeared in Israeli media. Now the issue of hunger dominates news coverage.
Other shifts in public discourse are noticeable. Human rights lawyers abroad have been accusing Israel of war crimes and genocidal intent in Gaza since just after the war started — charges the vast majority of Israelis have rejected. For the first time, two Israeli human rights groups are now using the term genocide for what's happening — B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights Israel.
Also on Monday, the presidents of five Israeli universities wrote an open letter to Netanyahu urging him to 'intensify efforts to address the severe hunger crisis currently afflicting the Gaza Strip.'
'Like many Israelis, we are horrified by the scenes from Gaza, including infants dying every day from hunger and disease,' they wrote. 'As a people who endured the horrors of the Holocaust, we also bear a responsibility to use every means at our disposal to prevent cruel and indiscriminate harm to innocent men, women and children.'
Yair Lapid, head of Israel's main opposition party, gave a fiery speech this week describing the war as a disaster and a failure and calling on Netanyahu to end it and eliminate Hamas through cooperation with regional powers.
After ceasefire talks stalled again last week, a new effort is under way to revive negotiations with Hamas, designated a terrorist organization by the US and others. There's growing commentary in mainstream media declaring Hamas defeated, making an end to the war easier to accept.
There's also pushback to the starvation narrative.
Israeli military authorities said, without additional evidence, that one photo of a skeletal boy published on front pages around the world was a child with a genetic disease that makes his bones protrude, and that he'd been evacuated from Gaza more than a month ago. In addition, the military has distributed photos purported to be of Hamas operatives surrounded by food and looking healthy.
And, so far, Netanyahu has shown no sign of shifting policy.
'We are fighting a just war, a moral war, a war for our survival,' he said in a statement on Monday. 'No country in the world would allow the continued rule in a neighboring territory of a terror group bent on its destruction that already stormed across its borders in a genocidal attack.'
'We'll continue to act responsibly, as we always have, and we'll continue to seek the return of our hostages and the defeat of Hamas,' he said. 'That is the only way to secure peace for Israelis and Palestinians alike.'
With assistance from Gina Turner.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
15 minutes ago
- India Today
Court rejects woman's plea to quash FIR over controversial messages post-Op Sindoor
The Bombay High Court on Tuesday dismissed a writ petition filed by Farah Deeba, a 46-year-old resident of Pune, who had sought to quash an FIR registered against her over controversial WhatsApp messages and status updates following Operation Sindoor, a recent Indian Armed Forces operation targeting terrorist launch pads in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied division bench of Justices A S Gadkari and Rajesh S Patil observed that Deeba's actions, including a laughing emoji reaction to pro-military posts, a WhatsApp status video showing the Prime Minister riding a rocket alongside a burning Indian flag, and messages identifying herself with Pakistan while referring to India as 'Makkar,' reflected mens rea, or criminal court said, 'What is expected of a prudent person is that, before putting up any kind of message on social groups, a person like the petitioner—who is educated and a teacher by profession—should also think about the pros and cons which might occur due to sending online messages through her social media account (WhatsApp).' The FIR, filed at Kalepadal Police Station in Pune, invokes multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS), 2023. The case emerged from a WhatsApp group named Sath Sath Margosa Ladies, comprising women residents of the Margosa Heights residential complex in to the complaint, after Operation Sindoor was launched on May 7, several group members expressed admiration for the Indian Armed Forces. Deeba allegedly responded with a laughing emoji, objected to the group being used for patriotic discussions, and later posted a video link from Facebook critical of the Prime Minister. She is also accused of uploading a WhatsApp status featuring a burning Indian flag and making disparaging comments against the lawyer, advocate Harshad Sathe, argued that Deeba was not mentally sound at the time of the incident, had removed the posts shortly afterward, and had issued an apology. He noted that she had already been dismissed from her teaching job and claimed procedural lapses in the issuance of notice under Section 41-A of the bench, however, found sufficient grounds for investigation, noting that the petitioner's conduct, especially in the immediate aftermath of a sensitive military operation, was capable of disturbing public sentiment and attracting penal consequences under to a recent ruling of the Allahabad High Court, the Bombay High Court reiterated that freedom of speech does not extend to derogatory commentary against the Prime Minister or Armed Forces when such speech could disrupt national harmony or incite court emphasised that quashing of criminal proceedings before the filing of a chargesheet is an exception rather than the rule, and that the present case did not warrant such the petition was dismissed, and the investigation against Deeba will continue.- EndsMust Watch


India Today
15 minutes ago
- India Today
UN conference backs two-state solution, urges Israel to commit to Palestinian state
High-level representatives at a UN conference on Tuesday urged Israel to commit to a Palestinian state and gave 'unwavering support' to a two-state solution, signalling widespread international determination to end one of the world's longest 'New York Declaration' sets out a phased plan to end the nearly eight-decade conflict and the ongoing war in Gaza. The plan would culminate with an independent, demilitarised Palestine living side by side peacefully with Israel, and the nation's eventual integration into the wider Mideast two-day meeting, which ends Tuesday, is taking place amid the latest reports that starvation and famine are taking place in Gaza, and growing global outrage at Palestinians not getting food due to Israeli policies and practices – which Israel REJECTS THE NOTION OF TWO STATES Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu opposes a two-state solution and has rejected the meeting on both nationalistic and security grounds. Its close ally, the United States, is also boycotting, calling the meeting 'unproductive and ill-timed.'The conference, which was postponed from June and downgraded from world leaders to ministers, for the first time established eight high-level working groups to examine and make proposals on wide-ranging topics related to a two-state declaration's plan says conference co-chairs France and Saudi Arabia, the European Union and Arab League, and 15 countries that led the working groups agreed 'to take collective action to end the war in Gaza.'Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan urged the rest of the 193 UN member nations 'to support this document' before the start of the 80th session of the U.N. General Assembly in declaration condemns 'the attacks committed by Hamas against civilians' in southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. It marks a first condemnation by Arab nations of Hamas, whose attacks killed about 1,200, mainly Israeli civilians, and whose militants took about 250 people hostage. Some 50 are still being declaration condemns Israeli attacks on civilians and civilian infrastructure in Gaza and its 'siege and starvation, which have produced a devastating humanitarian catastrophe and protection crisis.' Israel's ongoing offensive against Hamas has killed over 60,000 Palestinians, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, which doesn't distinguish between civilians and WOULD GIVE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY GOVERNING POWERThe conference plan envisions the Palestinian Authority governing and controlling all Palestinian territory, with a transitional administrative committee immediately established under its umbrella after a ceasefire in also supports deployment of 'a temporary international stabilisation mission' operating under UN auspices to protect Palestinian civilians, support the transfer of security to the Palestinian Authority and provide security guarantees for Palestine and Israel — 'including monitoring of the ceasefire and of a future peace agreement.'advertisementThe declaration calls for countries to recognise the state of Palestine, calling this 'an essential and indispensable component of the achievement of the two-state solution.' Without naming Israel but clearly referring to it, the document says 'illegal unilateral actions are posing an existential threat to the realisation of the independent state of Palestine.'French President Emmanuel Macron announced ahead of the meeting that his country will recognise the state of Palestine at the General Assembly's meeting of world leaders in late September. The French Foreign Ministry on Tuesday pushed back on Israeli claims that recognition of Palestine would 'reward' Hamas, saying that 'on the contrary, it has contributed to isolating Hamas.'United Kingdom Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced Tuesday that Britain would recognise the state of Palestine ahead of September's high-level meeting, but would refrain if Israel agrees to a ceasefire and long-term peace process in the next eight weeks. The countries are now the biggest Western powers and the only two members of the Group of Seven major industrialised nations to make such a pledge.- EndsMust Watch


India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
‘No Recognition For Israel Until...': Saudi Crown Prince Drops a Bombshell, Abraham Accord Dream Shattered
New York: Saudi Arabia stands tall and speaks in firm tones. Its foreign minister Faisal bin Farhan speaks from New York. Israel hears. The United States hears. Normalisation talks with Israel stay paused. Conditions laid bare. A Palestinian state. A ceasefire in Gaza. No room for shortcuts. No room for deals without justice. Agreement called Abraham Accords hinges on trust. The United Arab Emirates (UAE) signed. Bahrain signed. Morocco followed. Now Saudi Arabia holds the line. No recognition of Israel until Palestinian state clarity. Israel faces resistance. Donald Trump's push for more Gulf nations to sign stalls. Saudi Arabia sets terms. The message echoes across diplomacy channels. The Israeli military strikes Gaza hard. Thirty‑four Palestinians killed in recent attacks. Local hospitals report aid site near deaths. Aid distribution zones hit. Injuries reported. Aid deliveries resume for limited hours. Brief ceasefire windows appear. Humanitarian corridors open. Still, lives lost. Still, fear spreads. Meanwhile, Trump meets U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer in Scotland. Discussion turns to Gaza. Trump reacts to Netanyahu's assertion that there is no famine in the strip. Trump disagrees. Gaza hunger looks real. Civilians lean on aid. Food access tightens. Neighbouring states step in. Jordan and the UAE send relief flights to Gaza. Saudi Arabia draws a clear line. Palestine recognition. End of Gaza war. No normalisation until justice. No hidden clauses. Pure conditions. Straight talk.