logo
New York debates mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani's plan for city-run grocery stores

New York debates mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani's plan for city-run grocery stores

NZ Herald3 days ago
Atlanta is set to open two grocery stores later this year through a public-private alliance backed by a US$8m ($13m) grant and operated in partnership with regional chain Savi Provisions. The stores are slated for so-called food deserts, where availability of fresh, affordable food is scarce.
City officials chose a public-private model not just for long-term sustainability but because the existing development incentives didn't encourage the private sector to step up, according to Laurie Prickett, a senior vice-president at Invest Atlanta, the city's economic development arm. If successful, Atlanta plans to expand its model, aiming to place every resident within a kilometre of fresh food by 2030, she said.
Government-supported grocery models aren't a new idea. They've taken the form of non-profits, co-ops, military-base commissaries, public-private partnerships, and municipally owned and operated stores - with varying results.
Boston's Daily Table, a non-profit grocery chain launched by a former Trader Joe's president, announced its closing in May after a decade of trying to sustain its mission of providing affordable food.
While its funding came from a variety of sources, federal cuts to food aid programmes was the catalyst for its demise. In Baldwin, Florida, a town-owned market folded for similar reasons.
But in rural St Paul, Kansas, which had been without a grocery retailer for more than 20 years before a public-private partnership opened a supermarket in 2008, the local government doubled down on its investment and became the store's sole owner in 2013.
A major difference between the models in other American cities and Mamdani's proposal is the scale.
Baldwin has fewer than 1300 residents; Atlanta is home to around 520,000, not far behind Boston's 673,000.
New York City has an estimated population of 8.48 million.
Also, Mamdani isn't proposing to have private operators run the stores. The enterprise would be fully owned by the city, which would sell the groceries at cost and source products from neighbourhood suppliers where possible.
Supporters of Mamdani's pilot programme call it a bold solution for New Yorkers struggling to afford the basics.
Critics warn of government overreach and unintended consequences, including harm to neighbourhood bodega owners.
Others question whether New York's bloated bureaucracy is even capable of running grocery stores.
Supply chains are complex, operating costs are high, and profit margins are thin. Even if city-run stores aim to break even at best, the savings for shoppers might be modest, said Sara John, who leads the Centre for Science in the Public Interest's work on federal policy and the private sector.
John doesn't view city-run grocery stores as a silver bullet but sees potential in a model accountable to consumers, not shareholders.
'Prioritising people over profits could make a difference,' she said, though she emphasised that execution would be challenging.
Zohran Mamdani while ordering an iced coffee from a deli after a campaign event in Queens in June. Photo / Adam Gray, Bloomberg via the Washington Post
Funding the pilot
Mamdani's plan comes after grocery costs in the city jumped nearly 9% in 2022 - the highest in 40 years - and climbed again in 2023, while wage growth failed to keep pace, putting basic necessities out of reach for a growing number of residents.
The financial strain is turning political; a recent poll found that nearly two-thirds of New Yorkers, including majorities across political lines, support the idea of city-run stores.
Funding for Mamdani's proposed plan largely relies on raising taxes on New York's wealthiest 1% and additional corporation tax.
The city already spends millions on Fresh, a programme launched in 2009 to tackle the lack of neighbourhood grocers in select communities.
There are now more than 50 Fresh-supported stores that are open or in development and receive a mix of zoning benefits and tax breaks. But a report from the comptroller's office found the programme's impact on food access has been limited at best.
Mamdani has jumped on those findings, criticising the programme for having little accountability for affordability, labour standards or acceptance among those eligible for food assistance.
'There's no guarantee those groceries are cheaper,' he said in an interview with Bloomberg's Odd Lots podcast in May.
Benjamin Lorr, author of The Secret Life of Groceries, which examines the human labour that goes into the industry, said the idea of city-run stores may sound radical, but is a natural response to deep imbalances in the current grocery market.
If the market is failing to provide basic goods affordably and equitably, it's not unreasonable for the public to step in, Lorr said. 'The question is: Can it be done well? Is the juice worth the squeeze?'
Much of the criticism of Mamdani's plan comes because it risks threatening existing businesses, which have been pressured to increase prices due to rising costs.
Bodega owners, for example, worry they could be undercut by city-run groceries, which under Mamdani's proposal wouldn't have to pay rent or city license fees.
A spokesperson for Mamdani said the new stores would be placed in food deserts, where there isn't existing competition - but the genuine existence of true food deserts in the city is debated.
Isabella Weber, an associate professor of economics at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, was one of 30 progressive economists (including Yanis Varoufakis) who signed a letter backing Mamdani's policies and sees municipally run grocery stores not as a cure-all, but as a necessary experiment amid what she calls an 'affordability crisis' engulfing food, housing and childcare.
This crisis, she said, is further exacerbated by overburdened food banks amid the eroding safety net of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Programme (Snap), which will face deep cuts under President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
'These are things where you can't say, 'I'm not in the mood of eating today,'' Weber said. 'They're necessities of life.'
A public store could reduce prices by eliminating mark-ups, using public land and applying subsidies, she said. If scaled, it might also force private grocers to lower prices. 'But that's a big 'if,'' she said.
An alternative use of the funds could rely on a model seen in Mexico, where the government negotiated with major grocery chains to cap prices on essential goods. India has taken a different approach too through fair price shops, which offer high-calorie foods at subsidised rates.
If Mamdani is elected in November and able to enact his plan, the pilot stores will become an important case study for democratic socialists. Photo / Adam Gray, Bloomberg, via the Washington Post
The Venezuela comparisons
The mayoral candidate's idea has prompted sharp warnings from local supermarket operators.
John Catsimatidis, owner of the Gristedes and D'Agostino grocery chains (and a former Republican candidate for New York City mayor), threatened to leave the city if Mamdani is elected and warned of 'Soviet bread lines' if the plan goes forward.
'Everything Mr Mamdani is suggesting was already done by Hugo Chavez in Venezuela and Fidel Castro in Cuba,' Catsimatidis wrote in an opinion piece for the Wall Street Journal.
Comparing the plan to Venezuela, whose food crisis is a cautionary tale of state-controlled food systems gone awry due to corruption and economic collapse, is not unique to the billionaire.
Francisco Rodriguez, a former economic adviser to the United Nations and longtime researcher of the Venezuelan crisis, said there are lessons to learn from the country's approach to operating city-run stores.
While the Chavez government's subsidised food stores initially helped reduce hunger and shore up political support, the model unravelled when oil prices collapsed and the country could no longer foot the bill, leading to extreme hunger.
'Those stores worked while the government was riding high on oil prices. Once that revenue fell - first from market forces, then sanctions - it couldn't keep subsidising food, and the whole system collapsed,' said Rodriguez, now a public affairs professor at the University of Denver.
New York, he said, would also have to contend with other problems that Venezuela faced, including exploitation of the subsidies by people who didn't need cheaper groceries and black markets that flourished as people bought products to resell.
'Most economists, and I would concur, say that universal subsidies aren't the most efficient use of public funds,' Rodriguez said. 'You end up helping people who don't need it.'
Instead, he recommends targeted support that delivers food directly to needy families, expansion of other programmes to those near poverty and social policies to support the middle class.
For now, Mamdani's proposal is still just a proposal. If he's elected in November and able to enact his plan, the pilot stores will become an important case study for democratic socialists. But their success will depend less on ideology than on execution.
'It's about trying, piloting, and seeing what works,' said Weber, the UMass Amherst professor. 'If it works, it can be scaled. If not, at least we've learned something valuable.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reforming Global Financial Architecture Is Critical For Gender Equality And Right To Health
Reforming Global Financial Architecture Is Critical For Gender Equality And Right To Health

Scoop

time16 hours ago

  • Scoop

Reforming Global Financial Architecture Is Critical For Gender Equality And Right To Health

14 July 2025 While governments have committed to deliver on Sustainable Development Goals by 2030, inequalities, injustices and deadly divide between the Global North and Global South nations (and within rich and poor nations) has jeopardised progress on SDG goals and targets – including gender equality and right to health – both of which are fundamental human rights. 'If we do a reality check, in the current times, we are in a dysfunctional international financing architecture – with countries in the Global South facing the brunt. We are increasingly facing challenges to mobilise resources for our own development. Because most of the countries in the Global South are in the cycles of perennial debt – which they have to keep servicing to international financial institutions. This results into austerity measures which include countries cutting down on public services, access to health services, education services, social protection services, among others,' said Sai Jyothirmai Racherla, Deputy Executive Director, Asian-Pacific Resource and Research Centre for Women (ARROW). 'While it impacts the general population, marginalised communities, and poor people, the impact on women and girls in all their diversity across the strata is much higher. Data tells us that developing countries are seeing a record high debt servicing costs in 2023. This is straining low- and middle-income economies. This is compounded by a US$ 4 trillion annual investment gap for SDG achievement in developing countries,' she added. In 2024, official development assistance from 30 DAC nations (developed nations that provide aid to developing countries) declined by 7.1% in real terms - the first drop in five years - reaching only US$ 212.1 billion (0.33% of combined gross national income). UN target for developed countries is to allocate 0.7% of their gross national income as official development assistance but it dipped to less than half to 0.33%. Poor investment in social sector fails us in economic sector too 'When there are poor social investments in the social sector then it does not contribute to the economic sector. Domestic resource mobilisation for the public sector for social protection, health, and education is less too. With declining official development assistance and perennial debt cycles, the impact becomes even more severe. This is going to impact gender equality and sexual and reproductive health and rights at so many different levels,' said Sai of ARROW. Sai was delivering her keynote address at SHE & Rights (Sexual Health with Equity & Rights) session on the theme: 'Did the 4th International Conference on Financing for Development deliver on gender equality & feminist agenda?', organised around UN inter-governmental High Level Political Forum (HLPF 2025) and 13th International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Science (IAS 2025). HLPF 2025 will review SDG3 (health and wellbeing), SDG5 (gender equality) among others. SHE & Rights session was co-hosted by International Conference on Family Planning (ICFP) 2025, Family Planning News Network (FPNN), Global Center for Health Diplomacy and Inclusion (CeHDI), International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF), Asian-Pacific Resource and Research Centre for Women (ARROW), Women's Global Network for Reproductive Rights (WGNRR), Asia Pacific Media Alliance for Health and Development (APCAT Media) and CNS. Governments did not deliver on feminist agenda but Feminist Forum gives hope The 4th International Conference on Financing for Development (FfD4) of the United Nations concluded a week ago in Seville, Spain. But FfD4 did not achieve its objective of restructuring the global economy and financial system, to benefit all equitably, including women, girls and all gender diverse peoples. FfD4 failed to guarantee long-term, flexible, inclusive, equitable financing for development. FfD4 looked into women and girls as merely 'economic potentials' for 'economic benefits' without really addressing the fundamental barriers to gender justice, including labour rights, safeguards for corporate abuses and preventing gender-based violence in the workplace. 'Feminist agenda refers to a gender transformative economic system that is based on rights to justice, care, and equality for everyone urgently. This was central to the Political Declaration of Feminist Forum held before the FfD4 began in Seville, Spain. But FfD4 failed to deliver on gender equality and feminist agenda,' said Sai Jyothirmai Racherla of ARROW. Feminist Forum's Political Declaration also called for deescalating wars and ending territorial invasions and genocide - "nothing less from this is acceptable," rightly stressed Sai. Sai feels that FfD4 conference outcome document was a mix bag, "as it was a diluted version of the vision and ambition of the Action Agenda adopted at 3rd International Conference on Financing for Development (FfD3) in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (2015), and also of Monterrey Consensus adopted at the 1st International Conference on Financing for Development (FfD1) in Monterrey, Mexico (2002), as well as Doha Declaration on financing for development (2008). FfD4 outcome document also compromised the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) 1994 and the Beijing Declaration and its Platform for Action 1995 commitments." Empowerment of women and girls, economic value inherent in unpaid care work, and references to eradicating gender-based violence were mentioned in FfD4 outcome document but the broader and deeper aspects of gender equality or sexual and reproductive health and rights were missing in the FfD4 outcome document. "From the very beginning, the demand to reform international financing architecture was undeniably strong, to realise gender-just economy in which financing for development will result in equitable outcomes for all, in terms of fair distribution of resources within countries - and in between countries. We need to reform international financing architecture to promote social, economic, and environmental justice and strengthen democracy and multilateralism equitably. This was not achieved at FfD4," said Sai. Reality check on gender equality and health "2 pregnant persons die every minute. 700 women die unnecessarily from preventable causes related to pregnancy and childbirth every day, mostly in sub-Saharan Africa and Southern Asia. To reach the global target of less than 70 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births, nearly 700,000 maternal deaths need to be prevented between 2024 and 2030," said Sai. The current international financial architecture is not working and does not guarantee long-term, flexible, inclusive, equitable financing for development. "We need to restructure global economic governance to centre feminist leadership, Global South parity, and the meaningful leadership of civil society and marginalised communities. This includes democratising decision-making across all the international financial institutions and multilateral development banks, including through the urgent reform of the voting systems of the IMF and the World Bank. This is part of Political Declaration of Feminist Forum held before FfD4 too," she added. In Asia-Pacific, household health expenditures (SDG indicator 3.8.2) remain high, placing families under financial strain and limiting access to essential services. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the percentage of people in South-East Asia spending more than 10% of their total household income on health has increased, rising from 13.1% in 2010 to 16.1% in 2019. "Global poverty reduction is virtually at a standstill. Around 9% of people worldwide lived in extreme poverty in 2022. While social protection coverage has reached a milestone of covering half the world's population, low-income countries have shown almost no improvement since 2015 - with coverage rates of 9.7%, with poorest within these countries left behind," said Sai of ARROW. Polycrisis "Global South is also in an age of poly-crisis. For example, the climate crises are becoming real. Just the Asia-Pacific region in the Global South, accounts for 40% of global natural disaster events. These natural disasters further increase the burden of unpaid domestic work for women who have to invest more hours in securing water, food, and energy for cooking and heating the homes. The closing or underfunding of public services such as health centres, schools, and water provision facilities due to debt crises and increasing debt service payments, is further exacerbated in extreme climate events, and natural disasters. Simply put in the context of disasters, the health services are just not accessible for women and girls," rightly says Sai. Hope lies in the people and communities Even if inter-governmental FfD4 disappointed, hope lies in people and communities. "Moving forward, Feminist Forum's Political Declaration calls for funding and resourcing genuine multi-stakeholder feminist platforms and partnerships with women's civil society, especially from the Global South. It is important to ensure civil society leadership and engagement in these processes like FfD4. We are also asking for eliminating all economic policy conditionalities that are attached to aid because these conditionalities promote austerity, privatisation and deregulation. We do not want conditionality when it comes to loans. There should be no loans in the first place (for development assistance), rather these should be grants," said Sai. "We must reform financial architecture so that it can guarantee long-term flexible, inclusive, and equitable financing for development. We also need to restructure the global economic governance because currently it is very Global North heavy. We need to have Global South parity. We need to include democratisation of the decision-making processes across the international financial institutions and the multilateral development banks," she added. "We are not going to stop until we deliver on gender equality. We will continue to do our work to demand for a right-based, environmentally-just, decolonial, intersectional, sustainable, and person-centred economic model. We need such an economic model in current times where care, reparations, redistribution and accountability remain central," rightly said Sai Jyothirmai Racherla of ARROW. Shobha Shukla – CNS (Citizen News Service) (Shobha Shukla is the award-winning founding Managing Editor and Executive Director of CNS (Citizen News Service) and is a feminist, health and development justice advocate. She is a former senior Physics faculty of prestigious Loreto Convent College and current Coordinator of Asia Pacific Regional Media Alliance for Health and Development (APCAT Media) and Chairperson of Global AMR Media Alliance (GAMA received AMR One Health Emerging Leaders and Outstanding Talents Award 2024). She also coordinates SHE & Rights initiative (Sexual health with equity & rights). Follow her on Twitter @shobha1shukla or read her writings here

Diplomatic sources say profits from $390b seized by the EU could form new war chest
Diplomatic sources say profits from $390b seized by the EU could form new war chest

NZ Herald

time18 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

Diplomatic sources say profits from $390b seized by the EU could form new war chest

He said at least eight member states had signed up to the scheme as he announced it alongside the US president in the Oval Office on Tuesday. A Nato official said: 'It is widely considered that Nato's support mission for Ukraine – Nsatu – will play the lead role in co-ordinating purchases of American weapons and their eventual delivery to Kyiv.' Ministers and officials said it would be more logical for Nato to oversee the scheme than one of its member states because of concerns over transparency. Xavier Bettel, Luxembourg's Foreign Minister, joked that the scheme would need a 'sugar daddy' to oversee it – a reference to Rutte calling the US President 'daddy' at the recent Nato summit. However, there were some reservations about using Nato to purchase weapons on behalf of Ukraine because of fears it could be seen as a provocation by Moscow. Under the most likely plan, a central, Nato-controlled cash pot will be topped up by European allies and Canada. The money will then be used to make purchases from a 'shopping list' of American weapons and ammunition created by the Ukrainian Government. Radosław Sikorski, Poland's Foreign Minister, suggested to EU colleagues the bloc's contribution from the fund could come from the profits of frozen Russian assets. 'Should it be a burden shouldered by our taxpayers or the Russians,' he told the room, according to a source familiar with the discussions. Brussels had been discussing its own war chest for weapon purchases using the seized assets. But using the cash towards the new scheme is seen as more efficient and a better way to maintain Trump's support for Ukraine. European sources have noted a significant about-turn in the President's stance on Ukraine, after previously being accused of being friendly towards Moscow. Topping up the American scheme will also come as a direct contribution to the Nato defence spending target of 3.5%, making it easier for countries to hit the goal. Details of the military aid deal are still to be finalised, according to Nato officials, although the first deliveries of Patriot air-defence batteries are expected in Ukraine within days. Sources said they would still have to hammer out particulars, such as what long-range missiles could be made available to Kyiv. Most of these decisions will be in the hands of the White House in the coming days as the scheme takes shape. Meanwhile, the EU is expected to sign off on its 18th package of sanctions against Russia at a meeting today. 'Catch-all powers' The measures are expected to hand unprecedented 'catch-all' powers to customs officials, who will be able to seize shipments out of the bloc they believe could make their way to Russia. The system being introduced by Russia is purchasing European goods to fuel its war machine through third countries, such as Kazakhstan or Turkey. Under the scheme, exporters of seized shipments will have to provide cast-iron evidence that the freight will not make its way to Russia before it is released. Brussels will also target Moscow's 'shadow fleet' of oil tankers, sanctioning a refinery in India and a bank in China suspected of supporting President Vladimir Putin's sale of fossil fuels abroad.

Markets turn volatile after reports Trump considered firing Fed chair Powell
Markets turn volatile after reports Trump considered firing Fed chair Powell

RNZ News

time18 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Markets turn volatile after reports Trump considered firing Fed chair Powell

By Sinead Carew and Elizabeth Howcroft , Reuters US President Donald Trump, left, and Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell. Photo: AFP Markets turned volatile on Wednesday (US time) with equities losing steam, the dollar selling off sharply and gold prices spiking higher on a report that US President Donald Trump is looking to fire the Federal Reserve chairperson. However, investors pared back bearish bets when Trump said he was not planning to do so. US Treasury two-year yields dropped sharply after Bloomberg reported that Trump is likely to fire Federal Reserve chairperson Jerome Powell soon, citing an unidentified White House official. Such reports were not true, Trump said, adding that it was "highly unlikely" that Powell would be fired. Trump did talk with some Republican lawmakers about firing Powell , but he said he was more conservative about his approach to the question than they were. The US Federal Reserve has been keeping interest rates steady as it monitors the inflationary impact from tariffs, which Powell expects to become clearer in the summer. But Trump has railed against Powell for months about not cutting rates sooner, prompting investor concern about whether the central bank's independence could be eroded. "Given the passage of the one Big Beautiful Bill, given the very dramatic increase in the deficit and the substantial increase in the debt ceiling, we're paying close attention to Treasuries to see at what point does the bond market, more broadly, begin to push back, especially if the independence of the Federal Reserve is called into question," Don Calcagni, chief investment officer at Mercer Advisors, said. The US President has been criticising Jerome Powell for months. Photo: AFP / Oliver Douliery On Wall Street at 12:07pm the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 46.41 points, or 0.11 percent, to 44,069.70, the S&P 500 fell 1.51 points, or 0.02 percent, to 6,242.25 and the Nasdaq Composite fell 17.99 points, or 0.09 percent, to 20,659.97. MSCI's gauge of stocks across the globe fell 0.75 points, or 0.08 percent, to 919.50 while the pan-European STOXX 600 index fell 0.57 percent. The reports about Powell overshadowed an unexpectedly tame inflation reading. US producer prices were unexpectedly unchanged in June as an increase in the cost of goods due to tariffs on imports was offset by weakness in services. The unchanged reading in the producer price index for final demand last month followed an upwardly revised 0.3 percent rise in May. This was after Tuesday's U.S. consumer price data for June pointed to higher costs for some goods. "It's very early innings when determining whether or not and to what extent tariffs are going to impact inflation," Calcagni said. He noted that while investors wait to see where the Trump administration ultimately sets tariff levels, inflation numbers were also being muddied by the depletion of goods in stock at companies which had built up higher than usual inventories in anticipation of the new import taxes. In currencies, the dollar index, which measures the greenback against a basket of currencies including the yen and the euro, was last down 0.26 percent to 98.36. The euro was up 0.33 percent at $1.1637 while against the Japanese yen, the dollar weakened 0.49 percent to 148.14. Sterling strengthened 0.38 percent to $1.343. Earlier data showed that Britain's annual rate of consumer price inflation unexpectedly rose to its highest in over a year. In Treasuries, the yield on benchmark US 10-year notes fell 1.8 basis points to 4.471 percent, from 4.489 percent late on Tuesday while the 30-year bond yield rose 1.3 basis points to 5.0303 percent. The 2-year note yield, which typically moves in step with interest rate expectations for the Federal Reserve, fell 5.7 basis points to 3.902 percent, from 3.959 percent late on Tuesday. Oil prices were lower, with Brent crude futures around US$68.50 ($115.12) a barrel, as signs of stronger Chinese crude consumption were outweighed by investor caution about the wider economic impact from US tariffs. US crude fell 0.83 percent to $65.97 a barrel and Brent fell to $68.16 per barrel, down 0.8 percent on the day. Gold prices added to gains after the Powell reports with the safe haven commodity bolstered by persistent Middle East conflict and uncertainty over tariffs. Spot gold rose 0.66 percent to $3344.66 an ounce. US gold futures fell 0.01 percent to $3329.50 an ounce. -Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store