
NA Speaker extends olive branch as PTI stages walkout
Presiding over the session, NA Speaker Sadiq reaffirmed his role as the custodian of the House and declared his willingness to facilitate negotiations between the government and PTI. 'Differences of opinion are the beauty of democracy,' he noted. 'But it is dialogue that ultimately serves the national interest.'
Despite the appeal, PTI lawmakers stage a walkout from the House, citing ongoing grievances over what they described as infringements upon their parliamentary privileges and conviction of the party's senior leaders.
The Speaker's remarks came in response to PTI leader Asad Qaiser's sharp intervention, during which he accused the government of systematically marginalising the opposition.
Sadiq pushed back, asserting that 'the Constitution, law, traditions and rules apply equally to all,' and stressed the need for mutual respect and adherence to democratic norms.
In a veiled reference to PTI's demands for production orders, Sadiq compared the situation with India, where opposition leader Rahul Gandhi was recently arrested without any such orders being issued.
He described the National Assembly as a 'grand jirga', calling on all political actors to work constructively in support of Parliament.
In one of the most startling moments of the day, Federal Minister for Law and Justice Azam Nazir Tarar revealed he had been offered Rs70 million to represent a shadowy political figure in court – a proposal he said he unequivocally rejected.
The bombshell revelation came amid heated debate over judicial independence, political vendettas, and the state's aggressive pursuit of PTI leaders.
The opposition PTI's Latif Khosa was especially scathing, branding the post-26th constitutional amendment period as a death knell' for both parliamentary sovereignty and judicial independence.
'The Assembly and judiciary have been buried,' he said, accusing courts of blocking access to lawyers and increasing fees to restrict justice for ordinary citizens.
Tarar strongly denied any government meddling in PTI-related court cases, attributing fee hikes to Supreme Court policy. 'I was offered Rs70 million to appear against a political personality (…) I turned it down,' he stated, without naming the individual involved.
As debate intensified, the chamber descended into a broader confrontation over military courts, the limits of parliamentary privilege, and the treatment of detained PTI leaders.
PTI's Iqbal Afridi accused Speaker Sadiq of enabling the forceful removal of ten opposition lawmakers and issued a stark warning: 'Tomorrow, PTI's Speaker will sit here. Retribution will be harsh.'
Sadiq, unshaken, responded coldly, 'This chair is temporary and it changes in the blink of an eye.'
The PTI lawmakers expressed deep unrest, insisting their communities wanted peace, not renewed operations in Bajaur and other parts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
Minister of State for Interior Talal Chaudhry briefed the House on ongoing intelligence-based operations (IBOs) under the National Action Plan (NAP), coordinated closely with provincial authorities to combat terrorism.
About the demolition of a mosque and seminary on Murree Road, Chaudhry dismissed allegations of state overreach. He stated that the relocation had been carried out after extensive dialogue with the seminary's management, not through any sudden or unilateral action.
A new facility, valued at Rs140-150 million and now housing 185 students, had already been constructed. 'Mosques and seminaries are sacred to us,' he said. 'No step was taken without proper respect, dialogue and thorough documentation.'
He further rejected claims of a planned overnight operation against religious seminaries in the capital as 'entirely baseless', adding that any future actions would follow legal protocols and involve consultation with religious leaders and planning authorities.
A 48-hour consultation period was agreed following discussions with Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) leadership and local clerics. A final decision would be made upon the return of Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi from abroad.
In a separate intervention, Minister of State for Finance Bilal Azhar Kayani addressed longstanding concerns regarding tax exemptions in the former FATA and PATA regions.
He clarified that a 10 per cent General Sales Tax (GST) had been levied only on locally produced and sold goods, while income tax exemptions remained intact.
'These regions have made tremendous sacrifices during the war on terror,' he said. 'Their preferential treatment remains a collective national responsibility.'
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Supreme Court unveils modernised 2025 rules
The Supreme Court on Thursday formally published the Supreme Court Rules, 2025, replacing the Supreme Court Rules, 1980 in what the court described as its commitment to modernization, digitalization, and to bring procedural clarity in the justice system in line with global governance of law. Framed under Article 191 of the Constitution, the new rules replaced "outdated provisions" and brought court procedures in line with contemporary legal, constitutional, and technological developments. According to a press release issued by the SC on Thursday, the rules came into immediate effect. The new rules were framed by a committee formed by Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Yahya Afrifi. The committee comprised four SC judges — Justice Shahid Waheed, Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Justice Naeem Akhter Afghan, and Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi. According to a press releases issued by the apex court, the committee engaged with judges, the Pakistan Bar Council (PBC), the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA), and other bar associations. The final draft was placed before the full court and approved after detailed deliberation. Following the promulgation of the new rules, the SCBA issued a statement, stating that the SC did not consult with bars with regard to increase in court fees. It demanded that the SC withdraw its decision to increase the fees, noting that such increase in fees will not help in dispensation of justice. Later in the day, the SC issued a public notice inviting suggestion to improve the rules. The notice said the new rules are conceived as a living document-responsive to the needs of the bench, the bar, the litigants, and adaptable to emerging legal and technological developments. It said that in the spirit of transparency and inclusivity, the CJP has constitute a committee under Rule 1(4) of Order I of the Supreme Court Rules, 2025, to make recommendations for addressing any difficulty that may arise in giving effect to its provisions. Interestingly, the committee comprises the same four judgesJustice Waheed, Justice Khan, Justice Afghan and Justice Abbasiwho were part of the committee that framed the rules. "The SC invites suggestions and feedback from judges, members of the bar, litigants, and the general public in this regard. Submissions will be compiled and reviewed by the committee and placed before the full court for consideration at the commencement of the new Judicial Year. "Suggestions may be sent in writing to the SC registrar," it added. The new rules The Supreme Court Rules, 2025 consist of seven parts, thirty-eight orders, and six schedules, with approximately 280 provisions amendedincluding 160 from the schedules. The rules include 60 new provisions while five outdated provisions have been deleted. The new rules include digital transition and technological enablement. Now all petitions and paper books must now be filed electronically while scanned copies are also mandatory. Notices, orders, certified copies, and pleadings will be issued digitally. Hearings through video-link are now permitted. It makes the authentication of affidavits by an Apostille mandatory. An Apostille is a certificate that simplifies the authentication of documents for international use, particularly for countries that are part of the Hague Apostille Convention. Parties and advocates are also required to provide updated phone numbers, email addresses, and digital app details. Now judicial documents sent via post will not be entertained. It provides litigant access to records and parties may inspect records or obtain copies online or in person. Applications marked urgent or requesting interim relief must be listed within 14 days or at the earliest practicable date. The SC registrar is authorized to ensure compliance with formats prescribed in the Sixth Schedule. Under the new rules, court fees are revised after decades; advocate and official expenses are also updated. However, criminal petitions are fee-exempt — except for certified copies. Copies are free for petitions submitted from jail while habeas corpus and Article 184(3) petitions related to criminal matters remain exempt from fees. The registrar may appoint advocates at state expense in death sentence cases. Counsel fees have also been enhanced. Under the rules, intra-court appeals have been introduced for orders under Article 184(3) and contempt proceedings. One review petition is permitted per judgment and it may be filed in person or through alternate counsel. Frivolous reviews may attract penalties and the security deposit has been increased. A party may revoke a power of attorney and appoint a new Advocate-on-Record. Transfer applications under Article 186A and Section 25A of the Family Courts Act, 1964, are now recognized. Constitutional Benches are formalized through a newly added chapter. The rules also introduce adjudication and procedural safeguards. Appeals from interlocutory orders will be heard by a bench of at least two judges; all other appeals, including those against acquittal will be heard by not less than three judges. Paper books will be delivered in advance to the Attorney-General, Advocate-General, Prosecutor-General, and respondents, with certification of service. The registrar may recall ex-parte orders upon sufficient cause. Compromise in compoundable offences is now formally accommodated. In acquittal appeals, the court may require surety or take coercive action if a respondent avoids appearance. Procedures for summoning records from lower courts have been streamlined. Under the administrative and structural reforms, the registrar is empowered to supervise staff and exercise procedural powers as assigned under the rules. Branch Registries are retained at all provincial capitals; filings are allowed at either Islamabad or the relevant registry. Under the rules, all fees, costs, security deposits, and allowances will be reviewed and revised every three years. Written tests for registration as advocate-on-record have been abolished and advocates with five years' standing may apply directly. The new rules also highlight courtroom conduct. Advocates may wear either a sherwani or a short black coat; wearing gowns is now optional. No concise statement is required in criminal appeals. In civil matters, if security for costs is not deposited within 30 days, leave to appeal stands rescinded unless otherwise ordered. Respondents may seek summary dismissal of frivolous or delay-motivated appeals. Procedural failures shall be treated as irregularities and will not nullify proceedings. Under the new rules, the court's inherent powers to ensure justice remain unaffected. "The Supreme Court Rules, 2025, reflect a transformative vision — integrating digital tools, promoting timely justice, and eliminating procedural rigidity. "With inclusive provisions and simplified processes, the rules usher in a new era of judicial efficiency and responsiveness in Pakistan. These rules have also been uploaded on the Supreme Court website for the information of the general public," said the official press release.


Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Sindh PA celebrates Independence Day
KARACHI: In a display of unity and inclusion, the Sindh Assembly on Thursday celebrated Pakistan's 78th Independence Day with a symbolic session at its historic old building, bringing together lawmakers, special students, and guests. The day began with Speaker Syed Owais Qadir Shah hoisting the national flag, followed by special prayers for the country's security, progress, and prosperity. The ceremony was attended by Deputy Speaker Anthony Naveed, Provincial Home Minister Zia Ul Hassan Lanjar, Leader of the Opposition Ali Khurshidi, ministers, women and minority representatives, and members from all political parties. Special students from the Ida Rieu Welfare Association were given seats in the members' chairs. Abid Ali, a differently-abled student, read out an Independence Day resolution from Braille, seconded by Asma Zahoor, Tauseef Ahmed, and Hans Raj. The resolution paid tribute to the armed forces, praised the success of Operation Bunyan Mursus — described as the 'Battle of Truth'— and commended Bilawal Bhutto Zardari for enhancing Pakistan's image through diplomacy. It called on the youth to stand as a united front in service of the nation. The House unanimously adopted the resolution, greeting the students with standing ovations and desk-thumping. Tauseef Ahmed recalled the night of May 7, when the Pakistan Air Force 'brought down six enemy aircraft in minutes' and the army 'held the Line of Control with their blood.' He called Operation Bunyan Mursus a decisive chapter in the spirit of the Pakistan Resolution. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025


Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
SC releases minutes of Committee
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Thursday made public the minutes of a Committee constituted under Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) and the Chief Justice of Pakistan's letter. These contain a decision of the senior puisne judge of the Supreme Court Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah and Justice Munib Akhtar date October 31, 2024, wherein, they demanded that the constitutional petitions challenging the 26th Amendments be placed before the Full Court (on judicial side) and fixed for hearing on November 4, 2024. In response to that decision, CJP Yahya Afridi wrote a letter on 31-10-2024 that 'the matter for constitution of the benches for hearing a petition under Article 184 of the Constitution, vests upon a Committee set up comprising of worthy judges of the Constitutional Bench, and not the Committee constituted under Supreme Court (Practice & Procedure) Act, 2023.' The CJP's letter mentions; 'I personally sought the opinion of all other thirteen judges of the Supreme Court, as to whether the request made by the two judges regarding the constitutional petitions challenging the 26th Constitutional Amendment filed under Article 184 of the Constitution to be fixed before a Full Court of the Supreme Court or before the Constitutional Bench under Clause (a) of Sub-Article (3) of Article 191A of the Constitution. Nine of the thirteen judges were of the view that the petitions challenging the 26th Constitutional Amendment be placed before a Constitutional Bench and not before the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Pakistan.' As the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court I did not find it appropriate to call for a Full Court Meeting, as the same would not only dampen the much-needed spirit of collegiality amongst Judges but would also expose the Supreme Court to public comment, which regretfully has been the case in the recent past,' it added. According to the minutes of 26th May, 2025, the Committee considered the revised draft of the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Committee Procedure, 2025. 'It was unanimously decided that in case the Chairperson/Chief Justice of Pakistan is unavailable, for any reasons, or in case he proceeds abroad, he may constitute a committee for dealing with urgent situations mentioned in the Draft during his absence.' Copyright Business Recorder, 2025