logo
The Words You Choose Might Be Your Most Underrated Leadership Tool

The Words You Choose Might Be Your Most Underrated Leadership Tool

Forbes08-08-2025
Matthew Mathison is a seasoned entrepreneur, investor, and co-founder of MBL Partners with 25+ years leading business transformation.
In leadership, much is said about vision, metrics and execution.
These are essential. However, often overlooked is something even more elemental: the language leaders use to describe themselves, their decisions and their organizations.
Language is not simply a tool for communication. It is one of the most powerful instruments a leader has to shape culture, create alignment and model clarity. In high-stakes environments where ambiguity is constant, language steadies the room. And in periods of pressure, it provides calm.
Over the years, I have led through volatility, transformation and public scrutiny. One moment stands out. I was helping lead a company navigating a reputational crisis triggered by an 82-page short-seller report. Markets reacted quickly. Internally, the team looked to leadership for signals. We chose to communicate internally with transparency and confidence. Not to spin, not to posture, but to name the reality and outline our first steps forward. That decision, at least internally for employees, was critical and set the cultural tone for everything that followed. It was different from the public or external view, and I was able to really see the difference that language made to the internal vs. external audience.
Use positive vocabulary to shape the energy in the room.
What I have seen, again and again, is that people do not just hear what you say. They absorb what your words signal. Language often travels faster than strategy. It shapes not just understanding, but belief.
It starts internally. One of the most overlooked aspects of leadership communication is self-talk. The language leaders use with themselves shows up in how they show up for others. I have experienced this firsthand. In moments of pressure, when the instinct is to say, 'You missed it,' I have learned to shift toward, 'You're learning. Keep moving forward.' That is not performance coaching. That is leadership hygiene.
Real leadership often begins with internal alignment, and language plays a central role in that process. The words leaders use with themselves shape the energy they bring into the room, and that energy influences how others respond, engage and align.
This matters because teams often calibrate their mindset from leadership vocabulary. A leader who describes conditions as 'confusing' creates a different culture than one who says, 'We're exploring.' The first suggests waiting. The second invites motion. These differences are small, but they carry weight.
Choose words rooted in optimism to encourage participation.
The emotional tone of that language matters just as much. Leaders who choose words rooted in optimism and forward-thinking energy create lift. Hopeful language opens people up, helps them re-engage and encourages movement. Complaints, blame or negative framing, on the other hand, tends to drag momentum down. It closes space. It drains initiative. Over time, the language leaders use shapes not just perception, but pace and participation.
Language does not just describe culture. It constructs it.
In turnarounds and transformation contexts, I've seen how leadership language directly influences team behavior. When leaders use vocabulary grounded in ownership, clarity and direction, it creates cultural stability. Over time, these patterns of intentional language help shift organizations away from blame or bottlenecks and toward accountability, alignment and forward motion. It may seem subtle, but the words leaders normalize often determine whether teams stay reactive or step into shared responsibility.
The best leaders I have worked with treat vocabulary as part of their leadership system. They are not scripting messages. They are aligning words with values and direction. When a leader uses language that is clear, candid and steady, especially under pressure, it builds trust. It builds motion. It builds resilience.
Speak with intention to ensure your team knows your priorities.
None of this requires charisma. It requires consistency. You do not need to be a brilliant communicator to speak with intention. You need to be aligned. When your language reflects your priorities, your teams know where to aim.
In fast-moving, high-pressure settings where attention is scarce and complexity is constant, language becomes a leader's most immediate lever. It does not require a new platform, a formal rollout or a strategy offsite. It requires a single moment of clarity. One well-placed phrase. One message delivered with conviction and calm.
So here is the question I ask most often, both of myself and others: What are your words teaching your team to believe? Not just what they are hearing, but what they are internalizing. What they are repeating when you are not in the room.
Because in a climate defined by complexity, the words you choose might be the most strategic asset you already have.
Use them like they matter. Because they do.
Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

OpenAI lawyers question Meta's role in Elon Musk's $97B takeover bid
OpenAI lawyers question Meta's role in Elon Musk's $97B takeover bid

TechCrunch

time2 minutes ago

  • TechCrunch

OpenAI lawyers question Meta's role in Elon Musk's $97B takeover bid

OpenAI is asking Meta to produce evidence related to any coordination with Elon Musk and xAI to acquire or invest in the ChatGPT-maker. The request was made public in a brief filed Thursday in Elon Musk's ongoing lawsuit against OpenAI. Lawyers representing OpenAI said they subpoenaed Meta in June over its potential involvement in Musk's unsolicited, $97 billion bid to takeover the startup in February. It's unclear from the filing whether such documents and communications exist. OpenAI's lawyers say they discovered that Musk communicated with Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg concerning xAI's bid to purchase the ChatGPT-maker, including 'about potential financing arrangements or investments.' Meta objected to OpenAI's initial subpoena in July; the ChatGPT-maker's lawyers are now seeking a court order to obtain such evidence. OpenAI is also asking the court for any of Meta's documents and communications related to 'any actual or potential restructuring or recapitalization of OpenAI' — the core issue in Musk's lawsuit against OpenAI. In the background of OpenAI's fight with Elon Musk, Meta has significantly invested in its own efforts to develop frontier AI models. That effort has included poaching several of OpenAI's leading AI researchers, including a co-creator of ChatGPT, Shengjia Zhao, who now leads research efforts at Meta Superintelligence Labs, the company newest AI unit. Meta also invested $14 billion in Scale AI, and reported approached several other AI labs about acquisition deals. Lawyers representing Meta asked the court to reject OpenAI's request for evidence, arguing that Musk and xAI can provide any relevant information. Meta also argues that its internal discussions of OpenAI's restructuring and recapitalization are not relevant to the case. This is a developing story… Check back for updates.

How MLB's upcoming deals will change how you watch out-of-market, Sunday night and Wild Card games
How MLB's upcoming deals will change how you watch out-of-market, Sunday night and Wild Card games

Associated Press

time3 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

How MLB's upcoming deals will change how you watch out-of-market, Sunday night and Wild Card games

When ESPN opted out of its contract with Major League Baseball in February, the network was hoping to get a reworked package at a lower cost while Commissioner Rob Manfred thought the sport could optimize its rights in the short term for Home Run Derby and Wild Card round. In the end, both parties may get what they want. According to people familiar with negotiations, ESPN is nearing a deal to distribute out-of-market games while NBC/Peacock, Netflix, Apple TV are in talks for regular-season packages, the Wild Card round and Home Run Derby. All sides hope to have everything finalized by the end of the regular season next month, three people told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because the contracts have not been finalized or announced by either side. The negotiations around the three-year deals is complicated due to the fact that MLB is also trying not to slight two of its other rights holders. MLB receives an average of $729 million from Fox and $470 million from Turner Sports per year under deals which expire after the 2028 season. While ESPN would be losing the playoffs and Home Run Derby, it would be gaining something it considers more valuable — the streaming package of out-of-market games as part of the direct-to-consumer service that launched on Thursday. ESPN would also sell the in-market rights to the five teams whose games are produced by MLB — San Diego, Colorado, Arizona, Cleveland and Minnesota. 'We are engaged. We are having healthy conversations with them. Nothing to announce today, but we're very interested in baseball in general,' ESPN Chairman Jimmy Pitaro said on Tuesday during a presentation about the network's DTC service. ESPN, which has carried MLB games since 1990, opted out of the final three years of a seven-year deal in February. The package averaged $550 million per season and also included the Home Run Derby and Wild Card games. Baseball would be the second league that would have its out-of-market digital package available in the U.S. on ESPN's platform. The NHL moved its package to ESPN in 2021. It would also be a win-win situation for MLB and ESPN. Manfred wrote in a memo to owners after ESPN opted out of its contract: 'While ESPN has stated they would like to continue to have MLB on their platform, particularly in light of the upcoming launch of their DTC product, we do not think its beneficial for us to accept a smaller deal to remain on a shrinking platform. In order to best position MLB to optimize our rights going in to our next deal cycle, we believe it is not prudent to devalue our rights with an existing partner but rather to have our marquee regular season games, Home Run Derby and Wild Card playoff round on a new broadcast and/or streaming platform.' The moves keep ESPN involved in baseball, but at a point where it can benefit while MLB could benefit from other partners in a short-term deal. There is a possibility that ESPN would still air 30 regular-season games, but not Sunday nights. That package of games would go to NBC/Peacock, along with the Wild Card round. NBC, which celebrates its 100th anniversary next year, has a long history with baseball, albeit not much recently. The network carried games from 1939 through 1989. It was part of the short-lived Baseball Network with ABC in 1994 and '95 and then aired playoff games from 1996 through 2000. Peacock had a Sunday streaming package of early-afternoon games in 2022 and '23. The addition of baseball games would give NBC a year-around night of sports on Sunday nights. It has had NFL games on Sunday night since 2006 and will debut an NBA Sunday night slate in February. NBC would likely do Sunday Night Baseball from May through Labor Day weekend. Fox's Saturday nights have been mainly sports the past couple years with a mix of baseball, college football, college basketball and motorsports. Netflix is in discussions for the Home Run Derby, which would align with its strategy of going for a big event in a major sport. The streamer will have an NFL Christmas Day doubleheader this season for the second straight year. Apple TV, which has had 'Friday Night Baseball' since 2022, remains involved in negotiations. The deals would also accomplish another of Manfred's goals. He has said for three years that he would like to see MLB take a more national approach to its rights instead of a large percentage of its games being on regional sports networks. 'We're blessed with a huge amount of content: 2,430 games. Because of the amount of content, I think there will be some local component but I think the strategy needs to be more national and our reach needs to be more national,' he said during a panel discussion last September at the CNBC x Boardroom's Game Plan event. ___ AP MLB:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store