SC decries media trial of accused in custody
"A confession made by such an accused while in custody of a police officer cannot be proved against him/her unless made in the immediate presence of a Magistrate," states the 25-page judgment authored by Justice Athar Minallah.
The bench was hearing a criminal appeal in which the accused, earlier sentenced to death by the trial court and whose conviction was upheld by the high court based on circumstantial evidence and his televised confession, was acquitted by the SC.
"It is not uncommon for a reporter to be given access to interview and record a statement of the accused and then disseminate it for information of the public. The news regarding a crime is always of interest to the people, particularly when the case is of high profile or the nature of the crime is of interest to the general public. An unusual interest of the public could lead to a media trial and the consequences could be irretrievable, not only for the accused but the victims as well."
The judgment warned that such trials could also obstruct justice by enabling wrongful convictions.
"The public interest may also be harmed by preventing the actual perpetrators of the crime from being held to account and instead facilitating the conviction of an innocent person on the basis of a perceived imputation of guilt," it said.
Justice Minallah noted that media holds enormous power to shape narratives - whether true or false - and this influence can wreak irreparable harm on the reputation and lives of not only the accused but also their families.
"The media has the unique power to make heroes or villains, intentionally or unintentionally, and such powers are susceptible to be abused in a society where the State suppresses freedom of expression and manipulates the media."
In such a context, the judgment underscores that an even greater ethical responsibility lies on the media. "A greater responsibility rests with the media to strictly observe high standards of ethical codes in order to strike a balance between the rights of parties involved in criminal proceedings and the public interest i.e. what information should be disseminated to the general public."
The judgment noted that the bedrock of the criminal justice system was the right to a fair trial, rooted in the presumption of innocence. "The guilt can only be proved in a trial before a competent court. The investigation ought to be conducted strictly in accordance with the procedure prescribed under the law i.e the Cr.P.C. and, that too, by a person authorised in this regard."
Justice Minallah stressed that every effort must be made by investigators to protect the rights of the accused. "Extreme caution and care are required to be exercised by those associated with the process of investigation to safeguard the rights of an accused - his or her right to be presumed innocent, the right to privacy, reputation, respect for private life and the lives of the family members and the right against self-incrimination."
Those involved in criminal investigations must not act in ways that create or support perceptions of guilt. "It is an onerous obligation of the investigators, prosecutors and other persons associated with the task of investigation to prevent the creation of perception and bias by acting in any manner likely to impute guilt."
The court also called on media to uphold the dignity of both the accused and victims.
"It is also the responsibility of the media, in any form, to respect the rights of an accused as well as the victims while reporting on matters relating to criminal proceedings. A disproportionate and excessive media spotlight and the manner in which it is presented is likely to create perceptions of guilt and influence the public as well as those who are associated with the criminal proceedings."
In this regard, Justice Minallah acknowledged that judicial officers are not immune. "The judicial officers are also humans and in this age of information and technology it would not be wrong to assume that they may also be susceptible to be influenced by the media coverage. This is a universal phenomenon."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
PARTLY FACETIOUS: ‘Have we ever been rated as investment grade?'
'Hallelujah!' 'Hallelujah is Hebrew and can be broken down into two words – halel means joyous song, praise, and Yah is a shortened form of Yahweh or Jehovah, Allah.' 'Why did you do that?' 'Do what? I merely translated…' 'Why did you translate the Hebrew Yahweh into the Muslim Allah?' 'Dear me, learn to distinguish between Judaism as a religion and Zionism as a policy of a state that justifies genocide and…' 'It's hard given what Israel is doing, but anyway that's not why I said Hallelujah.' 'I know why you said it. Because we have been upgraded by Standard and Poor's from CCC (substantial risk) to B- (highly speculative) which, as per the definition on their website, retains us in the junk category.' 'I believe we would need six more upgrades to get out of the junk category and into the investment grade category.' 'Have we ever been rated as investment grade?' 'Never, I believe the highest rating we got was B+.' 'There you go so we need only two more upgrades to reach the historic high.' 'Why do you keep the bar so low?' 'Why do you take it up so high – I mean to me, it means that you are succumbing to hopelessness and last I heard this is not the Islamic way and…' 'I was merely trying to point out to the SPs that it's rather a long road and…' 'SPs?' 'Same Pagers – we need to aim higher than the historic high, and we need…' 'OK, but remember one thing. In a world gone crazy…' 'Yes, but there is change – the under 40s in the West including the US, and President Trump's support base are all challenging the Israel First Policy of successive US administrations…' 'That has not changed policy yet, that would require another twenty to thirty years, when these under 40s take over the reins of government and…' 'Hamm and you have Germany that allowed the US to blow up the Nordstream pipeline that had supplied cheap Russian fuel to German industries resulting in German deindustrialization, you have Ursula Von Der Layen, a German heading the European Union, hell-bent to compel member states to borrow hundreds of billions to set up a defence industry capable of fighting Russia, and…' 'Hatred does more harm to the hater than the hatee I reckon, and especially when there is unreasoning hatred….' 'I heard the cabinet collectively hates The Man Who Must Remain…' 'Good that you mentioned collective, because the 2016 Supreme Court verdict in the Mustafa Impex case insisted that the cabinet instead of the prime minister can take a decision…' 'Don't be facetious.' 'Hallelujah.' Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
SC rejects Commissioner IR's plea against LHC order
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court dismissed the petition of Commissioner Inland Revenue against the Lahore High Court (LHC) order, saying the findings on facts does not suffer from any illegality or error. The petitioner department had assailed the LHC, Rawalpindi bench's order dated 26.03.2025, whereby, reference application filed under Section 47 of the Sales Tax 1990 by the petitioner against the order dated 4.01.2024 passed by the Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue (ATIR), Islamabad, was dismissed. A two-judge bench of Justice Munib Akhtar and Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi heard Commissioner Inland Revenue's appeal. The court noted that the show cause notice and the Order-in-Original passed by the Assistant Commissioner Inland Revenue in the instant case, against the respondents (M/s Mustafa Enterprises) are based on vague and frivolous allegations and certain conclusions have been made on mere presumptions only, whereas, no material or evidence has been produced to substantiate the same. The court further noted that while passing the Order-in-Original, the Assistant Commissioner Inland Revenue exceeded his jurisdiction while travelling beyond the very premises and the allegations made in the show cause notice, whereas, the respondents were never confronted with any such allegations or entries as reflected in the bank statement which were subsequently furnished by the respondents, showing the details of the total amount and the particulars of suppliers from whom purchases were made. It observed that while initiating the proceedings against the respondents, there was no material or evidence available on record to make out a case against the respondents of illegal or inadmissible claim of input tax adjustment, whereas, the entire proceedings and the Order-in-Original passed in the instant case was based on presumptions, whereas, no inquiry or verification was made by the department in respect of alleged fake/flying invoices. The SC judgment said that the ATIR and the Division Bench of LHC were justified to set aside both the Order-in-Original and the Order-in-Appeal, while recording concurrent findings on facts which does not suffer from any illegality or error. The proceedings in the instant matter were initiated by Deputy Commissioner Inland Revenue Unit-IV Cantt Zone RTO, Rawalpindi vide show cause notice dated 10.08.2021, whereby, the respondents were required to submit the record to prove as to whether the purchases made for the (Tax Period July 2019 to June 2020) amounting to Rs323,722,601 against which an amount of Rs55,032,846 was claimed as input tax, were actually made by them. It was further alleged in the show-cause notice that the record submitted by the respondents does not prove as to whether such purchases were actually made by the respondents during subject period, therefore, they have also failed to comply with the requirements of Section 73 of the Act. It was concluded that respondents did not purchase any coal from the local suppliers and unlawfully claimed input tax on the basis of fake/ flying invoices issued by the dubious suppliers, therefore, caused loss to the national exchequer to the tune of Rs55,032,846 by violating the provisions 6,7,8,22,23,26 and 73 read with Section 2(37) of the Act. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
3 days ago
- Express Tribune
PHC dismisses contempt plea against police
A two-member bench of the Peshawar High Court (PHC) comprising Justice Ejaz Anwar and Justice Faheem Wali on Thursday dismissed a contempt of court petition filed against the arrest of Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) provincial leader Syed Haider Shah Bacha. During the hearing, Justice Ejaz Anwar remarked that summoning the police in every case could hinder their ability to perform their duties effectively. He noted that the police admitted to arresting the petitioner but stated that they had not received any court order prohibiting the arrest. "If the police claim they acted on orders from higher authorities, then we would have seen how they could defy court directives," the judge added. The hearing began with Additional Advocate General Bashir Naveed and the petitioner's counsel appearing before the bench. The petitioner's lawyer argued that his client was arrested under Section 3 of the Maintenance of Public Order (MPO) for protesting against electricity load shedding and was subsequently sent to Dera Ismail Khan Jail, despite having secured protective bail from the court. He contended that the arrest constituted contempt of court as it violated a prior judicial order barring police from detaining his client. Justice Ejaz Anwar questioned how the arrest could be justified if a court order existed, adding, "Is the police so powerful that it can ignore the judiciary?" The police, in its written reply, stated that they had no knowledge of the court order at the time of arrest and released the petitioner once the order was received. The court also took note of the fact that 18 FIRs had been registered against the petitioner. His counsel responded that the petitioner was already on bail in those cases. After hearing arguments from both sides, the bench ruled that there was insufficient evidence to establish contempt of court and dismissed the petition accordingly. Livestock notification Meanwhile, PHC has suspended the notification issued by the Livestock Department regarding the premature repatriation of the Project In-Charge for Khyber District, and has issued notices to the Secretary of Livestock and other relevant officials, seeking a formal explanation. The case was heard by a two-member bench comprising Justice Ijaz Anwar and Justice Faheem Wali. Advocate Aminur Rehman Yousafzai, representing petitioner Naeemullah, the current Project In-Charge of the Integrated Development Package in Khyber District, told the court that his client's appointment was made in April 2025. However, on July 1, the posting was abruptly withdrawn and he was directed to report back to the parent department. The counsel argued that the transfer order was issued without the recommendations of the relevant committee, making it procedurally flawed. He further informed the court that the provincial government has already issued a formal policy for project-based appointments.
