
Swiss glacier collapse renews focus on risks of climate change as glaciers retreat around the world
How glaciers collapse — from the Alps and Andes to the Himalayas and Antarctica — can differ, scientists say. But in almost every instance, climate change is playing a role.
In Switzerland, the mountainside gave way Wednesday near the village of Blatten, in the southern Lötschental valley, because the rock face above the Birch Glacier had become unstable when mountain permafrost melted, causing debris to fall and cover the glacier in recent years, said Martin Truffer, a physics professor at the University of Alaska who studies how glaciers move.
While the debris insulated the glacier and slowed melting, its weight caused the ice to begin moving — which accelerated dramatically a few weeks ago. Authorities ordered the evacuation of about 300 people, as well as all livestock, from the village in recent days, 'when it became clear that there's a whole mountainside that's about to collapse,' said Truffer, who grew up in Switzerland.
Glacial lakes pose threat
Lakes that form at the base of glaciers as they melt and retreat also sometimes burst, often with catastrophic results. Water can even lift an entire glacier, allowing it to drain, said Truffer, adding that Alaska's capital of Juneau has flooded in recent years because a lake forms every year on a rapidly retreating glacier and eventually bursts.
In 2022, an apartment building-sized chunk of the Marmolada glacier in Italy's Dolomite mountains detached during a summer heat wave, sending an avalanche of debris down the popular summer hiking destination, killing 11.
A glacier in Tibet's Aru mountain range suddenly collapsed in 2016, killing nine people and their livestock, followed a few months later by the collapse of another glacier.
There also have been collapses in Peru, including one in 2006 that caused a mini tsunami; most recently, a glacial lagoon overflowed in April, triggering a landslide that killed two.
'It's amazing sometimes how rapidly they can collapse,' said Lonnie Thompson, a glacier expert at the Ohio State University. 'The instability of these glaciers is a real and growing problem, and there are thousands and thousands of people that are at risk.'
Scientists say melting glaciers will raise sea levels for decades, but the loss of inland glaciers also acutely affects those living nearby who rely on them for water for drinking water and agriculture.
No way to stop the melting
Scientists say greenhouse gases from the burning of fossil fuels such as coal have already locked in enough global warming to doom many of the world's glaciers — which already have retreated significantly.
For example, glaciers in the Alps have lost 50% of their area since 1950, and the rate at which ice is being lost has been accelerating, with 'projections ... that all the glaciers in the Alps could be gone in this century,' Thompson said.
Switzerland, which has the most glaciers of any country in Europe, saw 4% of its total glacier volume disappear in 2023, the second-biggest decline in a single year after a 6% drop in 2022.
A 2023 study found that Peru has lost more than half of its glacier surface in the last six decades, and 175 glaciers disappeared due to climate change between 2016 and 2020, mostly due to the increase in the average global temperature.
A study published Thursday in Science said that even if global temperatures stabilized at their current level, 40% of the world's glaciers still would be lost. But if warming were limited to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit ) — the long-term warming limit since the late 1800s called for by the 2015 Paris climate agreement — twice as much glacier ice could be preserved than would be otherwise.
'There's places in Alaska where we've shown that it doesn't take any more global warming,' for them to disappear, Truffer said. 'The reason some ... (still) exist is simply because it takes a certain amount of time for them to melt. But the climate is already such that they're screwed.'
___

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
17 hours ago
- New York Post
Why many women over age 52 have a higher risk of getting STIs
STIs are on the rise — but it's not just frat bros and free-lovers feeling the burn. While younger people still account for the majority of cases, studies show that some of the steepest spikes are happening in people 55 and up. Experts have offered several explanations for the surge, but research suggests there's a risk factor affecting many midlife and older women that has largely flown under the radar and could be playing a key role. Advertisement 4 More Americans are having sex in their senior years thanks to advancements in medicine. Monkey Business – More than a million American women hit menopause each year — and it's not just hot flashes and mood swings they're facing. The transition, which wraps up around age 52 on average, marks the end of reproductive years and is driven by a drop in estrogen as the ovaries slow hormone production. While vaginal dryness and loss of elasticity are well-known symptoms, research from Ohio State University (OSU) shows that menopause can also weaken the vaginal tissue itself, making it more prone to tearing. Advertisement That vulnerability comes down to changes at the cellular level. The vagina's surface is made up of multiple layers held together by key proteins like desmoglein-1 (DSG1) and desmocollin-1 (DSC1). 'These proteins strengthen the vaginal lining and restrict pathogen access to deeper tissue, reducing the risk of infection,' Dr. Thomas L. Cherpes, associate professor of otolaryngology at OSU, wrote in The Conversation. Advertisement 4 Menopause can bring a host of uncomfortable symptoms, including vaginal changes. – In their research, Cherpes and his colleagues found that postmenopausal women have significantly lower levels of DSG1 and DSC1 than women who haven't gone through the transition. To see how this might impact infection risk, the researchers removed the ovaries of mice in a lab to mimic estrogen loss in postmenopausal women. Compared to mice with intact ovaries, those without had far lower levels of DSG1 and DSC1 in their vaginal tissue. Advertisement The team also found that these mice were more vulnerable to infection with herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2), which causes genital herpes. They were less able to clear chlamydia infections from the lower genital tract as well. The findings help explain why postmenopausal women are more susceptible to STIs than their younger counterparts. Notably, when Cherpes and his colleagues applied estrogen cream to the mice without ovaries, it restored the vaginal lining's integrity and fully protected them from HSV-2 infection. 4 The vaginal tissue is more vulnerable to tearing after menopause, opening the door to infection. megaflopp – 'While additional research is needed, findings from our lab suggest that estrogen-containing compounds used to relieve vaginal irritation and other symptoms of genitourinary syndrome of menopause can also reduce susceptibility to STIs among older adults,' Cherpes wrote. Sex doesn't stop — and neither do the risks Americans might not like to talk about it, but older adults are still very much having sex. A 2018 survey found nearly 40% of people aged 65 to 80 are sexually active, and almost two-thirds remain interested in sex. Advertisement More recent AARP data shows that 26% of 60- to 69-year-olds and 17% of those 70 and older have sex weekly. 'Hormone-replacement therapy, vaginal lubricants and the approval of sildenafil (Viagra) and its relatives have extended people's sex lives,' Dr. Sandra Adamson Fryhofer told the American Medical Association. But while more people are living longer and staying sexually active, more are also paying the price. 4 Sex-crazed seniors are fueling a major spike in STIs nationwide. David – Advertisement 'Rates are highest in the under 25 age group, which accounts for about 50% of STIs, but we're definitely seeing a rise in infections in the older population, particularly in people over 65,' Dr. Angelina Gangestad said in an interview with University Hospitals. Between 2010 and 2023, the number of Americans over 65 diagnosed with chlamydia, gonorrhea or syphilis rose by roughly three-, five- and sevenfold, respectively, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Research also suggests women over 50 are at greater risk for HIV than their younger peers. Advertisement In addition to the effects of menopause, experts say several other factors are likely fueling the rise. Condom use is significantly lower among older adults compared to younger people. One study found that just 3% of Americans aged 60 and older have used a condom in the past year. Older adults also tend to have less knowledge about STIs, including how they spread, what symptoms look like and how to prevent them. Advertisement To make matters worse, research suggests that many doctors don't ask older patients about their sex lives — and seniors aren't exactly jumping to bring it up with their family or friends, either. 'No one wants to think about grandma doing this,' Matthew Lee Smith, an associate professor at the Texas A&M School of Public Health, told NBC News. 'You certainly aren't going to ask grandma if she was wearing condoms — and that's part of the problem, because every individual regardless of age has the right to intimacy.'


Chicago Tribune
3 days ago
- Chicago Tribune
Air quality alerts issued across Illinois. But how safe are you inside your home?
Air quality alerts issued Thursday in Illinois because of Canadian wildfire smoke marked the latest bout in an increasingly common summer occurrence. The alert covers 34 Illinois counties designated as having unhealthy air for all residents. Although it is recommended to hunker inside during these stretches, experts say indoor air quality can often be just as bad, if not worse, than outdoor air quality. 'When they're in the home, their windows are closed, the doors are shut and locked, and they think, 'this is my indoor air, and it's totally different than what's in the outdoor air,'' said Ian Cull, founder and chief science officer of Indoor Science, an indoor air quality consulting and training company headquartered in Aurora. 'But homes and all buildings are leakier than what people imagine.' There were two multi-day periods of bad air quality in the Midwest earlier this summer — both due to smoke from Canadian wildfires. In June, Chicago saw three days of some of the worst air quality in the world, and in mid-July, air quality was bad enough for the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency to declare an 'Air Quality Action Day' – when air quality is at least unhealthy for sensitive groups for two or more consecutive days. Thursday afternoon, Chicago's air was ranked worst in the world, according to Swiss air quality technology company IQAir. But staying indoors with air conditioning doesn't offer complete protection — nor does it necessarily mean that your indoor air quality was good to begin with. 'Wildfire smoke contains particles that are so small they can get through ventilation system filters and AC units,' said Susan Buchanan, clinical associate professor of environmental and occupational health sciences at University of Illinois at Chicago. Fine particulate matter is defined as particulate matter measuring 2.5 micrometers or smaller. For comparison, the width of a human hair is about 80 micrometers. These particulates are the biggest and most dangerous pollutant in wildfire smoke. In the short term, fine particulate matter causes irritation of the eyes and respiratory system, with symptoms mimicking allergies or the common cold. Long-term exposure to wildfire smoke is still being studied, but exposure to other fine particulate matter causes a wide variety of health effects, including decreased lung function and heart issues or heart attacks. But even when outdoor air is considered healthy, indoor air quality can often be much worse than what's outside. That's because indoor products like cleaning supplies, candles, and even spray deodorant can significantly worsen indoor air quality, according to a series of studies released by Purdue University in February. Cooking fumes, dust, smoking indoors, and pet dander also bring down air quality. In addition, most homes are underventilated, or they rely on air conditioning systems that recirculate the dirty indoor air. That's why even when a home air purification system is in place, Cull said it's generally a good idea to open doors and windows every day or so to bring in fresh air. 'The whole benefit of ventilation is to flush out some of the contaminants that we've created,' Cull said. 'But then the tables are turned when outdoor air quality is bad. Then, indoor air, despite its chemicals from cleaners and personal care products, ends up being better than the outdoor air.' Air quality is measured on a scale of 0 to 500 by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, with 0 being good and anything above 300 being hazardous. The value is calculated from tracking five factors: ground-level ozone, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide. When air quality is above 100, sensitive groups are advised to limit outdoor time, and above 150, like it is Thursday, air quality is unhealthy for everyone. According to experts, climate change is increasing the intensity, frequency and reach of the Canadian wildfires. Buchanan recommended that people check the Air Quality Index online every day. 'People with respiratory conditions like asthma, pregnant people, and the elderly should stay indoors in AC,' she said. To keep indoor air as clean and fresh as possible, the Illinois Department of Public Health recommends that people minimize the amount of indoor-air pollutants they use. Chemical cleaning should wait until the air quality improves, and fuel-burning stoves should not be used. When these recommendations can't be followed, especially when outdoor air quality is bad for an extended period of time. Cull and Buchanan said a standalone air purifier is the best ally. Cull said that air purifiers with HEPA filters are the best for improving air quality. HEPA, which stands for high efficiency particulate air, is the highest standard of air filter, with the ability to remove at least 99.97% of the most common microscopic pollutants and particulate matter from the air. This includes pet dander, dust, pollen, mold, and even bacteria. Cull also warned that some air filters are known to produce ozone as a byproduct when they remove particulates from the air. This is most commonly seen in air purifiers with ionizers or UV light components. Dr. Momen Wahidi, an interventional pulmonologist and medical director of Northwestern Medicine's Canning Thoracic Institute, says that hospitalizations only went up a little bit during the last two air quality alerts in Chicago this year — but that doesn't mean that this is not an issue. 'I know I've dealt with this about a month or two ago, again from the wildfire,' he said. 'We're probably going to see this issue popping up more often.'
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Vape Fluid Warps The Skulls of Fetal Mice, Study Shows
Pregnant mice exposed to the base ingredient of most vape 'juices' develop babies with smaller, narrower skulls, a new study has found. It's a concerning find, especially given the 'vapor' in this experiment contained none of the other chemicals usually found in vapes, not even nicotine. It suggests that even nicotine-free vapes may not be safe, especially if you're pregnant. The key ingredients in vape fluids are usually a humectant – a carrier fluid that makes up the bulk of the material, most commonly propylene glycol and glycerol (otherwise known as vegetable glycerine) – combined with nicotine, and various flavors and sweeteners. The study, led by anatomist James Cray from The Ohio State University College of Medicine, was designed to define a baseline of what effects the carrier substances have on the body. This means that in future experiments, the researchers can add other components of vape fluid, like nicotine, to this carrier, with a better idea of which effects can be attributed to which substance. Related: 'Popcorn Lung': Vapers at Risk of Irreversible Disease, Experts Warn Cray and his team prepared two basic formulas of plain vape fluid out of propylene glycol and glycerol. One formula contained a 50/50 mix of propylene glycol and glycerol, while the other had a 30/70 ratio. Because propylene glycol was previously found to increase nicotine uptake, Cray says, many companies have shifted to ratios with more glycerol, "trying to position this as a safer alternative." It turns out this may not be the case. Pregnant mice were exposed to vape hits of one of the formulas or fresh air as a control, at a rate of one puff per minute of four hours in a day, across five days each week. This continued through their roughly 20-week-long pregnancies, which resulted in 21 litters and 140 mouse pups. Fourteen days after birth, the mouse pups were euthanized, their skulls measured in detail and scanned for 3D reconstruction. While Cray's team had expected the 30/70 fluid would have fewer negative effects on skull and face development than the 50/50 formula, the results were quite the opposite. "The 50/50 mixture had no dramatic statistical changes – and that's where we were looking for the difference. We thought heavier propylene glycol should be causing more effects, and it was the exact opposite," Cray says. Compared to the other groups, pups of mothers exposed to the 30/70 fluid while pregnant had significantly smaller craniums and faces, in measures of both width and length, and shorter noses. "What we see is a consistent narrowing of all of the facial features, and the same thing as we move back into the cranium as well. So globally they're narrower and a little bit shorter-headed, which does mimic some observable changes that we see in children," Cray explains. The group exposed to the 30/70 mixture also had significantly lower body weight compared to the others, though still within the normal range for mice of this age. Figuring out the health impacts of vapes is tricky. For ethical reasons, it's not possible to do this kind of testing directly on humans; long-term natural experiments, in which scientists observe the effects vaping has on existing users, require time. While experiments on animal models are considered more ethical and time-efficient, their results can't always be extrapolated onto human health. Additionally, lack of market regulation means the contents of each vape can vary widely. Isolating the effects of each component may help people make a more informed decision at the counter. That's especially important when vapes have been shown, in certain cases, to have some medical benefits, like helping people to quit smoking. It gets even more complicated when you consider that vapes heat and aerosolize these components, which can result in the production of entirely different compounds. For now, isolating each variable is the only way we're going to start seeing through the haze. "This is a small study that speaks to the possibility that nicotine-free vaping is not safe," Cray says. "And it's a sign that we probably should study the nicotine-free products as much as we study the nicotine-laden products." The research is published in PLOS One. Related News Heart Cancer Strikes Very Rarely. An Expert Reveals Why. Brain Variations Identified in Children With Restrictive Eating Disorders Vitamin D During Pregnancy Linked to Cognitive Boost in Children Solve the daily Crossword