logo
Warren Buffett reveals to WSJ why he's stepping down from Berkshire Hathaway

Warren Buffett reveals to WSJ why he's stepping down from Berkshire Hathaway

CNN14-05-2025
At 94 years old, Warren Buffett stunned the investor world when he announced he was stepping down as CEO of Berkshire Hathaway.
But he had a simple answer for why he decided to hand over the position to Greg Abel at the end of the year.
'There was no magic moment,' Buffett said to The Wall Street Journal in an interview published Wednesday. 'How do you know the day that you become old?'
Abel, the CEO of Berkshire Hathaway Energy and the vice chairman of non-insurance operations of Berkshire, is slated to succeed Buffett at the start of 2026. Buffett said in the annoucement he will remain as chairman until his death.
'I didn't really start getting old, for some strange reason, until I was about 90,' he continued to WSJ. 'But when you start getting old, it does become—it's irreversible.'
Some of those symptoms, he said: losing his balance, having difficulty recalling names, a harder time reading the newspaper.
Abel, 62, an Edmonton, Alberta-born businessman, was designated as Buffett's successor in 2021.
Buffett, who has been with Berkshire Hathaway since 1965, made the announcement at the company's annual shareholder meeting, an event often called 'Woodstock for Capitalists.'
But Buffett told the Journal he still plans to keep working, and his investing acumen is very much intact.
'My health is fine, in the sense that I feel good every day,' he said. 'I'm here at the office and I get to work with people I love, that they like me pretty well, and we have a good time.'
As for his retirement plans from Omaha: 'I'm not going to sit at home and watch soap operas… My interests are still the same.'
CNN's Auzinea Bacon contributed to this report.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Big Joe Donates Custom Walkie Stacker to University of Wisconsin-Madison's College of Engineering
Big Joe Donates Custom Walkie Stacker to University of Wisconsin-Madison's College of Engineering

Business Wire

timean hour ago

  • Business Wire

Big Joe Donates Custom Walkie Stacker to University of Wisconsin-Madison's College of Engineering

MADISON, Wis.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--When a 1960s-era Big Joe walkie stacker was discovered still in use at the University of Wisconsin-Madison's College of Engineering, the team at Big Joe Forklifts knew they had to do something special. In honor of the decades-old workhorse still serving the university's engineering department, Big Joe donated a brand new IBH stacker, branded with the University of Wisconsin's signature red and white, to support and empower the next generation of engineers. Big Joe's New Product Development Engineer and former intern and alumni at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Zach Skelton noted, 'I was walking through the basement of the engineering building and did a double take. I thought, 'Wait a minute… that's a Big Joe!' At that moment, I knew there was an opportunity not just to celebrate this equipment standing the test of time, but to help the university modernize its processes. I'm glad to be a part of making this a reality and providing new resources to students and faculty alike.' The new Big Joe stacker will be used in instructional and operational settings within the College of Engineering, giving students hands-on experience with modern material handling equipment. 'We are truly excited to not only help the University of Wisconsin at Madison continue on its mission to train future engineers, but to see the full life cycle of Big Joe products in action,' said Big Joe's VP of Engineering, Mat McEachern. 'We look forward to working with our dealer partner Wolter as well as university staff and students as a part of the Madison community.' 'As a Big Joe dealer, this opportunity to support UW Madison is a huge priority as Wolter is focused on supporting the future of Wisconsin industry and the community at large,' said Ross Jeremiah, president of Wolter Midwest. 'We are happy to continue to support UW Madison as this new stacker provides support and dependability to the engineering department for years to come.' Wisconsin-born and built, the Big Joe IBH is proudly manufactured about an hour northwest of the university, in the Wisconsin Dells. Staying true to its Wisconsin roots, the original forklift will be moved from the university to a new home at Big Joe's Madison headquarters, where it will serve as a testament to the longevity of Big Joe equipment, the spirit of innovation, and partnership that powers progress. About Big Joe Established in 1951, Big Joe is a customer-centric, North American material handling solutions company, offering a variety of purpose-built integrated lithium-ion forklifts designed to replace internal combustion, innovative material handling equipment for warehouse and distribution centers, and market-leading autonomous solutions. Based in Madison, Wisconsin, we provide world-class market-driven solutions with a reputation for exceptional customer service through our nationwide dealership network.

Nearly 1 in 3 businesses plan to raise prices within six months: Report
Nearly 1 in 3 businesses plan to raise prices within six months: Report

The Hill

time4 hours ago

  • The Hill

Nearly 1 in 3 businesses plan to raise prices within six months: Report

Nearly a third of U.S. businesses are likely to increase prices by the end of the year as they continue to adjust to rising costs and inflation, a new report found. More than 30 percent of businesses surveyed by LendingTree said they expect their prices will be higher in six months than they are now. About 5 percent said that their prices will go down, while 65 percent said they will stay the same. The findings come amid uncertainty over President Trump's long-awaited tariff rollout this year and continued pressure from inflation. 'Tariffs are likely playing a significant role in these concerns, but so is the overall sense of uncertainty that remains in the American economy,' LendingTree chief consumer finance analyst Matt Schulz said in a release on the report's findings. 'There are so many unknowns that it's nearly impossible to predict what the next few weeks will look like, much less six months from now.' he continued. 'However, this report makes it clear many businesses see continued rising prices ahead.' The Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday that modest price hikes will soon hit home improvement retailer Home Depot, despite the company's efforts to lessen the impact of tariffs by relying on domestic products and diversifying its supply chain. Economists and political strategists have sounded alarms about escalating costs throughout the year, after Trump promised to drive down prices if elected. Businesses in Rhode Island, New Hampshire, Montana, Washington, Oregon and Vermont were most likely to say they expect to increase prices in the coming months, with more than 36 percent in each state reporting that they will likely make adjustments, according to the polling. Businesses in West Virginia, Mississippi, Arkansas, Alabama, Washington, D.C., New Mexico, Indiana, South Dakota, Louisiana and Nebraska were the least likely, though more than 20 percent in each reported some anticipated price hikes, the data shows. More than half of the companies surveyed across the country said they expect their own costs for goods and services to increase over the next six months, impacting their bottom lines if they resist raising prices. 'Pricing pressure may force other choices, such as staffing reductions, in the hopes of remaining competitive,' Schulz said. LendingTree's researchers conducted the surveys from June 2-15, and analysts relied on data from the U.S. Census Bureau Business Trends and Outlook Survey for their findings.

How the ‘tech titans' can save Social Security
How the ‘tech titans' can save Social Security

The Hill

time4 hours ago

  • The Hill

How the ‘tech titans' can save Social Security

The Wall Street Journal reports that several of 'Silicon Valley's elite' believe the artificial intelligence boom will generate massive wealth even as it displaces millions of workers, leaving them unemployed. Their solution to this unemployment crisis is to use the newly generated wealth from AI to provide a universal basic income for everyone. It's a terrible idea for several reasons. But it could be tweaked to address a huge public policy problem: funding Social Security. The idea of a universal basic income has been around for decades. While proposals vary, the basic plan is a taxpayer-funded redistribution scheme: providing everyone with a designated amount of money — usually between $500 to $1,000 per month — with no strings or work attached. Wall Street Journal reporter Josh Reich notes that Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey and Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes have used their own money to set up limited universal basic income, or UBI, pilot programs to see if they work. And they aren't alone. Stanford University's Basic Income Lab tracks UBI programs around the world. While most are in the U.S. and created at the state or local level, there are several in other countries. Some are funded by donations; others are taxpayer funded. Reich says OpenAI CEO Sam Altman is a UBI proponent and funded an experiment in 2016 that gave $1,000 a month to low-income individuals for three years. Elon Musk has talked about 'universal high income,' and boasted that AI 'will automate most production and the public can share in the revenue.' And tech entrepreneur Andrew Yang proposed a $1,000 a month UBI program as part of his failed Democratic presidential campaign in 2020. What's different now is that some tech titans 'see a future flush with wealth generated by artificial intelligence.' And 'that revenue can be shared under a massive wealth-redistribution system.' It's not clear how AI-created wealth could be redistributed. Wealth is usually created by a company or an individual, who owns the wealth. To redistribute that wealth, the owner has to voluntarily donate it or the government must take it. Even if AI were to dramatically boost federal revenues, the federal government currently has a $37 trillion debt and a $1.9 trillion 2025 budget deficit that need to be reduced. And there are other problems. UBI programs have a dubious record, as a recent National Bureau of Economic Research paper demonstrates. The funds aren't enough to reduce income inequality, especially since participants tend to work fewer hours. Even many center-left organizations oppose them. Finland tried a pilot UBI project for two years. About 2,000 unemployed Finns received the equivalent of $634 per month. The hope was the money would encourage the unemployed to find a job. The BBC asks, 'Did it help unemployed people in Finland find jobs, as the centre-right Finnish government had hoped? No, not really.' However, if untold riches flow from AI advancements — and that's a very big 'if' — as some tech titans seem to think, there is a way that money could help both individuals and the country. Instead of handing people a monthly check, establish something like a special individual retirement account for everyone. The individual could not take out any funds until retirement age — say 60 or 65. Individuals would have limited, broad-based investment options to prevent speculation. Workers would continue to pay their current payroll taxes to Social Security. They wouldn't be funding this new type of IRA because the money would come instead from the tech titans' predicted AI revenue. At retirement, an individual could then choose between standard Social Security and their AI-funded retirement accounts. If enough money has been deposited and appreciated in these accounts over the years, retirees might choose it over standard Social Security. Plus, they would have ownership rights, meaning any money left over would be passed on in their estate. Retirees who choose their special private retirement account would forfeit their claim on traditional Social Security, leaving fewer retirees relying on Social Security's underfunded financial position. Those who choose traditional Social Security would forfeit their special account. Unlike a universal basic income, the special account would be more like a universal basic retirement program. Because people would not have access to their universal basic retirement funds until retirement, there would be no economic incentive to reduce work. And it wouldn't be a new entitlement, because retirees would choose between traditional Social Security or their private retirement option. Although AI will surely make a lot of money for some people, it is unlikely to produce the flood of revenue some tech billionaires anticipate. That said, if AI does produce massive wealth, using it to improve retirement and save Social Security is a much better and more workable option than a universal basic income.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store