Britain's security depends on more than soft power
Russia was incorporated into the G7, received a state visit from the Queen, and was added to Eurovision. Tony Blair gave Vladimir Putin silver cufflinks for his birthday, and supported Russia's war in Chechnya. None of this, not the facilitating of Russian oligarchic investment in the UK, not BP investing billions in Russia, not Russia hosting the Winter Olympics and World Cup, has worked.
Sometimes soft power simply ensures that tyrants continue to act with impunity, and ensures that the message 'We disagree with your actions and want you to stop' falls on deaf ears.Chris RousellDurham
Simon Jenkins is absolutely correct. To spend $1.3bn on US aeroplanes whose operational use is subject to US approval serves only to repeat the continuing and expensive folly of Trident et al. To announce this in the same week as proposing to cut support for some of the most disadvantaged people in our grossly unequal society beggars belief.
Many years ago, Ralph Miliband argued that the Labour party had become a 'party of modest social reform'. Even this now seems overly optimistic. As a party member since the early 1970s, I am one of many thousands who are seriously thinking of resigning.Richard TaylorPooley Bridge, Cumbria
Simon Jenkins makes a compelling case. Arming ourselves to the teeth sustains hostility rather than fostering peace. The west missed the golden opportunity to end the cold war when Mikhail Gorbachev dismantled the Soviet Union. The end of the cold war would have made Nato redundant. Instead it was treated as a victory of capitalism over communism, and Nato was strengthened. That has led inexorably to Putin.
Soft power fosters mutuality. Overseas aid, properly targeted, helps communities to health education and self-reliance. It engenders a friendly disposition towards the aid-givers when it is politically unconditional. That is surely a more successful path to a safer world, rather than retreating behind a fortress mentality and spending on defence, which soaks up our public services resources while not solving real, existential global problems.John StoneThames Ditton, Surrey
Apparently Simon Jenkins thinks that in dealing with Putin's Russia, soft power will keep us safe. It is a huge pity that the great Russian journalist Anna Politkovskaya is not alive to comment on this story, but she was shot dead outside her Moscow apartment in 2006 – on Putin's birthday as it happened. Natalia Estemirova, the Russian human rights activist might have said something, but she was murdered in 2009. Possibly Sergei Magnitsky, the Russian tax lawyer, might have said something, but he died in police custody in 2009. Boris Nemtsov, the Russian opposition politician, would surely have offered a different point of view but he was assassinated within sight of the Kremlin in 2015. Sadly Alexei Navalny is unable to rebut the wishful thinking of Jenkins as he died in a Russian gulag in 2024.Brendon BonnerPorirua, New Zealand
Of course Simon Jenkins is right to emphasise the importance of soft power, but surely we need both the hard and soft options? As Theodore Roosevelt said: 'Speak softly and carry a big stick.'Dr David FineExeter
Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
JD Vance expected to host Robert Jenrick during UK trip – but not Tory leader
JD Vance is expected to host shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick during his holiday in the UK – but not Tory leader Kemi Badenoch. Mr Jenrick has been invited to meet the US vice-president before a drinks event on Tuesday, it is understood. A Conservative spokesman said the party leader's team had spoken to Mr Vance's but that 'scheduling' had proved difficult. Both sides have played down the notion of a snub, the Telegraph reported. Former leadership contender Mr Jenrick has strayed well beyond his justice brief in recent months, building a prominent social media presence with campaigns on a range of issues, from the impact of immigration on housing to tackling fare-dodgers on the London Underground. He and the vice-president have voiced similar concerns about the erosion of freedom of speech, as well as opposition to equality, diversity and inclusion initiatives. It comes after Mr Vance joined David Lammy at Chevening, the Foreign Secretary's grace-and-favour country estate in Kent, last week. The vice-president, who has also been tipped for a future leadership bid, described the Labour Cabinet minister as his 'good friend' but said there were 'disagreements' between the US and the UK governments on how best to respond to the humanitarian crisis and war in Gaza. A Liberal Democrat source claimed Mrs Badenoch was 'losing out to her leadership rival' while 'she messes up her efforts to mimic Nigel Farage and drag the Conservative Party ever further to the right'. 'Bungling Badenoch strikes again – JD Vance has apparently joined the electorate in giving Kemi the cold shoulder,' they said.
The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
If stopping the boats were simple, it would have happened by now
Given the unusually fine weather – coupled with the world's many conflicts, and regions of endemic poverty – it should not come as a great surprise that yet another small boats record has been broken. New Home Office figures show that, since Labour came to power after the general election, more than 50,000 migrants have arrived in the UK via the English Channel. A few weeks ago, the numbers of refugees and economic migrants arriving via the English Channel reached a record rate for the time of year – 25,000 by the end of July, and, thus, the fastest flow since 2018, when such movements were first monitored. The new headline figure is different, and even more 'political'. At this rate, 2025 will set a new record for a calendar year. The political reaction has been predictable. Labour says it is 'unacceptable', while the Tories accuse the government of having 'surrendered our borders'. A little over a year ago, it was the Conservative government admitting the flows were unacceptable, and the Labour opposition laying the charge that the Sunak government had surrendered our borders. Meanwhile, Nigel Farage and Reform UK continue to pretend that solving this complex and intractable problem is simply a matter of willpower and a willingness to break international law and start a naval conflict with France. To borrow a recently fashionable phrase, the Reformists are the least serious people in British politics since… well, they persuaded the nation that Brexit was a good idea. Of course, in some ways, taking the Guinness Book of Records approach to the immigration statistics is playing the old immigration numbers game in an even more unhelpful way. The numbers may be large by recent trends, but they are rarely placed in context. Even a figure of 50,000-plus would, for example, only represent about 4 to 5 per cent of the total of gross, entirely lawful immigration into the UK on work and study visas. Not all will be able to make a successful claim for asylum. If any commit a criminal offence, they are liable to be deported – and much more rapidly under the latest proposals from the home secretary, Yvette Cooper. Contrary to some lurid and confused headlines, asylum seekers are neither responsible for most sexual offences in Britain, nor the same as those predators of Pakistani heritage who inflicted their appalling crimes on young girls for most of the last two decades. They were not responsible for the Southport murders; and they are mostly quite anxious to go to work, even if it is illegal for them to do so. The economic case for migration also stands. Despite an uptick in unemployment, there is a labour shortage in many parts of the UK, and it is almost as bad as it has ever been since Brexit in agriculture and the hospitality, health, social care and leisure sectors. A policy of 'net zero' migration, as advocated by Reform UK, would cause chaos in care homes, on farms and elsewhere, and inflict grievous damage to the economy. Those who want to reduce regular, lawful, documented and visa-based migration, such as Mr Farage, need to come up with some better ideas about how the demographically challenged and ageing British nation can undergo the renaissance they so cynically promise. Ministers have a duty to take on the myths and legends of irregular migration. But they are also under an obligation to 'stop the boats', something all parties actually agree about: this trade in human misery is dangerous and, indeed, unacceptable. Politically, Labour may have given the impression before the last general election, analogous to the way it approached economic policy, that fixing the problem of irregular migration would be easier than it has turned out to be. That is not to decry its efforts. Sir Keir Starmer was perfectly sincere in his belief, based on past experience as director of public prosecutions, that the criminal gangs engaged in human trafficking are susceptible to the same methods as gangs involved in terrorism and drug peddling. He was also right to rebuild cooperation with European neighbours, as with the 'one in, one out' deal with France and changes in German law to make obtaining and running the boats more difficult. Yvette Cooper seems fully aware of the need to stop using so-called 'migrant hotels', and to clear the huge backlog of cases left behind by the Sunak administration – people supposedly destined for Rwanda who were never going to get there because the Rwanda scheme was so small. Without condoning the ugly violence and vicious Islamophobia that disfigures too many local demonstrations, it is plain that the public is impatient with the lack of tangible progress. It is unfortunately not yet clear that Labour is making the requisite moves to 'smash the gangs' and 'turn the page and restore order to the asylum system so that it operates swiftly, firmly, and fairly'. The best thing that Sir Keir and Ms Cooper can do in these circumstances is to level with the electorate and explain why this intractable challenge will have to take time, and that they will do whatever is necessary to get the numbers radically lower. If stopping the boats were as easy as some claim, it would have happened by now. Nonetheless, the government needs to provide more evidence of progress, if only to counter the propaganda and misinformation so widespread on social media. In short, the public would like to hear about record-low numbers of small boat arrivals.
The Guardian
3 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘We don't want him': Cotswolds residents protest against JD Vance's UK visit
There was cake and music. The weather was perfect. At first glance, it could have been a joyful community gathering in a sun-dappled Cotswolds village park, but the placards gave the game away. These pulled no punches as they criticised the policies and stances championed by the US vice-president, JD Vance, who is enjoying a country break down the road. About 100 people, the majority of them women, turned up for the 'not welcome' party organised by the Stop Trump Coalition on the park opposite the Co-op in Charlbury. 'He's simply not welcome here,' said therapist Sue Moon, from nearby Chipping Norton, who was carrying a placard reading: 'We don't want him. Cotswold childless cat ladies say go home', a reference to Vance's typically blunt put-down of Democrats. Moon, who has children and no cats, said the Cotswolds was earning a reputation as a bolt-hole for the rich and powerful – former prime minister David Cameron lives nearby. 'That's not what we're about. We don't want anything to do with people like him,' she said. Natasha Phillips, who had travelled 70 miles from Bath, bore a placard saying: 'JD Vance – the guy who bullied a war hero from the comfort of his couch.' 'The way he treated Volodymyr Zelenskyy was disgusting,' she said. 'The Ukrainian people are heroes. British people admire the way they are standing up to [Vladimir] Putin. I wanted to come here to show that.' Chris Tatton, a long-term resident of Charlbury and a former councillor, said one of the worst things he had seen in a lifetime of watching politics was Vance's ambush of the Ukrainian president. 'That was disgraceful,' he said. His friend, retired union organiser Steve Akers, said even worse for him was the sight of starving children in Gaza. 'That wouldn't happen without this US government.' One placard said: 'Make Charlbury great again – go home.' Another said: 'Not too push to protest.' A third: 'Rolling hills. Not rolling back climate change.' There were plenty of versions of the meme of Vance as a bloated baby. In June, a Norwegian man, Mads Mikkelsen, 21, accused American border officials of denying him entry into the US because he had the meme saved on his phone. More wholesomely, a boy with a skateboard wore a T-shirt with a cheerful Canadian motif. And the organisers had brought along a Colin the Caterpillar cake with an image of Vance's face attached to it. Rachel, a carer from Banbury, Oxfordshire, said: 'I'm most worried about his environmental policies. They risk eliminating the whole of humanity, all the creatures on the Earth.' Over the past few decades, this corner of Oxfordshire has been turned into a celeb-magnet – a place of designer delis, gastropubs, spas and private clubs. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion It is associated with rightwingers. Jeremy Clarkson's Diddly Squat farm shop and pub attracts fans of his TV shows and his conservative views (though Clarkson called Vance 'a bearded God-botherer' in a Times column earlier this year.) In the interest of political balance, Vance's predecessor as veep, Kamala Harris, was spotted in Charlbury's pub, the Bull, last month. House prices here have soared, making it hard for local young people to find a place to live. A modern three-bedroomed house in Charlbury will set you back the best part of £500,000. As in rural areas across England, services such as health and transport are stretched. Vance probably won't see the issues. He is believed to be staying in an 18th-century manor house, owned by the lightbulb millionaire Johnny Hornby and his wife, Pippa, a London art patron and collector, who are friends of Cameron. Jonathan Mazower, communications director for Survival International, a charity that works with Indigenous peoples, did not attend the 'party' but was angry that Vance had been invited. 'There's massive disruption – all roads and footpaths have been closed, all cars are searched, no visitors are allowed in. There are police and US Secret Service agents everywhere,' said Mazower, who lives near the sprawling digs where Vance is staying. 'But more important than the disruption is what he represents. On the whole people here are very much live and let live but this is something else entirely. Trump's No 2 coming here feels like an absolute outrage and imposition. 'The massive police and Secret Service presence makes any normal protest impossible, so we've had to resort to putting up placards around the village, some of which are being taken down.' Andy Graham, the leader of West Oxfordshire district council, compared the scenes to the Will Smith film Men in Black. 'Seeing someone dressed up with black suit, sunglasses, the whole lot, you kind of felt it was a bit over the top really,' he said. 'We understand that people do need security but I think they haven't been discreet about it.'
