No evidence to show reduction in gambling harm from $81m industry tax
Photo:
RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly
The government has decided not to increase a problem gambling tax on the industry following a critical report from the Gambling Commission.
The independent regulator says there's no evidence from the Ministry of Health the money from the levy is actually reducing gambling harm.
It's the second time the commission has asked the ministry to front up with evidence of the effectiveness of the programme.
The Minister for Mental Health Matt Doocey said it was concerning it had taken the ministry so long to show its strategy was working.
The Ministry of Health said it was undertaking a review of the programme, and was now funding a research programme that would provide evidence for decision-making.
The Ministry of Health had suggested increasing the 2025-2028 problem gambling levy by 20.6 percent, to $92 million, but Cabinet instead decided last month it would be kept at $81 million over three years.
The levy was imposed on casinos, sports betting, pokie machine operators and Lotto to fund public health and addiction services to minimise gambling harm.
Online gambling operators were not included in the levy.
The Gambling Commission said in a report issued earlier this year that the ministry had not provided evidence the money from the levy was actually reducing gambling harm.
Chief Gambling Commissioner, Susan Hughes, KC, wrote that the commission was "very clear" in 2022 the ministry needed to undertake a major strategic review of its strategy, and it was "disappointed" it had not done so.
"The ministry has spent hundreds of millions over a prolonged period of time but there is no evidence that the strategy has had a substantial impact on the level of gambling harm in New Zealand."
The commission was also critical of the way the levy was going to be allocated, saying the Ministry of Health's agency costs were budgeted to double, while funding for research and evaluation, and new services, were budgeted to decrease significantly.
"The ministry should be exercising restraint, consistent with the entire New Zealand Public Service, and should be imposing the minimum levy necessary, rather than increasing it in a manner that is inconsistent with the current financial climate."
Hughes said there was no monitoring or reporting framework to analyse the ministry's strategy and what aspects were working or not.
The commission also said the number of presentations to problem gambling services was declining significantly, from 6525 in 2013-2014 to 3615 in 2023-2024, but noted a growing use and concern about online gambling.
Minister of Mental Health Matt Doocey.
Photo:
RNZ / Mark Papalii
The commission noted that numbers of people presenting to gambling services did not fully capture the harm caused by gambling.
Doocey said it was worrying the Ministry of Health was taking so long to provide evidence its gambling harm strategy was working.
"I think that it's concerning that it's taken so long to see what changes are being delivered as a result.
Doocey said the ministry was conducting a review of its strategy and Cabinet would reconsider the levy next year in light of that evaluation.
"We want the money that is being invested to be making a real difference on the ground and deliver a return on investment.
"Our focus is on delivering timely, effective support to individuals, families, and communities affected by gambling harm.
"We will be making sure that New Zealanders are seeing that material difference," Doocey said.
A spokesperson for the Ministry of Health said its gambling harm strategy for 2025-2028 was informed by international and local research, and drew on a range of public health services.
The spokesperson said the ministry listened to a range of views during its consultation on the levy and said there was "strong support" for new priorities to prevent gambling harm.
"The revised strategy reflects the feedback we received and includes new investment in treatment and support, improving prevention and early intervention initiatives, and improving the effectiveness of support for those experiencing gambling harm."
In response to criticism from the commission on the agency's operating costs, the spokesperson said operating costs at the ministry had risen from $3.5 million to $5.2m under the new levy period, and that the Gambling Act required that some part of the levy was used to implement its strategy.
Hughes said several problem gambling organisations supported an increase in the levy, with The Problem Gambling Foundation's chief executive Melissa Thompson telling the commission the increase was relatively modest in relation to the growth in spending from gambling products.
The Problem Gambling Foundation could not be reached for comment.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Ministry of Health forced to release documents showing alcohol lobby influence
The spirits industry says it supports targeted programmes but believes the draft Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder strategy is too broad. File photo Photo: By Angie Garrett from Ridgely, USA [CC BY 2.0 ( via Wikimedia Commons Alcohol lobbyists pushed health officials not to raise taxes, curb supply or cut industry sponsorship of sport - despite those measures being endorsed by the World Health Organisation as among the most effective ways to reduce alcohol harm. The tactics are laid bare in documents the Ministry of Health tried to keep secret, only releasing them after RNZ appealed to the Ombudsman. They also show industry efforts to shape a government strategy to combat Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD). Officials handed the draft FASD plan to alcohol companies for feedback - while keeping it from the public. Spirits New Zealand dismissed estimates that up to 3000 babies are born with the disorder each year as "not credible" and attacked a taxpayer-funded ad campaign from 2019, even though it won five awards. Health Coalition Aotearoa said the industry should have no role in shaping alcohol policy. But the ministry's deputy director general Andrew Old defended its engagement, insisting companies had no special access. "They certainly haven't had any particular special treatment or back door into the ministry. It's been a deliberate, structured approach. They've had quarterly meetings with the team," Old said. "I can absolutely and categorically say that there is no veto power. So if the industry says 'we don't want to see this', that has no bearing on the outcome. It is a view that is considered alongside a range of other views." Old accepted the alcohol industry was motivated by profit. "I also would hope that, in doing that, they don't want to be doing harm," he said. "There's clearly a conflict. But, to my mind, it's not an irreconcilable conflict that would mean that we should just never talk to them." Read more: Alcohol lobbyists were also given a draft investment strategy on how to spend the Alcohol Levy, a ring-fenced fund of $16.6 million for alcohol harm reduction measures. The documents include an email from Spirits NZ to the MOH, saying there was intense interest in the Alcohol Levy, which is funded from a small tax on sales - equivalent to less than one cent on a standard can of beer. "My members with global links are seeking advice from their HQ's from London to Louisville, Kentucky - yes, this is how important this matter is to them," the lobbyist says, in a November 2024 email to the MOH. The documents show industry concern the Alcohol Levy would be spent on programmes based on the WHO's SAFER strategy, which says that, globally, a person dies every ten seconds due to alcohol related causes. "The WHO SAFER strategies include measures like restricting availability and raising excise taxes," a submission from the Brewers Association says. "These broad based initiatives are generally seen as reducing consumption overall and not targeting harmful consumption." The Brewers Association said there was an "overemphasis on restrictions" in the WHO guidelines. "Metrics tied to SAFER principles could incentivise programmes that focus excessively on punitive measures, such as limiting availability and marketing, rather than collaborative, education-based harm reduction approaches." The Brewers Association also warned against using the Alcohol Levy to fund "controversial" programmes it believes won't reduce harmful consumption. "Examples raised in our meeting included research with little application actions in the outcomes, funding of legal support for opposition of licences and replacing sponsorship arrangements in sport organisations with funds from the levy." The documents, which the MOH tried to withhold using a section of the OIA designed to protect advice between Ministers and officials until overruled by the Ombudsman, also include industry critique of the FASD strategy. Spirits New Zealand, which represents the likes of Asahi, Bacardi, Diageo, Lion, Moet-Hennessy and Pernod Ricard, warned against launching action on FASD without knowing what the prevalence was. It took issue with estimates, based on international studies and expert opinion, that 3-5 percent of babies - 1800 to 3000 every year - are born with FASD. "This is simply not credible and is similar to the situation that existed when the last plan was developed in 2016," the lobbyists say. "We cannot see how any FASD-prevention plan can be started without good data as a baseline. We would ask that the Public Health Agency give assurances that work on measurement frameworks occurs prior to other plan elements being launched." Leigh Henderson, chair of the advocacy group FASD-CAN, was concerned the alcohol industry doubted the prevalence of FASD. "Are they saying, 'Okay, it's all right for 500 babies to be born, but not 1800," she asked. "We know it's not 100 percent preventable, but to try and downplay it in that way is just callous and not recognising the level of the problem." In a statement chief executive Robert Brewer said Spirits NZ "categorically denies" downplaying the extent of FASD. "The government can't fix a problem if it doesn't know its true extent, level of occurrence, who is affected and why and to do this you need good data. This is basic public policy." Henderson said the motivation of the industry was clear, given its opposition during the 20 year battle to get mandatory pregnancy warning labels on alcohol. The spirits industry says it supports targeted programmes but believes the draft FASD strategy is too broad. It raised the ad campaign 'Pre-Testie Bestie' as an example, saying its "ultimate audience seemed to be any woman of child-bearing age who may or may not be having sex and who may or may not be pregnant". It said that was "an impossible audience to communicate with" as the campaign, funded by the Health Promotion Agency (HPA), was trying to be both targeted and national. But the HPA (now part of Health New Zealand) said in its 2019 Annual Report that 38 percent of women aged 18 to 30 saw the campaign and 70 percent of them got the key message: "Don't drink if you are or might be pregnant". The Pre-Testie Bestie ad campaign won five Axis Awards. The spirits industry also took issue with the draft FASD strategy saying New Zealand is a country where "alcohol is highly accessible, use is normalised," and there are high rates of hazardous drinking. Brewer said hazardous drinking had declined over the last four years in New Zealand to just 16 percent of adults.
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
Rare Disorders NZ Urges Government To Include Rare Disorders Strategy In Pae Ora Legislation
With the Government set to make a number of amendments to the Healthy Futures (Pae Ora) Act, Rare Disorders NZ is calling for the Government to incorporate the Rare Disorders Strategy as one of the official health strategies in the Healthy Futures (Pae Ora) legislation. The Rare Disorders Strategy was released by the Ministry of Health in 2024, during the current Government's term. Similar to the other health strategies in the Act it outlines five priorities to guide health entities over the next ten years to improve equitable access to healthcare. Currently, the health strategies in the legislation are: New Zealand Health Strategy Pae Tū: Hauora Māori Strategy Te Mana Ola: The Pacific Health Strategy Health of Disabled People Strategy Women's Health Strategy Rural Health Strategy Mental Health and Wellbeing Strategy (under development) 'The Government has recognised that people living with rare disorders face significant barriers to equitable health care. They have invested in the development of the Rare Disorders Strategy. We see no reason for them not to incorporate the Strategy into legislation as a health strategy, as was done with the Mental Health and Wellbeing Strategy, which was added in 2024,' says Chris Higgins, Rare Disorders NZ Chief Executive. There are estimated to be 300,000 New Zealanders living with a rare disorder. Surveys by Rare Disorders NZ have revealed significant gaps in the health system preventing people living with rare disorders from accessing timely diagnosis and appropriate health care and treatments. 'Legislating the Rare Disorders Strategy as a health strategy is the only way to genuinely demonstrate commitment to the 6% of New Zealanders living with a rare disorder. It would ensure they are consistently considered in future system changes, investment decisions, and performance monitoring, as is required by the Strategy itself,' says Higgins. Rare Disorders NZ has made a submission to the Health Committee on the Healthy Futures (Pae Ora) Amendment Bill, which can be accessed here:
RNZ News
10 hours ago
- RNZ News
Disability groups fear vital travel subsidy could be capped
Fears are growing in the disability community that a vital travel subsidy scheme could be capped. The Total Mobility Scheme that is co-funded by the government helps disabled people who cant use buses trains or ferries get where they need to go in subsidised taxis. The scheme has been under review for the past two years, with no official word on any changes. Disability groups fear the subsidy will be cut or overall funding capped, seriously restricting options for people who use the scheme. Auckland academic Dr Sally Britnell spoke to Lisa Owen. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
