IN CASE YOU MISSED IT: Kim Kardashian graduates law school
The reality star has graduated from law school after six years of legal training. Kim announced the news on Wednesday, and threw a small commencement ceremony for family and friends, including sister Khloe Kardashian, kids Saint, nine, Chicago, seven, and Psalm, six, as well as her pal Van Jones. 'All of you guys have been on this journey with me," Kim said in her speech, which was shared on Khloe's Instagram Stories. The TV star explained she had been "dumbfounded" by the state of the legal system, so had started looking into criminal justice reform.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
18 minutes ago
- News.com.au
New TikTok trend involving your front door could result in severe damage
Homeowners and sellers tend to overlook the importance of their home's front door. However, experts argue that this is one of the key features that can make or break a sale. Front doors offer a first impression to buyers, and as the saying goes, the first impression lasts the longest. For owners, the main entry to the home is also the first line of defence from the outside world, whether it be intruders or the elements. Over in the US, there's been a resurgence of the concerning 'door-kicking' prank, which gained traction on TikTok last year. This trend has led to concerns among owners and sellers alike — especially given that things have escalated rapidly since the prank was last popular. The TikTok 'door-kicking' trend, which started in 2024, involves pounding and kicking on front doors in the middle of the night. While it might seem like a harmless prank at first, it often leaves residents bewildered and burdened with costly repairs. Against this backdrop, the importance of your front door can't be overstated as it's more than just an entryway: it's both the first impression of your home and a critical line of defence. According to high-quality doors can increase a home's marketability by 5 per cent to 10 per cent, as it suggests durability and low maintenance. Materials matter when it comes to front doors With all of this in mind, as real estate agent Alexei Morgado puts it, homeowners should not view the front door just as a surface-level design enhancement but also as a security feature. Fibreglass Fibreglass offers a balance of strength, insulation, and low maintenance, mimicking the look of wood without the warping. According to Doors Plus, 'fibreglass doors lead the way in resilience to the elements and insulation performance'. Although the price is high, fibreglass doors have a longer lifespan than wood or steel doors. Also, its low maintenance makes it cost-effective over time. Steel Steel is the most durable material available for front doors, making it an ideal choice for enhanced security. As long as the weather conditions aren't too extreme, it will not be affected – unlike wood, for example, which can warp when it gets wet. The downside of a steel door includes that it can be easily scratched or dented and requires a good finish to prevent rust. Solid wood Wooden doors can provide a stunning finish, and owners can accentuate the grain to achieve a beautiful appearance. They can also be stained or painted to give a different finish and to give a tired door a new lease of life. While timeless and customisable, wood demands regular maintenance. But it adds unmatched warmth and character. How to protect your front door There are several upgrades owners can make. Steel-reinforced doors with deadbolt plates and longer strike screws slow down break-ins fast. In addition, smart locks are helpful, but the core still comes down to the strength of the actual door and frame. Owners should also consider smart security upgrades, such as video doorbells or cameras, which can deter pranks and enhance monitoring. Finally, in terms of return on investment, doors are one of the simplest high-impact upgrades you can make. 'But the ROI goes far beyond resale value. Insurers are also beginning to include fortified doors in homeowners' premiums,' Morgado told Realtor. 'And even more valuable is time on the marketplace. Homes with obvious security upgrades, including smart doors and secure doors, also sell faster, particularly with millennials and Gen Z, who care about tech as much as security.'

ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Aldi is being sued by Oreo maker Mondelez for 'blatantly copying' packaging
The company behind US snacks such as Oreos and Chips Ahoy is suing the American branch of the Aldi supermarket chain, alleging the store's biscuit brands are "blatant copies" of its products. This isn't the first time the supermarket has found itself facing a challenge over similarities in the packaging of its products and those of other brands. Here's what we know. Chicago company Mondelez filed a federal lawsuit this week which alleged Aldi's packaging of several of its biscuit products was "likely to deceive and confuse customers". It also alleged that the packaging threatened to irreparably harm Mondelez and its brands. The company is hoping for a court order that would stop Aldi selling the products and monetary damages. In the lawsuit, Mondelez displayed side-by-side photos of multiple products. For example, Aldi's chocolate sandwich biscuits and Oreos both have blue packaging, with images of the treats arranged in similar orientations. The supermarket's Golden Round crackers and Mondelez's Ritz crackers are packaged in red boxes with a breakout blue field with yellow lettering. Mondelez said it had contacted Aldi on numerous occasions about "confusingly similar packaging." It alleged Aldi discontinued or changed the packaging on some items but continued to sell others. Aldi has not yet publicly responded to the case and did not respond to requests from multiple US news outlets. Aldi, which was founded in Germany, keeps prices low by primarily selling products under its own labels. It's one of the fastest-growing grocery chains in the US, with more than 2,500 stores in 39 states. In Australia, there are currently 600 Aldi stores. Yes. Aldi has faced multiple lawsuits around its packaging and brands around the world. Last year in Australia the company Hampden Holdings and Lacorium Health Australia sued Aldi Foods for breach of copyright in relation to children's food products. Hampden licenses intellectual property to Every Bite Counts which sells children's food products under Baby Bellies, Little Bellies and Mighty Bellies which are sold in Australia. In 2018 and 2019, Aldi engaged the company Motor Design to re-design the packaging for its baby food and product range. The case found that in April 2019, Aldi instructed Motor Design to reuse the Little Bellies brand as the "benchmark" for the re-design of the packaging for the Mamia dry food range. Court documents compare the packaging on both brands showing similar names of products, images and colours. Aldi was found liable for copyright infringement for its puff products, which are three of the eleven products Hampden raised. However, Aldi was found not liable for the other products' branding such as rice cakes. Included in evidence were emails between the supermarket and design firm which discussed the similarities between the new design and its "benchmark". "Unfortunately I have received feedback that this particular artwork is too close to our benchmark, I understand we are now on V5 of artwork rounds," it read. A post-it note from the design first said "Aldi have now had legal come back to them and state this design is too close to the benchmark — no shit!" The supermarket no longer sells products with that packaging and has appealed the federal court's ruling in Hampden's favour. Separately, Aldi won a federal court appeal in 2018 against a deceptive conduct ruling over haircare products brought against the supermarket chain by Moroccanoil Israel. In the UK, an appeal court ruled in favour of a cider company called Thatchers, which sued Aldi over design similarities.

ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Ex-hotel security guard says Sean 'Diddy' Combs paid him $US100,000 for video of LA hotel assault
Warning: This story contains details of sexual abuse and domestic violence. A former hotel security guard has testified that Sean "Diddy" Combs gave him a brown paper bag stuffed with $US100,000 ($154,000) in cash, for what he hoped was the only copy of surveillance footage of him viciously attacking his then-girlfriend, R&B singer Casandra Ventura. The video shows Ms Ventura, also known by her stage name Cassie, at an LA hotel in 2016. Eddy Garcia, 33, said the hip-hop mogul repeatedly made the comment that his career and image would be destroyed if the video of the assault became public, before giving him the bag of money. Prosecutors at Mr Combs's sex trafficking trial in Manhattan have made the footage a centrepiece of their federal case against him. It shows Mr Combs kicking, beating and dragging Ms Ventura at the Intercontinental Hotel in Los Angeles. They contend it supports the claims of three women, including Ms Ventura, who allege Mr Combs sexually and physically abused them over two decades. Prosecutors say Mr Combs's persistent efforts to hush up the episode fit with allegations he used threats, fortune and fame to get what he wanted. Mr Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty to sex trafficking and racketeering charges. After the attack, Mr Garcia said he spoke several times to Mr Combs's chief-of-staff Kristina Khorram, telling her he couldn't show her the recording but "off the record, it's bad." He said during one phone call she put a "very nervous"-sounding Mr Combs on the phone, who "was just saying he had a little too much to drink" and that, as Mr Garcia surely knows, "with women, one thing leads to another and if this got out it would ruin him." "He was talking really fast, a lot of stuttering," Mr Garcia said. Mr Garcia said he became nervous and scared when Ms Khorram called him on his cell phone, the number for which he had not provided, and she put Mr Combs on. "He stated that I sounded like a good guy," Mr Garcia testified, adding that Mr Combs again said "something like this could ruin him." When he told Mr Combs he didn't have access to the server to obtain the video footage, Mr Combs said he believed Mr Garcia could make it happen and that "he would take care of me," which Mr Garcia said he took "to mean financially." Mr Garcia said he checked with his boss and was told he would sell it to Mr Combs for $US50,000. When he told Mr Combs, he said the music producer "sounded excited." "He referred to me as 'Eddy my angel,'" Mr Garcia said, adding that Mr Combs told him: "I knew you could help. I knew you could do it." Within two days of the attack on Ms Ventura, Mr Garcia gave the accused a storage device containing the footage in exchange for $US100,000 in cash which Mr Combs fed through a money counter before putting in a brown paper bag. Mr Garcia signed a confidentiality and non-disclosure agreement, shown in court, that required he pay $US1 million if he breached the deal. At the time he said he was making $US10.50 an hour working hotel security. The former security guard said he signed a declaration swearing that there was no other copy of the video. He said he signed the papers in an office building with Mr Combs's bodyguard and Ms Khorram present. Mr Garcia said he didn't fully read the documents, explaining that he was nervous and "the goal was to get out of there as soon as possible." After signing, he said, Mr Combs asked him what he planned to do with the money and advised him not to make big purchases. Mr Garcia said he took that to mean he shouldn't do anything that would draw attention. Mr Garcia said he gave $US50,000 to his boss and $US20,000 to another security officer. He pocketed $US30,000 and used some of it to buy a used car, he said. He said he used cash and to avoid a further paper trail, never put the money in the bank. A few weeks later, Mr Garcia said Mr Combs called him and asked if anyone had inquired about the video. Mr Garcia said no, recounting Mr Combs's ebullient greeting: "Happy Easter. Eddy, my angel. God is good. God put you in my way for a reason." Mr Garcia said he asked the accused if he might have future work for him, and Mr Combs sounded receptive. But Mr Combs never responded to his later inquiries, the witness said. Another hotel guard has testified he recorded the footage on his phone so he could show it to his wife. Mr Combs could face life in prison if convicted on all counts. Prosecutors have said they may finish presenting their case next week, allowing the defence to put on its case. AP