logo
Aldi is being sued by Oreo maker Mondelez for 'blatantly copying' packaging

Aldi is being sued by Oreo maker Mondelez for 'blatantly copying' packaging

The company behind US snacks such as Oreos and Chips Ahoy is suing the American branch of the Aldi supermarket chain, alleging the store's biscuit brands are "blatant copies" of its products.
This isn't the first time the supermarket has found itself facing a challenge over similarities in the packaging of its products and those of other brands.
Here's what we know.
Chicago company Mondelez filed a federal lawsuit this week which alleged Aldi's packaging of several of its biscuit products was "likely to deceive and confuse customers".
It also alleged that the packaging threatened to irreparably harm Mondelez and its brands.
The company is hoping for a court order that would stop Aldi selling the products and monetary damages.
In the lawsuit, Mondelez displayed side-by-side photos of multiple products.
For example, Aldi's chocolate sandwich biscuits and Oreos both have blue packaging, with images of the treats arranged in similar orientations.
The supermarket's Golden Round crackers and Mondelez's Ritz crackers are packaged in red boxes with a breakout blue field with yellow lettering.
Mondelez said it had contacted Aldi on numerous occasions about "confusingly similar packaging."
It alleged Aldi discontinued or changed the packaging on some items but continued to sell others.
Aldi has not yet publicly responded to the case and did not respond to requests from multiple US news outlets.
Aldi, which was founded in Germany, keeps prices low by primarily selling products under its own labels.
It's one of the fastest-growing grocery chains in the US, with more than 2,500 stores in 39 states.
In Australia, there are currently 600 Aldi stores.
Yes.
Aldi has faced multiple lawsuits around its packaging and brands around the world.
Last year in Australia the company Hampden Holdings and Lacorium Health Australia sued Aldi Foods for breach of copyright in relation to children's food products.
Hampden licenses intellectual property to Every Bite Counts which sells children's food products under Baby Bellies, Little Bellies and Mighty Bellies which are sold in Australia.
In 2018 and 2019, Aldi engaged the company Motor Design to re-design the packaging for its baby food and product range.
The case found that in April 2019, Aldi instructed Motor Design to reuse the Little Bellies brand as the "benchmark" for the re-design of the packaging for the Mamia dry food range.
Court documents compare the packaging on both brands showing similar names of products, images and colours.
Aldi was found liable for copyright infringement for its puff products, which are three of the eleven products Hampden raised.
However, Aldi was found not liable for the other products' branding such as rice cakes.
Included in evidence were emails between the supermarket and design firm which discussed the similarities between the new design and its "benchmark".
"Unfortunately I have received feedback that this particular artwork is too close to our benchmark, I understand we are now on V5 of artwork rounds," it read.
A post-it note from the design first said "Aldi have now had legal come back to them and state this design is too close to the benchmark — no shit!"
The supermarket no longer sells products with that packaging and has appealed the federal court's ruling in Hampden's favour.
Separately, Aldi won a federal court appeal in 2018 against a deceptive conduct ruling over haircare products brought against the supermarket chain by Moroccanoil Israel.
In the UK, an appeal court ruled in favour of a cider company called Thatchers, which sued Aldi over design similarities.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Diddy's last ex airs disturbing sex claims in during tearful testimony
Diddy's last ex airs disturbing sex claims in during tearful testimony

News.com.au

time32 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Diddy's last ex airs disturbing sex claims in during tearful testimony

Sean 'Diddy' Combs' influencer ex-girlfriend began weeping on the stand today, testifying about her futile attempts to end the mogul's alleged depraved 'freak-offs' — and the shocking preparations she had to take to endure the marathon sex sessions. The witness — identified as 'Jane Doe' — testified in Combs' sex trafficking trial in Manhattan federal court that she had to fuel up like an athlete and take drugs for the 'freak-offs,' which could last more than three days. Jane said not only did she take ecstasy for their so-called 'hotel nights' — or 'freak-offs' — but she pumped herself with caffeine, water, smoothies and protein shakes to keep up the sexual performances with male escorts for the Bad Boy Records founder. 'Who decided if you could stop?' prosecutor Maurene Comey asked Jane. 'Sean,' Jane said, first choking up and then bursting into tears, dabbing her eyes with a tissue. The 'freak-offs' are at the centre of prosecutors' sex trafficking and racketeering case against Combs. The unnamed social media influencer, who is expected to testify for about five more days, told jurors Thursday that 90% of their three-year relationship was spent in the drugged-up 'freak-offs' Diddy orchestrated, filmed and pleasured himself to. Jane was Combs' last girlfriend, dating him until his arrest in September 2024. She previously testified that Combs brutally beat her and forced her to have unprotected sex with strangers. As testimony began Friday, Jane testified that Combs would call her a 'freak' over the course of their relationship — an apparent way for him to say that he wanted her to be 'wild and sexual.' Combs even 'guilt-tripped' her into having sex with male escorts without condoms, she said. 'He said he didn't want to see a rubber while he was watching,' Jane testified. Jane — who said she didn't want to have sex with other men — felt like she 'had to take' drugs to endure the emotional ordeals. 'If I didn't, it would feel too real, the atmosphere,' Jane testified. 'I didn't want it to feel too real. I just kind of … I don't know, just feel,' she said, interrupting herself as she choked up. '[It] makes things easier.' Jane said her longest 'hotel night' lasted between three and three-and-a-half days, and her shortest lasted for 12 hours. From May 2021 through October 2023, the 'freak-offs' would run for between 24 and 30 hours, she said. Jane testified that when she started giving subtle cues she wanted to stop, Combs wouldn't have it. 'You're not getting tired on me are you?' Combs badgered Jane, she testified. 'Let's finish strong. Let's end on a high note.' Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty on charges that carry up in life in prison, if convicted. Flights for male porn stars Sean 'Diddy' Combs and his one-time influencer girlfriend hired two porn stars for numerous 'hotel night' sex sessions, according to testimony. Jane — Combs' girlfriend until his 2024 arrest — said that starting around late 2021 and early 2022, she started to try choosing the men she slept with during her and the Bad Boy Records founder's 'hotel nights,' aka 'freak-offs.' Jane reached out to the men on separate occasions after watching their adult films with the rapper, she told the jury. She booked flights for one of the men, whose screen name is 'Sly,' from his home in Atlanta to Los Angeles or New York for 'hotel nights,' for which she paid him around $US2,000 to $US4,000, Jane testified. Later, Jane started hiring another porn star, 'Antoine,' for 'hotel nights,' she said.

Kilmar Abrego Garcia returns to US to face criminal charges after deportation to El Salvador
Kilmar Abrego Garcia returns to US to face criminal charges after deportation to El Salvador

ABC News

time35 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Kilmar Abrego Garcia returns to US to face criminal charges after deportation to El Salvador

Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the man the Trump administration mistakenly deported to El Salvador, has returned to the United States to face criminal charges, according to US Attorney-General Pam Bondi. Mr Abrego Garcia was charged in an indictment filed in the Federal Court in Tennessee with conspiring to transport illegal immigrants to the United States. The indictment was filed on May 21, more than two months after Abrego Garcia's March 15 deportation, court records showed. In a statement, Mr Abrego Garcia's lawyer, Andrew Rossman, said it would now be up to the US judicial system to ensure he received due process. "Today's action proves what we've known all along — that the administration had the ability to bring him back and just refused to do so," he said. Mr Abrego Garcia was deported despite an immigration judge's 2019 order granting him protection after finding he was likely to be persecuted by gangs if returned to El Salvador, court records show. Critics of US President Donald Trump pointed to the erroneous deportation as an example of the excesses of the Republican president's aggressive approach to stepping up deportations. Officials countered by alleging that Mr Abrego Garcia was a member of the MS-13 gang. His lawyers denied that Mr Abrego Garcia was a member of the gang and said he had not been charged with or convicted of any crime. His case has also become a flashpoint for escalating tensions between the United States's executive branch and the judiciary, which has ruled against a number of Mr Trump's policies. The US Supreme Court ordered the Trump administration to facilitate Mr Abrego Garcia's return, with Justice Sonia Sotomayor saying the government had cited no basis for what she called his "warrantless arrest". US District Judge Paula Xinis has since opened a probe into what, if anything, the Trump administration has done to secure Mr Abrego Garcia's return, after his lawyers accused officials of stonewalling their requests for information. The indictment also charges Mr Abrego Garcia and two unidentified co-conspirators with transporting firearms illegally purchased in Texas for resale in Maryland. It also alleges Mr Abrego Garcia transported illegal narcotics purchased in Texas for resale in Maryland and was on some occasions accompanied on those trips by members and associates of MS-13. Reuters

Grilling season demand for Aussie beef outweighs Trump tariffs
Grilling season demand for Aussie beef outweighs Trump tariffs

ABC News

timean hour ago

  • ABC News

Grilling season demand for Aussie beef outweighs Trump tariffs

It has been more than two months since Donald Trump's "liberation day" tariffs were announced, which included a 10 per cent tariff on imported Australian beef. But US demand for lean beef has far outweighed the tariff and exports have been surging. "In terms of volume, I don't think Trump's tariffs have had an impact at all," Rabobank analyst Angus Gidley-Baird said. "Year to date, beef exports are up over 30 per cent and if we continue at this pace, we'll go very close to pushing our quota limit for the first time (which is about 450,000 tonnes)." According to Meat and Livestock Australia, 167,722 tonnes of beef have been shipped to the US so far this year, which is up 32 per cent. Beef exports to China are also rising, with 117,341 tonnes exported, up 30 per cent on last year. General manager of meat processing company, The Midfield Group, Dean McKenna, said Donald Trump's tariffs were "one of the best things" that had happened to his business. "I wish he went 50 per cent [tariff]," he told Queensland Country Life. The United States cattle herd is at its lowest point since the 1950s because of drought. The supply of lean beef for America's famous hamburgers is tight. Going into its summer "grilling season" the United States has been relying on beef imports, which has coincided with Australia producing record amounts. "The US needs a lot [of lean beef] and Australia has a lot to sell, especially the way the prices are at the moment," Mr Gidley-Baird said. US cattle and beef prices are at record highs and are expected to rise further in 2026, making imported Australian beef very competitive — despite the 10 per cent tariff. According to Rabobank the average finished cattle price in the US is over $US4.50 a kilogram live-weight ($A6.92/kg), compared to about $US2.25 a kilogram for Australian cattle ($A3.46/kg). Beef made headlines on Friday, when it was suggested Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was willing to "loosen or compromise biosecurity rules" for US beef imports. A claim the PM quickly denied. As previously explained by ABC Landline, Australia does not have a ban on United States beef, as long as it comes from cattle born, raised and slaughtered in the US. The Australian government has been assessing a request from the US to expand its access, to include beef from cattle that it has imported from Mexico and Canada and then slaughtered in the US. Yet at the moment, the US has a ban on importing Mexican cattle because of an exotic pest called new world screwworm. Cattle Australia chief executive, Chris Parker, said the US would need to prove it can be like Australian beef exporters, which adhere to strict traceability standards. "Our position is that the US needs to be able to demonstrate it can either trace cattle born in Mexico and Canada, or has systems that are equivalent to Australia's traceability, before imports of meat could occur from non-US cattle," he said. Australia has not imported any beef from the US since 2005 for a few reasons including price. Australia also has plenty of its own beef. In 2024, Australia produced more beef than ever before, turning off 2.57 million tonnes of beef, of which a record 1.34 million tonnes was exported around the world. So imagine if Australia exported iron ore for $100 a tonne and was then criticised for not importing American iron ore for $200 a tonne. As meat analyst Simon Quilty recently told Landline, importing US beef is not viable. "I don't see us being swamped by American beef, in fact I'd say for the next five years, even if the US had open access, we'd see next to nothing coming out of America." Watch ABC TV's Landline at 12:30pm on Sunday or on ABC iview.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store