logo
Democrat and Republican lawmakers at odds after state-arranged tour of ‘Alligator Alcatraz' detention centre

Democrat and Republican lawmakers at odds after state-arranged tour of ‘Alligator Alcatraz' detention centre

Globe and Mail14 hours ago
Democratic lawmakers condemned Florida's new Everglades immigration detention centre after visiting Saturday, describing it as crowded, unsanitary and bug-infested. Republicans on the same tour said they saw nothing of the sort at the remote facility that officials have dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz.'
The state-arranged tour came after some Democrats were blocked earlier from viewing the 3,000-bed detention centre that the state rapidly built on an isolated airstrip surrounded by swampland. So many state legislators and members of Congress turned up Saturday that they were split into multiple groups.
'There are really disturbing, vile conditions and this place needs to be shut the hell down,' U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a Democrat, told reporters after visiting the agglomeration of tents, trailers and temporary buildings. 'This place is a stunt, and they're abusing human beings here.'
U.S. detainees describe worm-filled food, inhuman treatment at 'Alligator Alcatraz' migrant centre
Cage-style units of 32 men share three combination toilet-sink devices, the visitors measured the temperature at 28°C in a housing area entranceway and 29°C in a medical intake area, and grasshoppers and other insects abound, she and her fellow Florida Democrats said.
Although the visitors said they were not able to speak with the detainees, Rep. Maxwell Alejandro Frost, also a Democrat, said one called out 'I'm an American citizen!' and others chanted 'Libertad!,' Spanish for 'freedom.'
State Sen. Blaise Ingoglia, a Republican from Florida, countered that he had seen a well-run, safe facility where the living quarters were clean and the air conditioning worked well.
'The rhetoric coming out of the Democrats does not match the reality,' said Ingoglia, who said he toured in the same group as Wasserman Schultz. Ingoglia said a handful of detainees became 'a little raucous' when the visitors appeared, but he did not make out what they were saying.
State Sen. Jay Collins was in another group and said he also found the detention centre to be clean and functioning well: 'No squalor.'
Collins, a Republican, said he saw backup generators, a tracking system for dietary restrictions and military-style bunks with good mattresses. The sanitation devices struck him as appropriate, if basic.
'Would I want that toilet-and-sink combination at my bathroom at the house? Probably not, but this is a transitional holding facility,' Collins said by phone.
Journalists were not allowed on the tour, and lawmakers were instructed not to bring phones or cameras inside.
U.S. Supreme Court keeps block on Florida immigration law
Trump tours Florida immigration lockup, jokes about escapees having to run from alligators
Messages seeking comment were sent to the state Division of Emergency Management, which built the facility, and to representatives for Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican. DeSantis spokesperson Molly Best highlighted one of Ingoglia's upbeat readouts on social media.
Across the state in Tampa, federal Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said that of the Everglades detention centre that 'any issues that were there have been addressed.' She added that she has talked with five unnamed Republican governors about modelling other facilities on it.
DeSantis and fellow Republicans have touted the makeshift detention centre, constructed in days as an efficient and get-tough response to President Donald Trump's call for mass deportations. The first detainees arrived July 3, after Trump toured and praised the facility.
Described as temporary, it is meant to help the Republican president's administration reach its goal of boosting migrant detention capacity from 41,000 people to at least 100,000. The Florida facility's remote location and its name – a nod to the notorious Alcatraz prison that once housed federal inmates in California – are meant to underscore a message of deterring illegal immigration.
Ahead of the facility's opening, state officials said detainees would have access to medical care, consistent air conditioning, a recreation yard, attorneys and clergy members.
But detainees and their relatives and advocates have told The Associated Press that conditions are awful, with worm-infested food, toilets overflowing onto floors, mosquitoes buzzing around the fenced bunks, and air conditioners that sometimes shut off in the oppressive South Florida summer heat. One man told his wife that detainees go days without getting showers.
Judge orders Trump administration to curtail immigration arrests in California
Division of Emergency Management spokesperson Stephanie Hartman called those descriptions 'completely false,' saying detainees always get three meals a day, unlimited drinking water, showers and other necessities.
'The facility meets all required standards and is in good working order,' she said.
Five Democratic state lawmakers tried to visit the site July 3 but said they were denied access. The state subsequently arranged Saturday's tour.
The lawmakers have sued over the earlier denial, accusing the DeSantis administration of impeding their oversight authority. A DeSantis spokesperson has called the lawsuit 'dumb.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

1 year after Trump assassination attempt, changes at U.S. Secret Service but questions remain
1 year after Trump assassination attempt, changes at U.S. Secret Service but questions remain

CBC

time3 hours ago

  • CBC

1 year after Trump assassination attempt, changes at U.S. Secret Service but questions remain

In many ways, the assassination attempt against Donald Trump at a Pennsylvania campaign stop was a perfect storm of failings coming together that allowed 20-year-old Michael Thomas Crooks to climb on top of a nearby building and take eight shots at the once and future U.S. president. One attendee was killed, two others wounded and a bullet grazed Trump's ear before a U.S. Secret Service counter-sniper opened fire on Crooks and killed him. That day jolted an already chaotic race for the White House and solidified Trump's iconic status in his party and beyond. It also became a turning point for the agency tasked with protecting the president. As more details emerged about what went wrong, questions multiplied: What happened to the Secret Service's planning? Why was a rooftop with a clear line of sight to Trump left unguarded? What motivated the shooter? Another incident in September where a gunman camped in the shrubbery outside one of Trump's golf courses before being spotted and shot at by a Secret Service agent also raised questions about the agency's performance. A year after Butler, multiple investigations have detailed the breakdowns that day. Under a new leader hired by Trump, the agency has been pushing to address those problems but key questions remain. "This was a wake-up call for the Secret Service," said retired supervisory agent Bobby McDonald, who's now a criminal justice lecturer at the University of New Haven in Connecticut. Here's a look at what went wrong, what's been done to address problems and questions still unanswered. How did he get on that roof? Who was talking to whom? All the investigations zeroed in on a few specific problems. The building in Butler, Pa., with a clear sight line to the stage where the president was speaking only 135 metres away was left unguarded. Crooks eventually boosted himself up there and fired eight shots with an AR-style rifle. The Secret Service's investigation into its own agency's conduct said that it wasn't that the line-of-sight risks weren't known about ahead of time. It was that multiple personnel assessed them as "acceptable." Supervisors had expected large pieces of farm equipment would be situated to block the view from the building. Those ultimately weren't placed, and staffers who visited the site before the rally didn't tell their supervisors that the line-of-sight concerns hadn't been addressed, the report said. Another glaring problem: fragmented communications between the Secret Service and the local law enforcement that the agency regularly relies on to secure events. Instead of having one unified command post with representatives from every agency providing security in the same room, there were two command posts at the rally. One investigation described a "chaotic mixture" of radio, cellphone, text and email used to communicate that day. 'Ensure such an event can never be repeated' The Secret Service issued a report Thursday about what it has done to address problems laid bare at Butler. "Since President Trump appointed me as director of the United States Secret Service, I have kept my experience on July 13 top of mind, and the agency has taken many steps to ensure such an event can never be repeated in the future," said Sean Curran, whom Trump tasked with leading the agency. Curran was one of the agents standing next to Trump as he was hustled off the stage after the shooting. The agency said it had implemented 21 of the 46 recommendations made by Congressional oversight bodies. The rest were in progress or not up to the agency to implement. WATCH | What went wrong in Butler: 'Preventable': How the Secret Service failed to protect Trump | About That 10 months ago Duration 13:47 How was a gunman able to come so close to assassinating former U.S. president Donald Trump during a campaign rally in Butler, Pa.? Andrew Chang breaks down a new report published by a bipartisan U.S. Senate committee that found the Secret Service's lack of organization and technical planning failed to keep Trump safe. Some of what they've done involves new equipment and a greater emphasis on addressing threats from above. They've created a new aviation division to oversee aerial operations like drones. The agency said it has two armoured ATVs for use on golf courses and is producing another three. And they're purchasing mobile command vehicles that will be pre-positioned around the country. But much of what the agency says it has done is about changing policies and procedures to address those July 13 lapses — things like revising their manual to "advance procedures and communication practices" when it comes to co-ordinating with local law enforcement or clarifying who's responsible for events where protectees are appearing. They've updated their procedures about documenting line-of-sight concerns and how those concerns are going to be addressed. So far it doesn't appear that anyone has been or will be fired, although the agency's director at the time, Kim Cheatle, swiftly resigned. The agency said Thursday that six staffers have been disciplined with suspensions ranging from 10 to 42 days without pay; the six were placed on restricted duty or nonoperational positions. Their identities and positions were not released. What we still don't know In many ways, Crooks and his motivations are still a mystery. He was killed by a Secret Service counter-sniper and did not leave much information about why he did what he did. Investigators say they believe he acted alone and they didn't find any threatening comments or ideological positions on social media that shed light on his thinking. And while it's clear what went wrong in Butler, questions linger about how things that were so clearly problematic — like that open roof — weren't addressed ahead of time. Anthony Cangelosi, a former Secret Service agent who is now a lecturer at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York City, said that without being able to read the interviews with the agents involved in the Butler planning it's hard to know exactly why they did what they did. A year later, he still struggles with how so many things went wrong. "I can't understand how many errors were made on that site that day," he said. "If they agreed to leave that roof unoccupied, I can't ... understand it for the life of me." The widow of Corey Comperatore, who died during the Butler assassination attempt, echoed some of that sentiment during an interview with Fox News this week. "Why was that such a failure? Why weren't they paying attention? Why did they think that that roof didn't need [to be] covered? I want to sit down and talk to them," Helen Comperatore said. Cangelosi said he still questions whether the agency asked for additional personnel to cover a busy election year and if they did, whether those requests were granted. He thinks the Secret Service needs better pay to retain agents tempted to leave the agency for other federal government jobs. McDonald said he suspects part of the problem ahead of the Butler rally was that the Secret Service might have had a hard time understanding that the type of protection Trump needed wasn't the same as for other former presidents. He said it "boggles the mind" how Crooks was able to get on that roof and said that "communication" and "complacency" are the two issues that he thinks really went wrong in Butler. But he also said that he feels the agency is moving in the right direction. "A lot of good people doing a lot good work there," he said, "and I hope they continue to move in the right direction."

Trade, tariffs top Chatham-Kent councillors talk with U.S. counterparts
Trade, tariffs top Chatham-Kent councillors talk with U.S. counterparts

CTV News

time3 hours ago

  • CTV News

Trade, tariffs top Chatham-Kent councillors talk with U.S. counterparts

Alysson Stoney, a councillor for the Municipality of Chatham-Kent speaks at a Great Lakes Regional Forum Meeting at the National Association of Counties annual conference in Philadelphia, Pa., on July 12, 2025. (Source: Federation of Canadian Municipalities) A representative from the Municipality of Chatham-Kent was part of a Canadian delegation in Philadelphia talking trade, tariffs, and other matters with U.S. counterparts. Alysson Storey, a councillor for Chatham-Kent, is the vice-chair of the Ontario Caucus for the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM). Storey was part of the FCM team attending the annual conference for the National Association of Counties over the weekend, which consists of more than 2,000 officials from counties across the U.S. 'If we can learn from the solutions and the challenges they're working on here in the U.S. or vice versa, that benefits all of us,' Stoney said on Saturday. Speaking to CTV News from the conference, Storey said the meetings and presentations are an opportunity to speak about challenges facing municipalities in both countries. 'What is clear, especially with states that are close to the Canadian border, they're very aware of the tariff impacts,' Storey explained. 'They're already seeing it in manufacturing and agriculture, in border crossings and tourism.' Ties between Canada and the U.S. have been precarious due to a changing trade landscape, largely fuelled by tariffs levied by U.S. President Donald Trump. On Thursday, Trump announced a 35 per cent tariff on Canadian imports starting Aug. 1. Similar to upper levels of Canadian Governments, Storey said their messaging remains tariffs will hurt economies on both sides of the border. 'As the government of proximity, local governments, both here in the states and in Canada, we're the first ones to see impacts on jobs, we're the first ones to see impacts of factory closures, the first ones to see impacts on tourism,' Storey explained. FCM representatives began a larger dialogue with their U.S. counterparts earlier this year to discuss ongoing challenges. Storey planned to speak as part of a forum for states around the Great Lakes, as well as talks on rural affairs and agriculture. 'The agriculture piece is huge,' she said. 'That is our primary economic driver in our community as it is in a lot of southwestern Ontario, so farmers have issues with the trade concerns.' The FCM delegation planned to return home on Sunday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store