Pretoria law firm challenges mandatory mediation directive in Constitutional Court
Gert Nel, the head of a law firm that specialises in Road Accident Fund matters, has expressed his concerns over proposed plans regarding mandatory mediation for civil trials. He is now challenging the directive in the Constitutional Court.
Image: File
A Pretoria law firm has turned to the Constitutional Court for direct access to the highest court in the country in an urgent bid to overturn a directive introducing mandatory mediation in the Gauteng Division of the High Court.
Since last week, the Johannesburg and Pretoria high courts no longer allocate trial dates for civil cases (cases where evidence is being led, such as damages claims).
Litigants, who in these cases want a judge to determine their issues, must first prove that they have tried to resolve their issues via mediation.
A trial date will be allocated only if mediation does not resolve the issues, and they can prove via a certificate that they did try it.
Gauteng Judge President Dunstan Mlambo in March issued a draft directive and called for objections from the public, lawyers, and interested parties. While many vehemently opposed the directives, it came into force last week.
The Office of the Chief Justice explained that there are no alternatives as the Gauteng Divisions simply cannot cope with the heavy workload. Judge Mlambo also commented in his directive that the bulk of these cases are, in any event, settled on the day of the trial. Thus, the mediation route is the practical solution so that judges can be freed to adjudicate over other matters.
Gert Nel Inc Attorneys, through its director Gert Nel, questioned whether this move for mandatory mediation is constitutionally sound. In an affidavit accompanying his urgent application, Nel said there are constitutional limits on judicial power and the 'erosion of litigants' rights through unlawful judicial overreach'.
According to Nel, litigants, who include his clients, face tangible prejudice as they are now refused any court dates unless they can prove mediation in their matters was unsuccessful.
'Their cases have been stalled and even existing trial dates are in jeopardy.' Nel said even before the draft directive was made final, it was treated as being final. He said although the bar on allocating trial dates without first going the mediation route, the fundamental basis of this application is the uncertainty regarding the power of a head of court to issue a directive that purports to overrule legislation.
According to Nel, the head of the court - Judge President Mlambo in this case - lacks the power under the Constitution and the Superior Courts Act to mandate compulsory mediation for all civil trials in the Gauteng division. He asked the Constitutional Court to thus declare the directive to be constitutionally invalid.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
an hour ago
- TimesLIVE
Cape Town mayor takes Ramaphosa and government to ConCourt
City of Cape Town mayor Geordin Hill Lewis has approached the Constitutional Court challenging government and President Cyril Ramaphosa over the Public Procurement Act which he claims will slow down service delivery and undermine the constitutional autonomy of local government. Hill-Lewis said the challenge in the apex court points out problems which render parliament's adoption of the bill unlawful. The bill was enacted in July 2024 with the Presidency announcing it complies with the stipulation in the constitution that 'contracting of goods and services by organs of state in all spheres of government must occur in accordance with a system which is fair, equitable, transparent, competitive and cost-effective'. The Presidency at the time said national legislation must prescribe a framework within which a procurement policy must be implemented. The bill was intended to address weaknesses in the procurement of goods and services by organs of state that have in the past enabled corruption, including state capture. Previously, the legislation regulating procurement was said to be fragmented and constraining. Hill-Lewis pointed out that seven of nine provinces did not have lawful final mandates to vote on the bill in the National Council of Provinces (NCOP). He added there were inadequate public participation timeframes and notice periods by provinces and the NCOP. There was also incorrect information in reports considered by the NCOP and National Assembly and the Assembly failed to consult on changes to chapter 4, did not consider all public comments and failed to comply with the rules for introducing a bill. 'We believe this [act] should be invalidated due to fatal shortcomings in public participation and parliament's procedures. Beyond these issues, it is vital that any new consideration of the [act] takes into account the huge red tape burden it will place on local government and the unconstitutional interference it permits in municipalities. 'At a local level, we often have to procure fast to respond to urgent water, sanitation, electrical, waste and environmental issues. This [act] impedes the ability to respond swiftly to local needs by introducing more red tape to complicate procurements. This inefficiency will have a direct effect on service delivery to residents.'
IOL News
5 hours ago
- IOL News
eThekwini Municipality faces backlash over R23 million legal fees for R30 million payout
EThekwini Municipality is expected to pay R23 million extra after losing a legal battle to defend R30 million claim Image: Willem Phungula The eThekwini Municipality has defended its spending of R23 million in defending a R30 million payout. Last week, the city lost a bruising legal battle in the Constitutional Court in trying to overturn the lower courts' orders, which had dismissed its bid with costs. The latest ruling drew the ire of political parties and Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs MEC Reverend Thulasizwe Buthelezi, who also categorised the city's costs as wasteful expenditure, which he said must be recovered from the officials responsible for them. The ruling also drew attention to the city's former deputy manager, Sibusiso Makhanya, who, through his attorneys, penned a letter to Mayor Cyril Xaba asking him to take action against City Manager Musa Mbhele, whom he said was liable for this wasteful expenditure. Makhanya gave the mayor five days to take action or face potential legal consequences. He argued that the city charged him for causing it to incur costs similarly; therefore, to be consistent, the city must also charge Mbhele. The company, Daily Double Trading, has already calculated its total costs to R53 million and demanded that the city pay within five days. In the city's response to Makhanya, it defended the legal costs, saying the monies expended in defending the ratepayers' money did not constitute wasteful expenditure. 'There has never been an instance where the legal costs, for work done by the legal representatives, constituted wasteful expenditure, irrespective of the court outcome,' read the letter. The city further stated that the Executive Committee (Exco) fully supported the decision to approach the Constitutional Court and the Exco's resolution was reported to the council meeting of March 31, which also supported it; therefore, there was no need to refer the matter to the Financial Misconduct Disciplinary Board which Makhanya called for. Makhanya dismissed the city's assertion that the cost does not constitute wasteful expenditure, saying in terms of the Municipal Finance Management Act, fruitless expenditure is defined as an expenditure that was made in vain and would have been avoided had reasonable care been exercised. He said if the mayor does act, he would go to court as he indicated in the letter. The municipality has been in a legal battle since 2018 with the electrical company, Daily Double Trading, known as Pholobas. The company claimed it was legally blacklisted by the city and had done work for the city to the value of over R40 million. After the municipality objected, the business was granted a preservation order. The sheriff attached the city's assets, but the parties reached an out-of-court settlement in which the city, through its attorney, allegedly promised to pay the company R30 million, which the company accepted, but the city later disputed. The matter went to court again in 2021, however, the city did not oppose it, and the court ordered the city to pay R30 million with 10% interest from 2018. The municipality filed a leave to appeal, which was dismissed, and went straight to the Supreme Court of Appeal, which also dismissed the matter. [email protected]
The Citizen
12 hours ago
- The Citizen
Ramaphosa defends transformation, we must dispense false notion
Ramaphosa said economic growth without transformation entrenches exclusion and transformation without growth is unsustainable. President Cyril Ramaphosa has defended transformation, saying black empowerment is 'vital to inclusive economic growth.' Writing in his weekly newsletter, Ramaphosa emphasised that 2025 marks the 70th anniversary of the Freedom Charter, the country is reminded of its 'aspiration that the people shall share in the country's wealth.' 'Our Constitution reflects the promise we made to one another and to future generations to redress the injustices of our past and realise the full potential of our country. 'For this reason, we reaffirm that broad-based black economic empowerment is not just a policy choice but a constitutional imperative,' Ramaphosa said. ALSO READ: Ramaphosa urges employers to give BEEI youths their 'next opportunity' Inequality The president said that according to Statistics SA, between 2006 and 2023, black African households experienced real income growth of 46%, coloured households of 29% and Indian households of 19%. 'Despite this progress, the average income of white households is still nearly five times higher than that of black African households. This is the gulf we must close through deliberate and sustained efforts to expand opportunity. 'Transformation is not a favour. It is a necessity. The inequality of our past continues to shape the lives of millions of black South Africans. And yet many who continue to benefit from the legacy of exclusion continue to decry black economic empowerment and are even challenging it in our courts,' Ramaphosa said. 'False notion' Ramaphosa said economic growth without transformation entrenches exclusion, and transformation without growth is unsustainable. 'We must dispense with the false notion that we must make a choice between growth and transformation. 'We also need to challenge the notion that broad-based black economic empowerment is a cost to the economy. It is actually an investment in the economy,' Ramaphosa said. Last week, Ramaphosa came out swinging against critics of Black Economic Empowerment (BEE), questioning whether their opposition is rooted in 'greed' or 'jealousy'. ALSO READ: US visit came amid 'increasing strain' between two countries, Ramaphosa says
