eThekwini Municipality faces backlash over R23 million legal fees for R30 million payout
EThekwini Municipality is expected to pay R23 million extra after losing a legal battle to defend R30 million claim
Image: Willem Phungula
The eThekwini Municipality has defended its spending of R23 million in defending a R30 million payout.
Last week, the city lost a bruising legal battle in the Constitutional Court in trying to overturn the lower courts' orders, which had dismissed its bid with costs.
The latest ruling drew the ire of political parties and Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs MEC Reverend Thulasizwe Buthelezi, who also categorised the city's costs as wasteful expenditure, which he said must be recovered from the officials responsible for them.
The ruling also drew attention to the city's former deputy manager, Sibusiso Makhanya, who, through his attorneys, penned a letter to Mayor Cyril Xaba asking him to take action against City Manager Musa Mbhele, whom he said was liable for this wasteful expenditure.
Makhanya gave the mayor five days to take action or face potential legal consequences. He argued that the city charged him for causing it to incur costs similarly; therefore, to be consistent, the city must also charge Mbhele.
The company, Daily Double Trading, has already calculated its total costs to R53 million and demanded that the city pay within five days.
In the city's response to Makhanya, it defended the legal costs, saying the monies expended in defending the ratepayers' money did not constitute wasteful expenditure.
'There has never been an instance where the legal costs, for work done by the legal representatives, constituted wasteful expenditure, irrespective of the court outcome,' read the letter.
The city further stated that the Executive Committee (Exco) fully supported the decision to approach the Constitutional Court and the Exco's resolution was reported to the council meeting of March 31, which also supported it; therefore, there was no need to refer the matter to the Financial Misconduct Disciplinary Board which Makhanya called for.
Makhanya dismissed the city's assertion that the cost does not constitute wasteful expenditure, saying in terms of the Municipal Finance Management Act, fruitless expenditure is defined as an expenditure that was made in vain and would have been avoided had reasonable care been exercised.
He said if the mayor does act, he would go to court as he indicated in the letter.
The municipality has been in a legal battle since 2018 with the electrical company, Daily Double Trading, known as Pholobas. The company claimed it was legally blacklisted by the city and had done work for the city to the value of over R40 million.
After the municipality objected, the business was granted a preservation order. The sheriff attached the city's assets, but the parties reached an out-of-court settlement in which the city, through its attorney, allegedly promised to pay the company R30 million, which the company accepted, but the city later disputed.
The matter went to court again in 2021, however, the city did not oppose it, and the court ordered the city to pay R30 million with 10% interest from 2018.
The municipality filed a leave to appeal, which was dismissed, and went straight to the Supreme Court of Appeal, which also dismissed the matter.
[email protected]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
9 hours ago
- The South African
Kaizer Chiefs' R53 millions striker dream might crumble
Kaizer Chiefs' hopes of landing Congolese striker Fiston Mayele have hit a major snag, with financial constraints and stiff competition from Egyptian giants threatening to derail the deal. Coach Nasreddine Nabi personally scouted the lethal forward during his recent mission to Egypt, but sources close to the negotiations reveal that money may prove to be the decisive factor. Chiefs remain in the running for Mayele, but only if the striker chooses sentiment over salary. 'The only way Mayele can join Kaizer Chiefs is if the player himself wants to reunite with coach Nasreddine Nabi. It won't be because of money,' a source confirmed. 'Pyramids FC are offering him enough money to stay at the club or sell him to a club that can offer more money than Kaizer Chiefs.' Reports suggest Pyramids FC tabled a new two-year deal worth around R53 million, well beyond the R36 million Chiefs could muster even with their maximum wage package. Chiefs reportedly offered a R5 million signing-on fee, spread over three seasons, and a monthly salary of R1 million to R1.5 million. But this package pales in comparison to what Egyptian sides are willing to put on the table. Even if Mayele favoured a move to Naturena, Chiefs face an uphill battle. Pyramids FC aren't the only club circling the striker. Multiple Egyptian teams are reportedly interested, driving up both the player's value and expectations. Chiefs, limited by local market economics and budget restrictions, find themselves priced out of the race unless Mayele decides to sacrifice millions for the chance to reunite with Nabi and play in the Betway Premiership. Will Kaizer Chiefs find a way to get Mayele? Let us know by leaving a comment below or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
TimesLIVE
a day ago
- TimesLIVE
Cape Town mayor takes Ramaphosa and government to ConCourt
City of Cape Town mayor Geordin Hill Lewis has approached the Constitutional Court challenging government and President Cyril Ramaphosa over the Public Procurement Act which he claims will slow down service delivery and undermine the constitutional autonomy of local government. Hill-Lewis said the challenge in the apex court points out problems which render parliament's adoption of the bill unlawful. The bill was enacted in July 2024 with the Presidency announcing it complies with the stipulation in the constitution that 'contracting of goods and services by organs of state in all spheres of government must occur in accordance with a system which is fair, equitable, transparent, competitive and cost-effective'. The Presidency at the time said national legislation must prescribe a framework within which a procurement policy must be implemented. The bill was intended to address weaknesses in the procurement of goods and services by organs of state that have in the past enabled corruption, including state capture. Previously, the legislation regulating procurement was said to be fragmented and constraining. Hill-Lewis pointed out that seven of nine provinces did not have lawful final mandates to vote on the bill in the National Council of Provinces (NCOP). He added there were inadequate public participation timeframes and notice periods by provinces and the NCOP. There was also incorrect information in reports considered by the NCOP and National Assembly and the Assembly failed to consult on changes to chapter 4, did not consider all public comments and failed to comply with the rules for introducing a bill. 'We believe this [act] should be invalidated due to fatal shortcomings in public participation and parliament's procedures. Beyond these issues, it is vital that any new consideration of the [act] takes into account the huge red tape burden it will place on local government and the unconstitutional interference it permits in municipalities. 'At a local level, we often have to procure fast to respond to urgent water, sanitation, electrical, waste and environmental issues. This [act] impedes the ability to respond swiftly to local needs by introducing more red tape to complicate procurements. This inefficiency will have a direct effect on service delivery to residents.'
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
eThekwini Municipality faces backlash over R23 million legal fees for R30 million payout
EThekwini Municipality is expected to pay R23 million extra after losing a legal battle to defend R30 million claim Image: Willem Phungula The eThekwini Municipality has defended its spending of R23 million in defending a R30 million payout. Last week, the city lost a bruising legal battle in the Constitutional Court in trying to overturn the lower courts' orders, which had dismissed its bid with costs. The latest ruling drew the ire of political parties and Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs MEC Reverend Thulasizwe Buthelezi, who also categorised the city's costs as wasteful expenditure, which he said must be recovered from the officials responsible for them. The ruling also drew attention to the city's former deputy manager, Sibusiso Makhanya, who, through his attorneys, penned a letter to Mayor Cyril Xaba asking him to take action against City Manager Musa Mbhele, whom he said was liable for this wasteful expenditure. Makhanya gave the mayor five days to take action or face potential legal consequences. He argued that the city charged him for causing it to incur costs similarly; therefore, to be consistent, the city must also charge Mbhele. The company, Daily Double Trading, has already calculated its total costs to R53 million and demanded that the city pay within five days. In the city's response to Makhanya, it defended the legal costs, saying the monies expended in defending the ratepayers' money did not constitute wasteful expenditure. 'There has never been an instance where the legal costs, for work done by the legal representatives, constituted wasteful expenditure, irrespective of the court outcome,' read the letter. The city further stated that the Executive Committee (Exco) fully supported the decision to approach the Constitutional Court and the Exco's resolution was reported to the council meeting of March 31, which also supported it; therefore, there was no need to refer the matter to the Financial Misconduct Disciplinary Board which Makhanya called for. Makhanya dismissed the city's assertion that the cost does not constitute wasteful expenditure, saying in terms of the Municipal Finance Management Act, fruitless expenditure is defined as an expenditure that was made in vain and would have been avoided had reasonable care been exercised. He said if the mayor does act, he would go to court as he indicated in the letter. The municipality has been in a legal battle since 2018 with the electrical company, Daily Double Trading, known as Pholobas. The company claimed it was legally blacklisted by the city and had done work for the city to the value of over R40 million. After the municipality objected, the business was granted a preservation order. The sheriff attached the city's assets, but the parties reached an out-of-court settlement in which the city, through its attorney, allegedly promised to pay the company R30 million, which the company accepted, but the city later disputed. The matter went to court again in 2021, however, the city did not oppose it, and the court ordered the city to pay R30 million with 10% interest from 2018. The municipality filed a leave to appeal, which was dismissed, and went straight to the Supreme Court of Appeal, which also dismissed the matter. [email protected]
