logo
Five years on, we're only just starting to understand how much lockdown damaged our children

Five years on, we're only just starting to understand how much lockdown damaged our children

Yahoo19-03-2025

One of the lovely things about the breadth of Radio 4 is the station's ability to take a single subject and, via its various programmes, examine it from many different angles. Over the past few days, though mainly on Monday, Radio 4 has been marking five years since the UK's first Covid lockdown and has managed to give us distinct perspectives on that momentous event from children, parents, teachers, doctors, scientists, farmers, arts professionals, dramatists, data crunchers, psychologists and an Icelandic concert pianist.
If I have one complaint, it's that the station didn't go the whole hog and make every programme on Monday about the March 2020 restrictions – give us the comedic perspective, the literary perspective, the meteorological perspective, the culinary perspective, the Ambridge perspective. Heck, I'd have even listened to a Thought for the Day on the subject (well, perhaps not).
Things kicked off on Saturday with the reliably excellent Archive on 4, which went over the events from December 13, 2019 (Boris Johnson wins a landslide) to March 23, 2020 (Boris Johnson tells us we can't leave the house any more) and stirred up all sorts of repressed memories – Johnson singing Happy Birthday as he washed his hands, racegoers at Cheltenham delighted the event wasn't cancelled, Patrick Vallance. It was a guilty listen in many ways – those poor people we heard in the clips had no idea what was about to hit them. It was hard to know what to do with all that hindsight.
Far more illuminating, yet arguably even more depressing, was Monday's analysis of the long-term impacts of lockdown, particularly on children. On Woman's Hour we heard about babies not learning to point or wave; in the trio of reports titled Lockdown's Legacy, children, teachers and medics lined up to lay bare just how scarring that period of isolation was for the young; on Start the Week we learnt that adults whose mental health suffered in lockdown have largely recovered – but children haven't.
'We had this haloed image of kids doing Joe Wicks videos in the garden and sitting doing their homework,' said one doctor, 'but for many children that was just not the case.' Those children, he said, are the ones we should worry about. Later he spoke of seeing 'Victorian levels of abuse and neglect' when lockdown restrictions eased.
The day was a parade of anecdotes about stunted development, poor educational attainment, malnutrition, mental health epidemics, spiralling standards of behaviour and a lost generation. We heard statements such as, 'Many believe this [lack of social development in reception-aged children] is because of Covid-19' and, 'It's clear a year out of traditional schooling will have lasting impacts', and while it was all largely convincing you yearned for a bit of roughage in your diet: where was the data to support all this?
Step forward the excellent More or Less, Tim Harford's wonderfully clear-eyed, no bulls--t programme that sloughs away anecdote and asks what the numbers are actually telling us. It gave Monday's day of programming a spine of steel. It was, and I mean this as a compliment, quite boring at times. Harford was not about to allow an eye-catching statistic to go unchallenged or a strong statement to be uninspected. He wanted to know what damage we did to our young when, with the lockdown, we sought to protect the adults – the 'intergenerational transfer of harms' as Harford called it.
It was bleak. For children who started school in 2020, there's an appreciable drop in learning attainment, just as there was for older primary-aged children (though the data showed the pupils could recover that loss).
Absence has rocketed – 10.5 per cent of children missed 10 per cent or more of school days in 2019. In 2023, it was more than 21 per cent. Suspensions have doubled. The truly depressing aspect was how lockdown acted as an 'amplifier', with more affluent children coping well, while the disadvantaged suffered even more. 'A decade of progress in closing the educational attainment gap was wiped out,' said one academic. 'We should never, ever have closed the schools,' said a teacher.
More or Less's refusal to supply easy headlines – on lockdown's impact on university students: 'We just don't know yet' – makes it all the more powerful when it finds hard evidence. Throughout the day we heard emotive stories about young people's mental health, and while they were affecting you wondered what the true picture was. More or Less had data to show it's every bit as bad as the anecdotes suggest, and it's getting worse: 'The figures are a gut-punch.' One in 10 young people showed signs of a mental health illness before the pandemic. Now it's one in five – and rising.
Radio 4 gave us all sorts of perspectives on lockdown and, in the main, the farmers, parents, teachers, artists and Icelandic concert pianists have managed to roll with the punches. For the young, however, it came at an enormous cost. And we're only just beginning to learn how much.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Shannon Sharpe, Chad Johnson Reveal Why Shedeur Sanders' Draft Fall Is a ‘Blessing in Disguise'
Shannon Sharpe, Chad Johnson Reveal Why Shedeur Sanders' Draft Fall Is a ‘Blessing in Disguise'

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Shannon Sharpe, Chad Johnson Reveal Why Shedeur Sanders' Draft Fall Is a ‘Blessing in Disguise'

Shannon Sharpe, Chad Johnson Reveal Why Shedeur Sanders' Draft Fall Is a 'Blessing in Disguise' originally appeared on Athlon Sports. NFL legends Shannon Sharpe and Chad Johnson highlighted the bright side of Shedeur Sanders falling to the fifth round of the 2025 NFL Draft. After initially being touted as a top-five draft selection, the former Colorado Buffaloes quarterback had to wait until Day 3 of the draft to hear his name called. Advertisement The Cleveland Browns drafted him with the No. 144 overall selection, ending a shocking situation that many didn't see coming. It's been over a month since the draft, and Sanders is already settling in with his team, where he'll have to compete with fellow rookie Dillon Gabriel and veterans Joe Flacco and Kenny Pickett to earn the starting spot under center. His father, Deion Sanders, defended him against the narratives suggesting Shedeur didn't take the pre-draft process as seriously as expected. Cleveland Browns quarterback Shedeur Sanders (12).Jeff Lange / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images Sharpe and Johnson sided with the two-time NFL champion, saying that it was positive for Shedeur Sanders to be drafted that low during Monday's edition of their "Nightcap" show. Advertisement "I know one thing," Johnson said. "This was a blessing in disguise." "You and I both said it ain't it ain't it ain't how high how high you go, it's where you go," Sharpe responded. "And what you do when you get there." "That's it. Um, but look, he got, look, his dad has prepared for this. He, guess what? He's been Deion Sanders' son as long as he hadn't been. He hadn't been anything but that. So, the criticism has always been there." "Always," Johnson interjected. "Which is why he gonna be all right. He been dealing with adversity and obstacles for a long time. Very long time. So, this is nothing new." Advertisement After his dramatic draft slide, many sent Shedeur Sanders the same message. Tom Brady encouraged him to take this as an opportunity to grow and as motivation to show that he belongs in the league. Sanders is drawing mixed reactions during his first days with the Browns, but said that he's focused on learning as much as possible and helping his team as much as he can. Related: Shedeur Sanders Shares Interesting Take on Disappointing Draft Day Slide This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 3, 2025, where it first appeared.

Dakota Johnson's Revealing Dress Causes Awkward Interaction With Jimmy Fallon
Dakota Johnson's Revealing Dress Causes Awkward Interaction With Jimmy Fallon

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Dakota Johnson's Revealing Dress Causes Awkward Interaction With Jimmy Fallon

Dakota Johnson's Revealing Dress Causes Awkward Interaction With Jimmy Fallon originally appeared on Parade. Dakota Johnson's dress caused a little commotion during an appearance on The Tonight Show — and she didn't hesitate to confront host Jimmy Fallon about it! While stopping by the late night show to promote her upcoming film Materialists, Johnson pointed out her low cut dress may not have been the best option for the interview, telling Fallon that it was the "wrong dress." In response, Fallon said he thought the dress was "perfect" but suggested that Johnson "not move" in order to prevent any accidental spillage. It wasn't long before things got a little awkward though and Johnson had to remind the host where here eyes were! "My eyes are up here!" Johnson joked, while Fallon looked towards the ceiling and admitted that he couldn't meet her gaze — and didn't know where he should look. Fallon tried to get the interview back on track but things were derailed once again when Johnson got concerned that she might be a little too exposed. "Tell me if there's a problem," Johnson pleaded. "Keep my posture real good. Does anyone have, like, a blanket I could wear?" While Fallon tried to reassure her that there was "not quite a problem" yet and everything was still going "according to plan," he did offer her a tiny handkerchief to attempt to cover up her chest. "That's perfect! No one will even notice the difference. You look great...[but] I don't want to ruin your outfit. You look gorgeous," Fallon said. After Johnson removed the handkerchief, Fallon joked that he was listing it on eBay as soon as he got home — although there's no listing on the auction website just yet! In the end, Fallon presented Johnson with a cardigan that her father Don Johnson had gifted him. A visibly relieved Johnson used it to cover up for the next few moments — but by the end of the interview, she had ditched her cover up. You can watch Dakota Johnson and Jimmy Fallon's awkward interaction below. Dakota Johnson's Revealing Dress Causes Awkward Interaction With Jimmy Fallon first appeared on Parade on Jun 3, 2025 This story was originally reported by Parade on Jun 3, 2025, where it first appeared.

Dakota Johnson's Blazer Minidress Was So Low Cut, She Covered It Up With Tissues on TV
Dakota Johnson's Blazer Minidress Was So Low Cut, She Covered It Up With Tissues on TV

Elle

time2 hours ago

  • Elle

Dakota Johnson's Blazer Minidress Was So Low Cut, She Covered It Up With Tissues on TV

Dakota Johnson is no stranger to wearing daring ensembles, from sheer Gucci dresses to lingerie bodysuits. But the actress got a little self-conscious while filming The Tonight Show in a very low-cut blazer minidress. At two points during her interview, Johnson literally covered up the neckline with objects host Jimmy Fallon gave her. 'This is the wrong outfit,' she began the interview before warning Fallon to 'tell me if there's a problem.' 'Right now, there's not a problem,' he replied. 'There's almost a problem but not quite.' '[I'll] keep my posture real good,' she quipped. Then she asked a moment later, 'Does anyone have, like, a blanket I could wear?' Fallon offered her some tissues, joking, 'No one will even know the difference.' She put them in her neckline, and it almost looked like they were part of the look: She ultimately removed them. Later in the chat, Fallon gave her a sweater to wear. The first place she put it was over her cleavage to cover it up again. Johnson didn't actually have any wardrobe malfunctions during the interview, but she did cause a little trouble with Fallon doing prank phone calls. The host first brought up Johnson being prank-called by Billie Eilish on ELLE's Phoning It In series. Johnson defended her earnest response to Eilish's prank, saying 'I was trying to be a good friend...I love Billie so much.' Fallon and Johnson decided to do some prank calls of their own to businesses. Both used accents—and were pretty convincing. Watch the full segment below:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store