The GOP's 'big, beautiful bill' would leave 10.9 million more uninsured, CBO says
The Republican party's "big, beautiful bill" would leave 10.9 million fewer people in the US with health coverage while cutting more than $1 trillion in spending from federal insurance programs over a decade, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office reported on Wednesday.
Most of the coverage losses would be due to changes in Medicaid, the health program for low-income, elderly, and disabled children and adults, including new work requirements that are expected to knock millions from its rolls. The rest would be due to reforms to the Affordable Care Act that could make buying insurance through its marketplaces more difficult while also limiting benefits for immigrants.
By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's
Terms
and
Privacy Policy
Healthcare experts have described the cuts as unlike any in history and warned that they would undo much of the progress the US has made in reducing the number of people without insurance since the Affordable Care Act passed in 2010.
'This would be the biggest rollback in federal support for healthcare ever,' Larry Levitt, executive vice president for health policy at the think tank KFF said on X.
The new numbers are similar to previous estimates from Capitol Hill, but they were updated to reflect the final version of the legislation passed by the House of Representatives last month and to show how different portions of the bill would interact with each other.
According to the CBO, the GOP's legislation would reduce Medicaid enrollment by about 7.8 million. Much of the drop would be due to new rules requiring that able-bodied, childless adults spend at least 80 hours a month at work, in community service, or in an education program. The change is expected to shave $344 billion from the program, out of about $780 billion in total cuts.
The White House has tried to cast doubt on the CBO's numbers, suggesting with little evidence that its staff may be politically biased. Other Republicans have argued that the office's estimates are simply overblown and that the work rules are a 'common sense' reform that won't reduce coverage for individuals who truly need it.
'You're telling me that you're going to require the able-bodied, these young men, for example, to only work or volunteer in their community for 20 hours a week. And that's too cumbersome for them?" House Speaker Mike Johnson said on this Sunday's "Meet the Press." "I'm not buying it. The American people are not buying it."
But other healthcare experts have argued that work requirements are likely to block many Americans from coverage they are legally eligible for simply by piling on paperwork and red tape. They point to Arkansas' brief attempt to impose work rules during the first Trump administration, which led to about 18,000 residents losing coverage even though 'nearly everyone who was targeted by the policy already met the requirements,' as one study found.
Many of the bill's changes to the Affordable Care Act are more technical, but together they would narrow the opportunities for individuals to sign up and stay enrolled. They include shortening the open enrollment period and ending the ability of lower-income adults to buy coverage throughout the year. Customers will also no longer be able to automatically reenroll in their health plan from year to year, thanks to new requirements that they annually verify their income and residency.
Conservatives have argued that the changes are necessary to prevent fraudulent enrollments on the insurance exchanges, but more left-leaning experts have argued that the bill is simply trying to cut spending by throwing up unnecessary roadblocks.
'What they've done in both the marketplaces and Medicaid is that they've made it much harder to get and maintain your coverage,' said Sara Collins, vice president for healthcare coverage and access at the Commonwealth Fund.
Republicans have emphasized that some of their reforms are intended to cut coverage to illegal immigrants. For instance, the bill would ban states from using their own money to extend Medicaid coverage to undocumented residents, which the CBO estimates will lead to about 1.4 million more people uninsured.
The majority of coverage losses would fall on American citizens and legal residents, however, with 9.5 million more uninsured.
Separately from the GOP bill, the number of Americans without insurance is expected to increase significantly after next year when expanded Obamacare subsidies passed under the Biden Administration are set to expire, significantly increasing premiums. The CBO has forecast that about 4.2 million fewer people will have coverage as a result.
Between those losses, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, and regulatory changes the Trump administration has proposed, the office has projected that about 16 million fewer Americans will be insured over the coming decade.
Matthew Fiedler, a healthcare expert at the Brookings Institution, estimates that the US uninsured rate will increase to about 12 percent from around 7.7 percent today — undoing about half the decline since the Affordable Care Act was passed in 2010.
'We're on track for a fairly unprecedented increase in the uninsured rate,' he said.
Jordan Weissmann is a Senior Reporter at Yahoo Finance.
Sign up for the Mind Your Money newsletter
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stephen Miller Melts Down as Musk Exits With His Wife and an Attack on Trump
White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller spammed social media Tuesday night in a raging display of his unwavering support for President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' as it faced increasing backlash from MAGA figures, including Elon Musk. The Trump loyalist went in hard to sell the 1,038-page document that passed the House by a single vote on May 22. Miller's comments came hours after former DOGE chief Musk attacked the mega-spending bill as the legislation moves to the Senate, labeling it a 'disgusting abomination.' The world's richest man also threatened to 'fire all politicians who betrayed the American people' at next year's midterm elections. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk wrote on X. Miller responded by calling Trump's bill 'the most essential piece of legislation... in generations' and 'the most MAGA bill ever passed by the House.' Miller pointedly described those on Trump's side of the argument as the president's 'closest allies.' It is unclear how much personal animus there is between Miller and Musk after the tech billionaire walked out on the administration, taking Miller's wife Katie with him. Katie Miller was hired by DOGE under the same 'special government employee' status as Musk, meaning that she was also time-limited to 130 days in office, but that has done little to quell unsubstantiated internet speculation about Musk and the Millers. She will now reportedly work for Musk full-time. Miller began his own barrage of posts on X, first by claiming Trump's bill would fund increased deportation. '[The bill] will increase by orders of magnitude the scope, scale, and speed of removing illegal and criminal aliens from the United States,' Miller wrote. 'For that reason alone, it's the most essential piece of legislation currently under consideration in the entire Western World, in generations.' 'Now or never,' the 39-year-old wrote in another post. Trump's bill is estimated to increase the budget deficit by approximately $600 billion in the next fiscal year. Miller tried to explain his take on the bill by breaking it down into three sections: 'The most significant border security and deportation effort' in history, a full 'extension and expansion' of Trump's tax cuts and finally cutting almost $2 trillion through 'the largest welcome reform in history.' 'Item 1 alone (border security + deportation),' Miller wrote, 'makes this the most important legislation for the conservative project in the history of the nation.' Critics of Trump's bill fear it would lead to millions of Americans losing health coverage by slashing Medicaid and introducing budget cuts to food assistance programs, with spending on border security and military programs increased. Some Republicans have also expressed fears about the rising cost of the bill, despite a deadline of July 4 to get the measure passed and signed into law. Miller's flurry of posts included him bragging that the bill 'was designed by President Trump and his allies in Congress to deliver on his core campaign pledges to voters and that is exactly what it does. This is the most MAGA bill ever passed by the House, and it's not even close.' 'The bill was designed by President Trump, his loyal aides, and his closest allies in Congress to deliver fully and enthusiastically on the explicit promises he made the American People,' he wrote in another post. Miller also called out GOP Kentucky senator Rand Paul, who told Fox Business his biggest objection to Trump's bill was the addition of '$5 trillion to the debt ceiling' over the next decade. 'Why doesn't Rand ever fight this hard to deport illegals?' Miller asked in a post. Miller clarified Trump's bill would not fund the Department of Education, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, or the Environmental Protection Agency. Experts have, however, warned the bill could ruin student loan borrowers and universities and will have an environmental impact through increased mining and logging of public lands to raise revenue. 'We could have never dreamed of a bill like this in 2017,' Miller posted on X. Miller's loyalty comes as other Republican senators have joined Musk in questioning the contents of Trump's bill. At least four are demanding changes, according to Reuters. They include Sen. Mike Lee and Sen. Ron Johnson. While Republicans have a 53-47 seat majority in the Senate, they cannot afford to lose support. Georgia Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene revealed she had not read a part of the bulky bill that would prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence systems for a decade. 'Full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278-279 of (the bill) that strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years,' Greene posted on X. 'I am adamantly OPPOSED to this and it is a violation of state rights and I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there.' California Republican Jack Kimble was also critical of the bill on Tuesday. He posted on X: 'Full transparency, I did not know that the big beautiful bill was a real budget and would be used to determine spending levels. It seems to me that this is something that should have been made known to those in the House of Representative[s].' When a follower told him 'you're supposed to read the bills before you vote on them' Kimble replied 'Yeah, my bad.' Ron Johnson also agreed with Musk's 'disgusting abomination' comments on the bill. Speaking to NewsNation's The Hill on Tuesday, Johnson said, 'He's telling the truth... that's all I'm doing, too.' 'The trajectory of deficits is up, and no matter what the 'big, beautiful bill' does, it does not address that long-term prospect, it does not bend the deficit curve down. It supports it going up.' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said President Trump was already aware of 'where Elon Musk stood on this bill' and that he would not be changing it. 'This is one, big, beautiful bill,' Leavitt said on Tuesday. 'And he's sticking to it.'
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cuts to care: The price mothers and children will pay
HONOLULU (KHON2) — Congress continues to discuss possible cuts to Medicaid and many in Hawaii are concerned about the potential impacts. Some officials warn pregnant women and children could be hit the hardest. Those who rely on the service for themselves and their children also fear the worst. On Aug. 8, 2023, wildfires rip through the Lahaina community forcing thousands to flee. Mairey Garcia, then 10 weeks pregnant with her second child, made it out alive with her husband and daughter. Wanted man arrested after 'crime spree' leads to officer-involved shooting 'We live in Maui, for almost 16 years,' she said. 'Thinking and looking back after the fire, I don't want to think about it anymore.' They lost everything. Uprooting her family and relocating after the devastation on Maui she dealt with so many stressors and the added responsibility of another baby on the way. Garcia said having Aloha Care medical coverage was a huge weight off her shoulders. 'It's the only thing I have that time to support my babies and my family as well, because I can't afford to get a medical,' she Feb. 23, 2024 she gave birth to a healthy baby girl. 'Aloha Care has been there for me from the very start. It's been a blessing for me,' Garcia said. She is not alone. According to Aloha Care CEO Francoise Culley-Trotman, 1,500 moms delivered babies last year covered by Aloha Care. With 70,000 members it's the states second largest medicaid-medicare health plan. But if a bill to cut more than $600 billion in funding for Medicaid passes congress in the coming weeks, many will lose that lifeline. Download the free KHON2 app for iOS or Android to stay informed on the latest news 'The Republican tax bill makes the biggest cuts to Medicaid in history, meaning many people on Med-QUEST will lose coverage and hospitals and clinics may be forced to reduce services or close altogether,' U.S. Sen. Brian Schatz said in a statement. 'These cuts will disproportionately impact pregnant women and children.' 'This issue goes beyond just our membership or even the Quest recipients to what happens to our state and our ability to take care of people,' Culley-Trotman explained. She said cuts this extreme will increase preterm births and impact the long term health of mothers. 'Just an overall worsening of maternal and infant statistics in our state,' she added. For Garcia, it's personal. She worries about what will happen to her family and had this message for lawmakers. 'Please don't pass the bill,' she said. 'Because a lot of people need help and and rely on this program.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Editorial: Another UN failure — US had to veto a lopsided resolution that would not bring peace to Gaza
We wish that Elise Stefanik was sitting at the large C-shaped table in the UN Security Council chamber over on the East Side on Wednesday, where she would have ripped apart the fecklessness of the diplomats (from both friend and foe) who lined up to do the bidding of Hamas in support of a lopsided resolution that had to be vetoed by the United States. But due to D.C. politics and the narrowness of the Republican control of the House, Stefanik remains a congresswoman from upstate and is not the U.S. ambassador and the veto task fell to Chargé d'Affaires Dorothy Shea, a career Senior Foreign Service officer. Shea cast her veto, making for a 14-1 tally and correctly killing the resolution, which called for a ceasefire in Gaza without blaming Hamas, who started the fighting by launching the Oct. 7 onslaught against Israel and can stop the fighting by freeing the hostages, giving up, disarming and leaving Gaza. The way to peace is simple: get Hamas out and get aid in. They are stealing the supplies being shipped to the needy Palestinians in the territory. Hamas started this horrible situation by launching the Oct. 7 surprise attack on Israel, the deadliest day for Jews since Hitler's genocidal 1,000-year Reich was destroyed by the heroic soldiers and airmen of the Red Army and the Western Allies. Hamas has been defeated by Israel. Hamas has lost the war, but they are not willing to surrender and they are prolonging the agony for the innocent Palestinians by using them as human shields. The U.S., Egypt and Qatar have been conducting peace talks for months. Israel keeps saying yes, while Hamas keeps saying no, as recently as this past weekend. The U.S. policy has been consistent since Oct. 7: Hamas is the cause of the bloodshed and the suffering and any UN resolution must assign them the blame. The Biden administration vetoed prior Security Council resolutions that failed to condemn Hamas and now the Trump administration is continuing to do so. The Security Council cannot be allowed to deliver Hamas a propaganda victory, while in the real world, the terrorists refuse to accept a way out that the negotiators are offering. There was some hope for a breakthrough when Israel killed Hamas honcho Mohammed Sinwar last week, the younger brother of Yahya Sinwar, the fiend who masterminded Oct. 7 and who was killed last October. But this UN vote, which the Hamas champions will heap blame on Washington for, will only make a getting deal take that much longer and that means more suffering for the people of Gaza who have suffered under years of cruel Hamas dictatorship and now a war started by Hamas. But that's to be expected from the UN, which still hasn't labeled Hamas as a terror organization. As for what's happening in Gaza while the UN dickers, Hamas terrorists hide in their tunnels and ordinary Palestinians pay for their intransigence. There are still 58 Israeli hostages being held by Hamas, now for 608 days. The way forward is clear for Hamas: lay down your weapons, release the hostages and leave Gaza behind to be rebuilt. The Hamas legacy of death and suffering has to end. The UN is only postponing that day. _____