First fully indigenous AK-203 assault rifle to be delivered to Army by December
As per the contract, the Indo-Russian Rifles Private Limited (IRRPL) has to deliver all the rifles by December 2032. So far, the company has supplied around 48,000 to the Indian Army, with 50 per cent indigenous content.
IRRPL CEO and MD Major General SK Sharma on Thursday said, "We will deliver the first 100 per cent indigenised AK-203 rifle on December 31, 2025."
Another batch of 70,000 rifles will be supplied in the next five months, he said, adding that they will have 70 percent indigenous content.
"The IRRPL will supply all the rifles by mid 2030, 22 months earlier than the scheduled delivery," he added.
As reported earlier by The New Indian Express, the AK-203 rifles would replace the ageing Indian Small Arms System (INSAS). A contract for procurement of 6,01,427 AK-203 rifles, worth Rs 5,200 crore, was signed in December 2021 between the Ministry of Defence and IRRPL -- a joint venture between India, represented by the Defence PSUs-Advanced Weapons & Equipment India Limited (AWEIL) and Munitions India Limited (MIL), and Russia, represented by Rosoboronexport (RoE) & Concern Kalashnikov (CK), holding a stake of 50.5% and 49.5% respectively.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
27 minutes ago
- India.com
Inside Operation Akhal – India's Biggest Forest-Based Offensive To Smoke Out Terrorists From J&K's Densest Terrain
Akhal Forest/J&K: Operation Akhal, one of the most high-tech and large-scale counterterrorism offensives in Jammu and Kashmir, entered its sixth day on August 6. Joint forces of the Indian Army, the Jammu and Kashmir Police and the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) have zeroed in on the dense Akhal forest, uncovering a terrorist hideout that points to an entrenched and well-equipped presence of militants in the area. Acting on precise intelligence, the joint security forces have cordoned off nearly eight kilometres of forest terrain. Over 1,500 personnel, including elite PARA commandos, Rashtriya Rifles (RR), SOG units of J&K Police and CRPF troops, are involved. Throughout the operation, intermittent firing and explosions shook the region. Six soldiers have sustained injuries. Official confirmation so far acknowledges the killing of one terrorist, whose body has been recovered, although field reports suggest up to three may have been neutralised. Security forces uncovered a fortified terror hideout deep within the Akhal forest, stocked with supplies and gear. The dense terrain provides natural camouflage and has become a strategic refuge for terrorists following intense crackdowns in urban areas after the abrogation of Article 370. Over the past four years, militants have increasingly shifted to forested zones, taking advantage of the cover and adopting guerrilla tactics. Groups such as the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), the Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), the Hizbul Mujahideen (HM) and The Resistance Front (TRF) have made forest regions like Akhal their operational bases. Intelligence inputs reveal a sharp decline in local recruitment, with only four local youths joining terror groups in 2025. The vacuum has been filled by Pakistani nationals trained in guerrilla warfare. These foreign terrorists are believed to be responsible for major attacks carried out from forest hideouts over the past few years. Operation Akhal is part of a larger counterinsurgency strategy that includes prior operations such as Operation Mahadev, Shiv Shakti and combing operations in regions like Dachigam, Lolab, Aragam and Shamsawari. Since January 2025, more than 40 terrorists have been killed in forest encounters, including 15 in the Jammu region alone. To tackle this new threat landscape, forces have upgraded their surveillance and combat tools. Operation Akhal marks the use of HAL Rudra attack helicopters equipped with high-resolution thermal imaging, electro-optic tracking and targeting systems developed by Israel's Elbit Systems. These choppers provide critical support by identifying heat signatures of terrorists even in dense foliage. Advanced drones, FPV hexacopters and satellite imagery are providing real-time surveillance. AI-driven analysis tools are helping trace brief communication signals. FPV drones with live feeds enable precise monitoring of terrain and enemy movement, while thermal imagers and night-vision goggles aid in night operations. Ground forces are fully outfitted with the latest weaponry. Army soldiers carry Israeli-made 7.62mm Negev LMGs and AK-203 assault rifles. Rocket launchers and UBGLs help them engage fortified positions. The SOG operates AK-pattern rifles, submachine guns and Sterling SMGs for close encounters. CRPF units mirror this arsenal. Snipers are armed with Sako TRG 42 rifles and SIG716i systems. All personnel wear bulletproof vests and are backed by armoured troop carriers designed for high-altitude and rocky terrain. Operation Akhal is not limited to neutralising militants. Its strategic goal is to dismantle the entire terror infrastructure hidden within the forests. It aims to locate and destroy permanent militant bases that have allowed insurgents to regroup and launch attacks with impunity. The operation is a turning point in the fight against forest-based militancy. By targeting hideouts in difficult terrain using precision warfare and state-of-the-art surveillance, the security forces are sending a message that forests will no longer be a safe haven for terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir.
India Today
4 hours ago
- India Today
Uttarkashi disaster: Cloudburst or glacial collapse? Experts decode Dharali destruction
This episode of To The Point covers two major developments - the flash flood disaster in Uttarkashi's Dharali and the escalating US-India trade tensions. In Uttarkashi, over 100 people are missing following a flash flood, initially attributed to a cloudburst but now suspected to be caused by a glacial collapse or glacial lake outburst flood. Satellite data confirms the presence of two glacial lakes above the affected area. Rescue operations by the Indian Army face challenges due to inaccessible roads. Meanwhile, President Donald Trump has signed an executive order imposing an additional 25% tariff on India for its continued purchase of Russian oil, raising the total tariff to 50%. The move, aimed at curbing Russia's war in Ukraine, has strained US-India relations, described as being at an 'all-time low.' Experts discuss the economic and diplomatic implications, noting the strategic shift in US sanctions policy.
Hindustan Times
6 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Time for an ideological reset
NEW DELHI: This past week has seen a tectonic shift in Indo-US relations. Donald Trump first slapped a 25% tariff on Indian exports to the US and then topped it up with another 25% as a penalty for India buying Russian crude oil. While the first was shocking to a lot of people, the second is blatantly unfair. China buys more Russian crude than India, but Trump has not slapped any such penalty on China. As of now, tariffs on Indian exports to the US are 20 percentage points higher than on China's. Donald Trump on Wednesday slapped an additional 25% tariff on goods coming from India as penalty for New Delhi's continued buying of Russian oil. After the order, the total tariff on Indian goods, barring a small exemption list, will be 50% (PTI FILE) Where does this leave India and Indo-US relations? Are there larger lessons to be learnt? Answering this question requires an ideological clarity over and above merchandise trade. Here are three things which should matter. Enemy's enemy in cultural or superstructural wars is not your friend Shrill attacks on the American and the larger western woke ecosystem, have been an integral part of Trump's political rhetoric. Because this ecosystem has also been extremely critical of the BJP, Modi and the larger Hindutva framework, many on the Hindu right celebrated Trump's attacks on it. Many right wing influencers waxed eloquent on how Trump was good for India. What they did not understand then was that this did not necessarily mean a support from Trump for India's larger interests. These cheerleaders are having to eat crow today. Having said this, how best to position Indian politics vis-à-vis rising right-wing nativism in the advanced capitalist world – Trump is the most important and successful strain of this current – is a larger question to which there are no easy answers. But it is better to be unsure than be ecstatic and then be completely wrong. Foreign policy is driven by material realities, not personal equations Trump's abrasive stance against India is among the biggest foreign policy indictments of the Narendra Modi government. It is all the more damning because it does not look like the Indian government saw this coming. The biggest lesson to be learnt from this is simple. Foreign policy cannot be conducted on the basis of personal chemistry or friendships between leaders of two countries. It is hard material realities which shape their conduct. Trump is only messing with India because he can afford to do it without causing a major turmoil in the larger strategic and economic calculus of the US. This is also the reason why Trump is pussyfooting around China — the country with which the US has the biggest trade deficit and which is the biggest challenger to US's dominant status in the world. However, the same material realities also mean that India cannot reciprocate. Indian service sector companies, especially in the IT sector; the limited exemptions India still enjoys on exports to the US; and the remittances Indian Americans send back home, are still important interests which have to be preserved and for which there are no readily available substitutes in the world. Obviously, India must try to get these tariffs reversed. It is time to swallow hubris or overcome the shock and get to work. Russia can sell us cheaper crude and air defence systems, but it cannot compensate for the loss of an economic partnership with the US. There are no free lunches in the world There are many who believe that protecting India's strategic interests is as simple as joining one bandwagon or another. This choice was posed as Soviet Union versus US in the Cold War days and is often presented as Multilateralism (with Chinese characteristics) versus being an American satellite today. Neither of these choices is as simple and costless as it sounds. Placating Trump would have required opening up India's agriculture and dairy sectors to heavily subsidised American exports and buying significantly more expensive military hardware from American companies. Aligning firmly with China, on the other hand, would have entailed becoming a part of things such as One-Belt-One-Road initiative and signing off on a pre-ordained euthanasia of India's manufacturing prospects. This is one of the reasons India walked away from the RCEP trade agreement. Being the diverse, unequal and large economy that India is, there are a lot of influential players who would stand to gain from any of these overall sub-optimal choices. Even the muddled status quo – Trump's tariffs have ended it now – where India has been neither here nor there in the last couple of decades has created enough vested interests who have made significant gains while feeding off the natural economic momentum of the economy most of which comes from its 1.4 billion strong population. What is to be done? Patience is key. India must undertake a comprehensive appraisal of its strategic and economic abilities and decide on measures which can help it come to terms with what is likely to be the new global economic order: an increasingly protectionist and abrasive West and an even more dominant China in the manufacturing sector to the extent than it can cripple other countries' production lines in critical sectors. The illusion of some golden parachute of China+1 ensuring a smooth landing of India's economic transformation challenge should be dispensed with for good. This will not happen through some clichéd reforms to-do list which many economic commentators parrot. What it needs is a thorough overhaul of the contract between politics and capital which produces not inefficient national champions that draw their raison d'état from providing political finance but efficient ones that actually provide the much-needed edge to the country's geo-economic abilities. This will entail a major disruption in the status quo, but the only other option is outright humiliation and economic death by a thousand cuts.
