
'It's a Heist': Real Federal Auditors Are Horrified by DOGE
Mar 18, 2025 4:04 PM WIRED talked to actual federal auditors about how government auditing works—and how DOGE is doing the opposite. Photograph:Elon Musk's so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has spent the first six weeks of the new Trump administration turning the federal government upside down. It's moved from agency to agency, accessing sensitive data and payment systems, all on a supposed crusade to audit the government and stop fraud, waste, and abuse. DOGE has posted some of its 'findings' on its website, many of which have been revealed to be errors.
But two federal auditors with years of experience, who have both worked on financial and technical audits for the government, say that DOGE's actions are the furthest thing from what an actual audit looks like. Both asked to speak on the condition of anonymity because they weren't permitted to speak to the press.
'Honestly, comparing real auditing to what DOGE is doing, there's no comparison,' says one of the auditors who spoke to WIRED. 'None of them are auditors.'
In September, in a speech during the presidential campaign, then candidate Donald Trump said that he would create a government efficiency task force, headed by Musk, which would do a 'complete financial and performance audit of the entire federal government.' Musk initially said that he wanted to cut $2 trillion from the federal budget, more than the entire 2023 discretionary budget of $1.7 trillion. Musk has since tempered his ambitions, saying he'd aim to cut $1 trillion in government spending. Still, he has alleged that much of this money can be cut by identifying waste, fraud, and abuse, and has continued to claim DOGE's cuts of agency staff and resources are all part of an audit.
While there are certainly instances of government money siphoned off to fraud—a Government Accountability Office (GAO) study published in 2024 estimated that the government loses between $233 billion and $521 billion to fraud each year—even recovering all that spending wouldn't amount to the $1 trillion Musk hopes to cut from the budget.
The auditors who spoke to WIRED allege that not only is Musk's claim not true, but that DOGE appears to have completely eschewed the existing processes for actually rooting out waste, fraud, and abuse.
'An audit that follows Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards (GAGAS), also known as a Yellow Book audit, is conducted in accordance with the standards issued by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO),' says the first auditor. Audits can focus on the finances, compliance, or performance of an agency. 'That is the gold standard for how you audit the government.'
There are generally five phases of a GAGAS audit, the auditors tell WIRED: planning, evidence gathering, evaluation, reporting, and follow up. Auditors work to define the scope of an audit, identify all the applicable laws and standards, and come up with an audit plan. Next, auditors conduct interviews with staff, review financial records, and comb through data, reports, and transactions, documenting all the way. From there, auditors will assess that information against policies or procedures to figure out if there's been some kind of alleged waste, fraud, or abuse and issue a report detailing their findings and offering recommendations. Often, those reports are made available to the public. After an audit, the auditors can follow up with the agency to ensure changes are being made.
There are also very technical definitions for what constitutes waste, fraud, or abuse. Waste could mean that there are inefficiencies in a program that might lead to purchasing more of something that goes unused, or paying more for a service than is necessary. Fraud involves intentional deception—for instance, bribery or falsifying business records. Abuse means doing things that aren't necessarily illegal, but that are unethical. This could look like nepotism or favoritism in hiring, or spending excessively on travel.
In a recent interview with podcaster Joe Rogan, Musk said he believed that the government was 'one big pyramid scheme,' and alleged that 'entitlements fraud' was a 'gigantic magnetic force to pull people in from all around the world and keep them here.'
The two auditors told WIRED that going through the technological and financial minutiae of even just a single project or part of an agency can take anywhere from six to 18 months.
'You can't coherently audit something like the whole Social Security system in a week or two,' says the second auditor. It's exactly this rush to crack systems open without full understanding, the auditors say, that has led to Elon Musk's false claims that 150-year-olds were receiving Social Security benefits. 'It could be that DOGE didn't de-dupe the data.'
'In no uncertain terms is this an audit,' claims the second auditor. 'It's a heist, stealing a vast amount of government data.'
Federal workers who have spoken WIRED say they are worried their own data could be used to surveil and target them for firings based on their identities or political views. There are also concerns that DOGE could access contracts and procurement data that contain sensitive information companies provide in order to work with the federal government. DOGE has also deployed an AI chatbot within the General Services Administration (GSA), and appears to want to expand the use of such tools, bolstered by access to government data. New court documents also indicate that Marko Elez, the former DOGE representative at Treasury, shared a spreadsheet with personally identifying information outside the agency.
And without time spent for auditors to understand a new data system—like interviewing agency staff or learning the coding language—the first auditor believes it's likely the DOGE team is flying blind. 'When they collect a data set, they don't get it with any sort of description, I imagine,' they say. 'There are no terms of use for any government systems…There's no supporting testimony from data system owners, from data system experts. They don't even know the language and the database systems that they're working in. That's why they keep messing up.'
The auditors described a lengthy vetting process that allowed them to get the permissions necessary to dive into an agency's data and systems. In addition to going through the initial vetting process, the auditors say that they are required to engage in continuing education.
'None of them have any auditing background, none have any certifications, none have any clearances,' says the first auditor.
Federal workers who have spoken to WIRED expressed concern that DOGE's operatives appear to have bypassed the normal security clearance protocols in order to access sensitive systems. WIRED found that many of DOGE's youngest members, all of whom were 25 or younger, have very limited work experience, and none in the government. One, Edward Coristine, who goes by 'Big Balls' online, appears to be a 19-year-old high school graduate. Despite this, they were given high level access at places like the GSA, Social Security Administration, and the Treasury. Others, like those at the Federal Aviation Administration, come directly from Musk's own companies, and were not fully vetted by their start dates.
The auditors also noted that even canceling contracts, as DOGE has done, can add, rather than reduce costs in the long run. For instance, often the government negotiates deals on large purchases where it gets discounts for bulk purchases. Canceling a contract likely not only means the government needs to pay some kind of fee to compensate for the contract cancellation—maybe 10 to 15 percent of the contract amount—but if some or part of that purchase needs to be reinstated later, that initial bulk discount will likely be gone, making it more expensive overall. This was the case with many of the software licenses that DOGE said it wanted to cut.
Since sweeping through the government, DOGE has canceled thousands of government contracts, including 10,000 specifically for humanitarian aid. According to reporting from the Associated Press, 40 percent of those canceled contracts through late February will likely not save the government any money.
'They'll end up costing more in some way, whether it's time, inconvenience, or money,' says the second auditor.
But the auditors say that there are ways DOGE could get it right. 'If DOGE wanted to be the good guys, they could,' says the first auditor. 'I'd start by looking at existing Inspector General recommendations.' On the website for the Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human Services, for instance, there are more than 1,200 recommendations that have yet to be implemented that could potentially save the government hundreds of millions of dollars.
In an interview on FOX Business with Larry Kudlow, when asked about how his team was identifying what to go after in the government, Musk replied, 'We look at the president's executive orders, and we also just follow the money.'
The auditors say they aren't necessarily against bringing in people from outside the government to help streamline government processes—something that the government was already doing before Donald Trump was sworn in for his second term. For instance, 18F, the digital services agency within the GSA's Technology Transformation Services (TTS), was explicitly designed to serve as an in-house consultancy that would allow federal agencies to leverage private sector expertise. As part of DOGE's sweep of the government, however, it has gutted the group, putting a pause of several ongoing projects to make government services more efficient for users.
And it's these actions, the second auditor says, that best show that DOGE's intentions may not be geared towards 'efficiency' at all. 'It's a con,' they allege.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time Magazine
21 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
‘Went Too Far': Elon Musk Says He Regrets Some Posts About Trump
'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week,' Elon Musk posted on his social media platform X early Wednesday. 'They went too far.' Musk and Trump, who were once almost inseparable allies, were engaged in a public and vitriolic war of words last week. But the fierce hostilities between the man with the most money in the world and the man with the mightiest military appear to be cooling. The statement of remorse by Musk, who spent more than $250 million to help elect Trump in 2024, comes as observers have noticed another shift in his tone on social media toward the Administration. In retweets and replies, Musk signaled support for Trump's approach toward the protests in Los Angeles, including sharing multiple of the President's recent posts from Truth Social. He also responded with a heart emoji to a video of Trump telling reporters on Monday that he wished Musk well and that they had a 'good relationship.' It's a sharp contrast to how the two powerful men discussed each other last week, after Musk left his official government role and ramped up his criticisms of Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' massive tax-and-spending legislative package that is stumbling through Congress. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump told reporters at the White House on June 5. 'I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot.' On Truth Social, Trump said at the time that Musk ' went CRAZY!' and threatened that the 'easiest way to save money' would be 'to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts.' In turn, Musk alleged that the Administration was holding back the public release of so-called Epstein Files because Trump is implicated in them, and he endorsed a message that suggested 'Trump should be impeached' and Vance 'should replace him.' Those posts have since been deleted.

Wall Street Journal
38 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Musk Says He Regrets Some Posts About Trump After Explosive Fallout
Elon Musk appeared to row back his war of words with President Trump nearly a week after the pair traded insults in a dramatic and public falling out. 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week,' Musk wrote in a post on X overnight. 'They went too far.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk issues grovelling apology to Trump saying that his posts ‘went too far'
Elon Musk has taken to X to express regret over his war of words with President Donald Trump, backing down after less than a week and conceding that 'some' of his posts attacking the commander-in-chief 'went too far.' 'I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far,' the world's richest man wrote on the social media platform he owns in the early hours of Wednesday morning. The apology comes six days after Trump said he was 'very disappointed' in his former special adviser and campaign donor for criticizing the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' he is attempting to push through the Senate, prompting Musk to lash out with a series of highly personal attacks against the president, who responded in kind on his own platform Truth Social. Musk's 130-day tenure leading the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) as a government employee came to an end on May 30, but just days later the billionare began trashing Trump's signature tax and spending package, warning it would greatly increase the national debt and calling it a 'disgusting abomination.' 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' he wrote on X. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' Musk followed that up a day later with a fresh appeal to 'KILL the BILL', imploring his millions of followers to contact their representatives and senators to remind them that 'bankrupting America is NOT ok!' The president was reportedly quickly 'losing patience' with Musk's intervention behind the scenes and was 'confused' by his animosity, eventually saying as much while hosting German Chancellor Friedrich Merz at the White House on Thursday. In addition to expressing his disappointment in the Tesla and SpaceX boss, Trump also claimed that he could have won the crucial battleground state of Pennsylvania in last year's presidential election without Musk's help. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk shot back on X. 'Such ingratitude,' he added in a separate post. From there, a vicious exchange of barbs commenced on the billionaires' competing social media platforms, with Trump saying Musk's company had been 'wearing thin' and accusing him of going 'CRAZY' on Truth Social, also threatening to take away his lucrative government contracts. The latter responded on X by threatening to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, which is used to ferry astronauts to-and-from the International Space Station and, most shockingly, alleging that Trump was mentioned in top secret files held by the government on the late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, which, he said, was the true reason for their being withheld from the public. Musk also posted a picture of Trump and Epstein together and a video of the two New Yorkers chatting at a house party from 1992. The following day, West Wing aides indicated that the two men were planning a phone call to clear the air, only for Trump to tell reporters that he had no interest in speaking to the man who had donated at least $288m to his election campaign just months earlier, leaving their once-close relationship in limbo. The fallout from the spat saw former Trump aide Steve Bannon call for Musk to be deported and investigated over his alleged drug use, the late-night satirists have a field day and the internet explode with speculation and opinion. But the situation has since been eclipsed by the eruption of protests in Los Angeles against the president's illegal immigration crackdown, which has seen activists clash with Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers and the president controversially send in the National Guard to aid local law police officers in maintaining order.