logo
'Meat intolerance': Can our bodies forget how to digest flesh?

'Meat intolerance': Can our bodies forget how to digest flesh?

BBC News11-03-2025
Some people who stop eating meat have reported unpleasant effects when they return to it. Can your body forget how to digest flesh?
Eating less meat is one of the simplest ways to reduce your carbon footprint.
If everyone in the UK moved to a low-meat diet, eating less than 50g, or one Cumberland sausage's worth of meat a day, it would save as much carbon as if eight million cars were parked for good, researchers have calculated. Data from the UK government shows that meat consumption is dropping – between 1980 and 2022, consumption of beef, pork, and lamb fell by 62% – and though the reasons cited vary, and may have more to do with rising costs than an environmental conscientiousness, more and more people are clearly experimenting with saying no to meat.
But if you go a long time without eating it, does that change your body's ability to digest it? Vegetarians and vegans sometimes post on social media, asking whether going back to meat could cause stomach pain, bloating, and other symptoms. Others weigh in with their own experiences, and a great, late-night whirlwind of curiosity and cramps is born.
However, there isn't much research on whether consuming meat after a long break can trigger an upset stomach, says Sander Kersten, a professor of nutrition at Cornell University in the US. "A lack of evidence doesn't mean it doesn't exist, it's just that people haven't studied it," he reflects. "That's not always a satisfying situation or answer, but it's just what you have to deal with sometimes."
It is possible – though it is very rare – to be allergic to meat. Alpha-gal syndrome, in which the immune system recognises animal proteins as invaders, can lead to anaphylaxis and death. But this allergy, which can crop up after a lifetime of cheerful meat eating, is not related to switching to a low-meat diet. You can, for example, develop the condition after a tick bite.
For many who are avoiding meat, discovering that they have unknowingly consumed it can be emotionally painful – it can feel like a personal violation, says Kersten, who is a vegetarian himself. "That would make some people extremely sad," he explains. " I don't know if that would lead to physical symptoms. It certainly could trigger a lot of anger."
But when you consider the biology of digestion, it is not as plausible as you might imagine that the body could, over a long period of time, lose the ability to digest meat. Meat is generally very easily digested, unlike the fibre in fruits, vegetables, and legumes. To break that up, our bodies require help from our microbiome, whose microbes do possess the enzymes necessary for digesting it.
Moreover, the enzymes used to digest plant proteins are the same as those used on meat proteins. These enzymes recognise and sever particular chemical bonds in proteins. Whether they come from plants or animals, the proteins are made of building blocks called amino acids. Enzymes can generally break them up no matter where they came from.
This process is different from the case of, say, animal milk sugars like lactose. To digest lactose, your body requires a specific enzyme called lactase, and people who do not produce enough of the enzyme, making them lactose intolerants, can suffer a tummy upset after eating dairy products.
But with meat proteins, it does not make sense to think of the body somehow ceasing to make the enzymes necessary to digest a hamburger comfortably – they're always there, breaking down any protein that comes through, be it from pea, soybeans, or steaks, says Kersten.
The human gut microbiome does morph and change depending on what its host eats, though. Sometimes this means that the specific types of bacteria there change; sometimes it's just that the microbes make other enzymes. While there are differences between the microbiomes of omnivores and vegetarians and vegans, they do not seem to be radically divergent, so long as the omnivores consume a variety of plants, research has found.
Microbiomes can shift quickly as a result of dietary changes, however – one study in which people switched to a fully animal-based diet showed that a shift away from their baseline microbiome was visible within a day (it swiftly reverted back to normal once the diet ended). Subjects were encouraged to report any discomfort they felt, but nothing made it into the paper.
More like this:• How a month of abstinence can lead to meat disgust• The rise and fall and possible rise of the oyster• The complicated history of gelatine
If anything, it's the sudden consumption of large amounts of fibre after a long hiatus that could cause digestive problems. It's better to ease into such dietary changes. "Depending on the fibre, you can have some pretty strong reactions to it," says Kersten.
In short, worrying about your body somehow losing the ability to digest meat shouldn't impair any plans you have to extend Veganuary into the spring. If you're among those who've had an upset stomach after eating meat following a long hiatus, a loss of enzymes is not likely to be the culprit, though this phenomenon remains understudied, Kersten says.
"The body is quite adaptable," he continues. "It can do more than you think."
--
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

RFK Jr has slashed vaccine research. You need to know how perilous that is for the world
RFK Jr has slashed vaccine research. You need to know how perilous that is for the world

The Guardian

time6 days ago

  • The Guardian

RFK Jr has slashed vaccine research. You need to know how perilous that is for the world

You'd be hard-pressed to find many public health experts who have positive things to say about Donald Trump's handling of the Covid-19 pandemic in the United States. Alongside his numerous policy failures, one Cornell University study found that he was the biggest source of Covid-19 misinformation. But if there's one redeeming feature to Trump's pandemic record, it has to be his leadership on Operation Warp Speed – a massive, government-funded initiative that played a pivotal role in fast-tracking Covid-19 vaccines. 'Operation Warp Speed stands as one of the most remarkable scientific and humanitarian achievements of the past half-century,' the former US surgeon general Jerome Adams said. It directed billions of dollars into vaccine development and manufacturing, particularly into the mRNA platform, which became the backbone of the Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech vaccines. Vaccines work by preparing the body's immune system to identify and successfully attack foreign agents entering the body. Traditional vaccines use weakened or inactivated viruses to offer a baby version for the body to fight and learn from. These vaccines are often produced by growing the virus in hen's eggs, which means production is slow and can take months to scale up. In contrast, the mRNA platform functions like a plug-and-play video game console: you just 'plug in' the genetic code of a particular virus or pathogen. The vaccine provides instructions to our bodies to make parts of the virus in our own cells, which then prompts an immune response. The process of creating and manufacturing these vaccines is much faster and more flexible than their traditional counterparts. This is especially important for a disease such as avian flu, which has an up to 100% mortality rate in chickens. But despite the speed in which they come together, there is still a considerable time-lag before mass rollout to allow for clinical trials to ensure human safety, test for side-effects and figure out optimal dosing. During the Covid pandemic, the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines were created within weeks of research teams receiving the genetic sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 from China in January 2020. What took a year was the testing and regulatory approval processes to ensure there was trust in their safety. Given Trump's success with Operation Warp Speed, it's particularly bizarre that Robert F Kennedy Jr, his health and human services secretary, has announced $500m in cuts to the mRNA vaccine investment portfolio. These include cancelling funding for Moderna's development into a late-stage H5N1 avian flu vaccine. I asked Prof Rebecca Katz, a global health security expert and former US State Department adviser, for her assessment of the damage. She called it: 'A self-inflicted wound to a vital organ.' On its own, RFK Jr's decision isn't surprising, considering his longstanding anti-vax advocacy and cult-like following. He has built a whole identity on anti-science rhetoric and he is especially vocal about the supposed dangers of mRNA technology. But being an anti-vaxxer is also a tricky road to navigate: RFK Jr upset his base when, under considerable political pressure, he finally endorsed MMR vaccinations during the Texas measles outbreak. But putting one personality aside, what do these cuts mean for the health of people living in the US and the wider world? It's bad news. Take the example of H5N1 avian flu. This virus has shown concerning step-changes including becoming endemic in wild birds, infecting a number of poultry farms, and now has sufficient mutations to enable cow-to-cow (mammal to mammal) transmission in the US among dairy cattle. With its circulation in certain herds of dairy cattle has come a rise in human infections (cow-to-human). The virus is now one mutation away from easier transmission among humans. That's the nightmare scenario: an influenza pandemic, possibly more lethal than Covid-19. If a human-to-human transmissible H5N1 strain appears, the existing mRNA infrastructure could be used to rapidly develop a targeted vaccine. Many countries, including the UK, have been stockpiling vaccine components or ramping up surveillance. Under the Biden administration, the US had been among the leaders in this effort. By shelving investment and halting further development, the US is essentially gambling that we won't need quick medical countermeasures. It's a dangerous bet. When the next pandemic happens, the cost in human lives could be much higher than we witnessed in 2020. Can other countries simply pick up the slack with mRNA production? Not easily. After the Covid pandemic led to huge disparities in which places in the world had access to vaccine supply, many countries starting planning for their own vaccine and mRNA hubs. They didn't want to be dependent on the charity of the US or UK to donate them doses: they wanted to independently respond effectively. On a National Academies project that I was vice-chair of on the global coordination of vaccines for pandemic influenza, we looked closely into regional production, including in Africa. What I learned from experts across the world is that vaccine production, especially mRNA-based vaccines, requires a high degree of technical expertise, quality control and highly specialised supply chains. It will happen in other places, but not quickly enough to shoulder the impact of the US decision. Unlike foreign aid cuts, where the effect is felt immediately in the shutting down of food programmes or health clinics, cuts to research funding have a slower, deeper impact, especially in terms of expertise and knowledge generation. Research programmes that were working on pandemic preparedness are closing. Postdoctoral researchers aren't finding jobs, without the necessary soft money to support them. PhD programmes have been frozen or cancelled. Universities, highly dependent on government funding, are scaling back their research activities in health, especially in areas that money is being cut from. Perhaps most devastating of all: smart, ambitious young scientists have fewer opportunities to develop careers in public health research and vaccine development. They'll look elsewhere – into AI, tech, finance. Where will the expertise come from in the next 15 to 20 years if the career pipeline is being shut down? RFK Jr may position himself as Making America Healthy Again, but in reality, his policies make the entire world more vulnerable. He may, in fact, be the most dangerous person in the Trump administration – not because he's loud or erratic, but because he's steadily eroding the foundation of public health research and infrastructure. This isn't just bad policy. It's a generational setback. In that light, RFK Jr stands not merely as a controversial figure but as a serious risk to national and global health security. Prof Devi Sridhar is chair of global public health at the University of Edinburgh

RFK Jr has slashed vaccine research. You need to know how perilous that is for the world
RFK Jr has slashed vaccine research. You need to know how perilous that is for the world

The Guardian

time7 days ago

  • The Guardian

RFK Jr has slashed vaccine research. You need to know how perilous that is for the world

You'd be hard-pressed to find many public health experts who have positive things to say about Donald Trump's handling of the Covid-19 pandemic in the United States. Alongside his numerous policy failures, one Cornell University study found that he was the biggest source of Covid-19 misinformation. But if there's one redeeming feature to Trump's pandemic record, it has to be his leadership on Operation Warp Speed – a massive, government-funded initiative that played a pivotal role in fast-tracking Covid-19 vaccines. 'Operation Warp Speed stands as one of the most remarkable scientific and humanitarian achievements of the past half-century,' the former US surgeon general Jerome Adams said. It directed billions of dollars into vaccine development and manufacturing, particularly into the mRNA platform, which became the backbone of the Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech vaccines. Vaccines work by preparing the body's immune system to identify and successfully attack foreign agents entering the body. Traditional vaccines use weakened or inactivated viruses to offer a baby version for the body to fight and learn from. These vaccines are often produced by growing the virus in hen's eggs, which means production is slow and can take months to scale up. In contrast, the mRNA platform functions like a plug-and-play video game console: you just 'plug in' the genetic code of a particular virus or pathogen. The vaccine provides instructions to our bodies to make parts of the virus in our own cells, which then prompts an immune response. The process of creating and manufacturing these vaccines is much faster and more flexible than their traditional counterparts. This is especially important for a disease such as avian flu, which has an up to 100% mortality rate in chickens. But despite the speed in which they come together, there is still a considerable time-lag before mass rollout to allow for clinical trials to ensure human safety, test for side-effects and figure out optimal dosing. During the Covid pandemic, the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines were created within weeks of research teams receiving the genetic sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 from China in January 2020. What took a year was the testing and regulatory approval processes to ensure there was trust in their safety. Given Trump's success with Operation Warp Speed, it's particularly bizarre that Robert F Kennedy Jr, his health and human services secretary, has announced $500m in cuts to the mRNA vaccine investment portfolio. These include cancelling funding for Moderna's development into a late-stage H5N1 avian flu vaccine. I asked Prof Rebecca Katz, a global health security expert and former US State Department adviser, for her assessment of the damage. She called it: 'A self-inflicted wound to a vital organ.' On its own, RFK Jr's decision isn't surprising, considering his longstanding anti-vax advocacy and cult-like following. He has built a whole identity on anti-science rhetoric and he is especially vocal about the supposed dangers of mRNA technology. But being an anti-vaxxer is also a tricky road to navigate: RFK Jr upset his base when, under considerable political pressure, he finally endorsed MMR vaccinations during the Texas measles outbreak. But putting one personality aside, what do these cuts mean for the health of people living in the US and the wider world? It's bad news. Take the example of H5N1 avian flu. This virus has shown concerning step-changes including becoming endemic in wild birds, infecting a number of poultry farms, and now has sufficient mutations to enable cow-to-cow (mammal to mammal) transmission in the US among dairy cattle. With its circulation in certain herds of dairy cattle has come a rise in human infections (cow-to-human). The virus is now one mutation away from easier transmission among humans. That's the nightmare scenario: an influenza pandemic, possibly more lethal than Covid-19. If a human-to-human transmissible H5N1 strain appears, the existing mRNA infrastructure could be used to rapidly develop a targeted vaccine. Many countries, including the UK, have been stockpiling vaccine components or ramping up surveillance. Under the Biden administration, the US had been among the leaders in this effort. By shelving investment and halting further development, the US is essentially gambling that we won't need quick medical countermeasures. It's a dangerous bet. When the next pandemic happens, the cost in human lives could be much higher than we witnessed in 2020. Can other countries simply pick up the slack with mRNA production? Not easily. After the Covid pandemic led to huge disparities in which places in the world had access to vaccine supply, many countries starting planning for their own vaccine and mRNA hubs. They didn't want to be dependent on the charity of the US or UK to donate them doses: they wanted to independently respond effectively. On a National Academies project that I was vice-chair of on the global coordination of vaccines for pandemic influenza, we looked closely into regional production, including in Africa. What I learned from experts across the world is that vaccine production, especially mRNA-based vaccines, requires a high degree of technical expertise, quality control and highly specialised supply chains. It will happen in other places, but not quickly enough to shoulder the impact of the US decision. Unlike foreign aid cuts, where the effect is felt immediately in the shutting down of food programmes or health clinics, cuts to research funding have a slower, deeper impact, especially in terms of expertise and knowledge generation. Research programmes that were working on pandemic preparedness are closing. Postdoctoral researchers aren't finding jobs, without the necessary soft money to support them. PhD programmes have been frozen or cancelled. Universities, highly dependent on government funding, are scaling back their research activities in health, especially in areas that money is being cut from. Perhaps most devastating of all: smart, ambitious young scientists have fewer opportunities to develop careers in public health research and vaccine development. They'll look elsewhere – into AI, tech, finance. Where will the expertise come from in the next 15 to 20 years if the career pipeline is being shut down? RFK Jr may position himself as Making America Healthy Again, but in reality, his policies make the entire world more vulnerable. He may, in fact, be the most dangerous person in the Trump administration – not because he's loud or erratic, but because he's steadily eroding the foundation of public health research and infrastructure. This isn't just bad policy. It's a generational setback. In that light, RFK Jr stands not merely as a controversial figure but as a serious risk to national and global health security. Prof Devi Sridhar is chair of global public health at the University of Edinburgh

Cumberland Council's Spark project uses sport to help teenagers
Cumberland Council's Spark project uses sport to help teenagers

BBC News

time09-08-2025

  • BBC News

Cumberland Council's Spark project uses sport to help teenagers

A new scheme will use sport to teach teenagers about the dangers of alcohol and pilot programme, called Spark, also hopes to tackle vaping, peer pressure, mental health and improve leadership skills through sports-related creative will launch in September and will be organised by the Cumberland Alcohol Partnership, which is managed by Cumberland McDermott, the Labour-led council's portfolio holder for public health and communities, said the scheme would reframe alcohol education as "empowering, peer-led and fun". "We know both grassroots sport and the influence of others can be incredibly influential in young people's lives and choices," he said."We need to tap into that influence and meeting them 'where they are' could be a ground-breaking model." 'Wasted potential' Role models will be recruited from local sports clubs to lead the sessions and they will be trained to support and continue the work after the scheme Spark scheme will also include an alcohol-free match day the programme proves successful, it is hoped more funding will be granted for further work such as campaigns created by young people, school events delivered by Spark graduates, an ambassador programme and further alcohol-free match days. "We have to find ways to challenge the norms of underage drinking - the negative results of which can be health issues, anti-social behaviour, lower aspirations and wasted potential," McDermott said."I believe Spark's different approach - working in partnership with young people, using role models and leveraging their existing connections with community sport - could be transformational." Follow BBC Cumbria on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store