Reserve Bank Governor Lesetja Kganyago calls for dialogue to ease US-South Africa tensions
South Africa Reserve Bank governor Lesetja Kganyago and Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana call for dialogue to ease tensions
Image: Supplied/SARB
The ongoing diplomatic tensions between South Africa and the United States (US) have been scrutinised, with Reserve Bank Governor Lesetja Kganyago attributing the rising tensions to a lack of proper diplomatic engagement.
Speaking late Thursday evening after meetings with G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, Kganyago expressed concern that the escalation of trade disputes could have lasting impacts if not addressed through meaningful dialogue.
The tensions stem primarily from the Trump administration accusing South Africa of genocide against white minorities and the government's decision to take Israel to the International Court of Justice for the ongoing genocide in Gaza.
The US government cut all future funding to South Africa, disrupting the country's healthcare system.
This was also part of the broader context of US trade policy under the Trump administration, which saw the imposition of tariffs on numerous countries, including South Africa.
Earlier this month, Trump announced a 10% tariff on all imports to the US and additional reciprocal tariffs for dozens of countries, including 30% for South Africa.
Days later, after global financial markets took a pummelling, he suspended the reciprocal tariffs for 90 days, placing all countries on the 10% tariff.
While the US argued that tariffs were necessary to protect American industries, South Africa and other affected countries viewed these measures as disruptive and potentially harmful to global economic growth.
The lack of clear communication and diplomatic engagement further complicated efforts to find common ground. Kganyago's Warning: The Need for Dialogue
During his remarks, Kganyago emphasised the importance of open communication and warned that current tensions might hinder future cooperation.
'It means that we might not be talking to each other, that we need to open the dialogue so that we talk to each other," he said.
"We are coming to the point where the tensions have become so elevated that even when a hand is being extended, we might not see that because things have become so certain."
He underscored the urgency of re-engaging in diplomatic talks, noting that the current environment—marked by heightened tensions and mutual suspicion—risks fostering a cycle of disengagement.
"It's important that those conversations take place, especially as the days are becoming fewer and the environment is increasingly uncertain," Kganyago stressed. South Africa's Diplomatic Approach
South African Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana, who co-headed the G20 finance ministers' meeting, confirmed that US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent attended some sessions.
Despite the presence of US officials, the South African delegation decided against issuing a formal communique after the talks, citing deep divisions among the participating countries over how to handle the ongoing trade disputes.
The tensions have reverberated through global financial markets, with stock and bond markets experiencing volatility this month. South Africa's G20 Agenda
Amidst these challenges, South Africa's presidency of the G20 this year has focused on critical issues, including economic growth, food security, energy security, and climate change.
The country aims to leverage its platform to promote dialogue and cooperation. Still, the current state of US-South Africa relations underscores the importance of diplomatic engagement in achieving these goals.
As tensions persist, Kganyago's call for renewed dialogue highlights the need for diplomatic efforts to de-escalate the situation.
thabo.makwakwa@inl.co.za
IOL Politics
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Court orders RAF to honour R1. 4 million payment to undocumented Malawian immigrant injured in car crash
The Western Cape High Court has dismissed an application by the Road Accident Fund (RAF) to rescind a judgment mandating the payment of over R1.4 million to a Malawian man who has been in the country illegally. Image: Pexels The Western Cape High Court has dismissed an application by the Road Accident Fund (RAF) to rescind a judgment mandating a payment of over R1.4 million to an undocumented Malawian man. Charles Jeka Chipofya has been living in the country since 1994 and has been married to a South African woman since 2008. They have two children. Despite his long-term residence, his attempts to obtain citizenship through marriage were thwarted due to evident abuse of the system by some African nationals. The Road Accident Fund found itself at the centre of controversy after Chipofya was involved in a severe car accident in Plettenberg Bay in September 2016. He filed a claim with the RAF, culminating in a proposed settlement of over R1.4 million in November 2022. In January 2023, a draft order was presented to the court on mutual consent between the parties, and RAF was ordered to pay Chipofya over R1.4 million. However, two years later, RAF reneged and wanted the court to rescind the order claiming that when it was made, it was unaware that Chipofya was an illegal immigrant. RAF said that when Chipofya submitted a copy of a passport, it referred to him as Charles Chipeta and not as Charles Jeka Chipofya, and this was suspicious. In response to this suspicion, RAF investigated to ascertain the circumstances surrounding his dual identity and it came to light that Chipofya owns two passports, one naming him as Charles Jeka Chipofya and the other as Charles Chipeta. RAF stated that when Chipofya was confronted about having two passports, he tried to attribute the discrepancy to a data capture error. However, in RAF's view, his explanation was unlikely, as it is improbable that such an error could occur. Subsequent to that, RAF said investigations revealed that one of the passports did not exist at the time of the accident. Additionally, the movement system record revealed that the visa on the other passport expired in December 2012. Moreover, there were no records showing that Chipofya left the country using the old passport or that he entered the country with a new passport after December 2012. In RAF's view, this could imply that Chipofya was either not present in the country on the date of the accident or was potentially in the country illegally. RAF argued that the order was erroneously granted and had the court been made aware that Chipofya was an illegal immigrant, the court would not have granted the order. Furthermore, RAF contended that the Immigration Act prohibits illegal immigrants from being in the country and extending claims of damages to illegal immigrants will create an enormous burden on the State. In response, Chipofya's legal representative argued that RAF had prior knowledge of his nationality and legal status before reaching a settlement agreement. Moreover, it was argued that Chipofya never misrepresented his status in the country and the settlement agreement was not based on the assumed existence of his legal status in the country. Judge James Dumisani Lekhuleni who presided over the matter, sided with Chipofya, and noted RAF had reduced the claim amount specifically because Chipofya was an illegal immigrant at the time of the offer, a fact that had been openly discussed during negotiations. "This conclusion is fortified by the fact that RAF's legal representatives advised Chipofya's attorneys that his claim would be reduced because he was an illegal immigrant. This averment was not disputed by the RAF or RAF's counsel," he said. In addition, he said Chipofya's medical reports and some of his documents, showed that he didn't have a valid visa and despite this, RAF settled his claim and consented to have the draft order endorsed in court. Regarding the different names, the judge said Chipofya provided a plausible explanation regarding the names and when RAF made the offer, it was aware of the discrepancies. Judge Lekhuleni emphasised that RAF is legally bound under the RAF Act to provide compensation for losses arising from road accidents, asserting that the Act does not discriminate based on a claimant's immigration status. "In my opinion, the current legislative framework of the RAF Act does not support the fund's position to exclude illegal immigrants from the application of RAF. "Eligibility for the RAF fund is not contingent upon a person's legal status within this country. An individual's legal standing does not influence their eligibility for RAF benefits. Simply put, it is not the person's immigration status in the country that makes a person legible to the RAF benefits," he said. RAF's application was dismissed. [email protected] IOL News Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.


Eyewitness News
an hour ago
- Eyewitness News
27 killed as Israeli army opens fire near Gaza aid point
GAZA CITY - Twenty-seven people were killed in southern Gaza on Tuesday as Israeli troops opened fire near a US-backed aid centre, with the military saying the incident was under investigation. United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres decried the deaths of Palestinians seeking food aid as "unacceptable", and the world body's rights chief condemned attacks on civilians as "a war crime" following a similar shooting near the same site on Sunday. Gaza's civil defence agency said that "27 people were killed and more than 90 injured in the massacre targeting civilians who were waiting for American aid in the Al-Alam area of Rafah", in the territory's south. Civil defence spokesman Mahmud Bassal earlier told AFP the deaths occurred "when Israeli forces opened fire with tanks and drones", while Israel said troops fired towards "suspects" who had ignored warning shots. The International Committee of the Red Cross gave the same death toll but without mentioning the Israeli forces. The organisation said Gazans face an "unprecedented scale and frequency of recent mass casualty incidents". The latest shooting occurred about a kilometre from a centre run by the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), which Israel has worked with to implement a new aid distribution mechanism. The United Nations and major aid groups have refused to cooperate with the group over concerns it was designed to cater to Israeli military objectives. At a hospital in southern Gaza, the family of Reem al-Akhras, who was killed in the shooting at Rafah's Al-Alam roundabout, were beside themselves with grief. "She went to bring us some food, and this is what happened to her," her son Zain Zidan said, his face streaked with tears. Akhras's husband, Mohamed Zidan, said "every day unarmed people" were being killed. "This is not humanitarian aid; it's a trap." The Israeli military maintains that its forces do not prevent Gazans from collecting aid. Army spokesman Effie Defrin said the Israeli soldiers had fired towards suspects who "were approaching in a way that endangered" the troops, adding that the "incident is being investigated". 'UNCONSCIONABLE' Rania al-Astal, 30, said she had gone to Al-Alam with her husband to try to get food. "Every time people approached Al-Alam roundabout, they were fired upon," she told AFP. "But people didn't care and rushed forward all at once - that's when the army began firing heavily." Fellow witness Mohammed al-Shaer, 44, said at first "the Israeli army fired shots into the air, then began shooting directly at the people". GHF said the operations at its site went ahead safely on Tuesday but acknowledged the army's investigation. A military statement said troops saw some people "deviating from the designated access routes" to the Al-Alam aid point and fired warning shots. When "the suspects failed to retreat, additional shots were directed near a few individual suspects", it added. The previous shooting on Sunday killed at least 31 people at the Al-Alam roundabout, rescuers said. A military source acknowledged "warning shots were fired towards several suspects". Guterres urged an independent investigation into that shooting, with his spokesman on Tuesday saying it was "unacceptable civilians are risking and in several instances losing their lives just trying to get food". UN human rights chief Volker Turk called such attacks "unconscionable". "Attacks directed against civilians constitute a grave breach of international law and a war crime," he said. The White House said it was "looking into the veracity" of the reports from Rafah. SOLDIERS KILLED Israel has come under mounting pressure to improve the humanitarian situation in Gaza, where people are facing severe shortages after Israel imposed a more than two-month blockade. The blockade was recently eased, but the aid community has urged Israel to allow in more food, faster. GHF's first week of operations, in which it said it had distributed more than seven million meals' worth of food, has been marred by criticism. State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce said GHF was "succeeding in getting the meals distributed", adding that Washington would also look at "how we can further improve". Israel has stepped up its offensive in what it says is a renewed push to defeat Hamas, whose October 2023 attack sparked the war. The health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza said at least 4,240 people have been killed since Israel resumed its offensive on 18 March, taking the war's overall toll to 54,510, mostly civilians. Apart from the aid centre incident, the civil defence agency reported 19 killed on Tuesday. Hamas's 2023 attack on Israel resulted in the deaths of 1,218 people, also mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. The army said three of its soldiers had been killed in northern Gaza, bringing the number of Israeli troops killed in the territory since the start of the war to 424.


Eyewitness News
an hour ago
- Eyewitness News
Musk blasts Trump mega-bill days after farewell
WASHINGTON - Tensions between Elon Musk and Donald Trump erupted Tuesday as the world's richest man derided the president's key piece of economic legislation in a startling rupture just days after exiting a controversial job in the White House. Musk was lauded by the Republican leader as he left his advisory role atop Trump's "Department of Government Efficiency" last week, despite criticism over his failure to deliver on promises of radical spending cuts. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination," Musk posted on X as he followed its progress from the sidelines, in by far his most caustic remarks on Trump's agenda. "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong." It was not Musk's first comments on Trump's so-called "big, beautiful bill" which is set to add $3 trillion to US deficits over a 10-year horizon, despite deep cuts to health and food aid programs. But Musk's previous criticism was more restrained, with the Tesla and SpaceX magnate offering only that it undermined his cost-cutting efforts. On Tuesday he said the bill - being considered by Congress - would burden "citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt." His post laid bare an increasingly tense relationship between the White House and Musk, who donated almost $300 million to Trump's 2024 election campaign. Musk has become disillusioned, US media reported, as his goals for White House action that would benefit him personally have gone unrealised. The bill he was criticising cuts the electric vehicle tax credit - bad news for Tesla - while Axios reported that Musk was rebuffed in his efforts to extend his role beyond the statutory 130-day limit. He also failed to have his Starlink satellite system used for air traffic control, according to Axios, and was angered by Trump withdrawing the nomination of Musk ally Jared Isaacman to be NASA chief. The normally pugilistic Trump has pulled his punches, aware of his biggest backer's enormous influence over young, tech-savvy and historically apathetic voters - a key Trump constituency in 2024. "The president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill, it doesn't change his opinion," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters in a rapid response to Musk's tweet. The spat came with House Republicans set to pass legislation sent from the White House to enshrine into law $9.4 billion of DOGE's cuts, mostly money destined for public broadcasting and foreign aid. House Speaker Mike Johnson called Musk's comments "disappointing," adding that he had walked the entrepreneur through the bill on Monday, and that he "seemed to understand." BURGEONING DEBT As the world's richest person bowed out of his role as Trump's cost-cutter-in-chief, their relationship appeared on an even keel as the Republican hailed his fellow billionaire's "incredible service." Trump even insisted that Musk was "really not leaving" after a turbulent four months in which the South African born tycoon cut tens of thousands of jobs, shuttered whole agencies and slashed foreign aid. DOGE led an ideologically driven rampage through the federal government, with its young "tech bros" slashing tens of thousands of jobs. But its achievements fell far short of Musk's original boast that he could save $2 trillion - more than the government's entire discretionary spending budget for 2024. The DOGE website claims to have saved taxpayers less than a tenth of that total - just $180 billion - and fact checkers even see that claim as dubious, given previous inaccuracies in its accounting. Senate Democrats released a report Tuesday itemising 130 examples of "unethical or potentially corrupt" administration actions they say have helped Musk dodge regulation and add $100 billion to his wealth. The report came as senators began what is expected to be a fraught month of negotiations on Trump's mammoth policy package, expected to add between $2.5 trillion and $3.1 trillion to deficits over a decade. Trump said on Monday it was "the single biggest Spending Cut in History," although he added: "The only 'cutting' we will do is for Waste, Fraud, and Abuse."