Saving grace: High interest rates benefit savers if they know where to look
Saving grace: High interest rates benefit savers if they know where to look
Pop quiz: Do you know how hard your money is working for you?
It's very possible you don't - at least in the case of the interest rate on your savings account.
Consider that in an era when many higher-yielding savings products are offering around 4% on your cash, the industry average for savings accounts is actually significantly lower - 0.59%, according to the latest figures from financial information site Bankrate.
And when it comes to some of the biggest banks in the country, the difference is even more shocking: Often a minuscule 0.01%.
Consumer fintech banking platform Current says savers could very well be leaving money on the table. But they might not even know it.
According to a September 2024 survey from Santander, 40% of respondents weren't aware of the current interest rate on their savings.
"People don't put a lot of time or effort into tracking their savings interest rate," says Ted Rossman, senior industry analyst at Bankrate. "But you have to know where you stand, to figure out where to go next.
"This is basically free money. And especially if your money is parked at one of the big banks, you're probably getting next to nothing."
Big banks may not feel the need to offer juicy interest rates, because they have other factors in their favor, like name recognition or having physical branches around the country, says Rossman. But as a result, savers are probably not maximizing the cash they have been able to put away.
As an example, American households have a median cash balance of $10,000 across different accounts, according to Census data. At a 4% rate, that money is earning you $400 a year. At the average of 0.59%, you're looking at a measly $59.
A basic starting point for savers is to shop around. You are not restricted to whatever your primary bank happens to be offering. And in recent years, with the growth of online banks and fintech companies, you have more options than ever before. Bankrate, for instance, publishes a regular roundup of the highest savings rates available.
"Many of us don't even realize that by leaving our savings in our traditional savings accounts and not moving those assets, we are leaving money on the table," says Bobbi Rebell, a personal finance expert at CardRates.com and author of the book "Launching Financial Grownups."
"In some cases you can more than quadruple your returns just by moving from a savings account that may pay less than 1%, to one that pays more than 4% based on today's rates," Rebell says.
Another key point: Opening a savings account at one institution, doesn't mean you have to abandon your existing one. In the Santander survey, 58% of people didn't realize it was possible to do so.
It's also important to note that savings accounts typically offer easy liquidity - as opposed to some Certificates of Deposit, for instance, which lock in money for a certain period of time (and charge penalties for early withdrawal). Other features you want to look for include no minimum balances, and no account fees.
And, of course, look for the highest available interest rates. Increasingly, higher savings options are offered through fintech companies, sometimes in the 4% range - more than six times the national average of 0.59%.
Of course, historically high interest rates won't last forever. Looking ahead, the general expectation is for the Federal Reserve to cut rates from their current lofty levels, potentially two quarter-point cuts by the end of 2025.
As such, it would be wise for savers to take advantage of yields that are near the highest they have been in years. Especially to mitigate the effects of inflation and tariff-related price hikes, which have certainly taken a bite out of pocketbooks.
Interestingly, even though higher rates on savings are available, only 22% of savers report getting 4% or more on their cash, according to a Bankrate survey from February 2024 (when rates were at comparable levels). Meanwhile 17% were earning less than 1%, and another 17% were earning nothing at all.
As a result, it's puzzling why more savers aren't taking advantage.
"This is a teachable moment," says Bankrate's Rossman. "This is your sleep-at-night money, and it only takes a few minutes to open one of these accounts."
This story was produced by Current and reviewed and distributed by Stacker.
© Stacker Media, LLC.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Regalia Flag Store keeps history of American flag alive
Since 1897, Regalia Flag Store, a family-owned company in Rock Island, opened its doors. 'You want to keep it going because it has been an institution in Rock Island, even though a lot of people in Rock Island don't know we are here because we don't look like a store from the outside,' said Patricia Jahn, Regalia Flag Store's corporate secretary treasurer. 'We are building on the shoulders of those that came before us.' Regalia is known for creating ribbons for county and state fairs across the country, but within one step inside the door customers are surrounded by flags of all kinds and sizes. 'I just want to be sure that people in the Quad Cities have a place to buy their American flags, and we appreciate the fact that there are a lot of veterans in our Quad Cities that constantly do get new flags,' Jahn said. It's a store filled with red, white, and blue pride that goes back before World War I. 'The manufacturing part did actually physically make the American flag here,' Jahn said. For Jahn, seeing American flags throughout the store hits close to home. 'It's important to keep history going,' Jahn said. 'My grandfather was the first person that was drafted out of Rock Island County for World War I, and he was very patriotic. He belonged to the American legion. So he instilled that in me, and I'm glad to carry it forward.' Jahn doesn't take seeing the American flag waving in the wind for granted. 'It means that people have sacrificed their lives,' Jahn said. To learn more about Regalia Flag Store, click here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Fox Sports
15 minutes ago
- Fox Sports
Fans don't appear to be snatching up tickets to the Club World Cup
Associated Press If slashed ticket prices, closed stadium sections and moved seats are any indication, fans aren't exactly clamoring to attend the Club World Cup. The tournament opens Saturday with Lionel Messi's Inter Miami facing Al Ahly at Florida's Hard Rock Stadium. Thirty-two teams are taking part in the newly expanded tournament that will be played across 11 U.S. cities. The final is set for July 13 at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey. On Ticketmaster, FIFA's official ticketing partner for the Club World Cup, the least expensive tickets to the opener were $349 in December. As of Thursday, there were tickets available for just under $80. Upper deck seats for certain games at Seattle's Lumen Field and Philadelphia's Lincoln Financial Field were no longer available. Links to a smattering of resale tickets in those sections did not work. A person with knowledge of the situation confirmed to The Associated Press that some sections of Lumen Field in Seattle had been closed, but did not offer details. The person spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not allowed to speak on the record. In Philadelphia, some ticketholders received messages that said they were moved. 'As we continue preparations to deliver a world-class event, we are making a few enhancements inside the stadium to optimize operations and ensure the best possible matchday experience for fans, players and the global broadcast audience," the message said. 'As a result of these stadium optimizations, some seats, including yours, will be relocated. We want to ensure you that your new seat will be in the same or better value zone than your original one.' Ticketmaster used dynamic pricing for ticket sales, which is based on demand and other factors. They referred all questions about sales to FIFA. FIFA did not respond to questions about whether sections were closed due to slow ticket sales, or whether fans who originally bought tickets in those sections were moved or offered refunds. But soccer's international governing body did offer a general statement. 'We anticipate great attendances and electric atmospheres at its inaugural edition, with excitement growing with every round of matches and the tournament ultimately standing as the undisputed pinnacle of club world football,' the statement said in part. 'The appetite speaks for itself: fans from over 130 countries have already purchased tickets. The top 10 markets are led by the United States, followed by Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, Canada, France, Japan, Switzerland, Germany and Portugal — a clear sign of global anticipation and reach.' With 32 international teams, there are undoubtedly some clubs that are unfamiliar to American audiences. There are also 63 total matches, meaning not all can occur in prime hours for fans. Argentine club River Plate is playing Japan's Urawa Red Diamonds at Lumen Field on Tuesday at noon local time ($24 tickets), while a noon game between Brazil's Fluminense and Germany's Borussia Dortmund had tickets available via Ticketmaster for $23. However, some matches were drawing fans, including Paris Saint-Germain's opener against Atletico Madrid on Sunday at the Rose Bowl, where the least expensive seats were $100. The least expensive ticket for July's tournament final available through Ticketmaster was $769. FIFA President Gianni Infantino urged fans to buy tickets at a hype event in the leadup to the tournament this week. 'Be part of history,' he said. 'Football is such an important sport all over the world. We have billions of people watching this Club World Cup from home who would love to club and to attend." ___ AP soccer: recommended

Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump wanted ‘90 deals in 90 days.' Instead, he's finding wins where he can.
President Donald Trump is touting this week's trade agreement with China as the latest triumph of his dealmaking acumen. But his celebratory tone belies an uncomfortable reality: For all his optimistic talk on trade, Trump has made little tangible progress since this spring's tariff spree, so far only securing frameworks of agreements with the U.K. and China and leaving American businesses grappling with continued economic uncertainty. Critics and allies alike say Trump's talk about the China 'deal' signals how eager he is to telegraph progress ahead of the White House's July 8 self-imposed deadline to hash out agreements with trading partners. 'We were promised '90 deals in 90 days.' What we have at this point are 'general frameworks' for the U.K. and China,' said Marc Short, who served as Trump's legislative affairs director and Vice President Mike Pence's chief of staff during the president's first term, referencing Trump trade adviser Peter Navarro's vow. The administration will 'present it as if they're making significant progress and hail these general frameworks as really significant breakthrough deals,' Short added. But 'other countries are seeing that, if I wait this out, he's going to be overly sensitive to bond market yields, or he's going to get himself into trouble, and then he's going to need to get out of it with a deal.' The White House, however, sees the agreement with China as a true win — proof that it went toe-to-toe with its biggest economic adversary and held its own. 'We're in a solid place going forward in these negotiations, because the country that could most push back here, tried to push back and it didn't really go well for them,' said a White House official, granted anonymity to share the administration's thinking. 'We feel good about negotiations. We're increasingly walking into these discussions being able to demonstrate that we do have the cards.' But even Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent acknowledged that it was 'highly likely' that the July deadline could be extended for 18 trading partners he said are negotiating in good faith. Trump downplayed those comments when asked about them Wednesday night, saying that while he 'would' extend the deadline, he didn't think he'd have to. This week's tentative deal with China offers Trump a bit of a boost as he prepares to meet with major world leaders at the G7 summit next week in Canada. Representatives from foreign countries view the upcoming confab as the next best vehicle to nail down something concrete on trade, after White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Wednesday that there will be 'quite a few bilateral meetings.' One Canadian official, granted anonymity to speak candidly, said whether progress is made over the next few weeks with any country, 'depends greatly on U.S. bandwidth to respond on tariffs given all other talks.' 'I'd expect if [an agreement] lands, it's much closer to the U.K. document length than 1500+ pages of USMCA,' the official said, referring to the comprehensive North American trade deal known as the U.S.-Mexico Canada Agreement, which Trump negotiated during his first term. The U.S. announced its first trade 'deal' — which was, in reality, the framework for a more detailed future agreement — with the U.K. in May. But that accord has yet to be enacted, with U.S. levies on U.K. exports, including cars, steel and aluminum, remaining in place and provisions on agriculture and other issues still to be hashed out. And this week, Trump quickly declared mission accomplished on China — subject to final approval from both him and China's leader Xi Jinping — even though top negotiators had reached no more than a handshake agreement to deescalate tensions and advance trade talks, after a meeting in Geneva last month failed to move the ball forward. Meanwhile, the administration has continued to promise that deals with major trading partners, like Japan, South Korea, India and the European Union, are 'close' ahead of a July 8 deadline, after which Trump's sweeping and massive 'Liberation Day' tariffs are set to go back into effect. But talks with those countries have yet to bear fruit, and smaller countries, eager to negotiate, are having a hard time getting the administration to consider tweaks to proposals the U.S. has put forward. Even some Trump allies in regular contact with the White House are struggling to understand the administration's approach on trade. If the White House is truly interested in boosting domestic manufacturing, they say, it would move quickly to negotiate deals. That would allow businesses to move forward with some certainty instead of leaving them in limbo. 'You meet with officials at all these agencies, you even meet with Cabinet secretaries, and they all agree that the intent of the tariffs was never to hinder companies who are expanding, or trying to onshore supply chains here,' said one of those allies, granted anonymity to speak candidly about the trade discussions. 'I have no fucking clue what their strategy is.' A second Trump ally was more optimistic, acknowledging that the deals seem 'elusive' but voicing confidence the administration 'can get them done.' Talks with South Korea, for instance, appear to be ramping up after the country's new president, Lee Jae-myung, spoke with Trump last week and selected on Tuesday a chief trade negotiator, Yeo Han-koo. While negotiations between the two countries have been ongoing, the South Korean government had made clear it was not possible to make a deal until a new president was in place after its June 3 elections. Leaders in India, who were negotiating with the administration on trade even before Trump announced its 'Liberation Day' tariffs, appear optimistic that the pace of negotiations is picking up ahead of the July deadline. India's foreign minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar told the French paper Le Figaro earlier this week he was 'hopeful' the country would soon reach an agreement with the U.S. And conversations with the EU — which had stalled, nearly triggering a trade war last month — have moved into a negotiating stage, though progress still remains elusive. The EU has expressed a willingness to engage on issues that have long irritated the U.S., like energy, semiconductors, steel and aluminum and autos, but the U.S. has indicated it will only make concessions on tariffs implemented since Trump took office, and that its flat 10 percent 'baseline' tariff on all countries is off the table for negotiations. That's clouded talks, despite a positive readout from U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer after a meeting with E.U. trade czar Maroš Šefčovič in Paris last week. 'The erratic behavior of the Trump administration has to stop if we want to reach a deal,' Italian Member of the European Parliament Brando Benifei said in an interview. Benifei, who chairs the European Parliament's Delegation for relations with the United States, added that the Trump administration's decision to hike tariffs on steel and aluminum in the middle of trade talks 'is damaging the ongoing negotiations, increasing more uncertainty also for the global economy.' Japanese officials, meanwhile, left Washington empty handed last week following a fifth round of trade talks. The country's trade negotiators said that while talks had 'progressed' Japan had yet to find 'common ground' with the U.S. Prospects for a deal are slightly better for Mexico. President Claudia Sheinbaum said it was 'very likely' that she would speak with Trump at the G7 summit, which she will attend as a guest of Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. The countries are closing in on a narrow deal that could remove the U.S.'s flat 50 percent tariffs on steel, Bloomberg News was first to report. A person close to the White House, granted anonymity to discuss details of the negotiations, told POLITICO that the countries are weighing a quota-based system, and could reveal more details at next week's G7 summit. Those plans, they said, are not final, and the administration is grappling with pressure from its more protectionist factions that have long requested Trump remain focused on reciprocal tariffs in trade talks. Both Mexico and Canada are not impacted by so-called reciprocal tariffs, and received some exemptions for sector-specific duties because of the pre-existing North American trade deal. Other tariffs, such as those on steel and aluminum, remain in full force. Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio), a staunch Trump ally, argued the pressure to make deals is on foreign governments, not the White House, at this point. 'There's a lot in the hopper. There's pressure on those other countries because quite frankly it's embarrassing to the EU, it's embarrassing to Japan, it's embarrassing to South Korea that we're making a deal with China first,' Moreno said. 'The reality is that those countries just need to step up, acknowledge that we've had a tilted relationship with them for decades and then they need to fix that and come to the table with a legitimate offer to rebalance our trade." Even without substantial deals, some on the right continue to point out how U.S. tariffs have already significantly shifted the economic conversation. Baseline reciprocal tariffs of 10 percent remain in effect globally, with tariffs in China at an even higher level of about 55 percent, on average. 'Some, they want to call it 'caving' or 'giving in' or something like that,' said Mark DiPlacido, policy advisor at American Compass, a think tank that embraces economic populism. 'But they're not comparing it to the baseline of where things were at at the beginning of the year.'