logo
Vietnam War Navy SEAL returned for second tour in honor of friend killed in action

Vietnam War Navy SEAL returned for second tour in honor of friend killed in action

Yahoo22-02-2025

KINGSPORT, Tenn. (WJHL) — John Brooks was set to be drafted into the Army during the Vietnam War, but he had his sights set on becoming a Navy Frogman.
A Navy Frogman is commonly known now as a Navy SEAL, but no matter how you refer to the job, becoming one is no easy feat.
'We are the commandos that sneak in and sneak out. We're small units, small groups from four to 14 men. We're kind of a reconnaissance. We're like Army Rangers,' Brooks said. 'We find the enemy. We engage the enemy, and then we get out without a lot of casualties because we don't have that firepower that the larger enemy has.'
By the end of the 18-week training, the group of 100 was down to 25. He was shipped off to the Saigon area for six months as part of a group of 14 SEALs.
'The NVA, which stands for the North Vietnamese Army, they weren't around us too much then,' Brooks said. 'So we weren't having a whole lot of contact. We had a little bit of contact, no big firefights.'
But then that changed.
'March the 29th. We lost the heart and soul of our platoon,' Brooks tearfully recalled. 'He hit a landmine, anti-personnel mine. His name was Les Moe. He'd been over four times.'
Brooks believes his friend Les saved his life that day.
'Les saved a lot of peoples' lives because he was senior to a lot of people. And me, for one, we should have been running point,' Brooks said. 'He was running point because he felt like we didn't have the experience because it was a kind of pacified area. We didn't have a whole lot of encounters with the Viet Cong.'
After that, the platoon laid low as the war started to wind down, and Brooks went back home.
'I didn't feel like I was tested. I didn't feel like I was in that firefight that I wanted to be in. Maybe some of it was because of Les Moe,' said Brooks. 'But I went back as an advisor.'
Brooks couldn't return to a direct-action platoon so he spent 10 months advising Vietnamese SEALs.
'We were on one side of the river. It was night. We had our star lights scopes. We saw that it was the NVA, not the Viet Cong. This was an army. They had artillery. They were heavily armed. There was only 14 of us, two Americans, and the rest were South Vietnamese,' said Brooks. 'We, me in particular, wanted to open fire. This was a firefight I wanted to get in to see what I was made out of, to see if I had the right stuff. Well, the Vietnamese officers kept saying beaucoup, beaucoup, which means many, and they would not open fire. And to this day, I feel like maybe that was the Lord's way of taking care of me.'
But going back to his home country wasn't easy as a veteran of one of the most controversial wars in history.
'When I got back, I had to change out of my uniform in the restroom, in the airport,' Brooks recalled. 'I kind of just settled into the mindset, right or wrong, it's my country.'
That time in the military prepared him for serving students at Dobyns Bennett High School where he was a coach, teacher and guidance counselor.
'Dedication and strength of character and 'stick to it-ness' to make it through the training and to do my job in Vietnam,' he said. 'And so I felt like I was ready for the challenge… teaching would be a challenge.'
Despite all he's accomplished in the Navy and through being an educator, Brooks has one goal he's still working toward– hoping to live to be 100 years old.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Homeland Security stonewalling info on noncitizen DNA collection operation, lawsuit alleges
Homeland Security stonewalling info on noncitizen DNA collection operation, lawsuit alleges

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Homeland Security stonewalling info on noncitizen DNA collection operation, lawsuit alleges

The Trump administration has been turning to DNA technology to help find and arrest immigrants, including children, but immigration advocates say it has been slow to spell out how it's using and overseeing the genetic information. Three groups sued the Department of Homeland Security on Monday after trying to get records about the data collection program since last summer, during the Biden administration. The plaintiffs are the Georgetown Law Center on Privacy & Technology, part of the Georgetown University Law School that focuses on privacy and surveillance law and policy; the Amica Center for Immigrant Rights and Americans for Immigrant Justice, both immigrant rights groups. The groups describe in their lawsuit their back-and-forth with DHS, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection since they originally requested information about their DNA collection from noncitizens on Aug. 1, 2024. Since 2020, DHS has expanded its DNA collection program and increased DNA contributions to the FBI's database, CODIS, by 5,000%, becoming the largest contributor, according to the Georgetown center. The DNA database of the FBI can be accessed by police across the country for criminal investigations, the plaintiff groups said in a statement. Stevie Glaberson, director of research and advocacy at the Georgetown center, said in a statement that DHS is expanding its database by "collecting DNA from people accused of no crime and while operating with none of the constraints that are supposed to be in place before the government compels someone to give over their most sensitive personal information." He said Americans deserve more visibility on the program and said DHS's lack of transparency is unacceptable. DHS did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Daniel Melo, senior staff attorney with Amica's Immigration Impact Lab, told NBC News that previous administrations have also collected DNA. A 2005 law mandated federal agencies collect DNA from people in custody, including noncitizens. Prior to 2020, the Justice Department had told DHS that its immigration enforcement and border agents did not have to routinely collect DNA from every noncitizen it detained, Melo said. The Biden administration adopted rules requiring full compliance with the 2005 law, but whistleblowers and a government watchdog complained compliance was uneven. The "Securing Our Borders" executive order signed by President Donald Trump requires the attorney general and the DHS to fulfill requirements on DNA collection from noncitizens mandated in the 2005 law. Privacy and civil rights groups have long had issues with the government's DNA collection program. Melo said the public should be concerned whether people are being advised of their rights and how the information is being collected and used. "This information could tentatively be used in all sorts of ways to map full communities, to basically build a more intricate web of surveillance around noncitizen communities," Melo said. He said if DHS can continue to collect the DNA of noncitizens, essentially "experimenting" on them, "then they are able to refine these technologies and deploy them in new and interesting and probably really dangerous and scary ways on the rest of us." Emily Tucker, the Georgetown center's executive director, said in a statement that "it is a mistake to think of DHS' DNA collection program as 'immigration enforcement.'" "Trump is using immigration powers to justify the activities of his militarized federal police force because there is so little institutional or judicial oversight or accountability for executive enforcement actions that invoke 'immigration authority," she said in a statement. "This program is one part of a massive surveillance dragnet that sweeps in information about everyone. They will use it for deportation, but they will also use it to intimidate, silence, and target anyone they perceive as the enemy.' This article was originally published on

DHS targets sanctuary cities including Springfield and Holyoke
DHS targets sanctuary cities including Springfield and Holyoke

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

DHS targets sanctuary cities including Springfield and Holyoke

SPRINGFIELD, Mass. (WWLP) – As the federal government continues to detain illegal immigrants, sanctuary jurisdictions are now being targeted. Last Thursday, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security released a list of 500 counties, cities, and states that they claim are interfering with mass deportations. The department published the list, citing they were 'endangering Americans and law enforcement in order to protect violent criminal illegal aliens.' Operation Patriot nets 1,500 arrested by ICE in Massachusetts These places are referred to as sanctuary jurisdictions, or a place that limits cooperation with federal immigration authorities. While the list was posted on the Department of Homeland Security's website last Thursday, it was since taken down as of Sunday. Cities across the country on the list included San Diego, Las Vegas, and Philadelphia, but there were also four in western Massachusetts. 'In my mind, we are not a sanctuary city,' said Springfield Mayor Domenic Sarno. One of those cities was Springfield. 'We do not interfere with I.C.E., but we have the Welcome City Ordinance that says my officers cannot ask any type of status, immigration status,' said Springfield Police Superintendent Lawrence Akers. The city of Holyoke was also on the list. In a statement, Mayor Joshua Garcia said the city's executive order 'simply directs our police officers to follow the law and not act as federal immigration agents.' Two additional cities in western Massachusetts are publicly declared sanctuary jurisdictions: Amherst and Northampton. Federal officials have criticized sanctuary city policies, claiming local agencies are releasing criminals back into the communities. The DHS said the sanctuary jurisdiction list will be used to determine the termination of grants. 'I have already lost millions and millions of dollars in grants, this now possibly means we are going to lose even more money,' Mayor Sarno said. 'My first responsibility is to the residents and business community of the city of Springfield.' Since the webpage was taken down, it is uncertain what, if any, action will be taken against the sanctuary jurisdictions on the list. 22News will continue to follow this story and provide updates as more information becomes available. WWLP-22News, an NBC affiliate, began broadcasting in March 1953 to provide local news, network, syndicated, and local programming to western Massachusetts. Watch the 22News Digital Edition weekdays at 4 p.m. on Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Judge pauses Homeland Security's move to nix TSA officers' union contract
Judge pauses Homeland Security's move to nix TSA officers' union contract

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Judge pauses Homeland Security's move to nix TSA officers' union contract

A federal judge on Monday paused the Department of Homeland Security's effort to end the collective bargaining agreement covering tens of thousands of transportation security officers at airports. It's the latest loss in court for the Trump administration's drive to reshape the federal workforce. US Senior District Judge Marsha Pechman of the Western District of Washington in Seattle issued a preliminary injunction, saying that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's justification for terminating the union contract with the American Federation of Government Employees in March was 'threadbare' and exposed 'the retaliatory nature of the decision.' 'The Noem Determination appears to have been undertaken to punish AFGE and its members because AFGE has chosen to push back against the Trump Administration's attacks to federal employment in the courts,' wrote Pechman, an appointee of President Bill Clinton, in her order. Noem's decision is at odds with more than a decade of agency belief that collective bargaining benefits the officers, the Transportation Security Administration and the public, Pechman wrote. She ordered DHS to notify officers in the union that the contract and rights are in effect, including the right to have their union dues deducted from their pay. When DHS originally announced it was rescinding the contract, the agency told employees that the move would allow officers to 'to operate with greater flexibility and responsiveness, ensuring the highest level of security and efficiency in protecting the American public.' DHS told CNN at the time that 'we invite the union to join all Americans and TSA employees in celebrating renewed efficiency, greater safety and shorter airport security wait times thanks to this action.' In separate cases, AFGE and the National Treasury Employees Union are each battling Trump's executive order to end collective bargaining with unions covering hundreds of thousands of federal workers in multiple agencies. In April, a federal judge in the District of Columbia issued a preliminary injunction in the case brought by the NTEU.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store