Ofgem energy price cap falls by 7% - here's how much your bills will now be
Energy bills will drop by around 7% in July, energy regulator Ofgem has announced.
A household using a typical amount of gas and electricity should see their bills fall by £129 a year.
It comes as government regulator Ofgem reduce their price cap – the amount a supplier can charge for each unit of energy – for the first time in a year.
The typical amount someone will pay per year is £660 (28%) lower than at the height of the energy crisis at the start of 2023.
However it is still 9% higher than the price cap set for the same three month period last year.
Ofgem said the cap, which is reviewed every three months has fallen because global wholesale prices for energy have gone down.
Changes to supplier business costs have also made an impact, it added.
The price cap, which is reviewed every three months, does not apply to Northern Ireland.
Tim Jarvis, director general of markets at Ofgem, said: 'A fall in the price cap will be welcome news for consumers, and reflects a reduction in the international price of wholesale gas.
'However, we're acutely aware that prices remain high, and some continue to struggle with the cost of energy.
'The first thing I want to remind people is that you don't have to pay the price cap – there are better deals out there so it's important to shop around, and talk to your existing supplier about the best deal they can offer you.
'And changing your payment method to direct debit or smart pay as you go can save you up to £136.'
He added that in the longer term, the UK needs an energy system where prices are insulated from the volatile international gas market, ensuring more stable prices and energy security.
'And we're working closely with government to get the investment we need to reach our clean power and net zero targets as quickly as possible,' he said.
'We're also doing everything we can to support consumers today and pushing ahead with more changes to help consumers. This includes working on ways to support those trapped in energy debt and bringing in reforms to standing charge tariffs for this winter.'
Citizens Advice chief executive Clare Moriarty said the drop would ease the burden of high bills for some households but urged the government not to lose perspective.
She added: 'Bills will still be 52% higher than before the energy crisis and nearly seven million people live in households that have fallen behind on bills.
'Today's announcement will be cold comfort to the millions paying off a mountain of debt on top of their monthly costs.
'The government has said it hopes to provide more support to pensioners this winter but we know that people with children are often struggling most of all with energy.
'It must provide more targeted energy bill support to those hardest hit, and upgrade five million homes with money-saving energy efficiency measures.'
Meanwhile, Simon Francis, coordinator of the End Fuel Poverty Coalition said: 'The government's reverse ferret on Winter Fuel Payments are a clear sign that ministers know that people are struggling with energy bills – but sticking-plaster solutions and U-turns won't help people in the long-term. More Trending
'While bills may fall slightly in July, they're still significantly higher than before the energy crisis and remain tied to the unpredictable cost of fossil fuels. Without urgent reform and real investment, millions will continue to face unaffordable bills and cold homes.'
Here's how much you will pay in England, Scotland and Wales, according to Ofgem.
If you are on a standard variable tariff (default tariff) and pay for your electricity by direct Debit, you will pay on average 25.73p per kilowatt hour (kWh). The daily standing charge will be 51.37p per day. This is based on the average across England, Scotland and Wales and includes VAT.
If you are on a standard variable tariff (default tariff) and pay for your gas by Direct Debit, you will pay on average 6.33 pence per kilowatt hour (kWh). The daily standing charge is 29.82 pence per day. This is based on the average across England, Scotland and Wales and includes VAT.
Got a story? Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk. Or you can submit your videos and pictures here.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
Follow Metro.co.uk on Twitter and Facebook for the latest news updates. You can now also get Metro.co.uk articles sent straight to your device. Sign up for our daily push alerts here.
MORE: The average amount Brits have in savings, according to their age
MORE: I ate at the little-known Home Bargains Café — an 'immense' 99p treat blew me away
MORE: More pensioners will now be eligible for winter fuel payments
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
From winter fuel payments to two-child benefit: All Starmer's U-turns explained
Sir Keir Starmer appears to be heading for a number of major U-turns amid growing concern from MPs about the direction of government and following a devastating performance at the local elections. The prime minister last month announced plans to reverse his controversial cuts to winter fuel payments, saying he wants more pensioners to be eligible for the benefit. There is also a growing expectation he will lift the two-child benefit cap. While nothing has been announced yet, the prime minister is privately said to be in favour of lifting the cap – but has refused to commit to anything until the child poverty strategy is published in the autumn. Below, The Independent looks at all the times Sir Keir has U-turned on his promises or let voters down on the journey from Labour leader to prime minister. Winter fuel payments In July, the chancellor announced that pensioners not in receipt of pension credits or other means-tested benefits would no longer receive winter fuel payments - a £300 payment to help with energy costs in the colder months. After spending months ruling out a U-turn, the prime minister in May told MPs he now wants to ensure more pensioners are eligible for the payment – something he claimed has come as a result of an improving economic picture. Weeks after the announcement, there is still very little detail on who will be eligible. Pensions minister Torsten Bell said there would be no return to a universal payment for all and it is expected that the government will instead change the £11,500 threshold at which people can claim. But with no simple way to process that, there are reports the allowance could be paid to all pensioners, with the amount later repaid by those on higher incomes. Promising in 2020 to create a social security system fit for the 21st century, Sir Keir said: 'We must scrap the inhuman Work Capability Assessments and private provision of disability assessments... scrap punitive sanctions, two-child limit and benefits cap.' But before the election, Sir Keir said Labour was 'not changing' the Tory policy if Labour were to win power. He has stuck to his guns, even suspending seven Labour MPs for rebelling against his King's Speech in a bid to have the policy scrapped. And now, it looks like the prime minister is gearing up to row back on the position. While nothing has been announced, the prime minister is privately said to be in favour of lifting the cap. He has refused to commit to anything until the child poverty strategy is published in the autumn but has insisted he is 'absolutely determined' to 'drive down' child poverty and has repeatedly sidestepped questions on the issue when pressed on it. Waspi women In a 2022 interview, Sir Keir said: 'All your working life you've got in mind the date on which you can retire and get your pension, and just as you get towards it, the goalposts are moved and you don't get it, and it's a real injustice. 'We need to do something about it. That wasn't the basis on which you paid in or the basis on which you were working.' But, in a familiar change of tune since becoming prime minister, Sir Keir last year sent his work and pensions secretary out to tell Women Against State Pension Inequality, Waspi women, they would not be getting any compensation. £28bn green investment pledge As shadow chancellor, Rachel Reeves announced the party's plans for an extra £28bn a year in green investment at Labour's conference in September 2021. But before the election, Sir Keir ditched the £28bn a year target and said instead that he would spend a far smaller sum on Great British Energy, a national wealth fund for clean investment and pledges on energy efficiency. National insurance Labour's pre-election manifesto promised not to increase national insurance. It stated: 'Labour will not increase taxes on working people, which is why we will not increase National Insurance, the basic, higher, or additional rates of Income Tax, or VAT.' But, Sir Keir and Chancellor Ms Reeves used the ambiguity around whether they meant employer or employee national insurance contributions to steamroll the pledge at Labour's first Budget in power. The pair argue that they only promised to keep employee contributions frozen and instead landed firms with a 2 per cent increase to employer national insurance contributions. Tractor tax Farmers have also said they feel betrayed by the PM, after a 2023 National Farmers Union (NFU) speech in which he promised to have 'a new relationship with the countryside and farmers'. Sir Keir claimed to be concerned that 'each day brings a new existential risk to British farming. He added: 'Losing a farm is not like losing any other business, it can't come back.' Going even further, then shadow environment secretary Steve Reed said it was 'desperate nonsense' to suggest he would scrap tax breaks for farmers, just weeks before the July 4 poll. But, in another hugely unpopular Budget bombshell, Sir Keir slashed agricultural property relief, meaning previously exempt farms will be his with a 20 per cent levy on farming assets worth more than £1m. Critics have said it will see family farmers forced to sell up, ripping the heart out of countryside communities. Bankers' bonuses Strict regulations on bonuses, which limit annual payouts to twice a banker's salary, were introduced by the EU in 2014 in a bid to avoid excessive risk-taking after the 2008 financial crisis. Former prime minister Liz Truss and chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng scrapped the cap in 2022, in a bid to encourage more investment in the UK. Sir Keir had previously vowed to reinstate the cap, saying in 2022 that lifting it 'shows the Tories are absolutely tone deaf to what so many people are going through'. But in another major U-turn, Ms Reeves announced before the election that the party 'does not have any intention of bringing that back'. 10 pledges Sir Keir's bid to become leader of the Labour Party was based on 10 pledges, now infamous for having almost all been summarily dumped since. They included promises to increase income tax for top earners, abolish tuition fees, support public ownership of energy and water firms, give voting rights to EU nationals and defend freedom of movement. He has said a tougher economic backdrop means the promises are now no longer deliverable. But many Labour members who backed Sir Keir's leadership bid feel betrayed, arguing that he posed as a left-winger to win over Corbynistas before pivoting sharply to the right. After figures showed an exodus of millionaires from the UK had accelerated since Labour took office, chancellor Ms Reeves offered a concession to the super-rich and hinted Labour would row back on its non-dom tax raid. The planned changes will see Labour expand the temporary repatriation facility, which lets non-doms bring income and capital gains into the UK with a minimal tax bill.
Times
4 hours ago
- Times
Winter fuel payment U-turn: how will Labour balance the books?
Next week Rachel Reeves will unveil one of the government's biggest U-turns so far — reinstating winter fuel payments for millions of pensioners. Scrapping them is widely seen as one of the chancellor's biggest mistakes, and the government hopes the change of tack will help stem the pubic backlash over it. But the reinstatement will not be universal — there will be clear winners and losers — and the decision to claw back money from richer households through the tax system is likely to be controversial. Why is the government changing course? In one her first acts as chancellor, Reeves made an unexpected announcement. In July last year she scrapped winter fuel payments for ten million pensioners. She argued that the policy was a matter of necessity. The economic inheritance was so dire that the payments, worth between £200 and £300, were unaffordable. In doing so she made a moral and fiscal case. It was fundamentally wrong, she said, for wealthier households — including millionaires — to get the payments. At the same time she said that the £1.5 billion saved from the policy was necessary to balance the books and repair the public finances. Only those in receipt of pensions credit — those with an income of £11,500 — were entitled to the payments. The move was politically disastrous and contributed to Labour's collapse in the polls, which suggested it had endured the worst start of any government in history. There was a widespread backlash in both the cabinet and among Labour MPs. During the local elections the scale of the problem became tangible — voters repeatedly raised the issue on the doorstep — and Sir Keir Starmer decided he had no choice but to change course. After weeks of denials and obfuscation he announced that he would make a partial U-turn. What is the new policy? After Starmer announced a U-turn last month, Reeves said she would set out a new 'means test' at her spending review next week. Ministers say this is designed to protect pensioners on lower incomes without giving 'payments to millionaires'. The Times understands this will focus on restoring payments to the lower-income half by setting a new threshold based on average household disposable income, which is about £37,000. However, to implement the change, payments will have to be restored to all pensioners and then reclaimed from the better off through the tax system. How will this affect my tax bill? If you are a pensioner with an income above the new threshold, you are likely to get a payment this winter, which will then be clawed back by HM Revenue & Customs next year. This could come through self-assessment for those who complete a tax return, while others will see their tax code adjusted so they pay about £17-£25 more tax every month next year. Does this mean more power or data for HMRC? No — it relies on existing data sharing arrangements between HMRC and the Department for Work and Pensions. Child benefit is already clawed back from higher earners in a similar way through tax, and the taxman is attempting to simplify systems so that a 'reconciliation' happens automatically at the end of the tax year in April without the need to fill in tax returns. What if my partner is eligible for winter fuel payments and I'm not? One of the messy aspects of the new policy is that tax is paid by individuals but winter fuel payments are given on a household basis — a pensioner couple only gets one payment. In theory, a high-earning pensioner might be required to pay higher tax because their lower-earning partner gets a winter fuel payment, but it is unclear how HMRC will know when to apply this. Similarly, two higher-earning pensioners should not be taxed twice, but it's not clear that HMRC has robust records of household income. What if someone dies after receiving a winter fuel payment but before a tax bill? It is likely that their estate will have to repay the money. It is normal practice for executors to settle outstanding tax bills for people who die during a financial year, and an extra £300 is likely to be marginal for many higher earners. But the appearance of taxing dead pensioners may have outsize political impact. How much does the government save? Restoring payments to the poorer half of pensioners would cost about £750 million, half the amount saved by the original cut. This is far more expensive than an alternative option of expanding eligibility to pensioners on other benefits, which would cost about £300 million and give 1.3 million back their payments. However, a campaign to improve uptake of pension credit has led to more pensioners claiming, at a cost of £200 million — which will remain even if more pensioners get their payments back. It may well be that after all the political pain of the original policy and a protracted U-turn, Reeves only has a net saving of half a billion left to show for it. Will this revive Starmer's fortunes? The government's decision to broaden eligibility for winter fuel payments is unsurprisingly popular. However, critics question the approach given that Labour has already taken the hit for removing the universal payment in the first place. How much will voters thank Starmer for reinstating the payments to some voters? When payments are clawed back from wealthier pensioners next year, it is likely to be depicted by opponents as a stealth tax. Perhaps the biggest benefit for Starmer will come in the form of managing his party. With challenging votes on welfare and difficult decisions to come in the Budget, the prime minister needs to do all he can to keep his backbenchers in line.
The Independent
5 hours ago
- The Independent
Rachel Reeves' new plan for winter fuel allowance branded tax ‘nightmare'
Chancellor Rachel Reeves is expected to reinstate universal winter fuel payments for pensioners, reversing a previous policy change. The government plans to recover the grant from higher-income pensioners through increased taxes, potentially affecting those with household disposable incomes above £37,000, according to The Times. The policy change could cost around £700 million, with the full plan to be detailed in the autumn Budget. Silver Voices criticised the plan as an "administrative nightmare" that could draw more pensioners into the tax system. The announcement follows statements from pensions minister Torsten Bell indicating the allowance would not be restored universally, and Keir Starmer's stated intention to expand access to winter fuel payments.
