logo
Letters: Round 1 in Oval Office goes to Carney

Letters: Round 1 in Oval Office goes to Carney

Re: ' Carney to Trump: Canada will 'never' be for sale ' (NP Montreal, May 7)
On behalf of the 'owners of Canada,' I say congratulations, Prime Minister Mark Carney, on your first-round performance in the Oval Office.
I have no doubt most of the 40 million Canadians stand behind you. Please keep fighting the good fight.
Carlo Tarini, St-Lambert
First-name basis? Let teachers decide
Re: ' School cellphone bans to be expanded ' (The Gazette, May 3)
Given the growing body of evidence that spending too much time on technological devices, such as cellphones, has a negative impact on student learning, I think it's wise for the CAQ government to ban these devices during school hours.
However, Education Minister Bernard Drainville seems to be turning back the clock when it comes to certain mores, such as using 'vous' and 'tu, and not calling their teachers by their first names.
The reasoning seems to be that these measures will lead to a more respectful environment. I believe this is best left to the teachers and should not be imposed across the board by the government, though it may meet with the approval of some adults.
Some teachers have no problem with students using first names. Conversely, some students are uncomfortable addressing them in this way.
In my view, it is a false assumption to think that addressing teachers formally garners automatic respect. I liken it to the belief that the wearing of school uniforms leads to more disciplined and respectful behaviour.
Having taught for many years, I can attest that respect for teachers is earned by much more than how they are addressed, or what is worn in the classroom. It's earned by establishing an environment in which mutual respect, civility and consideration are practised by both teachers and students
Goldie Olszynko, Mile End
Read fine print on pet food
I read Bill Brownstein's column with interest and felt compelled to share my perspective as a Canadian entrepreneur in the pet food industry.
As the founder of a Montreal-based company producing human-grade wet toppers and meals for pets, I've seen firsthand the growing consumer demand for made-in-Canada products.
Many of the wet toppers and meals you see on store shelves are imported, even if they're branded under a Canadian company name. Most are labelled or distributed in Canada, not made here. That's a huge difference when you're thinking about local economic support.
I urge consumers to look for the red Maple Leaf on pet food products as a sign of authentic Canadian-made quality. Read the fine print. Ask questions.
If it matters where your food comes from, it should matter just as much where your pet's food is made.
Let's support Canadian jobs, Canadian quality and Canadian pets — all at once.
Josie Rivest, Laval
Submitting a letter to the editor
Letters should be sent by email to letters@montrealgazette.com
We prioritize letters that respond to, or are inspired by, articles published by The Gazette.
If you are responding to a specific article, let us know which one.
Letters should be sent uniquely to us. The shorter they are — ideally, fewer than 200 words — the greater the chance of publication.
Timing, clarity, factual accuracy and tone are all important, as is whether the writer has something new to add to the conversation.
We reserve the right to edit and condense all letters. Care is taken to preserve the core of the writer's argument.
Our policy is not to publish anonymous letters, those with pseudonyms or 'open letters' addressed to third parties.
Letters are published with the author's full name and city or neighbourhood/borough of residence. Include a phone number and address to help verify identity; these will not be published.
We will not indicate to you whether your letter will be published. If it has not been published within 10 days or so, it is not likely to be.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump removes IRS head Billy Long, taps Bessent as acting chief
Trump removes IRS head Billy Long, taps Bessent as acting chief

Canada News.Net

time11 minutes ago

  • Canada News.Net

Trump removes IRS head Billy Long, taps Bessent as acting chief

WASHINGTON, D.C.: President Donald Trump has removed former U.S. Rep. Billy Long from his post as IRS commissioner less than two months after his Senate confirmation, making him the shortest-serving commissioner in the agency's 163-year history, a White House official said August 8. The White House did not give a reason for Long's removal. In a post on X, Long said Trump had nominated him to serve as ambassador to Iceland. "It is an honor to serve my friend President Trump, and I am excited to take on my new role as the ambassador to Iceland," Long wrote. "I am thrilled to answer his call to service and deeply committed to advancing his bold agenda. Exciting times ahead!" Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent will serve as acting commissioner, according to the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity. Long's departure adds to the leadership churn at the IRS, which has struggled with high turnover since Trump's second term began. The agency went through four acting commissioners before Long's June confirmation and has seen its workforce shrink by roughly a quarter since the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) began cutting jobs as part of its campaign to reduce waste, fraud, and abuse. In a message to employees after his confirmation, Long outlined plans for his first three months, a time he ultimately didn't get. "In my first 90 days I plan to ask you, my employee partners, to help me develop a new culture here," he wrote. "I'm big on culture, and I'm anxious to develop one that makes your lives and the taxpayers' lives better." Long was an unconventional choice for the top IRS post. A former auctioneer and Republican congressman from Missouri, he served in the House from 2011 to 2023, where he sponsored legislation to abolish the IRS. He had no prior experience in tax administration. His confirmation was approved 53-44 despite Democratic concerns over his work with a firm promoting a pandemic-era employee retention tax credit later deemed fraudulent. After leaving Congress and failing in a 2022 Senate bid, Long joined the firm, which distributed the tax credit before then-commissioner Daniel Werfel shut it down. Democrats have since urged a criminal investigation into Long's connections to other alleged tax credit schemes. The acting leaders before Long included one who resigned after a deal to share immigrants' tax data with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and another whose appointment sparked a clash between former Trump adviser Elon Musk and Bessent. Long's removal comes amid sweeping DOGE-related workforce reductions at the IRS, which has gone from 103,000 employees in January to 77,000 in May 2025, according to the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration. Most cuts came via DOGE's deferred resignation program, part of the administration's effort to shrink the federal bureaucracy.

Partisan podcasts are failing at comedy
Partisan podcasts are failing at comedy

Winnipeg Free Press

time38 minutes ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Partisan podcasts are failing at comedy

Opinion Comedy has long been one of our most effective tools for speaking truth to power. The weapon of satire is capable of humbling even the revered and the royal, when wielded effectively. Wit and insight combined have the unique capacity for cutting through dogma, laying bare the truth that humans are preening primates who take the social mores we have contrived for ourselves far too seriously. So it has been a grating experience to witness the rise of the podcast bro edgelord as a strain of popular comedy — exemplified by the extended Joe Rogan cinematic universe, including figures like Andrew Schulz, Tim Dillon and the rest of their clones. Not only have they lost the plot when it comes to comedy, there is also much to be said about their shortcomings as interviewers when they stray into the territory of journalists. The way they are always 'just asking questions' while conveniently evading information which might lead them to real answers. Perhaps the most egregious example of this was when the Canadian podcasters known as the Nelk Boys recently interviewed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The hosts of this supposed comedy podcast acknowledged that they had little understanding of the conflict in the Middle East and were ill-equipped to conduct such an interview. Yet they proceeded on the weak premise that somehow speaking with Netanyahu personally would provide some sort of clarity, as if conversing directly with a propagandist is an avenue to truth. Unsurprisingly, the result was an unchallenged Netanyahu selling his war in Gaza to an audience of millions. The only pushback he received from his interviewers was when he contended that Burger King is better than McDonald's. This, the Nelk Boys contended, was Netanyahu's 'worst take' of the interview. Never mind being effective journalists, I'm not sure the Nelk Boys can be trusted near stairs unless there's a baby gate in place. But what all these podcasters will tell you is that they aren't trying to be journalists or pundits. They are, first and foremost, comedians. It's an excuse that was weak when Jon Stewart first contended it decades ago, but has grown fully laughable when these podcast bros push it. Because while Stewart undeniably strays into the territory of punditry, he remembers a rule of comedy that these podcasters have seemingly never learned. George Carlin was master of this lesson. Carlin understood that comedy suffers when you allow yourself to become a partisan. During this past American election cycle, many of these podcasters conducted interviewers with members of Donald Trump's political team, including Trump himself. These were uncritical interviews, entirely credulous of everything the Trump team said, and in many cases ended with outright endorsements from the podcasters for Trump's presidency. Carlin was the greatest satirist of his age because he understood all the things wrong with this. Firstly, he understood that as soon as you throw your lot in with a politician or a political party, you can never be taken seriously again as a pure comedian. Many of these podcasters are understanding this now, far too late, and speaking out against Trump's brutal policies. Somehow they had failed to foresee what a Trump term would bring, astute social analysts that they are. But even if Trump had been having an unlikely milquetoast term, think of the corner these comedians had painted themselves into through their sycophancy. For years they had established themselves as edgy truth-sayers as they mocked the Democrats in power, cultivating an audience of aggrieved Republicans. But now their guy is in power. What were they going to do on their edgy truth-saying podcast, talk about what a good job the president is doing for an hour? But even beyond the simple tenuous nature of their partisan branding, Carlin understood that most of the problems our society faces are systemic. His greatest bits were all about breaking down institutional power and traditional hierarchies. Subverting cultural norms and poking fun at our sacred cows. Did he have jokes about specific politicians and culture figures? Sure, tons of them. But he never fell into the trap of letting the news cycle du jour run his entire analysis. He satirized everyone who held power in a fashion that always let you know that the power itself was the target, leaving himself credible to go on the attack again when a new hand took the reins. And he would certainly never let himself become what these podcasters have become: at best duped mouthpieces for partisan propaganda, and at worst propagandists themselves. Distinctly choosing a side and selling yourself out to become a champion for one brand of institutional power effectively reduces you to a proponent of the system that satire is meant to undermine. A disastrous position for a would-be comedian. I think we have come to an impasse though. In our current political climate, the lines of morality and power have grown stark enough that even the typically wilfully blind are being forced to see light. And so I have hope the blueprint for effective satire will become the norm again as well, and that we will remember there is more to good comedy than making a room full of fools fawn over how politically incorrect one can be. Maybe we can even turf all these partisan mouthpieces for the hacks that they are. Alex Passey is a Winnipeg writer.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store