Ukraine peace talks in London downgraded
A planned high-level meeting in London to discuss the Ukraine conflict has been downgraded after several key European ministers withdrew from the talks. The development comes after US Secretary of State Marco Rubio signaled he would not be present.
The meeting, initially set for Wednesday, was due to include top diplomats from the UK, the US, France, Germany, and Ukraine. However, the sit-down has been postponed and the discussions will now proceed at the level of officials, the UK Foreign Office has confirmed to AFP.
Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrey Sibiga is still expected to hold a bilateral meeting with UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy, according to Sky News.
The US State Department earlier confirmed that Rubio would not attend the talks, citing scheduling conflicts. 'That is not a statement regarding the meetings; it's a statement about logistical issues in his schedule,' spokesperson Tammy Bruce said on Tuesday.
US President Donald Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, will also not be present and is expected to visit Moscow this week. The US side will instead be represented in London by presidential envoy Keith Kellogg.
Trump recently floated what was described as a 'final offer' to resolve the Ukraine conflict. The proposal would reportedly include 'de jure' US recognition of Crimea as part of Russia and unofficial recognition of Moscow's 'de facto' control over the Lugansk and Donetsk People's Republics, as well as the Kherson and Zaporozhye regions. The plan is also said to include the lifting of certain sanctions against Russia and opposition to NATO membership for Ukraine.
Crimea and four other regions overwhelmingly voted to join Russia in referendums in 2014 and 2022, respectively. However, Kiev has refused to accept the results of the vote.
A Financial Times report has claimed that Moscow would be ready to freeze hostilities with Ukraine along the current front lines. Commenting on the report, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov remarked that 'a lot of fakes are being published now,' calling for people to rely only on 'the primary sources' of information.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
30 minutes ago
- Russia Today
Iran could strike American military bases
Iran could target US military bases in the Middle East as part of its retaliation after being attacked by Israel, Fars news agency has reported, citing an informed ambassador to the UN Amir Iravani has said that Washington's support for Israel has made it complicit in the IDF strikes that killed 78 people and injured 320 others in Iran on Friday. A source with access to Iran's military leadership has told Fars that 'in the coming days,' Tehran's retaliation 'will spread to all areas occupied by this [Israeli] regime and related US bases in the region.' 'This confrontation will not end with last night's limited action. Iran's strikes will continue and… will be very painful and regrettable for the aggressors,' the agency's interlocutor claimed. Israel and the US will pay the price for being the 'main pillars of terrorism in the region,' the source said. Israel has claimed that it targeted Iranian uranium enrichment sites in the airstrikes as well as several senior military commanders and scientists as a preemptive measure aimed at stopping Tehran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. Iran, which has repeatedly denied pursuing a military nuclear program, responded on Friday by launching multiple volleys of ballistic missiles into Israel, killing at least three people and injuring over 150, according to the Jerusalem Post. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio insisted in a statement later on Friday that the attack on Iran was a 'unilateral action' by Israel. 'We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region. Let me be clear: Iran should not target US interests or personnel,' he stressed. According to the Council on Foreign Relations, the US operates military sites across at least 19 locations in the Middle East, including eight permanent bases in Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE. The think tank estimates that there are currently between 40,000 to 50,000 US troops in the region.
Russia Today
a day ago
- Russia Today
US officials react to Israel's attack on Iran
Several top US officials have warned Tehran against targeting American forces following Israeli air strikes that killed the country's top general and nuclear scientists and multiple explosions at key elements of Iran's nuclear enrichment program. In an interview with Fox News on Thursday, US President Donald Trump confirmed that he had prior knowledge of Israel's military action, known as Operation Rising Lion, which targeted nuclear facilities and missile infrastructure. Trump reiterated the US position that Iran must not acquire nuclear weapons, adding that he hopes Tehran will return to talks over a nuclear deal and that the US military in the Middle East is on high alert. House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers denounced Iran as the 'aggressor,' saying 'its pursuit of a nuclear weapon is an existential threat that will not be tolerated.' 'The US was not involved in the strikes, but our forces stand ready to defend themselves and our ally Israel. Any Iranian attack on US forces would be a grave miscalculation,' he warned. Iran has repeatedly denied that it has plans to develop nuclear weapons and insists that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only. US House Speaker Mike Johnson affirmed Israel's right to self-defense, saying, 'Israel IS right – and has a right – to defend itself!' Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed that the US was not involved in the Israeli strikes. 'Our top priority is protecting American forces in the region… Let me be clear: Iran should not target US interests or personnel.' Iran's Foreign Ministry said Tehran has a 'legal and legitimate' right to respond to Israeli attacks, adding that they 'cannot have been carried out without the coordination and authorization of the United States.' It went on to warn that 'the United States government, as the main supporter of this regime, will also be responsible for the dangerous effects and consequences of the Zionist regime's adventure.'
Russia Today
a day ago
- Russia Today
US officials react to Israeli attack on Iran
Several top US officials have warned Tehran against targeting American forces following Israeli strikes on Iran, while reiterating their commitment to stand by West Jerusalem. In an interview with Fox News on Thursday, US President Donald Trump confirmed that he had prior knowledge of Israel's military action, known as Operation Rising Lion, which targeted nuclear facilities and missile infrastructure. Trump reiterated the US position that Iran must not acquire nuclear weapons, adding that he hopes Tehran will return to talks over a nuclear deal and that the US military in the Middle East is on high alert. House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers denounced Iran as the 'aggressor,' saying 'its pursuit of a nuclear weapon is an existential threat that will not be tolerated.' 'The US was not involved in the strikes, but our forces stand ready to defend themselves and our ally Israel. Any Iranian attack on US forces would be a grave miscalculation,' he warned. Iran has repeatedly denied that it has plans to develop nuclear weapons and insists that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only. US House Speaker Mike Johnson affirmed Israel's right to self-defense, saying, 'Israel IS right – and has a right – to defend itself!' Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed that the US was not involved in the Israeli strikes. 'Our top priority is protecting American forces in the region… Let me be clear: Iran should not target US interests or personnel.' Iran's Foreign Ministry said Tehran has a 'legal and legitimate' right to respond to Israeli attacks, adding that they 'cannot have been carried out without the coordination and authorization of the United States.' It went on to warn that 'the United States government, as the main supporter of this regime, will also be responsible for the dangerous effects and consequences of the Zionist regime's adventure.'
