Gov. Mike Braun demands disclosure by state-affiliated nonprofits
Former Gov. Eric Holcomb on a trade mission to Germany and Switzerland funded by the Indiana Economic Development Foundation in 2022. (Photo from IEDF)
A secretive state-affiliated nonprofit aiding economic development efforts would have to disclose its funders — retroactively and into the future — under an executive order signed by Gov. Mike Braun Tuesday.
'If organizations like the Indiana Economic Development Foundation were created to assist state agencies with public business, then Hoosiers need full transparency into how these nonprofits operate, who funds them, and what they do with the money,' Braun, a Republican, said in a news release.
'Today's executive order mandates that these organizations file financial disclosures — including those missed over the past 10 years — so Hoosiers can have full transparency and accountability,' he continued.
The Indiana Economic Development Foundation (IEDF) operates in conjunction with the controversial Indiana Economic Development Corp. (IEDC), a quasi-public state agency.
Indiana had a traditional commerce agency until 2005, when then-Gov. Mitch Daniels, a Republican, signed into law legislation creating the IEDC. Shortly after, leaders created the corresponding IEDF, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization.
The agency and its foundation operate as a public-private partnership.
The foundation has paid for virtually all the international travel for prior governors on economic development trips.
Initially, some donor information was provided. But, in recent years, the foundation has refused to disclose such details.
It does identify some contributors and sponsors on its website, including the state's 'big five' investor-owned utilities: AES Indiana, CenterPoint Energy, Duke Energy, Indiana Michigan Power and the Northern Indiana Public Service Company.
But how much they give is kept secret.
In 2023, the Capital Chronicle found that outside organizations donated nearly $3 million to the foundation over three years. But who the donors are — and how the agency spends their contributions — is largely unknown. State rules don't require or outright prohibit disclosure of that information.
A little-known nonprofit boosts Indiana's economic development agency
The groups behind all but two of 16 transactions in records from 2020 through 2022, obtained by the Capital Chronicle, were permitted anonymity. Two didn't request anonymity: Washington, D.C.-based think tank The Urban Institute donated $5,000 in 2021, and Indiana's Battery Innovation Center, in Newberry, gave $12,000 in 2022.
The IEDF also said that, because the funds are private donations, how they're spent isn't subject to public records rules.
Julia Vaughn, executive director of watchdog group Common Cause Indiana, said the executive order is an acknowledgment that the IEDC and its foundation have, 'for many years, operated behind an opaque curtain of darkness that has created distrust of the agency and its actions.'
'This is a positive step to bring much needed transparency to the IEDC and the projects it supports,' she added.
Braun's release said the state has created numerous nonprofit groups to supplement agencies, like the Healthy Hoosiers Foundation, Indiana Destination Development Foundation, Indiana State Museum Foundation and more.
All government-affiliated non-profits need to file a Form 990 annually with the IRS that describes where their funding sources, how much they brought in, and how the dollars break down between programs and administrative expenses. This form provides Hoosiers with important transparency into these organizations.
But in 2012, the IEDF got an exemption from the IRS for future filings of the form, according to the release.
State-affiliated foundations are also required to file annual reports with the State Budget Committee — which the IEDF has not done since 2019.
Braun directed all state-affiliated foundations to comply with reporting requirements, including filing any previously missed reports from the past decade, by the end of the year. They must additionally file Form 990s annually, even if they have previously been granted an exemption, retroactive 10 years.
The forms 'must be clearly posted on the relevant agency's website for Hoosiers to read for themselves,' the release says.
The governor also signed two other executive orders Tuesday changing Indiana's approach to economic development.
One is to reassess the economic development regions in the state and better capitalize on regional strengths.
Braun said he wants to spread out economic development efforts geographically, 'and one important way we're doing that is starting from scratch on the map of our state's economic development regions to better reflect each area's strengths.'
His order empowers Commerce Secretary David Adams to make recommendations on the redrawing of regional economic development and workforce maps based on an area's 'unique' strengths, assets, workforce capabilities, natural resource and industries.
The second executive order focuses on wage growth and job creation in measuring how effective the state's economic development strategy is. Those numbers will go in all project proposals and performance reports related to state-supported economic development initiatives.
'Indiana is focusing our economic development efforts on the things that affect your family the most: raising wages and new job opportunities. More jobs, and higher pay: that's our North Star,' Braun said in the release.
Former Gov. Eric Holcomb's administration focused on capital expenditure and investment totals.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump-Musk feud: Are electric vehicles and Tesla at the heart of the breakup?
The President of the United States of America and one of the world's most influential billionaires are at odds after months of collaboration. The confrontation escalated Thursday with Elon Musk saying Trump would have lost the election without him in a post on X. President Donald Trump in turn referred to his former senior advisor as "the man who lost his mind" in a Friday morning ABC News phone interview. Republican Trump allies are now also speaking out against Musk. Musk's breakup with the administration has been public and is well-documented, with Trump and the Tesla CEO trading calculated jabs like pro boxers. The underlying reason behind the sudden intense feud is a serious cause of concern for some American car buyers. "Clean Coal" has been a popular buzzword for not one but two presidential campaigns for Donald Trump. So, Elon Musk's initial choice to stand beside a global warming skeptic as the CEO of a clean energy and automotive company was puzzling to say the least. At first, Musk's involvement with the administration was seen by many as mutually beneficial, since the CEO could potentially reap the benefits of government contracts for Tesla and SpaceX. The general public quickly soured to the idea of the eccentric CEO playing a key role in the administration. By April 8, Tesla stock had nosedived 41.50% from its January 2 share price. Tesla dealers have been attacked and vandalized while other Americans have staged peaceful protests against Musk's involvement in government and role at the Department of Government Efficiency. So, why would a guy who once wore a "Trump Was Right About Everything" hat suddenly publicly oppose his new bill? The short answer is, the two don't see eye to eye on the automotive industry's most controversial powertrain option. The One, Big, Beautiful Bill could decimate Tesla. President Donald Trump's stance and actions against EV adoption in America includes: Supporting the One, Big, Beautiful Bill, which suggests phasing out a federal EV tax credit that would benefit thousands of Tesla buyers Claiming former President Joe Biden's EV mandate "would kill 40% of the auto industry's jobs", according to Ordering the shut down of many federal electric vehicle chargers and pausing massive federal EV fleet purchases, according to Elon Musk (and Tesla's) stance and actions for EV adoption in America: Elon Musk bio says "Tesla's mission has been to accelerate the world's transition to sustainable energy" Musk claimed "the world does need electric cars" during a 60 Minutes interview and factory tour, asserting that Tesla has a crucial role in the future of EVs Tesla has collaborated with Ford, GM, Stellantis, Rivian, Volkswagen, Honda, Acura, Hyundai, Kia, Toyota and more to provide Tesla Supercharger access to EVs, making them easier to charge for American drivers Tesla stock recently plummeted in response to the feud between Trump and Musk. The President has also threatened Musk's government contracts amidst the dispute. The bill appears to be the focal point of the rift, but the two clearly have different ideas on what America's future should be. President Donald Trump and Elon Musk may have been able to join forces over their mutual stances on certain conservative points and a hatred of bureaucracy, but their White House tag team was short-lived. The One, Big, Beautiful Bill directly undermines some of the actions Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency have taken since the two united. Trump is 78 years old and expresses a desire to bring America back to a golden age of manufacturing before globalism outsourced American jobs and created a reliance on foreign trade. He also speaks about returning the country to an age where mining and drilling for fossil fuel production were prioritized over environmental concerns. Musk, on the other hand, is a 53-year-old futurist who strives to make humans a multi-planetary species and has made a fortune from innovation and technological disruption. At a glance, the issue seems to be about the One, Big, Beautiful Bill attacking Tesla's bottom line but the two polarizing figures are fundamentally different in terms of future aspirations. Based on Trump's falling out with several former members of the first Trump administration and Musk's known adversarial nature in the private sector, this could be the end for, arguably, the most fascinating duo of 2025. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Donald Trump vs Elon Musk: Could Tesla, EVs be at the art of the feud?

Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ohio budget moves closer to doing away with elected county coroners
Jun. 6—For now, the Ohio Senate is going along on an Ohio House plan to make county coroners appointed by county commissioners instead of being elected by county voters. But, while the Senate didn't change the House's proposal in its initial draft of the state's two-year operating budget, Senate President Rob McColley, R-Napoleon, told reporters that there's still a chance the Senate could eliminate the House's proposal when it amends the budget next week. McColley said he put a request out for those in his caucus with strong feelings on the matter to weigh in. "If members feel strongly that it should go back to the way that it is under current law, then there's a possibility to see an amendment here in the omnibus," McColley told this news outlet. "We didn't see a lot of members — we saw some — but we didn't see a lot of members asking for it to be changed back." The Senate is expected to make those amendments on Wednesday or Thursday of next week. The change could be consequential in counties where county commissioners and the coroner are different political parties. In Montgomery County, for example, the elected coroner is a Republican while Democrats hold two of the three seats on the county commission. The House's primary advocate for the change, county commissioner-turned-lawmaker Rep. Brian Stewart, R-Ashville, has framed the change as necessary to solve a scarcity issue. "It's really hard to find folks that want to serve as a coroner at all, it's even harder to find folks who are willing to be the coroner and want to run a political campaign to do so," Stewart said in April. But the proposed change is opposed by Ohio State Coroners Association, whose Executive Director David Corey told this outlet that he's still hopeful that former coroners in the Ohio Senate, like Sen. Matt Huffman, R-Tipp City, will help the Senate reverse course. "Commissioners already have the authority to appoint a physician to be coroner if no one runs," Corey said. "So they already have this authority — so why subject this as a blanket on everyone?" Corey noted that commissioners also already have the authority to contract out with different county coroner offices if there's no elected coroner and the commission cannot find an in-county physician that wants to be appointed. "We don't really know what (problem) the House is trying and the Senate are trying to fix ... other than chipping away at other elected officials," Corey said. Corey said the idea is "wrought with potential problems," and speculated that coroners appointed by commissioners might be more beholden to those officials than they are to the public. He said appointees could also be fired at will, which would make it harder for a coroner to stand up to the commission in budget negotiations or other high-stakes situations. "We just think it's a horrible precedent," Corey said. Senate Minority Leader Nickie Antonio, D-Lakewood, whose home county of Cuyahoga is one of two counties in the state where the position is already appointed following a local vote, told this outlet that she didn't like the sound of applying the idea to every coroner in the state. "You want the coroner to feel like they can have a lot of pressure on them," Antonio said. "If they're appointed, then it's almost like they have an affiliation to the person that appointed them." She said this could lead to undue influence. "I think we, probably in the long run, would be better off continuing to have them be elected," Antonio said. ------ For more stories like this, sign up for our Ohio Politics newsletter. It's free, curated, and delivered straight to your inbox every Thursday evening. Avery Kreemer can be reached at 614-981-1422, on X, via email, or you can drop him a comment/tip with the survey below.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Some Republicans hope Trump, Musk mend fences after blistering breakup
Some Republicans are holding out hope that President Trump and Elon Musk will mend fences after Thursday's blistering breakup of the bromance, which captivated Washington and left the party's 'big, beautiful bill' hanging in the balance. The longing for harmony comes amid a Republican sprint on Capitol Hill to finalize the Trump megabill — which Musk trashed — and as the party looks ahead to the 2026 midterm elections, which the billionaire is threatening to shake up by suggesting he may go after lawmakers who support the package. 'I was with the president in the Oval Office yesterday afternoon as some of this was unfolding, and I can tell you, as he said in his own words, he was just, he was disappointed, and I was surprised by Elon's sudden opposition,' Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) told reporters Friday when asked if Trump has any interest in mending fences. 'I hope they reconcile,' he added. 'I believe in redemption. That's part of my worldview, and I think it's good for the party and the country if all that's worked out.' Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) — a loyal Trump ally who also chairs the House's Subcommittee on Delivering on Government Efficiency, named similar to Musk's brainchild Department of Government Efficiency — said the two should bury the hatchet in private rather than on public channels. 'I don't think lashing out on the internet is the way to handle any kind of disagreement, especially when you have each other's cell phones. So I hope this gets worked out,' Greene said. 'But I will tell you right now that people are going to be focused on making sure that we get the agenda that we voted for, and that's President Trump's agenda.' The optimism is not limited to the House: Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) called on his 70-year marriage to find advice for the two. 'I just heard Barbara Grassley say this disagreement and arguments btwn musk and Trump must end I know she loves both musk and Pres Trump. I'd advise u to follow her advice,' he wrote on social platform X. The simmering tensions between Trump and Musk blew up Thursday, solidifying the split between the world's most powerful man and the richest person on the planet. The back-and-forth began about the sprawling package — with Musk calling it 'a disgusting abomination' and Trump defending it — before spiraling into personal attacks, headlined by Musk alleging Trump is named in the Jeffrey Epstein files and the president calling the billionaire 'crazy.' 'Elon and I had a great relationship; I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump said in the Oval Office Thursday. The blowup sapped Musk of much of his clout among Republicans on Capitol Hill, with several GOP lawmakers siding with the president over the billionaire. 'I've had a lot of love and respect for you for what you've done for this country over the last several months, but you've lost your damn mind,' Rep. Troy Nehls (R-Texas), a close Trump ally, told reporters of Musk. 'You've lost your mind. Enough is enough, stop this. I don't think it's healthy.' As of now, it does not appear that the president is interested in smoothing things over. After reports surfaced overnight of a potential phone call between Trump and Musk, the president told ABC News that he was 'not particularly' interested in talking to the former special government employee, whom he called 'the man who has lost his mind.' 'I won't be speaking to him for a while I guess, but I wish him well,' Trump said to CNN. While officials close to the White House did not dismiss the idea of a conversation between the two at some point, aides indicated this week that they wanted to turn the page on the drama and remain squarely focused on getting the megabill through Congress. Musk, for his part, opened the door to some sort of reconciliation: After Bill Ackman, the CEO of Pershing Square and an ally of both Trump and Musk, urged the pair on X to 'make peace for the benefit of our great country,' adding, 'We are much stronger together than apart,' Musk responded: 'You're not wrong.' Some Trump allies, however, think peace is possible — and likely. Rep. Max Miller (R-Ohio), who worked in the first Trump White House and retains a close relationship with the president, when asked if there's any chance of reconciling the relationship between Trump and Musk said: 'I do very much.' He compared the situation to a strategy utilized by World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) — founded by Vince McMahon and his wife, Education Secretary Linda McMahon — of getting rid of revered wrestlers only to bring them back into the fold later on, generating excitement. 'He set up this entire company to create heroes within the entire country of adult wrestling, and then he would fire that person, he would get rid of them, and then he would bring them back, and what would happen when he would bring them back?' Miller asked. 'When he would bring them back, the WWE stock price would shoot through the roof and the rating would shoot through the roof because everyone knows that that's where the excitement really is, is the reunification of these individuals.' 'So I do believe he's going to come back, I do believe we're going to sort this thing out,' he added. 'I do believe that at the end of the day this was really a bunch of nothing, and that you have a president of the United States and now a private civilian who are disagreeing with each other.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.