Bill to loosen education requirement for public library directors heads to Arkansas House
From left: Judy Calhoun, John McGraw and Misty Hawkins listen to discussion of Senate Bill 181 during a meeting of the House Committee on City, County, and Local Affairs on Wednesday, February 26, 2025. (Tess Vrbin/Arkansas Advocate)
An Arkansas House committee approved a bill Wednesday that would loosen the current education requirement for local public library directors.
If Senate Bill 181 becomes law, library directors would no longer need a master's degree in library science 'from an accredited American Library Association program' in order for libraries to receive state funding. It would allow someone with 'work experience in the field of library operations' but without the requisite degree to run a library or the Arkansas State Library with approval from its governing board.
Three regional library directors spoke against the bill before the House Committee on City, County, and Local Affairs. All three said they have the current required education and that SB 181 is unnecessary.
'It's deeply concerning and frankly a bit disrespectful to see my profession and the value of my degree undermined,' said Misty Hawkins, regional director of the four-county Arkansas River Valley Regional Library System. '…With 23% of Arkansans reading at or below the lowest literacy level, I cannot understand why we would discourage education rather than promote it.'
Hawkins also said SB 181 has 'no clear definition or explanation' for what work experience in libraries would qualify a potential director without the requisite degree.
The other two library directors who opposed the bill were Judy Calhoun, who recently retired from the five-county Southeast Arkansas Regional Library System, and John McGraw, director of the Faulkner-Van Buren Regional Library.
All three said work experience is valuable, but education is an important supplement.
'It gives you valuable tools, it tells you a lot of the theory behind why we're doing what we're doing, [and] it gives you skills, like cataloguing, that I don't think you're going to get as easily just doing the job on the fly,' McGraw said.
He also said the bill contradicted the current 'moral panic that librarians aren't doing enough.'
None of Arkansas' institutions of higher education have American Library Association-accredited master's degree programs, said the bill's Republican sponsors, Rep. Rebecca Burkes of Lowell and Sen. Dan Sullivan of Jonesboro. They also said SB 181 will make it easier for local library boards to fill library director vacancies.
The three library directors all asserted that these degree programs are offered online and that there is no shortage of degreed librarians in Arkansas.
The Arkansas State Library Board provides scholarships for students in an ALA-accredited master's degree program, and the board rejected a motion earlier this month to remove the ALA from its scholarship requirements.
The failed motion also would have removed the ALA from the State Library's standards for state aid to public libraries, which are partly based on one of the statutes SB 181 seeks to amend.
Sullivan is also sponsoring Senate Bill 184, which would dissolve the State Library Board. Hawkins spoke against the bill before a Senate committee earlier this month. The bill passed the Senate and has yet to be heard by a House committee.
On Wednesday, Sullivan reiterated his opposition to both ALA and the State Library Board. He has often criticized the statement within the ALA's Library Bill of Rights that access to libraries should not be restricted based on a person's age. Far-right conservatives nationwide have claimed this is proof that the ALA believes in forcing content about sexual activity and LGBTQ+ topics onto children.
Arkansas State Library Board refuses to reject American Library Association, withhold funds
Former ALA President Emily Drabinski called herself a Marxist in a 2022 tweet; Sullivan repeated his assertion that this means ALA supports a political agenda and expects libraries to do the same. He also criticized ALA's stated commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion.
'Our libraries are fantastic institutions,' Sullivan said. 'For decades, our professionals that run those are good hardworking folks in your communities… We can have professionals in our libraries who have a choice to go to programs that allow them to pursue what they think is important, and your local board can choose whether that's important.'
Rep. Aaron Pilkington, R-Knoxville, said he found SB 181 confusing. He represents part of the Arkansas River Valley Regional Library System and said he appreciated Hawkins' testimony.
'It'd be different if I had people coming to me saying that we can't fill these positions at the libraries in Pope, Johnson and Yell counties, but… I'm not hearing that, so it makes me think this isn't a need,' Pilkington said. 'And then I hear all this discussion about all these other [things], and granted, I don't like Marxists either, I don't like a lot of the things that the senator mentioned, but to me, I'm not seeing how we're addressing those problems in this bill.'
Pilkington was in the minority of committee members, primarily Democrats, who voted against SB 181 on a voice vote.
The full House is expected to vote on the bill Thursday, and it would then go to Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders' desk.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hegseth won't rule out military actions against Greenland, Panama
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday would not rule out the possibility of a future military invasion of Greenland and Panama, suggesting to lawmakers the Pentagon may have plans for such a future strike. Appearing before the House Armed Services Committee, Hegseth asserted the department 'plans for any particular contingency' and said, 'I think the American people would want the Pentagon to have plans for anything.' Pressed by Republican lawmakers to dismiss the possibility of such a U.S. military attack on Greenland or Panama, Hegseth reiterated that the 'Pentagon has plans for any number of contingencies' and that officials 'look forward to working with Greenland to ensure that it is secured from any potential threats.' Democrats on the panel scoffed at those answers. 'I don't think the American people voted for President Trump because they were hoping we would invade Greenland,' said committee ranking member, Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash. 'The message this sends to the rest of the world is one that the U.S. is purely in it for itself, and does not care about alliances.' Space Force commander fired after email DOD says 'undermined' JD Vance The issue of possible U.S. military intervention to take over Greenland, Panama, Canada and other allied territories has been a point of concern for months among critics of President Donald Trump. On social media and in White House comments, Trump has stated multiple times that Denmark should surrender control of Greenland for the good of global security, and that Canada should become the 51st state in the American union. Administration officials have downplayed those comments. Hegseth, in his first appearance before the committee, avoided directly responding to the claims, but said the United States government has significant interest in protecting the areas from Chinese influence or manipulation. Earlier this week, Denmark's Parliament approved legislation to allow new U.S. military bases on Danish soil, broadening an existing previous military agreement between the countries. But Greenland Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen in recent months has vowed to oppose any U.S. efforts to take over the Danish territory. The Pentagon, meanwhile, is likely to shift Greenland from U.S. European Command to U.S. Northern Command, the military body responsible for defense of the American homeland, Mexico and Canada. The change itself only involves redrawing the maps of U.S. combatant commands and handing over responsibility for the military forces in Greenland, but it has caused angst among some in Denmark who think the administration is trying to draw the territory closer to America.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump to sign a measure blocking California's ban on new sales of gas-powered cars
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump will sign a resolution on Thursday that blocks California's first-in-the-nation rule banning the sale of new gas-powered cars by 2035. The resolution was approved by Congress last month and aims to quash the country's most aggressive attempt to phase out gas-powered cars. He also will approve measures to overturn state policies curbing tailpipe emissions in certain vehicles and smog-forming nitrogen oxide pollution from trucks. Trump called California's regulations 'crazy' at a White House ceremony where he was expected to sign the resolutions. 'It's been a disaster for this country,' he said. It comes as the Republican president is mired in a clash with California's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, over Trump's move to deploy troops to Los Angeles in response to immigration protests. It's the latest in an ongoing battle between the Trump administration and heavily Democratic California over issues including tariffs, the rights of LGBTQ+ youth and funding for electric vehicle chargers. California is expected to challenge Trump's latest move targeting its vehicle standards rules in court. 'If it's a day ending in Y, it's another day of Trump's war on California,' Newsom spokesperson Daniel Villaseñor said in an email. "We're fighting back." The three resolutions Trump will sign will block California's rule phasing out gas-powered cars and end the sale of new ones by 2035. They will also kill rules that phase out the sale of medium- and heavy-duty diesel vehicles and cut tailpipe emissions from trucks. Newsom, who is considered a likely 2028 Democratic presidential candidate, and California officials contend that what the federal government is doing is illegal and said the state plans to sue. The signings come as Trump has pledged to revive American auto manufacturing and boost oil and gas drilling. The move follows other moves the Trump administration has made to roll back rules that aim to protect air and water and reduce emissions that cause climate change. The Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday proposed repealing rules that limit greenhouse gas emissions from power plants fueled by coal and natural gas. Dan Becker with the Center for Biological Diversity, said the signing of the resolutions was 'Trump's latest betrayal of democracy.' 'Signing this bill is a flagrant abuse of the law to reward Big Oil and Big Auto corporations at the expense of everyday people's health and their wallets,' Becker said in a statement. California, which has some of the nation's worst air pollution, has been able to seek waivers for decades from the EPA, allowing it to adopt stricter emissions standards than the federal government. In his first term, Trump revoked California's ability to enforce its standards, but Democratic President Joe Biden reinstated it in 2022. Trump has not yet sought to revoke it again. Republicans have long criticized those waivers and earlier this year opted to use the Congressional Review Act, a law aimed at improving congressional oversight of actions by federal agencies, to try to block the rules. That's despite a finding from the U.S. Government Accountability Office, a nonpartisan congressional watchdog, that California's standards cannot legally be blocked using the Congressional Review Act. The Senate parliamentarian agreed with that finding. California, which makes up roughly 11% of the U.S. car market, has significant power to sway trends in the auto industry. About a dozen states signed on to adopt California's rule phasing out the sale of new gas-powered cars. The National Automobile Dealers Association supported the federal government's move to block California's ban on gas-powered cars, saying Congress should decide on such a national issue, not the state. The American Trucking Associations said the rules were not feasible and celebrated Congress' move to block them. ___ Austin reported from Sacramento, Calif. Michelle L. Price, Sophie Austin And Seung Min Kim, The Associated Press


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Trump, Rand Paul go back-and-forth on invitation to White House picnic
Trump, Rand Paul go back-and-forth on invitation to White House picnic Show Caption Hide Caption 'Kill the bill': Musk urges lawmakers to stop Trump's tax cut bill Elon Musk blasted President Trump's new tax bill as a 'disgusting abomination,' urging millions of followers to lobby lawmakers to 'kill the bill.' WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump said Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul and his family are invited to the White House picnic, a bipartisan event attended by members of Congress, after Paul claimed they were 'uninvited.' Paul, a fiscal hawk conservative, has voiced opposition to Trump's sweeping tax and domestic policy bill, arguing that it would only add to the budget deficit. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that it would add roughly $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade. More recently, Paul, the chair of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, said he would propose less money for border security in the bill - a key issue that Trump campaigned on in 2024. The tax bill, which passed the House in May, includes more than $140 billion toward Trump's plan to crack down on illegal immigration. On June 11, Paul claimed that it was 'incredibly petty' for Trump not to invite him to the White House picnic, telling reporters that 'the level of immaturity is beyond words.' 'It really makes me lose a lot of respect I once had for Donald Trump,' Paul said. He added that his son, daughter-in-law, and grandson were flying up to Washington, D.C. for the picnic. But Trump in a June 12 Truth Social post wrote that quite the opposite is at play. 'Of course Senator Rand Paul and his beautiful wife and family are invited to the BIG White House Party tonight. He's the toughest vote in the history of the U.S. Senate, but why wouldn't he be?' Trump wrote. 'Besides, it gives me more time to get his Vote on the Great, Big, Beautiful Bill, one of the greatest and most important pieces of legislation ever put before our Senators & Congressmen/women.' Kentucky Republican Rep. Thomas Massie, who voted against the tax bill, claimed in a post on X that his tickets were 'withheld.' However Trump has not publicly commented on Massie's invitation. The bill is now in the Senate, where lawmakers in the upper chamber are proposing new changes. Senate Majority Leader John Thune only has three Republican "no" votes to spare, assuming that all Democrats are opposed to the bill. Paul has previously broken from his party. He joined with Democrats in voting against the temporary spending bill in March to avert a government shutdown, arguing that it was going against cuts that billionaire Elon Musk had proposed.