logo
Bill to loosen education requirement for public library directors heads to Arkansas House

Bill to loosen education requirement for public library directors heads to Arkansas House

Yahoo26-02-2025
From left: Judy Calhoun, John McGraw and Misty Hawkins listen to discussion of Senate Bill 181 during a meeting of the House Committee on City, County, and Local Affairs on Wednesday, February 26, 2025. (Tess Vrbin/Arkansas Advocate)
An Arkansas House committee approved a bill Wednesday that would loosen the current education requirement for local public library directors.
If Senate Bill 181 becomes law, library directors would no longer need a master's degree in library science 'from an accredited American Library Association program' in order for libraries to receive state funding. It would allow someone with 'work experience in the field of library operations' but without the requisite degree to run a library or the Arkansas State Library with approval from its governing board.
Three regional library directors spoke against the bill before the House Committee on City, County, and Local Affairs. All three said they have the current required education and that SB 181 is unnecessary.
'It's deeply concerning and frankly a bit disrespectful to see my profession and the value of my degree undermined,' said Misty Hawkins, regional director of the four-county Arkansas River Valley Regional Library System. '…With 23% of Arkansans reading at or below the lowest literacy level, I cannot understand why we would discourage education rather than promote it.'
Hawkins also said SB 181 has 'no clear definition or explanation' for what work experience in libraries would qualify a potential director without the requisite degree.
The other two library directors who opposed the bill were Judy Calhoun, who recently retired from the five-county Southeast Arkansas Regional Library System, and John McGraw, director of the Faulkner-Van Buren Regional Library.
All three said work experience is valuable, but education is an important supplement.
'It gives you valuable tools, it tells you a lot of the theory behind why we're doing what we're doing, [and] it gives you skills, like cataloguing, that I don't think you're going to get as easily just doing the job on the fly,' McGraw said.
He also said the bill contradicted the current 'moral panic that librarians aren't doing enough.'
None of Arkansas' institutions of higher education have American Library Association-accredited master's degree programs, said the bill's Republican sponsors, Rep. Rebecca Burkes of Lowell and Sen. Dan Sullivan of Jonesboro. They also said SB 181 will make it easier for local library boards to fill library director vacancies.
The three library directors all asserted that these degree programs are offered online and that there is no shortage of degreed librarians in Arkansas.
The Arkansas State Library Board provides scholarships for students in an ALA-accredited master's degree program, and the board rejected a motion earlier this month to remove the ALA from its scholarship requirements.
The failed motion also would have removed the ALA from the State Library's standards for state aid to public libraries, which are partly based on one of the statutes SB 181 seeks to amend.
Sullivan is also sponsoring Senate Bill 184, which would dissolve the State Library Board. Hawkins spoke against the bill before a Senate committee earlier this month. The bill passed the Senate and has yet to be heard by a House committee.
On Wednesday, Sullivan reiterated his opposition to both ALA and the State Library Board. He has often criticized the statement within the ALA's Library Bill of Rights that access to libraries should not be restricted based on a person's age. Far-right conservatives nationwide have claimed this is proof that the ALA believes in forcing content about sexual activity and LGBTQ+ topics onto children.
Arkansas State Library Board refuses to reject American Library Association, withhold funds
Former ALA President Emily Drabinski called herself a Marxist in a 2022 tweet; Sullivan repeated his assertion that this means ALA supports a political agenda and expects libraries to do the same. He also criticized ALA's stated commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion.
'Our libraries are fantastic institutions,' Sullivan said. 'For decades, our professionals that run those are good hardworking folks in your communities… We can have professionals in our libraries who have a choice to go to programs that allow them to pursue what they think is important, and your local board can choose whether that's important.'
Rep. Aaron Pilkington, R-Knoxville, said he found SB 181 confusing. He represents part of the Arkansas River Valley Regional Library System and said he appreciated Hawkins' testimony.
'It'd be different if I had people coming to me saying that we can't fill these positions at the libraries in Pope, Johnson and Yell counties, but… I'm not hearing that, so it makes me think this isn't a need,' Pilkington said. 'And then I hear all this discussion about all these other [things], and granted, I don't like Marxists either, I don't like a lot of the things that the senator mentioned, but to me, I'm not seeing how we're addressing those problems in this bill.'
Pilkington was in the minority of committee members, primarily Democrats, who voted against SB 181 on a voice vote.
The full House is expected to vote on the bill Thursday, and it would then go to Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders' desk.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why 17-year-olds are exempt from new Indy youth curfew passed after mass shooting
Why 17-year-olds are exempt from new Indy youth curfew passed after mass shooting

Indianapolis Star

time24 minutes ago

  • Indianapolis Star

Why 17-year-olds are exempt from new Indy youth curfew passed after mass shooting

Indianapolis officials have made the youth curfew two hours earlier for all children younger than 17 for at least the rest of this year. About a month after a July 5 mass shooting left two teenagers dead, the Indianapolis City-County Council voted Aug. 11 to make the youth curfew stricter effective immediately. An initial proposal that included 17-year-olds was amended at the last minute by Democratic councilors who felt that older teens should be granted more independence. The new rules mean that children ages 15 and 16 won't be allowed in public unsupervised past 11 p.m. on Fridays and Saturdays and past 9 p.m. Sundays through Thursdays. Children under 15 will face a 9 p.m. curfew every day. The city's emergency curfew will remain in place for 120 days, which means the council must decide in early December whether to extend or relax the policy. Teens who are 17 will still be subject to the state curfew of 1 a.m. on Fridays and Saturdays and 11 p.m. on Sundays through Thursdays. The 25-person council's Democratic majority passed the amendment that excluded 17-year-olds from the new curfew despite the opposition of all six Republican councilors. "The sun doesn't even go down in the summer until near 10 p.m., and I don't think we're putting ourselves in a good position pushing 17-year-olds to break curfew at 10-10:30 p.m.," said Councilor Jared Evans, who introduced the amendment at Monday's council meeting. Republicans like Councilor Joshua Bain said that excluding 17-year-olds from the new policy weakens the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department's efforts to keep people safe. "It is not the goal of IMPD to go around arresting every 17-year-old that's out at night," Bain said. "This is a targeted way for them to get in between a 17-year-old that's about to make a really bad decision and possibly ruin the rest of their life." The ordinance doesn't create a criminal offense for children who break curfew, but it does grant police the authority to detain them. The policy carves out several exceptions for kids who are returning home from work, a school activity, a religious event or activities protected by the First Amendment such as political protests, among others. IMPD Chief Christopher Bailey said he was unbothered by the change exempting 17-year-olds from a stricter curfew. (He mentioned in jest that his daughter, who is nearly 17 and has been criticizing her father at home over the new curfew, would be "very pleased.") "My direction to the officers is not some sweep of everyone that's out," Bailey said. "It's really behavioral-based." Democratic Councilor Dan Boots spoke bluntly in support of more leniency for 17-year-olds. "Seventeen-year-olds are rising seniors in high school, a step away from being able to vote and be drafted and killed for our country," Boots said. "I think they have a right to stay out past 9 to go to a movie and come back." Republican Councilor Michael-Paul Hart, who also voted against the last-minute change, introduced a new proposal Monday night that would fine parents whose children violate curfew. State law allows the city to impose thousands of dollars in fines, according to city attorney Brandon Beeler, but it's unclear how harshly violators would be prosecuted. Hart's proposal would give parents one written warning for a first violation, followed by a $500 fine for a second time and a $1,500 fine for each subsequent occurrence. Councilors will consider the proposal in committee later this month before a likely vote in September. The harsher curfew change comes after hundreds of unsupervised teens lingered downtown in the hours following the Fourth of July fireworks show, culminating in a mass shooting after midnight that killed Xavion Jackson, 16, and Azareaon S. Cole, 15. Two other teens and three adults were also injured. Four teenagers ranging from 13 to 17 years old have been charged in connection with the shooting for illegally carrying guns.

County commission punts vote on MSCS school board elections, passes term limits resolution
County commission punts vote on MSCS school board elections, passes term limits resolution

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

County commission punts vote on MSCS school board elections, passes term limits resolution

A vote over syncing Memphis-Shelby County School Board elections with the Shelby County Commission was punted, again, on Aug. 11. The delay came after hours of deliberating, with Commissioner Britney Thornton moving to bifurcate a resolution that would have synced up the two elected bodies' elections by 2030. The resolution also would set a term limit of two consecutive four-year terms on the school board. Thornton's bifurcation motion passed without opposition, splitting the term limit resolution from the syncing of the election. A vote on term limits being set in 2026 for school board members also passed unanimously. Under the resolution, school board members in Districts 1, 6, 8 and 9 will still have elections in 2026 and serve through 2030. School board members in Districts 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 will complete their full terms through 2028, but then would run for a two-year term, and then the seats would come up for reelection again in 2030. The term limits are not retroactive and take effect starting with the 2026 elections. In 2030, all board seats will be up for election and will be on the same election cycle as county officials moving forward. School board members will also be held to the same two-term election limit that county commissioners are held to. The resolution was brought as part of an amendment by Commissioner Erika Sugarmon during the Aug. 6 committee meeting. During the Aug. 11 commission meeting, Commissioner Edmund Ford, Jr. proposed an amendment to Sugarmon's resolution that would establish term limits in 2026. The term limit amendment passed unanimously. Previous legislation, which was punted to Aug. 6, would have abridged the terms of some school board members elected in 2024 and forced term limits starting with the upcoming 2026 county-wide election. The previous resolution, sponsored by Commissioners Thornton, Michael Whaley, Amer Mills and Mick Wright, would have put all nine seats on the same election cycle as the Shelby County Commission starting next year. Members of the school board spoke ahead of the commission's vote, arguing passing the resolution would open the county up to a lawsuit, would not change the cost of elections and would not impact voter turnout. Most members of the public, who also spoke ahead of the vote, supported the original resolution. Some called for immediate consequences for the board members who voted to remove former Superintendent Marie Feagins. Lowry offers substitute referendum ordinance to cement term limits, recall votes for school board A potential substitute to the resolution voted on at the Aug. 11 meeting was brought by Commissioner Mickell Lowery. That substitute came in the form of a referendum ordinance that would allow Shelby County residents to vote for term limits and pave an avenue for recall votes. Commissioners seemed opposed to that, with Ford saying they could "take care of the business now," with the original resolution. Despite the opposition to the referendum, commissioners kept the door open to passing it in the future to complement the resolution. The referendum, if it were to pass the commission and pass at the ballot box, would enshrine term limits and a recall vote in the county's charter. A county attorney at the commission meeting said the referendum's passing would make it "much harder" to change in the future. The referendum ordinance asked voters two questions: "Shall the Shelby County Charter be amended at Article VI, Section 6.02(A) to apply term limit provisions to the county school board members as governed by the laws of the State of Tennessee?" "Shall the Shelby County Charter be amended at Section 5.24(A) Recall of elected county officials to add language providing for language providing for recall of county school board members as governed by the laws of the State of Tennessee?" Brooke Muckerman covers education and children's issues for The Commercial Appeal. She can be reached at This article originally appeared on Memphis Commercial Appeal: Future Memphis-Shelby County Schools board members to have term limits Solve the daily Crossword

Likely Pennsylvania gov candidate slams Shapiro over rumored presidential ambitions
Likely Pennsylvania gov candidate slams Shapiro over rumored presidential ambitions

Politico

timean hour ago

  • Politico

Likely Pennsylvania gov candidate slams Shapiro over rumored presidential ambitions

Shapiro is considered a top potential presidential candidate in 2028, but has not said whether he will run for the White House. The video seemed intended to signal that Garrity would mount a more aggressive campaign against Shapiro than his past rivals. Far-right state Sen. Doug Mastriano lost to Shapiro by 15 points in 2022, after raising little money and airing few TV ads. Mastriano is considering another gubernatorial bid and remains popular with the MAGA base. 'I can tell you on the record that this may be both the first ad of 2026 and 2028,' Garrity adviser John Brabender told POLITICO. 'And that it's just a start.' The battleground state of Pennsylvania will host a gubernatorial race and as many as five competitive House races as Democrats grasp for control over the lower chamber in the midterms next year. Garrity, a combat veteran in her second term as treasurer, is seen by state GOP insiders as the best Republican candidate to challenge Shapiro. Mastriano's potential bid has alarmed President Donald Trump's advisers and Pennsylvania Republicans .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store