Indy police unveil new cybercrime-fighting ride to protect kids
Why it matters: The new mobile forensic and interview van will allow members of Indiana's Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Task Force to act more effectively in cases where time and evidence are critical.
Driving the news: With the support of Indianapolis-based nonprofit kNot Today Foundation, IMPD and ISP leaders introduced the van to the community Monday at IMPD North District Headquarters.
Founded in 2019 by former Colts head coach Frank Reich and his wife, Linda, kNot Today has a mission of bolstering child sexual abuse prevention efforts that are underfunded, fragmented and deprioritized.
kNot Today has awarded more than $1 million in grants, distributed more than 30,000 parent guides and funded the training of 11 K-9 officers.
Threat level: According to kNot Today, one in 10 children will experience sexual abuse. But the organization's executive director, Emma Marsh, says recent national data suggests that figure could be closer to one in five.
ISP Sgt. Christopher Cecil, the commander of the ICAC, said Indiana got around 325 cyber tips in 2005.
Seven months into 2025, the state has already collected more than 10,000 cyber tips.
What they're saying: "Mobile forensics vehicles like the one here enable the ICAC to bring essential digital forensics capabilities directly to the point of the investigations — thereby accelerating the process of identifying victims, gathering evidence and ultimately bringing offenders to justice," Cecil said during Monday's unveiling.
How it works: The front of the van serves as a mobile lab for on-scene evidence processing.
Reality check: While the van is another vital tool, officials say the real heroes combating online predators are attentive parents.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
29 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Appeals judges order ICC prosecutor to recuse himself from Venezuela investigation
THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — Appeals judges at the International Criminal Court on Friday ordered chief prosecutor Karim Khan to recuse himself from an investigation into Venezuela, citing a conflict of interest. Khan's sister-in-law, international criminal lawyer Venkateswari Alagendra, has been part of a team representing the government of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and the five-judge appeals panel at the ICC says her involvement creates an issue of 'bias' for the prosecutor. The British barrister, who is currently on leave from the court , stepped down temporarily pending an investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct. Alagendra and Khan worked together previously on cases, including as defense counsel for Kenyan President William Ruto and for Seif al-Islam Gadhafi, the son of the late Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi. Alagendra is the sister of Khan's wife, human rights lawyer Shyamala Alagendra. The Washington-based Arcadia Foundation, which focuses on human rights issues in Venezuela, filed a complaint with the court in 2024, asking for Khan to be removed from the case over a conflict of interest. The court dismissed the initial complaint in February. In written filings, Khan told the court he could not 'recall' any discussion with his sister-in-law about the facts of the case and did not attend any meetings where she was present. The ICC has an ongoing investigation into violence that followed Venezuela's 2017 election but has so far not sought any arrest warrants. Khan announced in late 2021 that he was opening the investigation after a lengthy preliminary probe and an official referral — a request to investigate — in 2018 from Argentina, Canada, Colombia, Chile, Paraguay and Peru. However, the full-scale investigation was put on hold when Venezuelan authorities said they wanted to take over the case. The ICC is a court of last resort that only takes on cases when national authorities are unwilling or unable to investigate, a system known as complementarity. Khan pressed ahead with efforts to continue the court's first investigation in Latin America. ICC judges agreed with Khan and authorized him to resume investigations in Venezuela in 2023 . Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Business Insider
5 hours ago
- Business Insider
Prosecutors cite Diddy's freak offs in opposing his latest bail try: He's no 'ordinary John'
Sean "Diddy" Combs is no "mere John," federal prosecutors say in urging he be kept behind bars. Combs is "far from being an ordinary and casual consumer of commercial sex," they argue, lambasting the rap mogul and his baby oil-soaked history of freak offs in an 11-page court filing opposing his latest bail effort. Combs hopes to be set free from a notorious Brooklyn jail pending his October 3 sentencing. He argues that last month's split verdict found him guilty of being, at most, a "John" who paid for male escorts he didn't even sleep with. Instead, his lawyers argue, trial testimony consistently described Combs sitting in the corner of a series of luxury hotel suites in Miami, New York, and Los Angeles, watching, masturbating, and recording as his girlfriends had sex with muscular strippers and porn stars. But if Combs is a John, he's a very, very bad one, prosecutors say in opposing bail in a filing made public early Friday. "The defendant transported individuals for the purpose of prostitution on hundreds of occasions over the course of decades," wrote the five remaining members of the Manhattan-based prosecution team — minus lead attorney Maurene Comey. (Comey, who also prosecuted Jeffrey Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, is the daughter of former FBI director and longtime Trump nemesis James Comey. She was fired by the Department of Justice two weeks after the Combs verdict.) Far from being a "mere John," the remaining team wrote, Combs "plied Cassie Ventura and Jane (as well as male commercial sex workers) with drugs to ensure their continued participation in the days-long freak offs." R&B artist Ventura spent four days on the stand describing Combs' violence and her own regret and humiliation in the decade ending in 2018. The second girlfriend, who testified as Jane Doe, told a similar tale from dating Combs in 2021 to 2024. Combs "used violence against both Ms. Ventura and Jane in connection with freak offs, and employed a small army of personal staff to ensure that his every need was met during freak offs," the prosecutors' filing tells US District Judge Arun Subramanian.. "The defendant's actions surely distinguish him from an ordinary 'John.'" In his own filing earlier this week, Combs had asked Subramanian to let him live at his Miami mansion on $50 million bail in the two months between now and sentencing. His lawyers argued that the stakes are lower now, because he has been cleared of the most serious charges against him. On July 2, the jury in Combs' six-week Manhattan trial rejected prosecutors' allegations that he sex-trafficked two girlfriends. The jury also rejected a racketeering charge that alleged he ran Combs Global, his multimillion-dollar media, entertainment, and lifestyle empire, as a criminal enterprise. Combs was found guilty only of the least serious counts he had faced. The jury convicted on two violations of the federal Mann Act, finding that Combs caused the two girlfriends and several male escorts to be transported across state lines for purposes of commercial sex acts. The felony Mann Act convictions are flawed and should be tossed out, Combs argues. Combs "lacked a commercial motive and did not intend for paid escorts to have sex with him," his lawyers argued Wednesday night in a legal filing signed by defense attorney Alexandra Shapiro. Instead, Combs was creating "amateur porn," filming as the male escorts had sex with longtime girlfriend Shapiro argued. Combs was "primarily a bystander" to the encounters, Shapiro argued. "Paying people to film them in sexual performances is protected by the First Amendment," she also argued. This is Combs' fifth attempt at bail since his September arrest. In denying the previous bail attempts, Subramanian said that by law, Combs' felony conviction requires that he remain in jail pending sentencing. In previous bail denials, Subramanian and two other judges cited Combs' admitted domestic violence against his girlfriends, including in the months before his September arrest, when he knew he was under investigation. They also cited prosecution allegations that Combs possessed illegal drugs when he was arrested and had tried to obstruct the trial by reaching out to witnesses from jail before it started, claims the defense has denied. Prosecutors have said they plan to seek a sentence of five years or more on the two Mann Act convictions.
The Hill
6 hours ago
- The Hill
Judge blocks DHS from stripping protections for 60K from Nepal, Honduras, Nicaragua
A federal judge ruled against Trump administration plans to end protections from deportation for citizens of Nepal, Nicaragua and Honduras, barring their removal while the case continues. San Francisco-based U.S. District Court Judge Trina Thompson agreed the plaintiffs had shown there was sufficient racial animus behind the decision and that the Trump administration had failed to undertake an 'objective review of the country conditions' before ending protections. 'The freedom to live fearlessly, the opportunity of liberty, and the American dream. That is all Plaintiffs seek. Instead, they are told to atone for their race, leave because of their names, and purify their blood,' Thompson wrote. 'The Court disagrees.' The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) ended Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Nepal in June and for Nicaragua and Honduras in July. Each country initially was initially designated after natural disasters, but the protections can also be offered to those unable to be deported to their home country due to civil unrest. The moves would require 51,000 Hondurans and nearly 3,000 Nicaraguans who have been in the country for roughly 25 years to leave the county by September. Some 7,000 Nepalese citizens were also set to lose protections in just days. Thompson reviewed a number of prior comments from President Trump as well as Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem, including comments from the secretary referring to migrants as criminals and gang members while the president has stated that migrants were 'poisoning the blood of our country.' 'Indeeed, code words may demonstrate discriminatory intent,' she wrote. 'Color is neither a poison nor a crime.' Thompson said DHS failed to do the fulsome review required to end TPS, determining that the Trump administration did not consider conditions beyond recovery from the hurricanes that rocked the Central American countries and the earthquake that sparked the designation for Nepal. 'Unlike previous iterations of DHS notices on Honduras, the Honduras notice does not mention political violence or crime,' the judge wrote. 'The new notice also omits the anti-democratic human rights violations and the humanitarian crisis which has led to 108,000 people fleeing the country,' Thompson said of Nicaragua. She added, 'The notice concedes that 'Nepal has continued to experience subsequent regional environmental events, including flooding and landslides' and that 'Nepal remains one of the poorest countries in the world' but nevertheless finds that modest economic growth (two percent) and reconstruction efforts support a termination of Nepal's TPS designation.' The Trump administration has argued citizens of all three nations have remained in the country well beyond the natural disasters that ignited TPS and that past administrations have abused a protection that is designed to be temporary. But Thompson determined that administration failed to rebut arguments that citizens of the three countries should be allowed to remain in the U.S. while the trial continues. 'Although Defendants argue that a delay in the Secretary's decisions would undermine United States foreign policy and national interests, Defendants have failed to identify the exact foreign policy or national interest at stake,' she wrote.
