Bangkok for the next Trump-Kim talks?
In a world longing for trust-building on the Korean Peninsula, Thailand finds itself at an advantageous crossroads. With renewed momentum in regional diplomacy and its unique position as a bridge between East and West, Bangkok may be the right place -- and now may be the right time.
This is more than symbolism. It rests on a compelling blend of history, geography, strategic diplomacy, and recent developments that together make Thailand not just a suitable host but a pivotal peacemaker in Asia and beyond.
Just days ago, Mr Trump helped broker a ceasefire between Thailand and Cambodia after intense border clashes displaced hundreds of thousands. His intervention -- widely acknowledged -- underscores his continuing influence in Southeast Asia and the region's openness to external mediation when conflicts escalate.
Shortly thereafter, Mr Kim made a rare public appeal for stability and dialogue in Southeast Asia, calling for "constructive engagement and mutual respect". In the current geopolitical climate, such a statement signals readiness -- however tentative -- for renewed international engagement.
These developments point to a single, powerful possibility: a renewed Trump–Kim summit is possible, and the venue matters now more than ever.
Why Bangkok?
Mr Trump's previous encounters with Mr Kim -- in Singapore (2018), Hanoi (2019), and the DMZ (2019) -- may not have produced formal agreements, but they reshaped diplomatic norms and demonstrated the power of unconventional engagement.
Each venue was an Asean capital chosen for neutrality and credibility. Bangkok fits that mould, crisp and clear -- and offers much more.
1. Thailand's diplomatic balance with the US and North Korea
Thailand's strategic partnership with the United States is deep-rooted, dating back to becoming the first Asian country to sign the US Treaty of Amity in 1833, and today, it stands as a key non‑Nato ally.
At the same time, Thailand was among the first Southeast Asian nations to formalise diplomatic relations with North Korea on May 8, 1975, maintaining one of Pyongyang's largest embassies in the region. The presence of North Korean and South Korean embassies in Bangkok creates a unique diplomatic dual-access unmatched elsewhere in Asean, allowing Thailand to engage both sides with discretion and credibility.
2. A decades-long mediator and facilitator
Thailand's reputation as a peacemaker spans decades and conflicts.
In 1962–67, Thailand facilitated the formation of Asean through informal retreats and ministerial trust-building known as "sports‑shirt diplomacy" under Thanat Khoman's leadership, helping reunite regional actors after the Indonesia–Malaysia confrontation.
In 1989, Thailand brokered the Hat Yai Peace Agreement, ending the Malayan Communist Party insurgency, hosting the negotiation and facilitating disarmament in the Malaysian conflict.
Thailand played a supporting diplomatic role in Cambodia's peace process, contributing to the international consensus that led to the 1991 Paris Peace Agreements, which formally ended Cambodia's long-running conflict with Vietnam, including support for the United Nations transitional administration.
Thailand has also participated in international peacekeeping and monitoring missions abroad, such as the EU's Aceh Monitoring Mission in Indonesia, helping oversee insurgency resolution and transition after the 2005 Helsinki MoU.
In Sri Lanka's long-running internal conflict, Thailand offered quiet facilitation and diplomatic assistance, joining other international actors to encourage peace talks, reconciliation, and capacity-building for local institutions (though direct mediation was led by others, Thailand was considered a trusted partner).
This consistent involvement -- from Asean's founding to regional insurgency settlements and UN missions -- demonstrates Thailand's pragmatic and credible role as a facilitator over generations.
3. A trusted peace facilitator
Thailand has long pursued strategic balance: engaging with both major powers and regional neighbours while maintaining neutrality. Mr Trump's recent involvement in the Thai–Cambodian ceasefire echoes this legacy. Hosting a Trump–Kim summit would elevate Thailand's identity from regional mediator to global peace platform.
4. An Asean anchor with global visibility
Thailand, a founding Asean member, consistently serves as a diplomatic hub. Bangkok is trusted to host global forums -- Apec, Asean regional forums, UN meetings -- with world-class infrastructure, security protocols, and hospitality experience.
5. A strategic signal to Beijing and Moscow
While US–Russia and US–China relations are strained, a successful summit in Bangkok sends a bold message.
To Vladimir Putin: peace is possible without Russia -- do you want to be isolated?
To Xi Jinping: Southeast Asia is leading diplomacy -- will China support or be left behind?
If Mr Trump can't engage Mr Putin, he can still reshape the narrative through tangible dialogue, starting in Asia.
Bangkok is where the global stage meets quiet power.
A Trump–Kim summit in Bangkok wouldn't be another photo op. It would be a geopolitical landmark -- the confluence of history, diplomacy, and peace. The Grand Palace skyline, the Chao Phraya River, and media from every corner covering not crisis, but dialogue.
For Mr Kim: a dignified re-entry to global diplomacy.
For Mr Trump: a final shot at a lasting legacy.
For Thailand: proof that we are not mere hosts, but active architects of peace.
Thailand should act. This is a moment for declarative diplomacy, not passive observation. The Thai government should formally extend an invitation to host the next Trump–Kim summit in Bangkok.
Even if the invitation does not yield a summit, Thailand will at least have demonstrated that she can be a creative, capable middle power, one that takes initiative on global issues. That's status, influence, and leadership -- from action, not mere rhetoric.
Let Bangkok be the place where words replace weapons, and dialogue triumphs over deadlock.
Thailand has earned its seat at the table.
Now it's time to offer the table itself.
Suthichai Yoon, a veteran journalist and a former Nieman Fellow at Harvard University, is the founder of Thai digital outlet KafedamMedia Group and was a co-founder of media company Nation Group based in Thailand.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bangkok Post
20 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
Call for strategy to cover circumvention
An academic has urged the government to develop a national strategy to tackle circumvention and adjust production structures by adding value to agricultural and industrial products, aligning with global trends. Aat Pisanwanich, an expert in international economics and an advisor on Asean affairs at Intelligence Research Consultant, said the US government's decision to impose tariffs of 20% on Vietnamese goods and 19% on Thai goods is expected to heighten competition between the two nations in the US market as they both offer a variety of similar products. According to Mr Aat, most Vietnamese products have a higher market share in the US than Thai products. On average, Vietnamese goods hold a 72% market share compared with a 28% share for Thai products. Key Vietnamese exports to the US include computers and peripherals, smartphones and peripherals, chips, office chairs, and furniture, representing 36% of Vietnam's total shipments to the US. Meanwhile, Thailand's main exports to the US are smartphones, computers, tyres, chips and electrical transformers, which make up 39% of its total exports to America. Peter Navarro, senior counsellor for trade and manufacturing to US President Donald Trump, said roughly 30% of Vietnam's exports to the US are classified as resulting from circumvention, whereas Hanoi-based Techcombank claimed the figure is 17%. Last year, China's exports of machinery and electrical appliances to Vietnam surged by 48% year-on-year to US$77 billion, accounting for 17% of China's total exports to Vietnam. During the same period, Vietnam's exports of machinery and electrical appliances to the US rose by 41% year-on-year to $45 billion. Mr Aat said while Vietnam's exports to the US climbed, the country also increased its imports from China. "Some Thai goods display a similar trend, and Thailand may face a 40% tariff for transshipment from the US, similar to what Vietnam is experiencing," he said. Mr Aat said his analysis is based on 24 key export products from Thailand and Vietnam shipped to the US. Last year, these products accounted for 53% of Thailand's total exports to the US and 65% of Vietnam's shipments. "Vietnam's labour costs are 18-25% lower than those in Thailand and fuel and electricity are 10-15% cheaper. Therefore, Vietnamese goods are 5-10% cheaper than Thai products, which may lead to a trade diversion effect between the two countries' products," he said. The analysis found the US tariffs are expected to reduce Vietnam's exports by $18.9 billion and Thailand's exports by $8.16 billion. When factoring in the trade diversion effect, Thai exports could drop by 457 billion baht this year, said Mr Aat. He called on the government to swiftly develop a national strategy to address circumvention practices and the improper use of rules of origin, particularly for goods containing local content at a rate of less than 40%. This initiative should include collaboration with the US Trade Representative to create "digital traceability", a verification system for such goods. Mr Aat also urged the authorities to create a new industrial production chain, enabling expansion and connection with other markets while securing Thailand's share in the US. He said a significant overhaul of the production sector is essential, enhancing the value of agricultural and industrial products to align with global market trends. A new investment framework should be introduced, requiring foreign investors to increase their procurement of materials from Thai small and medium-sized enterprises and farmers, said Mr Aat.
Bangkok Post
3 days ago
- Bangkok Post
Thais eye next GBC talks
Thailand is set to table proposals on landmine clearance and combating transnational crime at the forthcoming General Border Committee (GBC) meeting, which is expected to take place within the next month, according to Deputy Defence Minister Nattaphon Narkphanit. Speaking to reporters on Friday after the GBC meeting held in Malaysia on Thursday, Gen Nattaphon also revealed that he had met with Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim during his visit. He said that both sides reaffirmed a shared commitment that Malaysia and Asean would refrain from intervening in bilateral matters between Thailand and Cambodia, instead taking the role of observers. "We have made it clear that the United States and China should also allow Asean to manage regional situations independently, without interference," he added, noting that Malaysia had given assurances in support of this approach. One notable achievement of the recent meeting, Gen Nattaphon said, was Cambodia's participation in bilateral discussions -- something they had previously declined. "This represents a key milestone we have achieved," he noted. However, he acknowledged public concerns regarding the trustworthiness of Cambodia in this process. "We will maintain our existing approach, which is to act with maturity, abide by international law, and rely on international consensus as the framework for engagement with Cambodia," he affirmed. Gen Nattaphon said Cambodia showed a cooperative attitude during the GBC secretariat-level meeting. However, some of Thailand's proposals -- including landmine clearance operations and joint action against online scam networks -- have yet to gain full acceptance from the Cambodian side. Similarly, Thailand has not agreed to some of Cambodia's counterproposals. When asked by reporters why Cambodia had not yet accepted Thailand's proposals on mine clearance cooperation and efforts to combat transnational crime, Gen Nattaphon explained that no official reasons were given. However, he indicated that Cambodia likely still views landmines as part of its national defence strategy. "I have the sense that their reluctance stems from a lack of trust in us," he said. "That's why I've emphasised how challenging these secretariat-level negotiations have been. Cambodia doesn't fully trust Thailand, and Thailand doesn't fully trust Cambodia either. So, when it comes to reaching an agreement, you in the media can imagine just how difficult that is. These are not ordinary conversations." He praised the work of the committee secretariat, acknowledging the complexity of the negotiations: "I sincerely commend and thank our secretariat team, who managed to push through our proposals and reach a balanced outcome given the circumstances." When asked how Thailand plans to proceed with the proposals at future forums, Gen Nattaphon said that the two key issues -- mine clearance cooperation and tackling transnational crime -- will continue to be raised at every opportunity. "These matters will be brought up repeatedly until they are accepted," he said, adding that both Thailand and Cambodia have agreed to schedule the next GBC meeting within one month of Aug 7, though the venue is still under discussion.
Bangkok Post
3 days ago
- Bangkok Post
Malaysia minister to seek clarity from Myanmar on election
KUALA LUMPUR - Malaysian Foreign Minister Mohamad Hasan will seek details from Myanmar's military leadership about a planned election when he leads a four-nation delegation to the war-torn country next month, Malaysian state media reported on Friday. Myanmar has been in chaos since a 2021 military coup against an elected civilian government plunged the country into civil war. Last week, the junta lifted a nationwide state of emergency and nominally transferred power to a civilian-led government ahead of the election, although the junta chief remained in charge of the country in his other role as acting president. "I want to obtain a clearer picture (of the elections) to bring to the attention of Asean leaders in October," Mohamad said, referring to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations grouping, Malaysian state news agency Bernama reported. Mohamad, who will be accompanied by his counterparts from Thailand, the Philippines, and Indonesia for the trip on Sept 19, wanted clarity on whether Myanmar would hold a comprehensive election, Bernama reported. Myanmar state media has reported that martial law and a state of emergency would be imposed in more than 60 townships across nine regions and states, with voting to be held in December and January. Last month, Mohamad said Asean had agreed that an election in Myanmar was not a priority and urged the junta to adhere to the grouping's "five-point consensus" peace plan instead. Myanmar is an Asean member, but its generals have been barred from attending the bloc's key meetings since 2022 for failing to honour the peace plan. Malaysia is the current chair of Asean. Myanmar's election has been dismissed by Western governments as a sham to entrench the generals' power and is expected to be dominated by proxies of the military, with opposition groups either barred from running or refusing to take part.
