US tariffs, auto trade and the limits of the ‘Yank Tank'
The US does not export a significant quantity of passenger vehicles to the UK or Europe. It has never done so, nor indeed, is it likely to.
The reason is simply that American passenger vehicles – or domestic iron as they are often lovingly known are, with very few exceptions, just that. Domestic. Moreover, the bulk of US production comprises of large to extremely large pick-up trucks and SUV's, which are designed and manufactured for domestic consumption and ill-suited to European roads.
For example, let's take on-street city parking. Imagine driving a supersized US pick-up or SUV on a dark and damp November evening in London, frantically searching for a parking spot on an Edwardian terraced street lined to capacity with compact hatchbacks, a sprinkling of stylish coupes, saloon cars and mid-size SUVs. Near impossible to find anything remotely suitable on a road whose infrastructure was mainly conceived and built by Victorian engineers in the 19th century.
What about accessing multistorey car parks? Forget about it, height restrictions and manoeuvrability, too low and too small. Furthermore, the overall aesthetics of American cars do not conform to European design principles. The sheer bulk of these vehicles, coupled with their 'gas-guzzling' V6 and V8 engines, make them wholly inappropriate and thoroughly unappealing to the overwhelming majority of European consumers.
America's best-selling vehicle is the Ford F-Series pickup truck. The brand's entry-level model is the F150 and, by US standards, is fitted with a small 2.7 litre V6 which delivers 19 mpg on the urban cycle. The standard fuel tank holds 23 gallons. Customers can, if they so wish, opt for the larger 26-gallon tank or indeed go the whole hog and select Ford's 5.2 litre supercharged V8. Need I say more? And crucially, we come to gas prices for US consumers – petrol on this side of the pond. While considered high in the US at circa $3.64 (equivalent to £3.12/3.62 € per imperial gallon), they are a real bargain when compared to pump prices in the UK and Europe, currently around $8.70 or £6.90/8.04 € per gallon. I rest my case.
By contrast, the appetite for European vehicles among American consumers has always been strong and remains so, driven by factors such as design, performance, quality and of course, status. This imbalance in trade highlights a fundamental issue: if the US aims to achieve a trade balance in the automotive sector, it must first produce vehicles that are attractive to European consumers, rather than simply penalising the European auto industry for manufacturing cars that American consumers want to buy. Slapping a 25% tax on European cars will not make Europeans buy American iron but simply deprive Americans of choice. Consumers in 'the land of the free and the home of the brave' simply love choice, be it in which car they drive or which size bottle of tomato ketchup they buy.
Notwithstanding the above, the recent implementation of a 25% tariff on all vehicles imported from the UK and Europe to the US has sent shockwaves through the automotive industry, creating a complex and challenging situation for Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), National Sales Companies (NSCs), importers, franchised dealer networks and ultimately, American consumers. This drastic measure has far-reaching consequences that are only beginning to unfold, with the first major announcement coming from Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) in the UK.
JLR's decision to halt all shipments of cars to the US for four weeks, effective Monday, 7 April 2025, marks the beginning of what is likely to be a series of strategic moves by European automakers. This pause in operations will provide JLR, in collaboration with JLR USA and their franchisees, the necessary time to strategise on how best to mitigate considerable increases in sticker prices while balancing OEM, distributor, and dealer profit margins. This delicate balancing act is crucial for maintaining competitiveness in the US market whilst simultaneously absorbing the impact of the tariff.
As news of JLR's decision spreads, all eyes are now on other major European manufacturers whose products are highly sought after in the American market. Companies such as Volkswagen Group, Mercedes-Benz, and BMW are undoubtedly engaged in intense deliberations to address this monumental challenge. In the coming days, we can expect a flurry of press releases from their respective headquarters in Wolfsburg, Ingolstadt, Stuttgart, and Munich, outlining their respective strategies to tackle the tariff issue.
Madox Square LLP collaborates across the industry. Moreover, over the past days, I have been speaking with executives across Europe and the US, it is clear that the atmosphere remains febrile. The task of finding a satisfactory solution is fraught with difficulties, requiring a delicate balance between maintaining market share, preserving profitability and minimising the impact on consumers. Industry leaders emphasise the importance of keeping a level head and not allowing the emotional aspects of the situation to cloud judgment or decision-making processes.
It is important to note that these manufacturer-specific responses will be independent of any retaliatory actions that the European Union may decide to impose. The potential for escalating trade tensions between the US and Europe adds another layer of complexity to an already volatile situation.
The imposition of the 25% automotive blanket tariff also raises questions about the long-term strategy of the US government in addressing trade imbalances. A trade war is unlikely to be the path to prosperity for the US – in fact, many industry experts believe it could have the opposite effect. By artificially inflating the prices of popular European vehicles, the tariff may lead to decreased sales, job losses in the distribution and retail sectors and reduced consumer choice. Furthermore, John Murphy, Managing Director at Bank of America, said the increased cost from tariffs could reduce US car sales by up to 3 million units. This number represents a reduction of 20% of sales on the 15.9m vehicles sold in 2024.
Ultimately, the tariff could very well have unintended consequences for the US automotive industry. American manufacturers who rely on imported vehicles will undoubtedly face increased costs and complications in their supply chains. In turn, higher component costs will lead to increased prices for domestically produced vehicles as 40% to 60% of components rely on the global supply chain, thus creating a ripple effect throughout the entire automotive market.
Paul Bennett, Senior Partner at Madox Square LLP.
"US tariffs, auto trade and the limits of the 'Yank Tank'" was originally created and published by Motor Finance Online, a GlobalData owned brand.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Drivers warned major road rule change with $961 fines 'just weeks' away
Drivers are being reminded that a major road rule change is just weeks away, with penalties for breaking the law as high as $961. Millions of Aussies will be impacted by one state's move to protect roadside workers and operators of roadside assistance vehicles. From July 1, in just three weeks, motorists in Victoria will be required to ensure they are travelling at 40km/h when they pass the incident response vehicles. The rule, known as road rule 79A, is already in place for emergency services on the side of the road like police cars and ambulances. Now it's been extended to include tow trucks, mechanics and roadside assistance vehicles too. After South Australia recently made a similar change, Victoria was the only state, along with the Northern Territory, that didn't have the rule made official. Royal Automobile Club of Victoria (RACV) General Manager Makarla Cole told Yahoo News that the rule will "ensure that emergency roadside workers and tow truck drivers, regardless of who they work for, are given the same protection as other emergency workers." Those who ignore the rule will be fined for not complying with the 40km/h mandate. The standard penalty for non-compliance is $346 with a potential maximum of $961. There will be no demerit points attached to the offence, however. A recent survey by RACV revealed a startling 83 per cent of its roadside workers experience a near miss with another vehicle at least once a week. The road rule change has come after a consistent campaign from the group to bring Victoria in line with other jurisdictions. Patroller Johnny Dipietro, recently spoke out about the dangerous conditions he contends with while trying to do his job on busy roads. "I had a vehicle that almost hit me and I'll tell you what, it was really scary," he said. He's not the only one. Incident responder Steven Bevens said close calls were an "everyday occurrence for our staff" when pulled over on the shoulder of a busy road or highway. 🚗 Drivers warned as major licence change rolls out across Australia in days 🚛 Aussie truckie praises caravanners for simple road act that saves lives 🛑 Meaning behind little-known roadside marker popping up 'a lot' on Aussie roads VACC CEO Peter Jones backed the change. "With just weeks to go before the expanded Road Rule 79A takes effect on July 1, we're pleased to see the Victorian Government's commitment to roadside worker safety becoming a reality," he said. Jones said the rule change is about creating a "culture of mutual respect" on Victorian roads and encouraged all drivers on Victorian roads to "familiarise themselves" with the expanded rules ahead of July 1. "When you see those flashing lights – whether it's police, ambulance, or now our towing and roadside assistance vehicles – slow down to 40km/h. It's a simple action that could save lives," he said. He argued that roadside assistance workers are first responders too, and often the first on the scene, 'working in extremely hazardous conditions," he said, adding: "This rule change finally gives them the protection they deserve. Jones added that the rule isn't just about compliance but gives workers "vital extra seconds" to react if something goes wrong. "We urge all motorists to see this as an investment in everyone's safety," he said. Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@ You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
From lottery tickets to life insurance: Here are 6 ‘bad assets' that could cause you to retire poor in America
Moneywise and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue through links in the content below. We adhere to strict standards of editorial integrity to help you make decisions with confidence. Some or all links contained within this article are paid links. You probably know the importance of retiring with a hefty, well-diversified portfolio of assets. But what if some of your assets are actually hidden liabilities? Here are the top seven tempting but deceptive money drains that you could trap yourself in before retirement. Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how BlackRock CEO Larry Fink has an important message for the next wave of American retirees — here's how he says you can best weather the US retirement crisis Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10) If you're financially secure, splurging on your 'dream car' can be the ultimate temptation. But the average new car loses roughly 30% of its value within the first two years alone, according to Kelley Blue Book. New cars also often have higher insurance premiums compared to used cars. The depreciation rate slows down after those initial years, which means buying a modestly used car at an affordable price is a better way to secure your financial future. Plus, you can benefit from a lower insurance bill. According to a MarketWatch study, full-coverage insurance on new cars averages $168 per month, while used car owners typically pay $150 monthly. That means new car owners pay an extra $216 a year. You can lower your insurance premiums further by shopping around and comparing rates from leading providers through OfficialCarInsurance. Simply answer some basic questions about yourself, your driving history and the type of vehicle you drive then OfficialCarInsurance will show you rates from reputable insurance providers like GEICO, Allstate and Progressive. The best part? The process is completely free and won't affect your credit score. Get started and find rates as low as $29 per month. Buying a timeshare in Cabo Verde and spending your retirement on a beach is undoubtedly attractive, but there are caveats. Timeshare ownership involves steep initial costs, recurring maintenance fees, low resale potential and rigid usage schedules. On top of that, the secondary market is notoriously poor, and many owners struggle to exit their agreements. Instead of locking yourself into a timeshare, consider creating an annual travel fund for vacation rentals in your retirement plan. One option is opening a high-yield savings account. These plans can offer up to 10 times the national APY of 0.41%. There is a market for luxury collectibles such as vintage cars, designer handbags and luxury watches, but that doesn't mean a Rolex deserves a spot in your retirement portfolio. Collectors of all kinds can be fickle. What's considered valuable today may not be worth as much by the time you retire. Diamonds, for instance, were a popular collectible, but prices have declined by 26% in just the last two years, according to The Guardian. With that in mind, it might pay to avoid the glamorous and focus on safer investments like corporate bonds or dividend stocks. Investing small sums consistently can be rewarding, thanks to the benefits of compounding interest. For instance, investing $30 each week for a period of 20 years can add up to over $76,000, assuming it compounds at 8% annually. Read more: Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — Buying lottery tickets or going all in on a new cryptocurrency is rarely a good idea, regardless of your age. But the risks are magnified when you're older and approaching the end of your career. Instead of indulging in wishful thinking that a meme-coin or random penny stock is going to make you rich overnight, consider the safer path to retirement. Focus on assets that are relatively stable and can act as a hedge against inflation, like gold. A gold IRA can be a valuable tool — it combines the inflation-resistant properties of the precious metal with the tax advantages of an IRA. One way to invest in gold that also provides significant tax advantages is to open a gold IRA with the help of Thor Metals. Gold IRAs allow investors to hold physical gold or gold-related assets within a retirement account, thereby combining the tax advantages of an IRA with the protective benefits of investing in gold, making it an attractive option for those looking to potentially hedge their retirement funds against economic uncertainties. To learn more, you can get a free information guide that includes details on how to get up to $20,000 in free metals on qualifying purchases. Rental income from a robust portfolio of real estate is a great way to enhance your passive income in retirement. But if you're on a fixed income, you should recognize the fact that your capacity for risk is much lower. As a retired landlord, you can't afford a sudden housing market crash or interest rate volatility. One option to make your dollars stretch is to consider tapping into the $36 trillion U.S. home equity market by investing in home equity agreements (HEAs). Homeshares allows accredited investors to gain direct exposure to hundreds of owner-occupied homes in top cities across the country through their U.S. Home Equity Fund. This approach enables investors to unlock lucrative real estate opportunities without the headaches of buying, owning or managing properties. With risk-adjusted target returns ranging from 14% to 17%, the Homeshares U.S. Home Equity fund offers accredited investors a low-maintenance alternative to traditional property ownership. Despite what salesmen might say, whole life insurance isn't always the ideal retirement vehicle. These plans can usually be more expensive than term life insurance, and you have limited control over how the capital is invested. Instead, you could consider term life insurance that protects your loved ones if the worst comes to pass. With Ethos Insurance you can sign up and get instant life insurance without any medical exams or blood tests. The process takes just 10 minutes, and you can get up to $3 million in coverage starting at just $2 per day. Ethos has a 30-day free look period with a money-back guarantee, meaning you can get a full refund if you aren't satisfied. JPMorgan sees gold soaring to $6,000/ounce — use this 1 simple IRA trick to lock in those potential shiny gains (before it's too late) Are you rich enough to join the top 1%? Here's the net worth you need to rank among America's wealthiest — plus a few strategies to build that first-class portfolio You're probably already overpaying for this 1 'must-have' expense — and thanks to Trump's tariffs, your monthly bill could soar even higher. Here's how 2 minutes can protect your wallet right now Access to this $22.5 trillion asset class has traditionally been limited to elite investors — until now. Here's how to become the landlord of Walmart or Whole Foods without lifting a finger This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Trump order seeks to boost U.S. drone industry
June 7 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump is taking aim at drone technology from two directions -- boost the U.S. industry and crack down on malicious activity. Trump on Friday signed executive orders on efforts to spur U.S. production relevant to drone technology, increase U.S. drone security and regulation efforts, and an unleated one to promote design and eventual use of commercial supersonic aircraft. "Unmanned aircraft systems, otherwise known as drones, offer the potential to enhance public safety as well as cement America's leadership in global innovation," an executive order titled Restoring American Airspace Sovereignty read. "But criminals, terrorists, and hostile foreign actors have intensified their weaponization of these technologies, creating new and serious threats to our homeland. Another order, titled Unleashing American Drone Dominance, declares that "building a strong and secure domestic drone sector is vital to reducing reliance on foreign sources, strengthening critical supply chains and ensuring that the benefits of this technology are delivered to the American people." There are more than a million registered drones in the United States, according to the FAA with more than 400,000 commercial drones and more than 350,000 for recreational use. In a press release, the Commercial Drone Alliance said it has "believed that innovation and security are two sides of the same coin. Outdated regulations have long impeded technological innovation and hindered transparency in our airspace." Lisa Ellman, chief executive of the Commercial Drone Alliance, also lauded the executive orders for aiming at both innovation and security simultaneously. "We fully support the long-overdue steps taken by the Trump administration in these Executive Orders -- establishing a framework to scale safe and secure drone operations while enhancing drone security and airspace transparency -- to modernize our domestic drone policy and assure American aviation leadership into the next century of flight," she said in the release. Drone dangers Trump has warned that drones have been used to smuggle drugs across borders, and could threaten large public gatherings, such as the 2026 World Cup and the 2028 Summer Olympics, both in the United States. "It is the policy of the United States to ensure control over our national airspace and to protect the public, critical infrastructure, mass gathering events, and military and sensitive government installations and operations from threats posed by the careless or unlawful use of UAS," the security related order reads. Chinese-made drones from companies like DJI or Autel are not outright banned, but the Federal Acquisition Security Council has been called on to "publish a Covered Foreign Entity List ... identifying companies that pose supply chain risks." In 2022, the U.S. Treasury added DJI and seven other companies to its Chinese Military-Industrial Complex list, which indicates some level of national security concern. The includes a ban on U.S.-based companies exporting technology to them. The majority of drones are estimated to be built in China, The New York Times reported. The Justice Department and FAA were told to enforce civil and criminal penalties for drone operators who violate laws or airspace restrictions. There will be grants for state and local law enforcement to access drone-detection and tracking equipment. The Federal Aviation Administration requires all drones weighing more than 0.55 of a pound to be registered, in addition to restricting how high they can be flown without authorization. The Justice Department and FAA were told to more robustly enforce civil and criminal penalties for drone operators who violate laws or airspace restrictions. Grant programs are planned for state and local law enforcement to access drone-detection and tracking equipment., the order also indicates Drone industry growth In his first term, Trump sought to increase the use of drones and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has been directed to promote exports of U.S.-made drones, in addition to federal agencies being ordered to prioritize purchases of them. "The United States must accelerate the safe commercialization of drone technologies and fully integrate UAS into the National Airspace System," the order reads. "The time has come to accelerate testing and to enable routine drone operations, scale up domestic production, and expand the export of trusted, American-manufactured drone technologies to global markets." The order directs the FAA to allow commercial users and public safety officials not to fly drones beyond their range of sight, meaning that a user must be able to see the drone they are operating. "Building a strong and secure domestic drone sector is vital to reducing reliance on foreign sources, strengthening critical supply chains, and ensuring that the benefits of this technology are delivered to the American people," the order says. Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy was directed to initiate artificial intelligence tools to assist in and expedite the review of a UAS waiver application, and the Transportation Department was told to develop an Electric Vertical Takeoff and Landing Pilot Program to accelerate the deployment of safe and lawful eVTOL operations in the United States. Supersonic flight An additional executive order titled "Leading the World in Supersonic Flight" seeks to promise planes that travel at supersonic speeds, which are greater than the speed of sound at approximately 768 mph at sea level, or Mach 1. "The United States stands at the threshold of a bold new chapter in aerospace innovation," the order reads. "For more than 50 years, outdated and overly restrictive regulations have grounded the promise of supersonic flight over land, stifling American ingenuity, weakening our global competitiveness, and ceding leadership to foreign adversaries." The order noted that "advances in aerospace engineering, materials science, and noise reduction now make supersonic flight not just possible, but safe, sustainable, and commercially viable." The order repeals regulations prohibiting cross-country supersonic flights, which for decades have precluded nonmilitary air travel over land at faster-than-sound speeds. The Concorde was manufactured from 1965 to 1979, but are no longer flown by airlines, however, Boom Supersonic and NASA are currently developing new supersonic passenger jets. Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.