Lion breeding industry remains 'unchanged' says NSPCA
According to the NSPCA, its inspectors continue to encounter widespread contraventions of the Animals Protection Act.
The National Council of Societies for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (NSPCA) has warned that little to no progress has been made in shutting down South Africa's captive lion breeding industry, despite a series of government commitments and legal recommendations.
During a briefing to the portfolio committee on environment, forestry and fisheries on Tuesday, National Chief Inspector Douglas Wolhuter said that 'nothing has changed' — highlighting ongoing welfare violations and a continued lack of enforcement, despite a government-backed plan to phase out lion farming.
Lack of action despite recommendations
In 2020, a High-Level Panel (HLP) recommended a full audit of lion farms, a moratorium on breeding, and the elimination of lion bone stockpiles.
These proposals were adopted in April 2024 through the Ministerial Task Team (MTT) report.
However, the NSPCA says none of these have been fully implemented.
'[There has been] no full and extensive audit of the industry, no moratorium on breeding, and lion bone stockpiles still exist,' the presentation read.
ALSO READ: Chicken farm funded by PIC fails to reverse court order against inhumane practices
Disturbing welfare conditions persist
According to the NSPCA, its inspectors continue to encounter widespread contraventions of the Animals Protection Act 71 of 1962.
These include lack of potable water, inadequate shelter, insufficient veterinary care, poor hygiene, and evidence of neglect.
'Any person who unnecessarily starves or under-feeds or denies water or food to any animal is in violation,' the NSPCA reminded parliament, citing section 2 (1)(c) of the Act.
One example included lion cubs discarded in rubbish dumps, with undeclared carcasses and bones also recovered.
'How were the lions treated when alive, and how did they die?' the NSPCA asked.
ALSO READ: Addo Park moves elephants to avoid culling
While court rulings have affirmed the NSPCA's mandate—declaring animal welfare and conservation as 'intertwined values'—the organisation expressed frustration with ongoing delays.
'The justice process is too slow, and penalties remain insufficient,' the presentation said.
In one recent case, a guilty party received a suspended 12-month sentence or a R4 000 fine.
ALSO READ: Farmers 'on the edge' over crippling foot and mouth disease
A call for meaningful collaboration
The NSPCA has called on the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (DFFE) to provide project-specific funding to allow for joint inspections and audits.
'The NSPCA is willing to work in Joint Operations with the DFFE and EMIs to effect coordinated inspections […] and the information sharing must be a two-way street for effective compliance'
Wolhuter warned against replacing lions with other exotic species, such as tigers.
'South Africa cannot allow tigers to replace lions, as welfare still applies,' he stated.
NOW READ: Rabies warning: Over 4 800 people bitten by animals in Limpopo every year
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
Institute of Race Relations slams unclear expropriation law
The Institute of Race Relations (IRR) calls on Public Works and Infrastructure Minister Dean Macpherson to disclose all state bodies empowered under the Expropriation Act. The Expropriation Act allows property to be seized below market value, raising concerns about property rights in South Africa. Makone Maja of the IRR says more than 400 state entities may already hold expropriation powers. ALSO READ: Ekurhuleni residents to face new tariff hikes IRR polling shows 68% of South Africans oppose the Expropriation Act. The IRR will this week write to Macpherson, seeking clarity on how many public entities have been granted the power to expropriate property under the recently enacted Expropriation Act. The act grants expropriating authorities broad powers to seize property, including land, homes, and business assets, potentially at below-market value. It provides limited legal recourse for owners to challenge such actions in court. The IRR has raised concerns over the lack of transparency about the number of government bodies authorised to carry out expropriations. Makone Maja, the IRR's strategic engagements manager, said the law is unpopular among South Africans and poses a significant threat to property rights. 'Our polling conducted in March and April shows that 68% of registered voters oppose the Expropriation Act,' said Maja. 'The act is so broadly worded that all forms of property – including savings and pensions – are now vulnerable.' According to the IRR, at least 426 public entities currently have the authority to expropriate property under the Act. However, the organisation believes the actual number may be closer to 1 000. ALSO READ: Issues plaguing Edenvale tackled in a heated meeting 'It is the height of policy recklessness for such vast powers to be granted to an unknown number of authorities,' said Maja. 'If the number is unclear, how can citizens have confidence that these powers will not be abused?' The IRR argues that uncertainty around expropriation powers could undermine investment, economic growth and food security. In its Blueprint for Growth policy series, the institute emphasises the importance of secure property rights as a foundation for economic empowerment. Maja added that South Africa's history of corruption and abuse of power makes the lack of oversight especially troubling. ALSO READ: Court orders the removal of illegal billboard on Gillooly's 'We have seen how state power can be misused,' she said. 'It is deeply irresponsible to empower a vast and unaccountable network of officials to take property without clear safeguards. 'The minister must urgently disclose which entities have been given this authority and explain how abuse will be prevented.' The IRR has called on the government to publish a full list of authorised expropriating entities and to provide clarity on how the act will be implemented to protect constitutional property rights. For more information, visit At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
TimesLIVE
a day ago
- TimesLIVE
NHI is fiscally impossible, says the Health Funders Association
The Health Funders Association (HFA) has described the National Health Insurance (NHI) Act as fiscally impossible and has tabled a hybrid funding model that will enable private healthcare providers to provide services in tandem with the NHI. The HFA, accounting for 46% of the private healthcare market and representing 21 medical schemes and three administrators, this week became the latest entity to legally challenge the NHI for undermining the right of medical aid members to choose how to access health services. HFA commissioned an independent study released this week which found the NHI required substantial tax far beyond South Africa's fiscal capacity. 'What's more, the proposed model offers no guarantee of improved outcomes, while restricting the mechanisms that currently drive quality and innovation in health care,' said the FHA. Commenting on the report, HFA CEO Thoneshan Naidoo said South Africa needs a healthcare system that delivers equitable, quality care for all. 'However, in its current form, and without private sector collaboration, the NHI Act is fiscally impossible and operationally unworkable, and threatens the stability of the economy and health system affecting everyone in South Africa,' he said. Naidoo said the NHI Act centralises control of all healthcare financing in a single, state-run fund, removing the ability of medical schemes to offer cover for healthcare services reimbursable by the NHI. 'We continue to advocate for a more inclusive, hybrid funding model that incorporates medical schemes in NHI. We believe such a model would expand access to care while protecting the rights of all South Africans,' said Naidoo. The NHI, which introduces universal health coverage, has been challenged in court by Solidarity, the Board of Healthcare Funders, the South African Private Practitioners Forum, the Hospital Association of South Africa and the South African Medical Association. Foster Mohale, the health spokesperson, on Friday confirmed the department had received court papers. 'This is case number six. We have an evolving court process and we'll allow that process to take its course,' said Mohale. FHA commissioned a report by Genesis Analytics, which showed that personal income tax will need to increase from the current average rate of 21% to an average of 46% of income, pushing marginal tax rates in the lowest income bracket from 18% to 41%, and in the highest bracket from 45% to 68%. The Genesis model also considered a scenario of pooling existing healthcare expenditure, citing that personal income tax would need to increase from its average of 21% to 31%. At the same time, medical scheme members would face a 43% reduction in the level of healthcare services relative to what they currently received. 'In simple terms, the equation for medical scheme members therefore becomes 'Pay 1.5 times more tax for 43% less healthcare'. Such tax increases are fiscally impossible, particularly given South Africa's narrow personal income tax base of 7.4-million tax payers,' said the FHA.
eNCA
2 days ago
- eNCA
Health Funders Association challenges NHI Act over cost and constitutionality
JOHANNESBURG – The Health Funders Association (HFA) is mounting a legal challenge against key aspects of the newly signed National Health Insurance (NHI) Act, citing serious constitutional and economic concerns. HFA CEO Thoneshan Naidoo says while the organisation supports the goal of universal healthcare, the current NHI framework is fundamentally flawed. 'The debate around national health insurance has been ongoing for years,' said Naidoo. 'Unfortunately, despite consistently raising our concerns, we've now been forced to take legal action.' The HFA commissioned an independent expert to assess the economic impact of implementing the NHI as it currently stands. The findings are stark: For South Africa to provide the same level of care promised under the NHI -- equivalent to what private medical schemes currently offer -- it would require the country's 7.4 million taxpayers to double their current tax contributions , a cost Naidoo says is simply unaffordable. In addition to the financial strain, Naidoo highlighted a massive shortfall in human resources. 'To provide the same level of care across the population, we would need an additional 286,000 healthcare professionals, which the country currently does not have,' he added. Naidoo maintains the Act, in its current form, is economically unsustainable and constitutionally questionable, and does not align with the realities of South Africa's healthcare infrastructure. The legal challenge is expected to intensify debate around the future of healthcare reform in the country.
