logo
Lutnick downplays impact of tariff court ruling on US, EU talks

Lutnick downplays impact of tariff court ruling on US, EU talks

Reuters01-06-2025
WASHINGTON, June 1 (Reuters) - U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick downplayed the impact of legal uncertainty around U.S. tariffs on negotiations with the European Union during an interview with Fox News Sunday, saying talks were ongoing.
Lutnick was asked about a Reuters report quoting an unnamed EU official close to negotiations who said the legal uncertainty of the tariffs in the U.S. gave the E.U. "extra leverage."
"You can't listen to silly people making silly comments," Lutnick said. "All of the countries that are negotiating with us understand the power of Donald Trump and his ability to protect the American worker."
A U.S. trade court blocked most of President Donald Trump's tariffs in a sweeping ruling last week that found the president overstepped his authority by imposing across-the-board duties on imports from U.S. trading partners. A U.S. federal appeals court paused that ruling a day later, allowing the tariffs to go into effect while it considered an appeal by the Trump administration.
Lutnick said the ruling "maybe cost us a week, but then everybody came right back to the table."
Trump in late May threatened 50% tariffs on all European goods by June 1 but days later delayed the effective date to July 9 to allow for time to negotiate.
Trump also said on Friday that he would increase tariffs on imported steel and aluminum to 50% from 25%, leading the European Commission on Saturday to say it could consider countermeasures.
Speaking on ABC News' 'This Week,' White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett said the U.S. needed to protect its steel industry for national security reasons in light of economic rival China's steel production.
"We have to show strength," Hassett said. "We have to have a steel industry that's ready for American defense."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Defense Department to buy cobalt for up to $500 million
US Defense Department to buy cobalt for up to $500 million

Reuters

time28 minutes ago

  • Reuters

US Defense Department to buy cobalt for up to $500 million

Aug 21 (Reuters) - The U.S. is seeking to procure cobalt worth up to $500 million for defense stockpiles amid the country's move to boost its critical mineral supplies. Companies have been scrambling to source rare earths after China imposed restrictions, leading to a 75% drop in rare earth magnet exports from the country in June and causing some auto companies to suspend production. U.S. President Donald Trump in March invoked emergency powers to boost domestic production of critical minerals as part of a broad effort to offset China's near-total control of the sector. In July, Reuters reported that the White House tapped a former mining executive, David Copley, to head an office at the National Security Council focused on strengthening supply chains. According to the tender document published by the U.S. Department of Defense and the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) on Wednesday, they are looking for offers for alloy-grade cobalt of about 7,480 tonnes over the next five years. Cobalt, mostly imported by the U.S., is used in batteries, a component in nickel superalloys for high temperature sections of jet engines and industrial gas turbines, among others. However, the defense department was seeking offers from only three companies - units of Vale SA in Canada, Japan's Sumitomo Metal Mining and Norway's Glencore Nikkelverk. The document also said the purchase amount can range from between $2 million and $500 million in the five-year period.

Amy Hamm was a hard-working nurse. Now she's a case study in Canada's descent into tyranny
Amy Hamm was a hard-working nurse. Now she's a case study in Canada's descent into tyranny

Telegraph

time28 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Amy Hamm was a hard-working nurse. Now she's a case study in Canada's descent into tyranny

Canada used to be known as a bastion of free speech. It's even supposed to be protected as a 'fundamental freedom' under Canadian law. Unfortunately, the reality today is rather different – as the case of nurse Amy Hamm starkly demonstrates. Hamm has been a nurse in British Columbia for 13 years and, as she wrote in an essay for the online magazine Quillette in April 2022, she had 'never had a patient complaint, or otherwise received any type of workplace discipline'. Nevertheless, the British Columbia College of Nurses and Midwives placed her under investigation. Her supposed offence? Her 'off-duty statements' – specifically social media posts and articles that expressed her perfectly legitimate view that there are only two biological sexes. The fact that she had placed a billboard in September 2020 that contained the simple message 'I [HEART] JK Rowling' also came under scrutiny. Hamm wrote in Quillette that two people had complained to BCCNM that her views made her incapable of 'provid[ing] safe, non-judgemental care to transgender and gender diverse patients'. She was flabbergasted. 'I have worked with countless transgender patients. I am not transphobic by any reasonable or defensible definition of that word. Yet I now could lose my job because activists claim that I am a bigot.' An investigation into Hamm commenced. BCCNM wrote a lengthy report that examined her social media posts, freelance writing and more. Did they find anything egregious? Some might have found some of her posts offensive, but most will have considered them mainstream expressions of gender-critical opinions. But that didn't stop the college from making bizarre interpretations of what she said and wrote. One remark, 'trans activists determined to infiltrate or destroy women-only spaces,' was found to be discriminatory because the disciplinary panel felt it had a 'negative connotation of improper, illegal, aggressive, and destructive conduct'. Another post – is 'there anything more embarrassing than straight people going by they/them, getting a dumb haircut, and calling themselves trans and queer?' – was cited because it 'indirectly disparages transgender people '. Hamm, a single mother of two, wrote in the National Post – where she is a fellow columnist – that some colleagues 'created a public campaign' last year 'to get me fired over my political views – which I only ever expressed outside of work – and shared my exact work location'. She said someone threatened to find her at the hospital and 'beat me to a pulp with a baseball bat'. Many people mobilised to help Hamm. She was aided in her lengthy legal battle by the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms. JK Rowling gave moral support, tweeting '#IStandWithAmyHamm,' and sent Hamm a handbag last Christmas with a follow-up post: 'fabulous women deserve fabulous bags'. The academic Kathleen Stock testified in Hamm's defence. It was all for naught. The disciplinary panel ruled that Hamm had made 'discriminatory and derogatory statements' about transgender people and that her comments were designed in part to 'elicit fear, contempt and outrage against members of the transgender community'. Hamm was ordered to pay close to 94,000 Canadian dollars in costs and disbursements within two years, and was suspended for one month. What a ridiculous decision. It doesn't matter what you think about Hamm's views on gender identity, or the billboard that praised Rowling. She has the right to express these opinions in a free society, particularly when she is outside work. Free speech isn't a one-way street: it's the defence of ideas that are either objective or objectionable. Intellectual discourse will be severely limited if those who disagree with Hamm believe the right approach is to punish and silence her, rather than debate her. It is shocking that Hamm has been denied her basic right. It is positive, at least, that Hamm's case has drawn attention to the reality of free speech in Canada today. The Conservative Party leader, Pierre Poilievre, has written on social media this week that 'this is authoritarian censorship. We must restore free speech and free thinking in a free country.' Let's hope that's possible, because if an intelligent, thoughtful nurse like Hamm can't express her non-violent, non-hateful opinions outside the workplace, the chill that has descended on Canadian free speech may soon turn into an Ice Age.

US halts worker visas for commercial truck drivers, Rubio says
US halts worker visas for commercial truck drivers, Rubio says

Reuters

time28 minutes ago

  • Reuters

US halts worker visas for commercial truck drivers, Rubio says

WASHINGTON, Aug 21 (Reuters) - The United States is immediately pausing the issuance of all worker visas for commercial truck drivers, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Thursday. "The increasing number of foreign drivers operating large tractor-trailer trucks on U.S. roads is endangering American lives and undercutting the livelihoods of American truckers," Rubio said in a post on X. The administration of President Donald Trump has taken a series of steps to address concerns about foreign truck drivers who do not speak English. Trump in April signed an executive order directing enforcement of a rule requiring commercial drivers in the U.S. to meet English-proficiency standards. Earlier this week, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration has launched an investigation into a crash on a Florida highway that killed three people. The crash involved a driver who was an Indian national and did not speak English or have legal authorization to be in the United States, according to Florida and U.S. officials. Harjinder Singh has been charged with three counts of vehicular homicide and police said he attempted to make an illegal U-turn through an 'Official Use Only' access point blocking traffic and causing the fatal crash that resulted in the deaths of three people in a minivan that struck the truck. Florida officials took custody of Singh in California to return him to the state to face charges. A lawyer for Singh could not immediately be identified. While the English-proficiency standard for truckers was already longstanding U.S. law, Trump's executive order in April reversed 2016 guidance that inspectors not place commercial drivers out of service if their only violation was lack of English. Duffy has said that failing to adequately enforce driver qualification standards poses serious safety concerns and increases the likelihood of crashes. FMCSA said in 2023 that about 16% of U.S. truck drivers were born outside the United States. Last month, Reuters reported that Mexican truck drivers in the border city of Ciudad Juarez have begun studying English in efforts to comply with the Trump order.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store