Elon Musk's Black Eye Mystery: Who Hit The Billionaire And Why?
Washington:
Billionaire Elon Musk sparked fevered speculation when he turned up with a black eye for his Oval Office farewell with US President Donald Trump on Friday.
But the South African-born tech magnate said he had a simple explanation: his son had punched him in the face.
"I was just horsing around with lil' X, and I said, 'go ahead punch me in the face,'" 53-year-old Musk told reporters when asked how he got the shiner.
"And he did. Turns out even a five-year-old punching you in the face actually is..." he added, before tailing off.
"I didn't really feel much at the time but I guess it bruises up."
Trump hosted the press conference with Musk to mark the Tesla boss's last day at the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Musk had expressed increasing disillusionment with the job but said he would remain a "friend and advisor."
Musk's appearance was overshadowed by allegations in the New York Times that he had engaged in heavy drug use while on the campaign trail for Trump in 2024.
Trump said he "didn't notice" the purple bruise next to Musk's right eye, but added: "X could do it, if you knew X."
Musk's son X -- full name X Æ A-Xii -- made frequent appearances in the White House when his father was running DOGE's cost-cutting rampage through the federal government.
He even sat on Musk's shoulders during the SpaceX magnate's first Oval appearance back in February, and was seen picking his nose next to Trump's "Resolute" Desk.
Musk took the chance to joke at French President Emmanuel Macron's expense when it came to his black eye.
After Trump was asked for his reaction to a video of Macron's wife apparently shoving the French leader's face, Musk laughed and said: "I've got a little shiner here."
Musk, wearing a DOGE baseball cap and a T-shirt saying "The Dogefather," joked about it again when he was asked how he got the injury.
"I wasn't anywhere near France," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
'Russia-Ukraine war has blurred regional lines, exposing global threats'
China and North Korea's support for Russia in its war against Ukraine has exposed how lines between regions have blurred, and the need for a global approach toward defence, top security officials said Sunday. North Korea has sent troops to fight on the front lines in Ukraine, while China has supported Russia economically and technologically while opposing international sanctions. Lithuanian Defence Minister Dovile akaliene told delegates at the Shangri-La Dialogue, Asia's premiere defence forum, that if Ukraine were to fall, it would have a ripple effect in Asia and suggested it could embolden China in its territorial claims on Taiwan and virtually the entire South China Sea. If Russia prevails in Ukraine, it's not about Europe. It's not about one region," she said. It will send a very clear signal also to smaller states here in Indo-Pacific that anyone can ignore their borders, that any fabricated excuse can justify invasion. The comments echoed those from French President Emmanuel Macron as he opened the conference on Friday advocating for greater European engagement in the Indo-Pacific. On Saturday, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth suggested European countries should focus their defence efforts in their own region and leave the Indo-Pacific more to the US, but akaliene said the regions were clearly intertwined. It's not a secret that when we talk about the main perpetrators in cyber security against Japan it's China, Russia and North Korea, she said. When we talk about main cyber security perpetrators against Lithuania it's Russia, China and Belarus two out of the three are absolutely the same. She added that the convergence of Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea into an increasingly coordinated authoritarian axis, demands a unified response. Iran has been a key supplier of attack drones to Russia for its war effort. "In this context, the United States' strategic focus on Indo-Pacific is both justified and necessary, but this is not America's responsibility alone, she said. Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles told reporters on the sidelines that his main takeaway from the three-day conference, hosted by the International Institute for Strategic Studies, was the real intent in the way in which European countries have engaged in the debates. It reflects the sense of connection, interconnectedness ... between Indo-Pacific on the one hand and the North Atlantic on the other, he said. China sent a lower-level delegation from its National Defence University this year to the conference, but its Foreign Ministry on Sunday responded to comments from Hegseth that Beijing was destabilizing the region and preparing to possibly seize Taiwan by force. No country in the world deserves to be called a hegemonic power other than the US itself, who is also the primary factor undermining the peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific, it said, while reiterating its stance that the Taiwan issue was an internal Chinese matter. The US must neve play with fire on this question, the ministry said. Philippines Defence Secretary Gilberto Teodoro Jr, whose country has been involved in increasingly violent clashes with China over competing claims in the South China Sea, scoffed at the idea that the US was the problem. What the Chinese government considers fair and just may stand in stark contrast to the norms and values accepted by the rest of the world, especially the smaller countries, he said. "To envision a China-led international order, we only need to look at how they treat their much smaller neighbors in the South China Sea. He also underscored the international implications of the tensions in the Indo-Pacific, noting that the South China Sea was one of several maritime routes that are arteries of the global economy. Disruption in any of these maritime corridors triggers ripple effects across continents, impacting trade flows, military deployments, and diplomatic posture, he said. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
China says Hegseth is touting a Cold War mentality in calling it a threat
BEIJING — China on Sunday denounced U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth for calling the Asian country a threat, accusing him of touting a Cold War mentality as tensions between Washington and Beijing further escalate. The foreign ministry said Hegseth had vilified Beijing with defamatory allegations the previous day before at the Shangri-La Dialogue, a global security conference. The statement also accused the United States of inciting conflict and confrontation in the region. 'Hegseth deliberately ignored the call for peace and development by countries in the region, and instead touted the Cold War mentality for bloc confrontation,' it said, referring to the post-World War II rivalry between the U.S. and the former Soviet Union. 'No country in the world deserves to be called a hegemonic power other than the U.S. itself,' it said, alleging that Washington is also undermining peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific. Hegseth said in Singapore on Saturday that Washington will bolster its defenses overseas to counter what the Pentagon sees as rapidly developing threats by Beijing, particularly in its aggressive stance toward Taiwan. China's army 'is rehearsing for the real deal,' Hegseth said. 'We are not going to sugarcoat it — the threat China poses is real. And it could be imminent.' The Chinese statement stressed that the Taiwan question is entirely China's internal affair, saying the U.S. must 'never play with fire' with it. It also alleged Washington had deployed offensive weaponry in the South China Sea, was 'stoking flames and creating tensions in the Asia-Pacific' and "turning the region into a powder keg.' In a Facebook post on Saturday, China's Embassy in Singapore said Hegseth's speech was 'steeped in provocations and instigation.' The U.S. and China had reached a deal last month to cut U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs from 145% to 30% for 90 days, creating time for negotiators from both sides to reach a more substantive agreement. China also reduced its taxes on U.S. goods from 125% to 10%. But it's uncertain if a trade war truce will last. Trump in a social media post on Friday said he would no longer be 'nice' with China when it comes to trade and accused Beijing of breaking an unspecified agreement with the U.S. Tensions escalated anew after the U.S. said on Wednesday it would start revoking visas for Chinese students studying there. Separately, the Chinese Embassy in Singapore criticized attempts to link the issue of Taiwan with that of the war in Ukraine after French President Emmanuel Macron warned of a dangerous double standard in focusing on a potential conflict with China at the cost of abandoning Ukraine. The embassy made no mention of Macron in its post on Facebook that included a photo showing the French president at the Singapore forum. 'If one tries to denounce 'double standards' through the lens of a double standard, the only result we can get is still double standard,' it said. China, which usually sends its defense minister to the Shangri-La forum, this time sent a lower-level delegation led by Maj. Gen. Hu Gangfeng, the vice president of the People's Liberation Army National Defense University.
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
US raises issue with South Korea's restrictions on beef imports, data transfer
Seoul: The United States has called for resolution of South Korea's restrictions on beef imports, living modified organisms (LMOs), overseas transfer of high-precision map data and other non-tariff measures in their latest trade negotiations, government sources said on Sunday. The three items were mentioned in the second round of technical discussions on various trade issues, including trade imbalance and non-tariff barriers, between the two countries in Washington last month, according to the sources familiar with the matter, reports Yonhap news agency. All the items are listed on the 2025 National Trade Estimate (NTE) Report on Foreign Trade Barriers, issued by the office of the U.S. Trade Representative ahead of the Donald Trump administration's announcement of country-specific reciprocal tariffs in early April. The NTE report pointed out South Korea has an import ban on American beef from cattle aged 30 months or older, claiming such a "transitional measure" has remained in place for 16 years following the signing of a bilateral free trade agreement in 2008. The report also claimed Seoul's regulatory system for agriculture biotechnology, including the LMO act, presents challenges to U.S. agricultural exports, and Korea's restrictions on the export of location-based data have led to a competitive disadvantage for international suppliers. Google has repeatedly requested the South Korean government to allow the company to transfer the country's high-precision map data overseas, but the government has dismissed the request, citing national security and digital sovereignty concerns. The Seoul government plans to decide by August whether to allow such a transfer. Seoul and Washington have been working to craft a package deal on trade issues, including tariffs, non-tariff barriers and economic cooperation, by July 8, when the 90-day pause on the Trump administration's reciprocal tariffs will end. South Korea has been seeking either a full exemption from or reduction in the Trump administration's 25 percent reciprocal tariffs for the country, as well as sectoral tariffs on steel, automobile and other imports.
