logo
Why Democrats have limited power to fight Republican redistricting

Why Democrats have limited power to fight Republican redistricting

Yahooa day ago
Though Democrats such as New York Gov. Kathy Hochul say they will "fight fire with fire" and counter Texas Republicans' planned redistricting, the GOP is in a much stronger position to alter congressional maps in its favor before the 2026 midterms.
Republicans could flip at least nine seats in the House of Representatives if they redraw district maps in heavily populated states where they have the power to redistrict.
Democrats, on the other hand, are hamstrung in the biggest blue states such as California and New York, which have enacted redistricting changes to prevent one party from having too much control over map-drawing.
In all, five new Republican seats could come from Texas, two to three from Ohio, and at least one from Florida. The ruby-red states of Indiana and Missouri have discussed redrawing their maps and could add one seat each, but they have not taken steps forward. The number of seats Democrats could win is less clear because the process would be slower and less certain.
Michael McDonald, a political science professor at the University of Florida, said the purpose of Democrats pushing back on Republican efforts to redistrict "is really to shine a light on the Republicans' anti-democratic tendencies" as part of their messaging strategy.
The mid-decade redistricting movement could provide a short-run benefit to Republicans, who are at risk of losing their 219-212 majority in the House of Representatives.
What is gerrymandering? See where the term comes from.
Though states typically redistrict every decade in the two years that follow the new census, President Donald Trump has encouraged redistricting to happen ahead of 2026. Even several seats may not be enough to withstand the tendency of the party in the White House to lose seats in between presidential elections. In 2010, under President Barack Obama, the House of Representatives swung toward Republicans by 63 seats.
Here's a look at where redistricting is in progress, and where leaders have said they're considering redrawing their maps.
The process is moving in Texas, Florida and Ohio
Republicans' biggest gains in redistricting would come from Florida, Ohio and Texas, the most populous states with unified Republican control of state government. All of these states are taking action related to redistricting, and the resulting maps could provide Republicans up to nine new seats.
In Texas, the Republican-led state Legislature is moving aggressively to pass a new congressional map with five new districts likely to lean Republican. Democrats left the state in protest to deny their colleagues a quorum, but Republican Gov. Greg Abbott issued arrest warrants for the Democrats who fled, and Trump suggested the FBI may have to force them back to the state.
"I'm a little skeptical that that shift is going to be enough to withstand what's going to happen in the larger blue wave that's likely to happen in the 2026 election nationally in response to Trump," McDonald said of the five congressional seats Texas Republicans are trying to capture.
Ohio was already planning to redraw its congressional map because of gerrymandering reform language in the state Constitution. Because no Democrats in the state Legislature voted in favor of the new maps drawn in response to the 2020 Census, the Republican-approved map could legally be used only in 2022 and 2024.
The Legislature must draw a new map and pass it by Nov. 30. Observers are expecting two to three more seats to lean Republican, possibly affecting voters in the Akron, Cincinnati and Toledo areas.
Florida House of Representatives Speaker Daniel Perez has announced a special committee for redistricting that will focus exclusively on the state's congressional map, not state legislative maps. He said there is limited time to handle additional redistricting and points to a recent state Supreme Court case that upheld the Republican-friendly congressional map.
Gov. Ron DeSantis said Aug. 11 that Florida should have gotten an additional seat during the 2020 census and raised questions about the congressional districts in South Florida. Politico pointed to any of three Democratic-held seats in south Florida as possible targets. The Washington, DC-based news outlet Punchbowl reports that Republicans want at least three seats from a new map.
Indiana and Missouri consider redrawing, too
Additional Republican congressional seats could be drawn in the staunchly Republican states of Indiana and Missouri − one in each state − but the process for doing so is not as far along as in other states. Governors of both states would need to call special legislative sessions to have the maps redrawn.
Vice President JD Vance took the unusual step of visiting Indiana to meet with some of the state's top Republican officials Aug. 7 and discuss redistricting. Though Republicans already hold seven of the state's nine congressional seats, an expert says they have their eyes on the 1st Congressional District, which covers the northwest corner of Indiana and includes the suburbs of Chicago. It's more moderate than the other Democratic-leaning district, which encompasses Indianapolis, and the Cook Partisan Voting Index now ranks the district as a slight Democratic lean, so changing the boundary to add GOP voters could tip the balance. Republicans also have targeted the seat in past elections.
Republicans hold a supermajority in the state Legislature in Missouri. The state has eight congressional seats, and only two are held by Democrats. Republicans are eyeing Missouri's 5th District, according to the Missouri Independent. The district encompasses a large portion of the Kansas City area and is held by Democratic Rep. Emanuel Cleaver. But even the Republican Legislature rejected a similar map in 2022 that gave seven seats to the Republicans, according to St. Louis Public Radio.
Democratic states grapple with redistricting changes
Democrats who run populous states are considering redistricting, but some of them face a hurdle: Their parties don't have control over drawing legislative maps. Instead, the power is in the hands of independent commissions, something often left-leaning pro-democracy advocates have supported to enact fair maps that reduce gerrymandering.
In California, the only state more populous than Texas, Gov. Gavin Newsom wants to hold a special election in November so voters can greenlight a one-time redistricting plan to add seats for Democrats, according to ABC 7 News. He wants five to six seats in time for 2026, according to CalMatters. The congressional maps that are drawn every decade are usually completed by the California Citizens Redistricting Commission, which includes Democrats, Republicans and independents.
New York Gov. Kathy Hochul wrote in an Aug. 5 op-ed that she's looking at ways to redraw the maps. "If Republicans are changing the rules, we'll meet them on the same field," she wrote.
That includes asking voters to approve a constitutional amendment to allow for mid-decade redistricting, according to City & State New York. The move would bypass the state's independent redistricting commission, which essentially stops the Democrat-led Legislature from drawing its own maps. Change wouldn't come before 2028.
Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker said in a social media post Aug. 10 that Congress should pass new, fair maps, but he added that until that happens, "Democratic states must consider all the options to protect our constitutional republic." Common Cause, a left-leaning nonpartisan group that supports redistricting reform, gives Illinois an F grade for its maps that are drawn by the Democrat-led state Legislature. It's not clear how many seats Illinois could gain or when.
New Jersey has a redistricting commission that was created by a state constitutional amendment. A change to the process would require a change to the state constitution, according to Politico. Despite the long odds, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries specifically told CNN he'd be interested in redistricting New Jersey. Gov. Phil Murphy didn't rule it out, but also hasn't taken action, making any seats gained unclear.
"Never bring a knife to a gunfight," Murphy told the New Jersey Globe on July 21, quoting a Sean Connery movie. "So if that's the way we're going, we're from Jersey, baby, and we won't be laying down."
Contributing: Columbus Dispatch reporter Jessie Balmert; Indianapolis Star reporters Brittany Carloni, Tony Cook and Kayla Dwyer; and Tallahassee Democrat reporter Gray Rohrer
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Republicans have upper hand in House seats in redistricting battle
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Wants a Piece of Intel -- And Wall Street Is All Ears
Trump Wants a Piece of Intel -- And Wall Street Is All Ears

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Wants a Piece of Intel -- And Wall Street Is All Ears

The Trump administration could be gearing up for a bold move: a direct equity stake in Intel (NASDAQ:INTC). According to people familiar with the talks, the potential deal is aimed at reviving Intel's long-delayed factory project in Ohio, once promised to be the largest chipmaking hub in the world. Shares jumped 7.4% to $23.86 on the day of the news and gained as much as another 4% after hours, as the market reacted to the possibility of federal backing. The discussions come just days after President Donald Trump met with Intel's new CEO Lip-Bu Tan, whom he recently criticized for alleged ties to China. While the deal's details are still in fluxand could fall apartany move would signal Tan's job is likely safe for now. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 10 Warning Signs with INTC. This wouldn't be the first time the Trump administration takes a hands-on approach with corporate America. It recently took a 15% cut of certain semiconductor sales to China and secured a golden share in U.S. Steel to help clear a foreign acquisition. Even more surprising? The Pentagon just became the biggest shareholder in MP Materials (NYSE:MP) with a $400 million preferred equity deal. If Intel follows the same playbook, investors could see a blend of equity, guaranteed purchases, and government-led financingsomething the White House sees as a way to crowd in private capital while reassuring markets that the U.S. government has skin in the game. Intel's Ohio site was expected to benefit heavily from the 2022 CHIPS Act, but with funding momentum now uncertain, a direct government stake could change the equation. The factory buildout has already been pushed into the 2030s, and Tan has shifted focus toward stabilizing the company's finances. Earlier this year, one idea floated was to have TSMC (NYSE:TSM) operate Intel's factories under a joint venturebut that plan never advanced. What's unfolding now could become a new chapter in U.S. industrial policy: one where Washington doesn't just regulate or subsidizebut invests, owns, and influences. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio

NY state Senate candidate allegedly recruited homeless people to net matching funds: report
NY state Senate candidate allegedly recruited homeless people to net matching funds: report

New York Post

time24 minutes ago

  • New York Post

NY state Senate candidate allegedly recruited homeless people to net matching funds: report

ALBANY – An upstate GOP state senate candidate's campaign allegedly paid homeless people to claim they made donations to him, allowing him to net matching taxpayer funds, a report says. Several homeless men in Auburn told the Albany Times Union in a story published Friday that Caleb Slater's campaign offered them $30 a pop to sign paperwork saying they donated $250 to his run in November. This way, Slater, who ultimately lost his bid for office, could allegedly receive public funds from the state that match contributions up to $250, the paper noted. Advertisement At least seven people who spoke to the outlet say they never contributed to Slater's campaign but were paid to submit contribution forms. One man said he was asked to recruit other straw donors as well. A source sent The Post this photo seeming to show a volunteer or staffer of Caleb Slater's state Senate campaign offering $25 visa gift cards to people in exchange for $10. Obtained by The NY Post A photo apparently taken during the campaign and shared with The Post also seems to show someone with Slater's campaign posted at a table on a street corner with a sign offering to give people free $25 Visa gift cards in exchange for $10, which would be illegal under state campaign finance rules. Advertisement Slater's campaign ultimately netted $22,000 from the state public financing system before he was trounced by incumbent Democratic state Sen. Rachel May (D-Onondaga) in the general election. May won with 58% of the vote. Slater did not respond to The Post's request for comment. But he first told the Times Union that its reporting was 'inaccurate. 'Your facts are incorrect,' he texted the outlet. 'At this time, I have nothing to say.' Advertisement He then followed up by telling the outlet that he was contacting the Public Campaign Finance Board, saying, 'Within these questions are statements that I am learning of for the first time.' A rep for the state Board of Elections declined to confirm the existence of a possible investigation into the campaign to The Post. 'The [Public Campaign Finance Board] has a number of audit and anti-fraud measures in place, and the PCFB enforcement unit is proud to work alongside law enforcement agencies to ensure any alleged violations are treated seriously,' a board rep only said. Slater lost his bid against Democratic state Sen. Rachael May in 2024. Caleb Slater/X Advertisement State Sen. George Borrello, who leads the senate GOP's campaign arm, told The Post, 'Caleb Slater was never endorsed by the Senate Republican Campaign Committee or any of our members. 'Unfortunately, the primary voters did not vote our way. He received no resources from us even after the primary.' Last year's elections were the first cycle in which New York provided funds to candidates based on small-dollar donations.

Stop anti-Trump judges, it's still the economy, stupid and other commentary
Stop anti-Trump judges, it's still the economy, stupid and other commentary

New York Post

time24 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Stop anti-Trump judges, it's still the economy, stupid and other commentary

From the right: Stop Anti-Trump Judges 'The judiciary's credibility will continue to suffer until elected lawmakers set reliable restraints to thwart Judge [James] Boasberg's next intrigue,' fume The Washington Times' editors. The DC Circuit judge months back took issue with ICE deporting illegal migrants determined to be Tren de Aragua members, and even 'ordered the government to 'turn the planes around' while they were over international waters.' Then, after the Supreme Court in April 'concluded this inferior magistrate had no right to weigh in at all,' he nonetheless 'said he would levy criminal penalties on the administration lawyers who purportedly disobeyed' him. Last week, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals rebuked him, slamming that threat as an abuse of discretion. But 'the judiciary rarely punishes its own wayward members'; it's up to Congress to do something about these out-of-control judges. Liberal: It's Still the Economy, Stupid New data from The Economist/YouGov finds that 'Americans remain deeply pessimistic about the U.S. economy,' warns the Liberal Patriot's John Halpin. We have 'more than 70 percent of Democrats and half of independents' foreseeing 'higher inflation in the next six months,' while 40% of Republicans 'expect inflation to be lower.' Bottom line: 'Like President Biden before him, President Trump and his administration have not yet shown or convinced most Americans (even many of their own partisan voters) that they have a grip on the overall economy and rising costs.' And: 'Until the green shoots on jobs and prices turn into firm growth, expect Americans to remain dour on the economy and willing to punish those in power, of either party.' Harvard prof: Teachers Must Fight AI Overuse His students have 'told me that after relying on AI to draft their papers and emails, their ability to write, speak and conduct basic inquiry is slipping away,' Alex Green reports at The Wall Street Journal. Profs who don't resist 'the rampant overuse of AI' bear the blame. 'Students must gain the ability to synthesize information. They must be able to listen, read, speak and write — so they can express strategic and tactical thinking.' That's what they're losing. 'The human possession of these skills will never become irrelevant if we value life, society and governance. For students to grow into professionals who have those skills, they must first develop them.' But what it'll take for teachers 'to defend that right . . . I do not know.' Foreign desk: The End Is Near for Maduro 'Nicolás Maduro, the dictator of Venezuela, is on the ropes,' cheers Arturo McFields at The Hill. The feds set an unprecedented '$50 million reward' for his capture, and the Pentagon is preparing options for the 'use of military force against drug cartels' with the Maduro-linked Cartel de los Soles already 'designated as a foreign terrorist organization.' Secretary of State Marco Rubio says Venezuela's narco-terrorist state is 'no longer a law enforcement issue' but 'a national security issue.' Good: 'After nearly 25 years of the Chavista regime, the situation in Venezuela is worsening every day. International collaboration is needed to end a tragedy that represents a clear and present danger to Latin America and the U.S.' Libertarian: How to Save Social Security Most Americans 'don't understand how' Social Security works, but happily 'the public gets that there is a problem, and some are open to changes,' notes Reason's J.D. Tuccille. Sadly, some 55% 'think Social Security is supposed to 'largely replace seniors' income after they retire,' '; in fact, it's meant 'to make sure seniors don't fall into poverty.' Most people would be better off diverting 'the money they currently surrender as payroll taxes to retirement savings plans like the 401(k),' and 'younger Americans may be open to the idea,' as they are more likely than Boomers to support cutting benefits over raising taxes. A Social Security program 'that's rightly recognized as a safety net is on its way to replacement by private planning.' — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store