logo
Will evolving sustainability dynamics impact India's CETA gains in UK?

Will evolving sustainability dynamics impact India's CETA gains in UK?

Fibre2Fashion4 days ago
The recently signed Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between India and the United Kingdom has opened a major window of opportunity for Indian textile and apparel exporters by granting 99 per cent of Indian exports—including over 1,143 key textile and clothing items—duty-free access to the British market.
This unprecedented level of market access has been hailed as a landmark in bilateral trade relations and is expected to significantly boost Indian exports, solidify India's presence in the UK market, and help realise the ambitious target of increasing bilateral trade by $34 billion by 2040, as per reports.
Experts caution about UK buyers' stringent compliance and sustainability requirements. The UK's proposed CBAM, to be initially applied only to carbon-intensive sectors, when it takes effect from January 1, 2027, is widely expected to bring the textile industry under its purview eventually. If CBAM impacts Indian exports in the future, India will retain the right to formally take up the issue.
Until now, Indian exporters faced a duty disadvantage of 10–12 per cent when competing in the UK, which not only reduced their profit margins but also made it difficult to maintain consistent order flows, forcing them to contend with competitors in an already aggressive global marketplace.
This trade agreement is a win-win for both countries, especially for India's textile sector, which is heavily export-oriented and a major contributor to employment and foreign exchange earnings. However, stakeholders underlined that to make the most of this new opportunity, Indian exporters will need to carefully navigate the UK's evolving sustainability and compliance landscape.
'UK buyers have stringent compliance and sustainability requirements,' cautioned Rahul Mehta, chief mentor of the Clothing Manufacturers Association of India (CMAI), in a conversation with Fibre2Fashion .
He emphasised that Indian exporters would have to substantially upgrade their processes to meet evolving expectations, particularly in environmental sustainability, which includes improving operational efficiency and aligning with international standards on carbon emissions, ethical sourcing, water consumption, and waste disposal.
One of the long-term concerns in this direction is the UK's proposed Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), felt some.
'Even with FTA tariff cuts, exports could face effective protectionist barriers. Indian exports in textiles, ceramics along with engineering goods, steel etc may be disproportionately hit due to sustainability compliance costs,' opined an industry player.
CBAM is a carbon tax intended to prevent what is known as 'carbon leakage'—the migration of production to countries with less stringent environmental regulations.
Although CBAM will be initially applied only to carbon-intensive sectors like cement, steel, and aluminium when it takes effect from January 1, 2027, it is widely believed that the labour intensive textile industry could eventually be brought under its purview.
'While the India-UK FTA offers tariff concessions, the CBAM essentially introduces an indirect cost through carbon pricing—it is a case of 'giving with one hand and taking with the other,' typical of trade regulation,' said Akhil Sivanandan, CEO and Co-founder of Green Story, speaking to Fibre2Fashion .
He also highlighted the disproportionate impact that CBAM would have on small and medium enterprises (SMEs) within India's textile sector. According to him, 'Currently, most of India's textile exporters (particularly SMEs) are not well-prepared. There is a significant knowledge gap about carbon foot printing and emissions reporting. This lack of preparedness increases the risk of non-compliance, penalties, or exclusion from future procurement opportunities with UK buyers.'
However, Sivanandan was quick to add that the necessary investment in carbon accounting tools and digital infrastructure should not be viewed merely as a financial burden but rather as a strategic investment in future competitiveness.
He suggested that by adopting practices such as conducting Product Carbon Footprint (PCF) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies and sharing this verified data through Digital Product Passports (DPPs), Indian exporters could avoid the pitfalls of inflated emissions estimates.
'At Green Story, we have seen that having verified carbon data upfront gives exporters a stronger position when engaging with buyers in regulated markets,' claimed Sivanandan, who went on to explain that CBAM is essentially a non-tariff barrier, and for SMEs that often lack the capital, technical know-how, or human resources to implement carbon tracking systems or cleaner technologies, this creates a considerable disadvantage.
Larger firms with vertically integrated operations may have the capacity to comply, but smaller players could find themselves squeezed out of vital markets. To address these challenges, Green Story has reportedly collaborated with several UK and EU-based brands to deliver training and subsidised access to decarbonisation tools and systems for their Indian supplier networks.
If and when the textile industry is brought under the ambit of CBAM, Indian exporters could face higher compliance costs and in such a scenario, the hard-won advantage of duty-free access under the CETA could be somewhat eroded, felt some industry players.
Meanwhile, India is said to have raised concerns about CBAM during trade negotiations, to which the UK reportedly responded that, since the mechanism is not yet in effect, it cannot be included in the formal text of the trade agreement. However, according to media reports, there was a clear mutual understanding that if CBAM impacts Indian exports in the future, India will retain the right to formally take up the issue.
While the CETA may seem to offer substantial short-term advantages, experts like Sivanandan caution that the focus must also be on the long-term dynamics introduced by policies such as CBAM.
'It is vital that the narrative around CBAM shifts from punitive to preparatory,' he said, arguing that rather than seeing CBAM solely as an obstacle, Indian exporters should approach it as an opportunity to position themselves as global leaders in low-carbon manufacturing.
Sivanandan stressed that timely action from India's textile sector could transform CBAM compliance into a competitive edge. However, he also warned that this transition cannot be undertaken in isolation—it will require coordinated efforts and collaboration between manufacturers, technology providers, industry associations, and international buyers to build the necessary infrastructure and capacity.
Fibre2Fashion News Desk (DR)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

FPIs dump Indian equities worth ₹21,000 crore in first half of August
FPIs dump Indian equities worth ₹21,000 crore in first half of August

Business Standard

timea few seconds ago

  • Business Standard

FPIs dump Indian equities worth ₹21,000 crore in first half of August

Foreign investors offloaded Indian equities worth nearly ₹21,000 crore in the first half of August, pressured by US-India trade tensions, lacklustre first-quarter corporate earnings, and a weakening rupee. With this, the total outflow by Foreign Portfolio Investors (FPIs) in equities reached the ₹1.16 trillion mark so far in 2025, according to data with the depositories. The FPI activity will be influenced by the action on the tariff front ahead. The recent easing of tensions between the US and Russia, coupled with the absence of fresh sanctions, suggests that the proposed 25 per cent secondary tariff on India is unlikely to take effect after August 27, a clear positive for the market, Vaqarjaved Khan, CFA - Senior Fundamental Analyst, Angel One, said. Also, S&P has upgraded India's credit rating from BBB- to BBB, a move that could further boost FPIs' sentiment, he added. According to the depositories data, foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) withdrew a net sum of ₹29,975 crore from equities this month (till August 14). This came after a net withdrawal of ₹17,741 crore in July. Before that, FPIs invested ₹38,673 crore in the preceding three months from March to June. "The sustained outflows are being driven primarily by a confluence of global uncertainties. Heightened geopolitical tensions and ambiguity surrounding the interest rate trajectory in developed economies, particularly the United States, have contributed to a risk-averse sentiment," Himanshu Srivastava, Associate Director - Manager Research, Morningstar Investment Research India, said. Adding to this caution is the recent strengthening of the US dollar, which tends to reduce the relative attractiveness of emerging market assets like India's, he noted. Additionally, tepid earnings growth and elevated valuations have contributed to the outflow, VK Vijayakumar, Chief Investment Strategist, Geojit Investments, said. On the sectoral front, sustained selling in IT stocks has pulled the IT index down. However, banking and financials continue to be relatively resilient due to fair valuations and institutional buying. On the other hand, FPIs invested ₹4,469 crore in the debt general limit, and pumped ₹232 crore into the debt voluntary retention route during the period under review.

Papum Pare to Singrauli: India maps fresh hotspots for rare earth metals amid China concerns
Papum Pare to Singrauli: India maps fresh hotspots for rare earth metals amid China concerns

Time of India

timea few seconds ago

  • Time of India

Papum Pare to Singrauli: India maps fresh hotspots for rare earth metals amid China concerns

Papum and Pare—two little-known rivers winding through the hills of Arunachal Pradesh—may soon step into the national spotlight. The Papum Pare district, named after these rivers, has emerged as a promising frontier in India's quest for rare earth elements (REEs). A Ministry of Mines handbook released in June spotlighted the region's 'notably high neodymium' content — a vital component in electric vehicles and advanced electronics. If tapped, these reserves could one day fuel EV and auto manufacturing hubs from Gurgaon to Pune to Chennai. And Papum Pare is just the beginning. REE-enriched soils have also been identified in Assam's Karbi Anglong, while a bauxite-REE belt has surfaced in Meghalaya's Sung Valley. Adding to the momentum, Coal and Mines Minister G Kishan Reddy informed Parliament last month of newly discovered REE deposits of 'promising' nature in the Singrauli coalfields of Madhya Pradesh. Together, these discoveries signal a broader shift: the strategic metals the world is scrambling to secure are not limited to India's well-known beach sands, red sands, or alluvial deposits in states like Andhra Pradesh, Odisha, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, West Bengal, Gujarat, and Maharashtra. They lie deeper inland too—across the forests, hills, and even coalfields of India's unexplored heartlands. Amid global jitters over China's export curbs on rare earth, India has identified many of these new hotspots. Yet, diplomacy, not discoveries, holds the key to near-term supply security. A matter of balance 'India simply can't keep all its eggs in one basket. China will extract its pound of flesh, then open the gates—but by then, the damage may be done,' says a top executive of an Indian auto company requesting anonymity as he is also aiding the government to explore alternative sources for metals. India's reliance on China for rare earth magnets remains strikingly high, with 85-90 per cent of import volumes and 60-80 per cent of import value in two key categories. This data, revealed in a written reply to the Rajya Sabha on August 1, underscores the depth and complexity of India's supply chain dependence. According to an SBI Research report released last month, China's export curbs are impacting a broad swathe of industries including transport equipment, basic metals, machinery, construction and electrical and electronics, highlighting the far reaching consequences of supply chain disruptions. The rare in rare earth REEs comprise a group of 17 elements, divided into two categories: light and heavy. Light REEs, such as neodymium and praseodymium, are essential for electric vehicle motors, wind turbines among others. In contrast, heavy REEs like dysprosium and terbium are critical for high performance applications, including fighter jets and other advanced defence systems that require enhanced magnetic stability. While rare earths are classified as critical minerals, it's important to note that not all critical minerals are rare earths. Elements such as lithium and cobalt, also vital to the EV ecosystem, fall into the critical category but are not part of the rare earth family. In 2024-25 alone, the Geological Survey of India undertook 195 exploration projects to assess critical minerals including REEs. While the discovery of new pockets of clean-tech metals offers hope for the future, what India Inc urgently needs is a diversified and resilient supply chain. The reason is simple: China is dominating the game. India may rank third globally in rare earth reserves—trailing only China and Brazil—but when it comes to actual production and refining, the numbers tell a stark story. As of 2024, China mines nearly 70 per cent of the world's rare earth and controls an overwhelming 90 per cent of refining capacity, according to US Geological Survey's data. India's production share is less than 1 per cent. So, when Beijing imposed export restrictions in April—largely aimed at the US as part of tariff retaliation—the ripple effects were global. Auto breakdown For Indian automakers heavily reliant on Chinese rare earth magnets, alarm bells rang. 'This problem took automakers by surprise, but the disruption affects China too. So, it won't last long,' says RC Bhargava, the chairman of the country's largest carmaker Maruti Suzuki. Thanks to ample stockpiles and less exposure to the EV portfolio, the company has so far escaped unscathed. Bhargava remains confident that the industry will navigate around geopolitics, as it always has. Mahindra also saw the storm coming. 'We are comfortably covered on the rare earth magnet issue,' says Rajesh Jejurikar, Executive Director & CEO of Mahindra's auto and farm sectors. 'With a combination of inventory planning and alternative sourcing, we're covered for the next two quarters and mostly even for Q4,' he adds. But not every player is as insulated. Ather Energy has already flagged potential volume shortfalls this quarter, and Bajaj Auto has taken the drastic step of temporarily halting production. Over at TVS Motor, which is gearing up to launch electric motorcycles and bicycles later this year, the scramble is on to secure materials from non-Chinese sources. 'Supply chain constraints could affect our new launch timelines,' admitted CEO KN Radhakrishnan during the company's April-June earnings call. Workarounds As noted in a June statement by rating agency ICRA, Indian auto component makers have been actively exploring contingency measures. These include importing fully assembled motors from China, shipping rotors to China for magnet assembly and re-importing them, and even substituting rare earth magnets with alternative engineered materials. However, ICRA cautioned that these workarounds are fraught with logistical, regulatory, and engineering complexities, making them far from seamless solutions. China's export ban targets raw magnets, not finished motors. This subtle but significant distinction means the final product can still be imported. It, though, undercuts the economic and strategic benefits of local manufacturing. Ashutosh Sharma, former secretary of the department of science and technology, believes India must adopt a multi-pronged strategy to navigate the rare earth crisis. At the core of his argument is the need to boost domestic production, especially given India's considerable reserves—8.52 million tonnes (MT) of rare earths, including 7.23 MT of Rare Earth Oxide contained in monazite. 'The government should incentivise domestic production,' Sharma asserts, pointing to untapped potential beneath India's soil. At the same time, he underscores the importance of securing international supply lines through trade diplomacy. Finalising free trade agreements with resourcerich nations like Chile and Peru, he suggests, could help unlock critical mineral access. He also notes India's ongoing efforts to diversify imports by deepening engagement with countries such as Australia and Argentina. Beijing has been aggressively securing and processing rare earths worldwide, employing a mix of diplomacy, strategy, and opportunism — even in conflict-ridden regions. In 2024, Myanmar emerged as the world's third-largest producer of REEs, trailing only China and the US, a surge largely driven at China's behest, with much of the supply coming from the Kachin region, now controlled by rebel groups. This raises a pressing question: Can New Delhi flex its diplomatic muscle to forge alternative, stable rare earth supply chains of its own? Rare search Khanij Bidesh India Ltd (KABIL), a government-owned entity established in 2019, is actively scouting for overseas critical mineral assets, particularly lithium and cobalt. The company is currently pursuing projects in Argentina, Australia, and Chile. Meanwhile, several industry observers note that the government is actively considering a reduction in customs duties on imported electric motors to ease cost pressures on manufacturers. Simultaneously, it is urging domestic players like IREL (India) to ramp up mining operations and develop a comprehensive rare earth value chain within the country. But such an ecosystem could take years to materialise. This raises an obvious question: Why was IREL—a state-run enterprise under the department of atomic energy— exporting rare earth for years instead of supplying domestically? 'There simply weren't any takers from the auto sector,' says an industry insider. 'Chinese imports were cheaper and commercially more viable. But yes, the tables have turned now.' Reflecting this shift, IREL has recently suspended its REE exports to Japan, aiming to conserve strategic resources for domestic consumption as India moves to insulate itself from global supply shocks. Meanwhile, companies like Vedanta and Hindustan Zinc are positioning themselves to play a central role. In May, Hindustan Zinc secured a rare earth block in Uttar Pradesh's Sonbhadra district, marking a significant step toward diversifying the country's strategic mineral base. Vedanta, too, is aggressively pursuing critical mineral assets across Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Bihar, Arunachal Pradesh, Karnataka, and Chhattisgarh. 'We're leveraging our expertise in advanced metal extraction,' says Arun Misra, Executive Director at Vedanta, 'and investing in rare earth exploration and refining'. However, Misra offers a word of caution. 'Policy reform is crucial,' he notes. 'The current auction regime treats critical minerals like bulk commodities—and that simply won't work. We need a specialised framework to fast-track their exploration and development.' Time to science it According to former secretary Sharma, India's rare earth strategy must strike a careful balance between diplomacy and science—diplomacy to secure resilient global supply chains, and science to develop new technology for indigenous production, and also to pioneer alternatives to traditional REEs. 'Ultimately, we need to develop a new class of materials with properties similar to rare earths,' he says. 'India must take the lead on this.' There are early signs of indigenisation. One such initiative is a Rs 250-crore project backed by the Technology Development Board, a statutory body under the department of science and technology— which last year partnered with Pune-based Midwest Advanced Materials to support the indigenous commercial production of neodymium materials and rare earth permanent magnets. In the near term, diplomacy may buy time. But in the long run, it is science and innovation that will put India in control of its destiny.

FPIs dump Indian equities worth Rs 21,000 cr in first half of Aug
FPIs dump Indian equities worth Rs 21,000 cr in first half of Aug

Time of India

time17 minutes ago

  • Time of India

FPIs dump Indian equities worth Rs 21,000 cr in first half of Aug

Foreign investors offloaded Indian equities worth nearly Rs 21,000 crore in the first half of August, pressured by US-India trade tensions , lacklustre first-quarter corporate earnings , and a weakening rupee . With this, the total outflow by Foreign Portfolio Investors ( FPIs ) in equities reached the Rs 1.16 lakh crore mark so far in 2025, according to data with the depositories. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like AirSense 11 – Smart tech for deep sleep ResMed Buy Now Undo The FPI activity will be influenced by the action on the tariff front ahead. The recent easing of tensions between the US and Russia, coupled with the absence of fresh sanctions, suggests that the proposed 25 per cent secondary tariff on India is unlikely to take effect after August 27, a clear positive for the market, Vaqarjaved Khan, CFA - Senior Fundamental Analyst, Angel One, said. Also, S&P has upgraded India's credit rating from BBB- to BBB, a move that could further boost FPIs' sentiment, he added. Live Events According to the depositories data, foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) withdrew a net sum of Rs 29,975 crore from equities this month (till August 14). This came after a net withdrawal of Rs 17,741 crore in July. Before that, FPIs invested Rs 38,673 crore in the preceding three months from March to June. "The sustained outflows are being driven primarily by a confluence of global uncertainties. Heightened geopolitical tensions and ambiguity surrounding the interest rate trajectory in developed economies, particularly the United States, have contributed to a risk-averse sentiment," Himanshu Srivastava, Associate Director - Manager Research, Morningstar Investment Research India, said. Adding to this caution is the recent strengthening of the US dollar, which tends to reduce the relative attractiveness of emerging market assets like India's, he noted. Additionally, tepid earnings growth and elevated valuations have contributed to the outflow, VK Vijayakumar, Chief Investment Strategist, Geojit Investments, said. On the sectoral front, sustained selling in IT stocks has pulled the IT index down. However, banking and financials continue to be relatively resilient due to fair valuations and institutional buying. On the other hand, FPIs invested Rs 4,469 crore in the debt general limit, and pumped Rs 232 crore into the debt voluntary retention route during the period under review.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store