South Korea mobilising 'all resources' for violence-free Yoon verdict
The country's Constitutional Court will issue a ruling on whether to strip Yoon of office over his abortive declaration of martial law, which has already seen him suspended by lawmakers and arrested on insurrection charges.
The court in downtown Seoul has become a flashpoint, with near-constant protests in the area until the police moved Tuesday to seal the streets to head off possible clashes.
"The situation has become more grave than ever," Lee Ho-young, acting chief of the Korean National Police Agency, said Wednesday.
Hundreds of thousands of people for and against Yoon have poured onto Seoul's streets every weekend, with die-hards on each side also setting up tent camps and staging all-night protests.
Police are concerned that whatever verdict is announced, some people "may become agitated and engage in extreme or violent protests", said Lee during a meeting with top police officials.
Yoon's supporters stormed a court building in January after a judge extended the suspended president's detention. He was later released from custody on procedural grounds.
"The police will mobilise all available resources to ensure the safety of the public and to prevent the situation from escalating into serious social conflict," said Lee.
In Seoul, more than 14,000 riot police will be deployed.
More than a dozen nearby schools and several shops in the neighbourhood will close on the day of the verdict due to safety issues.
Major tourist sites such as the Gyeongbok and Changdeok palaces -- walking distances from the court -- will also be shuttered, the Korean Heritage Service said.
- 'Do not participate' -
The Chinese embassy in Seoul warned its nationals to keep away from local political protests.
"Do not participate, do not linger, do not watch," it posted on its social media channels.
"Do not publicly express or forward political comments, and try to avoid verbal or physical confrontations with local people."
The US embassy, meanwhile, warned its citizens to "avoid areas where demonstrations are taking place, and exercise caution in the vicinity of any large crowds, gatherings, protests, or rallies".
Acting President Han Duck-soo urged political leaders to refrain from making remarks that could incite or encourage illegal protests or violence.
"Regardless of the outcome, we must calmly and rationally accept the court's decision," he said during a meeting with ministry officials.
"Now is a time to prioritise the stability and survival of our community over political advantages or disadvantages," he said.
If Yoon is stripped of office by the court, it will trigger elections which must be held within 60 days.
hs/ceb/fox
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
21 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Number of Canadians with favourable view of U.S. has fallen, poll suggests
WASHINGTON - Amid months of tariffs and taunts from U.S. President Donald Trump, a new poll suggests the percentage of Canadians who have a favourable view of the United States has fallen and is now on par with the number who think positively about China. The survey by the Pew Research Center suggests one-third of Canadians — 34 per cent — now have a favourable view of the United States. It marks a 20 percentage point decrease from last year. The same percentage of Canadians had favourable views of China — a 13 point increase. 'For the last few years … many people have preferred the U.S. to China by a sizable margin,' said Laura Silver, associate director of global attitudes research at the Washington-based research centre. Now, she said, 'there's no daylight between the two.' Pew polled people in 25 countries and the survey found positive views of China increased in more than half the nations. There was also an increase in people who viewed Chinese President Xi Jinping favourably. 'This is the first real tick up that we've seen that we would describe as an increase across the board,' Silver said. Trump returned to the White House with an agenda to realign global trade and upend geopolitics by targeting friend and foe alike. Critics of Trump's tactics have said the ongoing instability will push countries to form closer ties with China. Canada was an early target with Trump repeatedly calling former prime minister Justin Trudeau 'governor' and insisting Canada should become a U.S. state. The president hit Canada and Mexico with duties he linked to fentanyl trafficking in March, only to walk back the tariffs for goods that comply with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade a few days later. Trump took his trade war to the world in April with so-called 'reciprocal' tariffs but paused the devastating duties a few hours later saying it would give time for countries to make a deal with America. He kept in place a 10 per cent tariff for most countries. China was hit by the hardest duties, prompting a brief but escalated tariff standoff between the world's two largest economies. The U.S. president has been sending out letters to nations suggesting they will be hit with high duty rates if no deal is made by Aug. 1. Trump did go ahead with specific tariffs targeting steel, aluminum and automobile imports, with copper duties also set to come into place on Aug. 1. Pew, a non-partisan think tank, surveyed 28,333 adults across 24 countries – not including the United States – from Jan. 8 to April 26 by phone, online and in person. The centre also surveyed 3,605 Americans from March 24 to March 30 by phone, online and in person. The poll reports 26 per cent of all people surveyed said they had confidence in the Chinese president, while 22 per cent said the same for Trump. 'That reflects both a rising view of Xi and a quite dramatically negative view of Trump,' Silver said. The changing views were especially stark in Mexico, where 45 per cent of people said it's more important for their country to have strong economic ties with China than with the U.S. — up from 37 per cent in 2019 and 15 per cent in 2015. Canada's relationship with China was roiled during the first Trump administration when in 2018 Canadians Michael Spavor and Michael Kovrig were taken into custody in China. It followed the arrest of Huawei's chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou in British Columbia at the request of the United States. Silver said the 2025 polling is the first time there hasn't been a wide gap in how Canadians view the world's two largest economies since the relationship with China took a 'nosedive.' The Pew Research Center survey found the share of Canadians who said the U.S. was more important for economic ties had dropped to 67 per cent from 87 per cent in 2019. 'Now, while it's still a majority, it's down more than 20 percentage points with a corresponding rise in the share who prefer China,' Silver said. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 15, 2025.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
With global sales slumping, Tesla tries to break into a new market
Tesla has started selling cars in India, the world's most populous country – but at a hefty price tag. Tesla, which is facing slumping sales and complications from CEO Elon Musk's political entanglements, opened its first showroom in Mumbai on Tuesday. The company needs to boost its sales, and pushing into a new market with untapped buyers could help. The Tesla web site shows the price of a Model Y at 61,07,190 rupees, or about $71,000. However, the same car is listed on the company's site for US buyers at about $45,000 before applying a $7,500 federal tax credit for electric vehicles (EV), which would lower the cost to $37,500. (That tax credit is due to expire at the end of September.) Tesla has had a long-stated desire to sell in India, but Indian tariffs on foreign autos, which can more than double the cost of a vehicle there, have been the barrier, according to the World Trade Organization and Tesla executives. 'We've been working on getting into India. India is a very hot market,' said Tesla CFO Vaibhav Taneja in a call with investors in April. 'It will be a great market to enter because India has a big middle class.' But he said the tariffs 'create a little bit of tension, which we're trying to work around.' India is the third largest market for auto sales behind China and the United States. The absence in India has hurt Tesla's global sales, which are suffering the largest sales decline in the company's history in the face of increased competition, and a backlash in some markets to CEO Elon Musk's political activities. Nearly half of Tesla's sales revenue comes from the United States, while just over 20% comes from China. The other 30% comes from other countries. The United States and India are involved in trade talks, and President Donald Trump announced two months ago that India had offered to eliminate tariffs on US imports as part of a deal to avoid the administration placing steep tariffs on all Indian exports to the United States. But Indian officials said at that time that there was no preliminary deal in place. Tesla is not only losing sales to legacy automakers that have increased their EV offerings, but it faces growing competition from Chinese EV makers. In fact, Tesla is poised to lose its title of the world's largest EV maker to Chinese automaker BYD, even though BYD is not able to sell in United States. The company has been losing some of its sales executives, with the Wall Street Journal reporting Tuesday that Troy Jones, Tesla's vice president of sales and service, has left the company. The report was attributed to people familiar with the matter. Tesla did not respond to a request for comment. Tesla executives have spoken of a desire to build a plant in India, but at the moment its existing plants in the United States, China and Germany have more capacity than there is demand for its vehicles. Its plans for another plant in Mexico are currently on hold. Sign in to access your portfolio
The Hill
36 minutes ago
- The Hill
Houston, we have a problem: Scrapping the space station harms the US
American astronauts have been in low-Earth orbit aboard the International Space Station for nearly a quarter century. Their continuous presence in space has led to innovations such as cochlear implants that help deaf people hear, technology that makes our phone cameras sharper, better water filtration and so much more that benefits us back here on Earth. Unfortunately, President Trump's budget effectively decommissions the space station, despite years of potential usefulness still ahead. In its own words, the administration plans to 'focus on maintaining minimal safe operations and very limited research essential to Moon and Mars exploration until [the station's] retirement in 2030.' That includes exploring reduced cargo and crew flights as today's transportation capacity won't be needed in a minimal operations environment. Such a move may seem penny-wise, but it is absolutely pound-foolish. The nation has invested billions of dollars into this national asset and transportation options to take astronauts to and from the platform. Additionally, the station generates substantial economic benefit domestically and soft power internationally. In fact, according to the International Space Station National Lab, the nonprofit organization that runs science aboard the station, startups who have flown their experiments to the station have secured nearly $2.2 billion in funding after their flights. This figure highlights the incredible value science and technology development performed on the station is generating today. Beyond these near-term returns, the space economy, of which low-Earth orbit remains a core component, is expected to be worth up to $2 trillion in total by 2040. But the U.S. will not be able to fully realize its potential in this new economic frontier without its own astronauts and labs in orbit. Plans call for commercial successors to the International Space Station, which requires a broad range of customers beyond NASA. Shutting down regular access to the station for technology demonstrations now will make it challenging for non-government customers to close their business cases as commercial stations aren't expected to be operational for a few years. This would amount to a death spiral in a strategically significant domain. Discerning readers may question why the federal government needs to invest, given the commercial interest in low-Earth orbit. This investment is necessary because the United States isn't the only game in town and the pipeline for industries in space is still quite nascent. The nation is engaged in a great power competition with China, which is heavily investing in their low-Earth orbit capabilities. China already has its own space station, Tiangong, in orbit and offers other nations access to it to conduct their science experiments and technology demonstrations. Scientists and countries are already choosing to send their experiments to the Chinese station instead of the International Space Station, given the advanced facilities and reduced level of competition for flights. Moreover, Beijing released a road map that will likely establish China as the global leader in space by 2050, or sooner, if the U.S. persists in the direction charted by Trump's budget request. Beyond these economic benefits, Tiangong also bolsters China's reputation internationally and earns Beijing diplomatic goodwill. The U.S. currently benefits similarly from the international exchanges that occur on the International Space Station. But if the U.S. stops conducting robust research aboard its station, as intended by the Trump administration, it will leave international goodwill on the table for China to pick up on the cheap. In other words, the Trump administration appears intent to inflict significant geopolitical and economic harm on the U.S. to save a few pennies in the overall federal budget.
